MwanaFalsafa1
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 26, 2008
- 5,565
- 843
Have you realized a common flow to your reply? There is a lot of "maybe". When there is a maybe it means what you are saying is not a matter of fact and is at best debatable. Now let me take each piece of your reply and answer it accordingly.
You also have to understand that culture is wide and does not include only religion. What you are saying only holds true if religion is the only thing that influences culture. Have you looked and investigated other parts of the white man's culture? You can not say simply religion is the only thing that influences the way they act. That is a very one dimensional argument.
You say "yes or may be" which already shows you are not sure. It means you have not proven yet that these whites are violent because they are Christians. And stop saying that is the fundamental question to the thread. Your thread says Christian nations are most violent people it never said anything about whites. Don't change your own thread. I'm the one who pointed out that your thread only refers to white Christians.
That is my question. Why do you provide evidence only for white Christians and not all Christians? If Christianity meant being violent then all Christians would be violent. If other Christians are not violent then it is safe to presume that there is another factor which is not Christianity which makes them violent. Mkuu weren't you taught critical thinking in school? And yes my argument can nullify your hypothesis because that's exactly what this thread is a hypothesis not a proven fact. Unajua maana ya neno hypothesis?
Again maybe. Prove your point. How is the Bible rubbish? The Holy Book is there so mention specific examples from the Bible which you feel causes are person to be violent. Again here all your answers are "may be" which is a sign of not being sure.
If not? So you are not sure but you are just throwing ideas out there and seeing which one works? I'm starting to doubt you know what you are talking about.
Like I said earlier your replies are full of uncertainties. Too many ifs and maybes. I have asked you questions you failed to answer but rather just repeated what I said, said if or maybe and threw the questions back to me. Word of advise.
*You said Christians are violent but you gave evidence for only White Christians. You have no supporting evidence to show that other Christians behave the same way. So until you give the same examples of Christians in Africa, Asia and Latin America your evidence will remain unique to Westerners only. For example, let's say regarding suicide bombings. I could give an example of Muslim suicide bombings by Arab Muslims, Asian Muslims, African Muslims, White Muslims etc. But I can't give an example of something that happens only in Arabia and say this is the characteristics of all Muslims.
Connection between being christian and violent?: Since most violent people happens to be from christian countries, and human being being is influenced by enviroment including culture (christian in this case) ..we can deduce that christianity might be the cause..
You also have to understand that culture is wide and does not include only religion. What you are saying only holds true if religion is the only thing that influences culture. Have you looked and investigated other parts of the white man's culture? You can not say simply religion is the only thing that influences the way they act. That is a very one dimensional argument.
Are this white violent because there are christians?: yes or may be! that is the fundamental question for the thread.
You say "yes or may be" which already shows you are not sure. It means you have not proven yet that these whites are violent because they are Christians. And stop saying that is the fundamental question to the thread. Your thread says Christian nations are most violent people it never said anything about whites. Don't change your own thread. I'm the one who pointed out that your thread only refers to white Christians.
Your argument that this traits are unique cannot nullify the hypothesis that most violent people on earth happens to be christians..because there are vivid historical evidence which support the argument..the central issue is why many if not selected few from africa and other parts of the world are so violent?
That is my question. Why do you provide evidence only for white Christians and not all Christians? If Christianity meant being violent then all Christians would be violent. If other Christians are not violent then it is safe to presume that there is another factor which is not Christianity which makes them violent. Mkuu weren't you taught critical thinking in school? And yes my argument can nullify your hypothesis because that's exactly what this thread is a hypothesis not a proven fact. Unajua maana ya neno hypothesis?
Does bible encourage violence?: may be ...because if you consume garbage then expect the negative consequences...perhaps bible the book were christians derived their moral standard is behind this violent behavior, may be the cause...
Again maybe. Prove your point. How is the Bible rubbish? The Holy Book is there so mention specific examples from the Bible which you feel causes are person to be violent. Again here all your answers are "may be" which is a sign of not being sure.
If not.then bibles effects to human moral behaviour is less less and useless book which change nobody (except few) leaving majority on their violent bahaviour...
If not? So you are not sure but you are just throwing ideas out there and seeing which one works? I'm starting to doubt you know what you are talking about.
Like I said earlier your replies are full of uncertainties. Too many ifs and maybes. I have asked you questions you failed to answer but rather just repeated what I said, said if or maybe and threw the questions back to me. Word of advise.
*You said Christians are violent but you gave evidence for only White Christians. You have no supporting evidence to show that other Christians behave the same way. So until you give the same examples of Christians in Africa, Asia and Latin America your evidence will remain unique to Westerners only. For example, let's say regarding suicide bombings. I could give an example of Muslim suicide bombings by Arab Muslims, Asian Muslims, African Muslims, White Muslims etc. But I can't give an example of something that happens only in Arabia and say this is the characteristics of all Muslims.