Siri kubwa kuliko zote kuhusu dunia yetu tambarare

[Poor Brain]

😀😀 Hii ndo akili ya flat Earthers. Yaani hiyo picha inadhihirisha mawazo Yao kuhusu umbo la Dunia.

Hawa majamaa hamna kazi 😃😃😃😃

 

[Chosen Rich]

Hujaelewa kwanini nimeweka hiyo quote,.. Lengo ni kuonyesha kwamba kuna vitu unachukulia kama ndiyo vipo hivyo 100% kumbe theories zake zilianza kwa imagination tu,. that's why hutakiwi kuufunga mlango wa kudadisi na kujiuliza maswali zaidi,. ikiwa utapata doubts zozote kwenye fikra zako,.

Alafu mbona unachagua sana hoja na maswali ya kujibu

Ukipigwa swali zito unapita kama huoni 😅

 

[hateeb10]

Ila ya nini tena? Jibu ni Moja tu huna ushahidi na huo ushahidi wa namna hiyo haiwezekani.

1. Kutoona Wala kuhisi Dunia ikimove wakati umeshindwa kunipa video nzima inayoonesha Dunia nzima ikiwa haimove sio uthibitisho.

2. Flatness huwez kuipima Kwa kuangalia sehem ndogo sana ya Dunia less than 1% ya Dunia nzima. Hapo utakuwa unajidanganya mwenyewe

Lastly, theoretically umeshindwa kuthibitisha umbo ya Dunia flat hata video pia umeshindwa then unasema Dunia ni flat, unaona upo sawa kweli?

Wewe sio wa kwanza na Wala hutakuwa wa mwisho kuja na madai haya lakini siku zote ukweli utasimama. Most of Flat Earthers mnatofautiana mawazo yenu Kwa sababu mnachokisema Hamna ushahidinacho zaidi ya maelezo ambayo kimsingi hayana connection nzuri na uhalisia wa mambo.

Mfano mdogo tu kuonesha hoja zenu ni dhaifu hata theoretically:

1. Mkiulizwa muelezee solar na lunar eclipse na lunar phases huwa mnaleta story za kisadikika. Mfano wewe mwenyewe uliwahi kuleta majibu ya kisadikika ambayo hata ww hujui umeyatoa wapi.

2. a) Mnadai pembezoni mwa Dunia Kuna ice walls ambazo ndio zinazuia maji yasimwagike. Sasa swali la kujiuliza tu hata kama huna elimu kwanza kwann maji yamwagike?

b) Achana na Hilo mkaenda mbali zaidi mnadai hakuna mtu anaruhusiwa kwenda huko Kwasabab ni more secured place. Sasa kama ni hivyo wao walijuaje? Na mpka Kuna ramani zenu je nan alietengeneza hizo raman kama hakuna aliewah kufika huko?

3. Sunset na sunrise, hapa mnadai kuwa ni PERSPECTIVE, yaani kwamba Jua linaenda mbali zaidi na UPEO wa macho yetu kiasi kwamba linapungua size mpk linapotea. Swali dogo tu kwann katika uhalisia Jua halipungui size kama mnavyodai? Bali tunaona ni kama linazama(linaenda below our horizon) likiwa Kubwa vile vile? Hili swali hata wewe ulishindwa kujibu badala yake ukanipa majibu yaliyokosa maelezo kama REFRACTION na ILLUSION.

Ni kweli REFRACTION inaelezewa vzr kabisa kwenye Dunia duara kwamba wakat Jua linazama(sunset) huwa Kuna saa Moja ambalo kiuhalisia Jua linakuwa limeshazama(linakuwa below our horizon) lakini Bado tunakuwa tunaliona. Hii inatokana na refraction.

View attachment 3184041

Sasa wewe mbona huo uthibitisho huna,...tutakuamini vipi bila evidence yoyote?

 

[hateeb10]

Hawa majamaa hamna kazi 😃😃😃😃

 

[The celebrity]

Sasa wewe mbona huo uthibitisho huna,...tutakuamini vipi bila evidence yoyote?

Elewa, ushahidi wa aina yako Sina, ila ushahidi juu ya umbo la Dunia umbo na hutaki bila sababu😀😀,

Chaajabu nimekuomba ushahidi wa aina unayotaka umeshindwa kuleta😀😀.
Umefeli theoretically na hata Kwa ushahidi wa picha na video, then unakuja kuongea nn hapa? Kama unaweza lete ushahidi hata wa CGI kama ambavyo unadai ww picha za NASA ni Generated and why hakuna picha ya CGI inayoonesha flat earth Kwa uhalisia kama za NASA? Au umeamua kujitwisha mzigo wa Kuni?

 

[The celebrity]

View attachment 3184917

Kweli ww unalishwa matangopori, unakuja na meme za ajabu humu kweli? Kama unaweza hoja lete maelezo ya majibu yangu ila umeshindwa, basi lete video(kama ulivyoomba ww) umeshindwa then ww unahoja gani sasa?

Kuonesha ww huna point nilikuuliza kuhusu uwepo wa Gravity ukasema haipo nikakuuliza sasa kama hamna gravity why vitu vinafall ukaja na hoja ya density na buoyancy, nilivyokubana ukaacha kujibu kama mwezio NkumbiSon mpaka akaanza kusema nashindana.

Swala la sunset nalo umeshindwa hata Kwa maelezo tu, sasa wewe unahoja gani ndugu yangu au umeamua kukubali kitu blindly? Hata kama umekuja hapa kuchangamsha genge lkn uje na vitu vya maana.

 

[The celebrity]

Sasa wewe mbona huo uthibitisho huna,...tutakuamini vipi bila evidence yoyote?

Swala ni hoja zako dhaifu badala uje kutetea nilichopoint out umekuja kusema mbona mm Sina ushahidi, serious?? Kwahy umekubali huna hoja?

 

[hateeb10]

Elewa, ushahidi wa aina yako Sina, ila ushahidi juu ya umbo la Dunia umbo na hutaki bila sababu😀😀,

Chaajabu nimekuomba ushahidi wa aina unayotaka umeshindwa kuleta😀😀.
Umefeli theoretically na hata Kwa ushahidi wa picha na video, then unakuja kuongea nn hapa? Kama unaweza lete ushahidi hata wa CGI kama ambavyo unadai ww picha za NASA ni Generated and why hakuna picha ya CGI inayoonesha flat earth Kwa uhalisia kama za NASA? Au umeamua kujitwisha mzigo wa Kuni?

View attachment 3185204

View attachment 3185206


View attachment 3185208

Umeamua kuja na vichekesho sasa,..

 

[hateeb10]

Kweli ww unalishwa matangopori, unakuja na meme za ajabu humu kweli? Kama unaweza hoja lete maelezo ya majibu yangu ila umeshindwa, basi lete video(kama ulivyoomba ww) umeshindwa then ww unahoja gani sasa?

Kuonesha ww huna point nilikuuliza kuhusu uwepo wa Gravity ukasema haipo nikakuuliza sasa kama hamna gravity why vitu vinafall ukaja na hoja ya density na buoyancy, nilivyokubana ukaacha kujibu kama mwezio NkumbiSon mpaka akaanza kusema nashindana.

Swala la sunset nalo umeshindwa hata Kwa maelezo tu, sasa wewe unahoja gani ndugu yangu au umeamua kukubali kitu blindly? Hata kama umekuja hapa kuchangamsha genge lkn uje na vitu vya maana.

Swala la gravity, swala la sunset au sunrise vyote nilikujibu,..kukubaliana na majibu ni maamuzi yako.

Kwa mfano,..kama hutaki kukubali kwamba technically Jua halizami wala kuchomoza it just moves further away from your sight,..unataka nitumie mbinu gani tena uamini?


Unasema unataka video uthibitishe kwamba Dunia ni flat na Imetulia,...hivyo vitu viwili vipo observed tayari kwa macho na hisia, wewe unaesema vice versa of what we observe ndiyo mwenye jukumu la kuleta uthibitisho wa video,..kama huna basi unategemea utaaminika vipi?

 

[Prince Luanda]

Flat earthers wote wapumbavu

 

[hateeb10]

Swala ni hoja zako dhaifu badala uje kutetea nilichopoint out umekuja kusema mbona mm Sina ushahidi, serious?? Kwahy umekubali huna hoja?

Hoja yangu ni kwamba,...wakati tunasubiri uthibitisho it's better tuamini kile ambacho our sense organs zinatuambia,...

Yaani kama huwezi kuthibitisha Dunia Ina move,... At the same time huioni wala kuihisi ikimove, Kwanini usiamini intuitives zako sasa wakati ukisubiri uthibitisho kutoka kwa waliokuambia Ina move?

 

[hateeb10]

Flat earthers wote wapumbavu

Watu wanaoamini Dunia Ina move na hawana uthibitisho wowote,..ni WAPUMBAVU.

Watu wanaoamini Dunia ni tufe 🌎,.na hawana uthibitisho wowote, ni WAPUMBAVU.

 

[Prince Luanda]

Watu wanaoamini Dunia Ina move na hawana uthibitisho wowote,..ni WAPUMBAVU.

Watu wanaoamini Dunia ni tufe 🌎,.na hawana uthibitisho wowote, ni WAPUMBAVU.

Naomba unielimishe kama jua linaizunguka dunia kwanini position ya kuzama na kuchomoza kwa jua inabadilika? Kwa kutumia hiyo michoro yenu miliyotuletea humu

 

[hateeb10]

Burden of proof inamuangukia nani......?

Scenario:
Two people are walking together when they notice a car that appears to be parked by the roadside. The first person claims, "The car is moving," while the second person says, "No, it’s not moving."

Who bears the burden of proof?
In this situation, the burden of proof lies with the first person, who asserts that the car is moving. This is because making a positive claim (that the car is in motion) requires evidence to substantiate it, such as visible movement, engine noise, or a change in the car’s position relative to its surroundings.

The second person, who claims that the car is stationary, is making a negative claim, which generally does not carry the burden of proof unless they need to refute the evidence presented by the first person.


The celebrity

 

[The celebrity]

Swala la gravity, swala la sunset au sunrise vyote nilikujibu,..kukubaliana na majibu ni maamuzi yako.

Umejibu wapi?

 

[The celebrity]

Yaani kama huwezi kuthibitisha Dunia Ina move,... At the same time huioni wala kuihisi ikimove, Kwanini usiamini intuitives zako sasa wakati ukisubiri uthibitisho kutoka kwa waliokuambia Ina move?

Nisubiri uthibitisho Gani bwana mdogo?? Kweli umejitwisha mzigo wa ujinga

 

[The celebrity]

Burden of proof inamuangukia nani......?

Scenario:
Two people are walking together when they notice a car that appears to be parked by the roadside. The first person claims, "The car is moving," while the second person says, "No, it’s not moving."

Who bears the burden of proof?
In this situation, the burden of proof lies with the first person, who asserts that the car is moving. This is because making a positive claim (that the car is in motion) requires evidence to substantiate it, such as visible movement, engine noise, or a change in the car’s position relative to its surroundings.

The second person, who claims that the car is stationary, is making a negative claim, which generally does not carry the burden of proof unless they need to refute the evidence presented by the first person.


The celebrity

Okay you're right 👍

 

[The celebrity]

Burden of proof inamuangukia nani......?

Scenario:
Two people are walking together when they notice a car that appears to be parked by the roadside. The first person claims, "The car is moving," while the second person says, "No, it’s not moving."

Who bears the burden of proof?
In this situation, the burden of proof lies with the first person, who asserts that the car is moving. This is because making a positive claim (that the car is in motion) requires evidence to substantiate it, such as visible movement, engine noise, or a change in the car’s position relative to its surroundings.

The second person, who claims that the car is stationary, is making a negative claim, which generally does not carry the burden of proof unless they need to refute the evidence presented by the first person.


The celebrity

Sasa ww unatofauti Gani na huyu?

 

[Prince Luanda]

Burden of proof inamuangukia nani......?

Scenario:
Two people are walking together when they notice a car that appears to be parked by the roadside. The first person claims, "The car is moving," while the second person says, "No, it’s not moving."

Who bears the burden of proof?
In this situation, the burden of proof lies with the first person, who asserts that the car is moving. This is because making a positive claim (that the car is in motion) requires evidence to substantiate it, such as visible movement, engine noise, or a change in the car’s position relative to its surroundings.

The second person, who claims that the car is stationary, is making a negative claim, which generally does not carry the burden of proof unless they need to refute the evidence presented by the first person.


The celebrity

Swali langu umeliruka kama hujaliona vile ndio maana flat earthers wote nawaita wapumbavu

 

[hateeb10]

Umejibu wapi?

Pitia post zilizopita,.utaziona