Religious people are less intelligent than atheists, according to scientific studies

Religious people are less intelligent than atheists, according to scientific studies

Mtu kukua anakremishwa dini, inaafect kweli akili. Mtu hataki kufikiria hata kidogo. Ni kama kaulema ka akili ambako mtu huwa anafanyiwa mazoezi na shule kidogo. Na bado... indoctrination ni ukoma kwakweli....
tatizo dini imetangulia mapema kabla ya elimu. na hii imewafanya hata wengine kutenda maovu kwa kutumia kivuli cha dini imesema. na wanaoelimika sasa wanazuiwa wasihoji chochote, bali wakubali tu ili wasipotoshwe na ubatili wa dunia hii. dini ina-high rank katika jamii kuliko hata elimu.
 
Tens of millions of people killed underatheistic communist regimes, in which militant atheism served as the official doctrine of the state. The death of somewhere between 40,472,000 to 259,432,000 human lives. Dr. R. J. Rummel's mid estimate regarding the loss of life due to communism is that communism caused the death of approximately 110,286,000 people between 1917 and 1987.[SUP][8][/SUP] Richard Dawkins has attempted to engage in historical revisionism concerning atheist atrocities and Dawkins was shown to be in gross error (see also: Atheism and communism and Persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union).
 
Are most communists inherently atheist? The two often seem intertwined and this combination has proven deadlier than Christianity.

Mao Zedong leader of China murdered 70,000,000. Joseph Stalin leader of the Soviet Union 20,000,000. Pol Pot leader of Cambodia 2,000,000. See what non Christian leaders of the 20th century have accomplished?

Communism is a religion in itself according to many who follow the doctrine. Since it is the religion there can be no God except the leader and the state. Therefore they are atheist. They replace God and religion with the state. Stalin went to religious school early in life and perhaps his communist, atheist, murderous rage was his answer to Christianity. Oddly enough he kept some churches open during WW2 realizing the strength and hope it gave to the average citizen. Hitler escapes the atheist roster as he was raised with generic Catholicism however when he was chancellor of Germany he and his henchmen delved into the occult and astrology. He kept the churches open for the same reason Stalin did while him and his boys had more fun with darker stuff. For the record we can't call Hitler a Christian or even a Christian gone bad. We can call him an occultist or pagan.
 
Non-theists/liberals are greedy and they are the true carnivores of capitalism. The biggest proof of this is their low birthrates. They sacrifice children in the name of money, status and personal freedom. Go to the University of Berkley and you'll see more students with pro-communist/pro-Palestinian rhetoric than an entire country of that nature. However when they get out they will work and live in Silicone Valley and act just like the capitalist/Zionist/Conservatives they condemn. DINK's until death.
 
Darwin elaborates on this theme further on in his Descent, describing this dream of his for mankind's future when the black races of man, as well as the mountain gorilla of Africa, will become extinct, thus enhancing the chances for the evolutionary advancement of the more "civilized" races of man:
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Descent of Man, Chapter Six: On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man)
 
It may surprise some people to find out the dark truth about Darwin, but the fact remains nevertheless that he did indeed propose in his second major work, The Descent of Man, that certain races of human beings were actually sub-species, that a race war among mankind's different races, with the extermination of one race and the survival of another would bring "beneficial" results in evolutionary terms, and he did explicitly state, as we have just read, that black people were intermediate on the evolutionary ladder between apes and white people. and wrote that it was his hope that in the near future the black races of mankind, the aborigines, and the African gorillas would become extinct, thus enhancing the evolutionary potential of the Caucasian race!


Darwin proposed in horrifying and explicit language that black Africans and Australian aborigines occupied a sub-species position between white Europeans and baboons! He not only stated this as his belief, but proposed that in the near future "as we may hope" according to his evolutionary theory, these "sub-races" of man will eventually be exterminated in a struggle for survival, along with the endangered mountain gorilla of Africa!


This type of statement makes the term "ethnic cleansing" seem mild by comparison.
 
Charles Darwin was himself a racist, referring to native Africans and Australians, for example, as savages. This shows that evolution is inherently racist.

  • A quote from "The Descent of Man", in a chapter called "The Races of Man.", in which Darwin wrote:
"At some future period not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes...will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest Allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as the baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla" (1874, p. 178).
 
Charles Darwin, the author of THE SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION in 1859 and the champion of evolution, renounced his evolutionary theory and became a Christian on his deathbed. This was reported by noblewoman Lady Hope who said she visited Darwin at his home in England at the close of his life. She described him as reading the book of Hebrews in the New Testament of the Bible. She also said that he regarded his writings about evolution to be questions that people made into a religion. Lady Hope said Darwin asked her to conduct a meeting outside a summer house he owned so he could hear the singing of the hymns.
 
[h=3]Romans 1:29-32 [/h]They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Though they know God's decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.
 
[h=3]Romans 1:30[/h]King James Version (KJV)

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
 
God_Haters_Cover_3x4-Copy1.png


god-haters_big.jpg
 
God-Haters hate the Bible because they know it is TRUE!
You are going to miss out on truly living life... You are going to be judged... and then you God-Haters will burn in hell... but most importantly it was YOUR CHOICE!
 
mbokaleo , I've read what you said and here's my thoughts.
  • First of, i love the star trek trilogy and i never knew Spock's home planet name originated from that dispute. So 'Props' to that.
  • Second i can see no offense was given so none shall be taken
  • But most importantly third ni kua there are alot more theories than these that have been proven wrong over the years, its what makes science SCIENCE. It sets a clear boundary between theories and laws. Na its open to disprove any theory if it does not well explain the facts. As another example ni The photoelectric effect and the general view of radiations(light), many scientists explained the effect but only recentlly, thanks to great minds like Einstein, Plank, Schrodinger and others the theories were put to rest and we now have a totally different view on light not as only a wave but also as a particle. Science is all about trials and errors, you go in blindly so as to come out enlightened.
  • Being open to changes kama nilivyosema juu ndo moja ya vitu vinavyotofautisha science and religion. Take a look at this.
-Giordano Bruno (1548 – February 17, 1600) and other scientists were burned in the middle centuries for Saying and teaching that the earth rotates around the sun and not otherwise, against religious teachings.
-Astronomer and professor Cecco d'Ascoli, was burned alive in 1327 in a Church for believing that the earth was round.
-Huo ugunduzi wa Galileo uliosema, mpaka sasa tunaamini na kujua kua dunia inazunguka jua ni kweli, ila what i think you do not know is that he was imprisoned, threatened with torture, and forced to recant his beliefs because they disagreed with Religious ones before.
-ALso did you know that before Germs were know by science Religious forks used to teach that diseases are caused by SIN.
The list goes on and on, na sababu ya hawa watu wa dini kufanya hivyo(kuadhibu wanasayansi wanaopingana nao) ni kua waliamini watu watakosa imani nao. Wafuaasi wao wakawa wanaendelea kuwekwa under constant fear na kureject clear facts. Nashangaa hadi sasa kuna watu "Mashahidi wa Yehova" i think wanapinga blood transfusion wakiamini zinapingana na mafundisho yao na hawataenda mbinguni wakikubali.Also some religions condemn the use of contraceptivee pills. What i'm trying to say is religion does not accept changes easily ni kama vile wana exploit something kutoka kwa waumini wake wakiendelea kua kwenye state of unknowing. Mimi as Scientists like Newton (Who was actually a very religious man) and Albert i do accept that there is a GOD out there and as i said before i always approach both simultaneously, i believe we came from dust, and we were created by a powerfull being. Weather there is After life i'm still sceptic but open for ideas. In short as ALBERT EINSTEIN once said "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind."

bravo bro! I liked your conclusions!!

According to your statements here! I have seen one problem!
see brother! through out the history we have learn that, scientist have been persecuted by so called religious leaders simply because of their findings!! but I tell you one thing you either you forgot to mention or may be you didn't know!

NON OF THOSE PERSECUTERS WERE MUSLIMS! AND ALL THOSE PERSECUTION WAS DONE BY THE NAME OF CHURCH!!
Islam in another hand, DOES NOT REJECT OR REFUSE TO ACCEPT TRUE SCIENCE FINDINGS, As matter fact there is Hundreds of SCIENTIFIC MIRACLES IN THE QURAAN WHICH WAS MENTIONED OVER 1400 YEARS AGO! AND ONLY RESENTLY SCIENCE CAME TO PROVE IT!

PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THIS LINK HERE! I AM ASKING YOU TO TAKE YOUR TIME TO GO THROUGH FEW LINKS!

PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY CONCLUSIONS OR COMMENTS UNTIL YOU LOOK AT THEM! AND DO YOUR OWN RESEACH ABOUT THEIR authenticity!

AND I PROMISE YOU WILL BE AMAZED!!



Miracles of the Qur'an - Modern Science Reveals New Miracles of the Qur'an
 
Ofcourse namjua vizuri!!

And mind you, kabla hujaanza kuquote bible verses, I hope you know how contradictory the bible is....

Well suala la biblia kuwa contradictory ni suala linajulikana kitambo sana. Sasa wewe huyu Mungu wa waisraeli unamkubali au unamkataa na kama unamkataa ni kwa sababu zipi?
 
Sikubaliani kabisa na hizo findings. Nilibahatika kusomea seminari ya wakatoliki Kilimanjaro, tulikua tunasali kwa siku mara 4 kuanzia unaanza form one mpaka four. Kwakweli ki academic ulikua huwezi kutulinganisha na wanafunzi wa shule za serikali au hizi za kata. Walimu wetu walikua hawatuandikii notes na ilikua ni marufuku kuchukua notes za mtu aliyekutangulia na kuzitumia kilichokua kinafanyika ni kumsikiliza mwl kwa makini baada ya hapo unaenda kwenye vitabu unatengeneza notes zako mwenyewe na hizo ndo unazisoma kwa ajili ya mitihani mbalimbali, vitabu ni vingi sana nakumbuka nikiwa form one nilisoma vitabu vya Physics 6. Seminari ni sehemu ambayo tulikua tunasali sana na ki academic tulikua tishio sana mpaka
leo hii
 
Sikubaliani kabisa na hizo findings. Nilibahatika kusomea seminari ya wakatoliki Kilimanjaro, tulikua tunasali kwa siku mara 4 kuanzia unaanza form one mpaka four. Kwakweli ki academic ulikua huwezi kutulinganisha na wanafunzi wa shule za serikali au hizi za kata. Walimu wetu walikua hawatuandikii notes na ilikua ni marufuku kuchukua notes za mtu aliyekutangulia na kuzitumia kilichokua kinafanyika ni kumsikiliza mwl kwa makini baada ya hapo unaenda kwenye vitabu unatengeneza notes zako mwenyewe na hizo ndo unazisoma kwa ajili ya mitihani mbalimbali, vitabu ni vingi sana nakumbuka nikiwa form one nilisoma vitabu vya Physics 6. Seminari ni sehemu ambayo tulikua tunasali sana na ki academic tulikua tishio sana mpaka
leo hii

Umeandika ki_seminari seminari bila hoja yoyote ya msingi kabisa,.....umeishia kujisifia sifia useminari wako.
 
Umeandika ki_seminari seminari bila hoja yoyote ya msingi kabisa,.....umeishia kujisifia sifia useminari wako.

Back to the topic sie tuliokua na dini ambao slogani yetu ilikua ni kazi na sala ndo tuliokua na akili kuliko hawa wacheza viduku wa shule za kata ambao mwaka mzima hawasali hata Mara moja
 
Back
Top Bottom