Should a mother be judged for sacrificing love to secure her family's future?

Should a mother be judged for sacrificing love to secure her family's future?

Siwez kumvumilia mtu asieonyesha juhudi za kujikwamua aisee… siko tayari kuja kutesa watoto wangu kwa kuwachagulia baba mvivu anaesubiria tu muujiza nevaaaa!
Kama wewe pia hauna hela kwanini unajiona unamvumilia mwenzako?. Hauna uwezo wa kuishi comfortable life kwa gharama zako wewe mwenyewe kwanini unafikiri mwanaume ndie anatakiwa kukugharamia wakati wewe mwanamke umepewa access zote kama huyo mwanaume mfano elimu, ajira, kumiliki mali n.k

Ushawahi kujiuliza pengine uyo uyo mwenye juhudi yupo na wews kwa sababu uwezo wake hauruhusu kuwa na mwanamke wa ndoto zake kwa kipindi hicho? Kwa maana hiyo hauoni kama na yeye anakua anakuvumilia tu. Mambo yakikaa sawa anatafuta mwanamke wa ndoto zake, wewe anakuacha
 
naa is it true that behind every Man's success there's a woman behind?
 
naa vipi huyu 'better option' akifilisika to negative digits kabisa au akiparalyse completely, unaendelea nae au utaruka na 'ndege' mwingine atakayeweza kufulfill your financial 'necessities' kama mtoa Mada alivyoziweka?
 
Mtoa mada umeuliza swali rahisi kwa lugha iliyojikunjakunja.
Uliza tu simply, ni sawa kujiuza in the name of taking care of the kids?
Putting it mildly....
  • Is it selfish for a mother to prioritize financial security over romantic love? or is it heroic and self sacrifice for the benefit of her kids
"Materialist or Martyr? A Mother's Sacrifice."
Je asifiwe kwa kujinyima furaha ya roho yake, hata kwenda kwa mtu asiyempenda au kupendezwa nae kama it means security ya watoto hata watakaokuja, au avumilie na kufurahia furaha ya moyo huku akijua kina Junior watateseka na Ulimwengu wa dhiki ? i.e Is Choosing Family Security Over Love: A Noble Sacrifice?;

The Mother's Choice: Security for Her Children vs. Her Own Happiness.
Je sisi kama watazamaji tuna haki ya ku-judge bila kuvaa viatu vyake ?

Mtoa mada umeuliza swali rahisi kwa lugha iliyojikunjakunja.
Uliza tu simply, ni sawa kujiuza in the name of taking care of the kids?

Huko kumuacha unaempenda kwenda kuolewa na usiyempenda kisa ana hela, ni kujiiuza in the name of future wellbeing. Haina tofauti na hawa wanaojiuza kwa watu tofauti ili wahudumie familia.
 
Putting it mildly....
  • Is it selfish for a mother to prioritize financial security over romantic love? or is it heroic and self sacrifice for the benefit of her kids
"Materialist or Martyr? A Mother's Sacrifice."
Je asifiwe kwa kujinyima furaha ya roho yake, hata kwenda kwa mtu asiyempenda au kupendezwa nae kama it means security ya watoto hata watakaokuja, au avumilie na kufurahia furaha ya moyo huku akijua kina Junior watateseka na Ulimwengu wa dhiki ? i.e Is Choosing Family Security Over Love: A Noble Sacrifice?;

The Mother's Choice: Security for Her Children vs. Her Own Happiness.
Je sisi kama watazamaji tuna haki ya ku-judge bila kuvaa viatu vyake ?

Mkuu unajua jamii zetu za kiafrika kwa sasa zipo katika kipindi cha mabadiliko. Tupo katika kipindi ambacho wanaume na wanawake tuna mgongano katika namna ya ku-implement hii nadharia ya usawa wa kijinsia.

Wakati wanawake wameenda kwenye ule mkutano wao beijin na ajenda yao ya haki sawa, kuna kitu hawakukijua/hawakukielewa/hawakukifikiria. Kitu chenyewe ni kwamba haki sawa wanayoitaka itakuja na wajibu sawa pamoja na kupoteza privilege zote walizokua wanazipata kutoka kwa mwanaume.

Matokeo ya wanawake kushindwa kukiona hicho kipengere ndio inasababisha hizi chaos tunaziona kwenye dating pool na ndoa leo hii.

Wanaume wameshtuka na kujiuliza kama mwanamke nae anapewa access zote kama sisi, kuanzia elimu, ajira, kumiliki mali, uongozi n.k kwanini bado tuwajibike kubeba jukumu la kuwahudumia na kuwaandalia mustakabali wa maisha yao?

Wanawake nao wanataka usawa wa kijinsia lakini zile privilege za provision na protection kutoka kwa mwanaume hawataki kuziachia. Elimu, ajira, uongozi haki sawa. Haya mama umepewa access zote kama mimi bill hizi hapa twende na kanuni ile ile ya 50/50 hapo ndipo wanawake hawapataki.

Unapewa elimu ili upate maarifa ya kutafsiri mazingira na kuyaishi. Unapewa ajira ili uondolewe kwenye kundi la watu tegemezi. Sasa kuna maana gani ya mwanamke kupewa ajira na elimu kama hatma ya kupewa hizo haki ataishia kuwa liability kwa mwanaume.

Katika andiko lako umemchora mwanamke wa zamani ambaye hana access ya kupata elimu au ajira. Ofcourse huyu lazima mwanaume awe nguzo ya mustakabali wake. Lakini katika zama za leo za usawa wa kijinsia mwanaume na mwanamke wanatakiwa kushirikiana, sio mwanamke kuwa opportunistic.

Kwahiyo hili swali lako lijibiwe kwa ukamilifu, tunatakiwa turudi nyuma na kuangalia ideology gani tuibebe kujenga ustawi wa jamii yetu. Twende na mfumo dume, usawa wa kijinsia au tuchukua advantage za mfumo dume na zile za usawa wa kijinsia halafu kuzisuke kuja na ideology yetu mpya.

Lakini hiki tunacholazimisha kukifanya kwamba mwanaume acheze role yake ya kubeba jumumu zima la mustakabali wa mke na familia. Wakati mwanamke yeye acheze role yake kama feminism inavyomfundisha, ndoa zitaendelea kuvunjika na single mothers wataendelea kushamili kwenye jamii yetu
 
Logikos
Who are we to judge?
it is not selfish nor heroic
She's not a materialist nor a martyr
IT'S JUST HER CHOICE, every one has theirs.

Charles the III asingekuwa King Leo hii kama babu yake mkubwa hakufanya 'choice yake mwenyewe'
 
Naamanisha hivi kama una mpenzi wako unayempenda kweli kweli wa kufa na kuzikana; ila ukipiga rada unaona hapa Bima ya Afya haitapatikana wala shule (elimu ya juu) itakuwa ngumu kuwalipia watoto sasa kuna choice imekuja inakupenda wewe huipendi unaamua kwenda huko na kuacha huku kwa unayempenda...; Je tuna haki ya kukuita materialistic au tukupongeze kwa kuacha furaha ya moyo wako kwa kuwekeza kwa watoto wako (future family) ?

Na hii point nimeweka hapa kwa watu wengi kuwaona wanawake wa hivi kwamba wapo kwa fulani kwa ajili ya pesa zake bila kuangalia perception yake kama mzazi kwamba ina-guarantee security ya watoto wake (hata kama sio chaguo la roho yake); hivyo huyu ni Angel na sio Shetani....
Sasa ulituandikia kingereza cha nini kutuchosha tu Asubuhi Asubuhi🙆‍♂️🙆‍♂️🙆‍♂️
 
Usichojua hapa chini ya jua hutakiwi kumkatia tamaa mtu anayeitwa mwanaume hata awe kachoka vp kapuku lolote linaweza tokea uvumilivu ndo unawashindaga unavumilia miezi miwili unachoka unaondoka mwezi wa tatu mtu anatoboasit
Siyo uchumba unakuta ndoa kabisa na watoto wamepata mtu kaanguka kiuchumi anakimbia

Na kumvumilia sio guarantee ya yete kutoboa. Ingekuwa hivyo basi wanaume wote wangekuwa matajiri.
 
Vyovyote iwavyo, tumia akili kufanya maamuzi na sio hisia.
 
naa is it true that behind every Man's success there's a woman behind?
Completely wrong. I will explain

As a man, in your building stage you must avoid unnecessary stress that you don't need. You see that statement women always make, "I was with him when he had nothing, he's finally doing well now and he has abandoned me." But when you ask them how they contributed to your life during that hard time, they wouldn't have anything reasonable to say aside"I gave him my body."...
But she forgot that, you were feeding her while still working on your dreams. You inconvenienced yourself several times to send her money from the little one you're trying to save. All she gave you was sex and she said she stood by you..

She wasn't there for you. You pushed through the tough time alone. Maybe you were good in bed and that was why she stayed..

As a man who is still trying to secure financial power.. you must avoid a broke woman by any possible means. A broke vvoman is hungry. She has bills to pay, and she's looking for a way to reduce the financial loads from her shoulders

She knows a relationship is the only chance she has to ease her burden and your own burden will double because you would want to prove you're the man and it's your responsibilities to take care of her..
From the moment you allow her into your life, your savings rate will reduce. You have just added a liability to your small income and that's why you don't save anymore.

Women don't go into relationship for love.. They go into relationship for survival. For what you can offer. That's why they will first get to know what you do for a living, then they will calculate if the work or business you do will be able to take care of their needs.. After considering all those things, they will accept you. And from that day, that's when you have accepted liability into your income and she has gained assets..

You love her and she said she loves you too but you will be the one be asked to prove your love..
If giving money is a proof of love, why don't men receive some money from women?

Avoid broke women if you really want to grow your finances. Every money you sent is a deduction.
STOP delaying your financial growth trying to prove love to a broke woman who cannot take care of her needs..
At the end of the day, you got loss for proving love and she got profit for not proving anything..
 
Back
Top Bottom