SOCIAL ENGINEERING: Jinsi binadamu tunavyoandaliwa kuwa mazombi na maroboti bila kujua

Mkuu shukrani,ni bandiko linalofikirisha.
Ki ukweli dunia hii imejaa mambo mengi yasio ya halisia na bahati mbaya yamefichwa sanaa
 
pia kuna mwalimu wangu mzuri sana aliyeweza kutafsiri hizi nyakati kwa kitabu takatifu kiitwacho QURAN uyu ndugu yetu huyu hapa Sheikh Imran Hosein uyu yeye atakupa mwelekeo mzuri tu,
 
Thanks sana Mkuu MSEZA MKULU kwa Elimu fikirishi.

Nimeona nami pasipo chuki wala hiana niongezee nyama kidogo kuhusu concept moj hapo juu "Group mind".

In this article we will discuss about the concept of group mind.


LeBon, the French sociologist used the term “Group Mind”, to explain the various characteristics of crowd behaviour. He viewed that when individuals come together in a crowd, a group mind or collective mind emerges. Guided by the group mind, they show a different type of behaviour than when they are alone. Thus it is due to LeBon that the concept of crowd mind or group mind came in to existence.

The observation of significant difference between the behaviour of the same individual in a lone situation and in a group or crowd situation led him to develop this concept. He held that as a member of a crowd the person behaves in such an irresponsible manner that after words he repents for the same.

He explains this by saying that when one sees other people of the group behaving in particular way, his sense of responsibility decreases and due to social facilitation, sense of encouragement and competition he vomits all the suppressed and repressed desires, tendencies and wishes.

During this period the concept of group mind or crowd mind was accepted and psychologists and sociologists thought that social psychology can explain every human behaviour with the concept of group and collective phenomena.

But Allport has criticised this concept of group mind completely, and it has no existence today. Allport does not deny that an individual behaves in a different way when he is a member of different groups. But to explain this, he says one need not use or coin the concept of group mind.

This can be explained by the individual mind. In the beginning of 20th century Durkheim also talked a good deal of the relations between individuals group and society. McDougall took this concept of group mind to explain the behaviour of individuals in highly organized, stable and well integrated groups like the church and army.

The concept of group mind has also been used to explain the peculiarities in behaviour of social and caste group.

Psychologists in favour of crowd or group mind argue that the person in crowd or an active group looses his personal consciousness and sense of responsibility and is guided by unconscious desires, repressed urges and crowd consciousness.

Consciousness depends upon the functioning of neural structure and nervous systems possessed by individual members. But the crowd of the group does not have nervous system of its own, they argued. This is an important fallacy of crowd mind or group mind.

The concept of group mind has no existence today. It has been completely abandoned because of the fact that the same individual shows different behaviour at different situations. Allport conducted several experimental studies in group and individual situations and found that there is interaction between various members of a group.

A influences B and is also influenced by B. He found that the majority of subjects showed improvement in speed and quantity of work in a group situation than when alone because of sense of cooperation, competition and social facilitation.

F.H. Allport was the staunch opposer of the concept of group mind or collective mind and today it is totally abandoned by social psychologists. But since the group functions as an unit, what a psychologist can do with an individual mind, some psychologists question.

So in place of group mind modern day social psychologists like Lewin and others have used the concept of group dynamics where groups are in dynamic relation with each other.

Group dynamics studies how the behaviour changes upon external conditions. In place of group mind or collective mind, laws of group behaviour need he formulated where the basic unit of analysis is the group and not the individual. Such laws of group behaviour should complement the laws of individual behaviour. But the group behaviour need not be stated in individual terms.

Kretch and Crutchfield (1947) held that a scientific and mature approach to group dynamics must seek out new concepts, new properties, new variables with which to characterize the group as a whole.
 
Kazi ya Bible hii !
 
Tv, Movie, Magazeti, mitandao ya kijamii mingi nimeweza ila JF na Whatsup bado zinanisumbua!!!
Ah ah ah mkuu mimi.whatsapp na mengine nimeweza ila jf duuh

Imenikamata
Nitaiachaje kama kuna mada kama hizi aisee
 
tukubaliane kutokukubaliana tunapotofautiana mkuu maana tutatoka nje ya mada ukianzisha bandiko juu ya changamoto unazotoa nitapita na mimi nitoe maoni yangu.
Ila kuhusu uhalali wa bibilia na origin yake nimefuatilia na naendelea kufuatilia sina shaka kabisa ni kitabu sahihi 100% na ni cha kuaminiwa na watu wote duniani sio wayahudi tu japo kuna nadharia nyingi nje ya kitabu hicho kupinga uhalali wa yaliyomo lkn hawabatilishi ukweli huu. Huko tusiende sana maana tutatoka nje ya mstari mkuu.
 
mamlaka ya mwanamke kidini ni machache mno ambayo hayamfanyi akawa mtawala wa familia, hapa nimeongea kifupi sana, ila kwakua hapa kuna watu wana uwezo wakujiongeza mtanielewa, angalia leo hii mwanamke alivyo kua juu ya mamlaka, kwanini? ni ili afanikishe na afanye wepesi wa kufikia malengo ya mtawala kututawala kila idara na ndo maaana kule marekani wakagundua ile (Toxic masculinity) (this one of the ways in which Patriarchy is harmful to men. It refers to the socially-constructed attitudes that describe the masculine gender role as violent, unemotional, sexually aggressive, and so forth)
sasa nikirudi katika imani yangu ya Kiislamu imeyasema haya, ipasavyo kwenye Quran, biblia imechakachuliwa na tunaweza kuiiita cyclepath, tusome tu kwkakua ni ukweli tunautafuta au sio
 
Mwanzisha uzi hongera kwa kujitahidi kuhamasisha turudi zama za ujima tule mizizi, tuvae magome na kuabudu mizimu
Ila kumbuka tuu TEHEMA na vyombo vya habari vinafaida na hasara kujadili hasara pekee na kuacha faida zake ni tatizo
 
Vivyo hivyo hata wewe unafanya mind control kwa kupitia media. Yaana unataka kuwafanya watu wakuamini wewe mwenyewe na kuacha kufanya mambo Mengine
 
Ni kweli kabisa haya mambo tunayaona na kuyachukulia kimzaha lakini yana impact kubwa sana katika bongo zetu chukulia mfano movies mbalimbali tuangaliazo zitufundisha kuona mathalani jambo la kuua kuwa ni la kawaida sana na hatutakiwi kumchukulia poa aliekuzingua, kila moie imetawaliwa na mauaji aidha kwa kutumia visu, bunduki na kadhalika hivyo sasa main theme ya haya mambo ya kileo kufundisha ukatiri ili tuamini hata at large scale pale nchi za magharibi zinapovamia nchi zinazoendelea tuone ni jambo la kawaida lakini nyuma yake kuna agenda za siri.
 
Mkuu hapo kwenye michezo sikubaliani na wewe kabisa. Michezo imekua kichocheo Cha uadui?? Hapana sema jingine kwa hili ni uongo.
 
Yaah somo zuri mnoo. Tatizo kubwa la watz ni uwezo Mdogo wetu wa kufikiri. Unapelekea kutojiuliza kwann hiki kimetoa? Ama kinafaida gani?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…