Research findings: Remittances can slow down growth of economies of receiving countries

Research findings: Remittances can slow down growth of economies of receiving countries

Kwa wajinga wanaobeza umuhimu wa remittance
Hii hapa jana serikali ya Sri Lanka inaambia raia wake wanaoishi ulaya watume dollars nyumbani kwa haraka kwa maana serikali inaanguka na hawana dollars ya kulipa madeni, kununua madawa na mafuta ya diesel na petrol.
 
Wajinga wanaopenda kuargue lakini ukiwapa vitu wasome hawataki.

Remittances inflow and private investment: a case study of South Asian economies via panel data analysis​

Zeeshan Khan
ORCID Icon,
Fazli Rabbi
,
Manzoor Ahmad
ORCID Icon &
Yang Siqun
ORCID Icon
Pages 2723-2742 | Received 09 Jul 2018, Accepted 15 Jan 2019, Published online: 26 Aug 2019

In this article








Abstract
Formulae display:
MathJax Logo
?​

This study examines the association between remittances inflow and investment. The data of five major South Asian countries that receive a significant portion of remittances including India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh are considered from 1990 to 2016. Pooled ordinary least square (OLS), the fixed effect within group estimator (FEWGE), fixed effect (FE) and random effect (RE) are used for the analysis of the data. Unit root tests were employed and then followed by a pooled mean group (PMG) analysis to analyse the long-run relationship between private investment and remittances while controlling for several other variables, such as real-interest rate, economic growth, and the interaction between remittances inflow and business freedom. We use the error correction mechanism (ECM) to find the short-run relationship among variables. Our findings reveal that private investment is positively affected by remittances inflow. Moreover, remittances flow with low business freedom opposes the positive association in the case of these sampled countries. We recommend channelising remittances and lower barriers to business freedom, which may pave the way for a conducive investment-friendly environment.

 
Umesema kwamba remittance sio capital? Soma hapa 👇👇


f4bb93f7-e0ce-4e1b-872e-1fb178d1b45a

The Financing Facility for Remittances​






Maximizing the impact of remittances on development​

Remittances and development
Over the past two decades, remittances have emerged as an important contribution to the well-being of migrant families and the development of communities of origin. In 2019, over 200 million migrant workerssent to their 800 million family members in developing countries US$554 billion, a figure representing more than three times the annual flow of official development assistance (ODA) and exceeding foreign direct investment (FDI).
Remittance are a private source of capital that should not be equated with other international financial flows. However, they can help lift millions of migrant families out of poverty, touching the lives of up to one billion people, either as senders or recipients. They allow migrants and their family members to improve their access to health, education and housing, thereby helping achieve their own Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
 
Kwa wajinga wanaobeza umuhimu wa remittance
Hii hapa jana serikali ya Sri Lanka inaambia raia wake wanaoishi ulaya watume dollars nyumbani kwa haraka kwa maana serikali inaanguka na hawana dollars ya kulipa madeni, kununua madawa na mafuta ya diesel na petrol.
Failed states Kama Kenya, Sri-Lanka na Nigeria ambazo zinashindwa kujenga uchumi wake wa ndani ndizo zinazotegemea "remittances".



Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Kenya hatuwashangai, kila kitu mnategemea toka nchi za nje, kuanzia chakula hadi pesa" remittances", hamuamini katika kujenga uwezo wenu wa ndani wa kuzalisha pesa, ndio sababu wakenya na Nigerians ndio wanaongoza Africa kwa kukimbia nchi zao.

Wakenya mtaendelea kulalamikia Sana kwamba hatuwapendi tunawanyanyasa mkija Tanzania, sisi tunajenga uchumi wetu "from within", ninyi mnategemea wakenya walioko nje ndio wawaletee pesa, lini nchi yenu itatengeneza ajira kwa wananchi wake?

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Failed states Kama Kenya, Sri-Lanka na Nigeria ambazo zinashindwa kujenga uchumi wake wa ndani ndizo zinazotegemea "remittances".



Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
What does a dead state kama Tz doing to resurrect itself? kwa vile mko way below, hovyo sana, at LDC or next it., ni kujipiga kifua na kujiliwaza tu ndio unapenda, ukweli uko pale pale, jikomboeni wachana na Kenya, tunazidi kuwaacha nyuma, mindset yenu ndio mbaya.., zero software. Mwenzako ame post research speaking otherwise, rubbishing the findings ya research uchwara, showing strong positives than negatives, wewe hauna jibu tena, sasa ona response yako? umelambishwa sakafu clean 🤣 😂 😂 😂
 
Ukiona nchi inategemea "remittances" kukuza uchumi wake kwa kiasi kikubwa, hiyo ni dalili ya uchumi uliokosa mizizi imara ndani ya nchi, mfano mzuri ni Kenya na Nigeria

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
Usilinganishe Kenya na Tajikistan. Remittance to Gdp ratio ya Tajikistan ni 50%. Remittance to gdp ratio ya Kenya ni 3/109×100=2.75%. Kwa hivyo remittance ni sehemu kidogo sana ya uchumi wa Kenya. Umuhimu wa remittance kwa uchumi wa Kenya ni kwa sababu hio ndio largest source of foreign exchange. Imeshinda tourism au majani chai ambazo ndio zilikuwa biggest source of foreign exchange kwa miaka nyingi sana.
 
Kwa wale wanaotaka kujua zaidi kuhusu "remittances", faida na madhara yake, wapitie hii article wajue ukweli.
Tony254
dyfre
Geza Ulole
The best 007

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
Hii inaanza households level vibrancy and energy ya aggressiveness kupanga mipango inashuka, dhana ya utegemezi, ndio hii ya nchi kutegemea uomba omba
 
Usilinganishe Kenya na Tajikistan. Remittance to Gdp ratio ya Tajikistan ni 50%. Remittance to gdp ratio ya Kenya ni 3/109×100=2.75%. Kwa hivyo remittance ni sehemu kidogo sana ya uchumi wa Kenya. Umuhimu wa remittance kwa uchumi wa Kenya ni kwa sababu hio ndio largest source of foreign exchange. Imeshinda tourism au majani chai ambazo ndio zilikuwa biggest source of foreign exchange kwa miaka nyingi sana.
Kama vyanzo vyenu vya ndani ni vidogo kuliko "remittances" hii maana yake ni kwamba hapo ndani hakuna "enough production of goods and services".

Hili jambo ninashangaa Sana unalichukulia kwa urahisi Sana,madhara yake ni makubwa Sana kwa uchumi na maisha ya wakenya.

Hivi hebu fikiria kwamba, hiyo labour force ya wakenya waliopo huko nje yenye kuzalisha zaidi ya $3B kwa mwaka, Kama wangelikua wanatumika hapo Kenya, unadhani ni kiasi gani cha ajira, goods and services vingezalishwa.

Jambo lingine la kujiuliza ni "Ni nchi zipi ambazo hao wakenya hukimbilia kwenda kufanya kazi, nyingi ni nchi za Ulaya, Amerika, Arabuni, South Africa, Mauritius, na Tanzania. Kwanini wasiende Malawi, Burundi, Central Africa Republic, Burkinafaso, Myamar, Sri-Lanka au Mozambique kwa wingi Kama wanavyokwenda kwenye hizo nchi za kundi la kwanza?

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Kwa wajinga wanaobeza umuhimu wa remittance
Hii hapa jana serikali ya Sri Lanka inaambia raia wake wanaoishi ulaya watume dollars nyumbani kwa haraka kwa maana serikali inaanguka na hawana dollars ya kulipa madeni, kununua madawa na mafuta ya diesel na petrol.


Kwa hiyo ukiwa ulaya na marekani wanafikiri muda wote unakuwa na madolari ya kutuma nyumbani ili kuokoa uchumi???
😛 🤣 😂
 
Ukiona jamaa anaenda kufanya research on negative effects of remittances, ndio ujuwe imewauma ile mbaya.
Research yoyote ambayo sio "biased" lazima ionyeshe pande zote mbili, hiyo niliyokuwekea inaonyesha "Pros & Cons za "remittances", ila kwasababu ninyi hamtaki kujua mapungufu yenu, mnazungumzia "positives" pekee.

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Research yoyote ambayo sio "biased" lazima ionyeshe pande zote mbili, hiyo niliyokuwekea inaonyesha "Pros & Cons za "remittances", ila kwasababu ninyi hamtaki kujua mapungufu yenu, mnazungumzia "positives" pekee.

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app

Siku zote, tena tangu zamani, ukiona watu wanakimbia nchini kwao, au kwao jua ni dalili ya backwardness ya maeneo hayo. Nchi ikiwa inajitosha huwezi kusikia wakiongelea remittance. wao watakuwa wanaongelea how to expand production and exports. Sasa kwa taifa wambalo ni bingwa wa ku export asylum seekers, litaongelea remittance. Hiyo ndiyo tofauti kubwa iliyopo.
 
Siku zote, tena tangu zamani, ukiona watu wanakimbia nchini kwao, au kwao jua ni dalili ya backwardness ya maeneo hayo. Nchi ikiwa inajitosha huwezi kusikia wakiongelea remittance. wao watakuwa wanaongelea how to expand production and exports. Sasa kwa taifa wambalo ni bingwa wa ku export asylum seekers, litaongelea remittance. Hiyo ndiyo tofauti kubwa iliyopo.
Ninauhakika pamoja na IQ ndogo ya wakenya, lakini wanalijua Hilo vizuri Sana, Kama Nyumbani kwako unajitosheleza, nchi lazima iwe inapokea wageni wengi kuzidi idadi ya raia wake wanaokimbia nchi Yao.

Duniani waafrika na watu toka Asia tunabaguliwa Sana huko nje kwasababu kuu hiyo, tunalazimisha kwenda kufanyakazi katika nchi zingine hata kama hatuhitajiki kwasababu Nyumbani hali ni mbaya Sana.

Wakenya wengi wananyanyaswa Sana katika nchi za kiarabu wakifanya kazi za Ulinzi na "house girls"

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Ndio kabisa. Huwa wanapenda kujigamba wanaishi nchi za nje kwa wingi lakini hali za nchi zao ni mbaya sana.
Katika nchi zenye kuidhalilisha Afrika huko nje ni Nigeria na Kenya, Ethiopia huwa hawajiiti waafrika wakiwa nje ya Africa, Kenya hali ya uchumi/maisha ni mbaya Sana, ndio sababu wanaamua kukimbia nchi hata kwa kujishikiza katika gurudumu la ndege na kuhatarisha maisha Yao.

Sent from my itel L5007 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom