LIVE Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Live coverage on JamiiForums
RUSSIA ameuvunja moyo wangu, yaani mpaka muda huu mji wa KIEV watu wamelala na wake zao wakiwa hawana hofu yeyote.

JAPAN nao wakiamua kuvamia kisiwa cha KURIL, warusi watawafukuza kwa njia hii wanayoifanya kwa UKRAINE.

FINLAND wakivamia Karelia, majibu ya urusi yatakuwa ndio haya.

TURKEY nao wakijaribu bahati yao huko Sochi, majibu yatakuwa kama haya.

MAREKANi na washirika wake wakielekea kule Arctic, majibu yatakuwa ndio haya.

Utawezaje kushambulia mji wa TOKYO, LONDON, NEW YORK na kwengineko ikiwa jirani yako anakuvua nguo mara kwa mara na bado unamuangalia.

RUSSIA hawana red line wala blue line.
 
Mimi ni Team Putin ila watu wamedharau sana Warusi sana hii aibu anatakiwa Mkuu wa Majeshi ..Mkuu wa FSB na Yule Mkuu wa Usalama wote wafukuzwe kazi...
 
Ameandika Mikael Valtersson
========
ANALYSIS: UKRAINIAN KURSK OFFENSIVE, AUG 10th 2024
Now, when the frontline has, at least temporarily, been stabilised on the Kursk frontline, we can talk about what has happened and how this happened. The Ukrainian goals, future developments and an assessment of the operations consequences will come in another tweet later today.

What has happened?
UkrAF started a surprise attack with limited forces into the Kursk region. The border was very weakly defended by mainly Russian border guards, some recon units and conscripts. During the initial phase UkrAF advanced fast, deep into Russian territory. This advance was mostly conducted by Ukrainian DRG units. The main force advanced more slowly and cleared areas bypassed by their own DRGs. There was no clear frontline and the amount of territory controlled by the UkrAF was hidden by the fog of war.

Then Russian reinforcement started to arrive at the scene and yesterday they established a real frontline. At the same time the Ukrainian DRG units withdrew or went underground. On the maps it looks like UkrAF took control of very large areas if you include the areas where the DRG units were active. If you map it that way, the Russians retook maybe half of the area during the last 48 hours. But in reality the DRG active area wasn't controlled by the UkrAF, it was only contested and now back in Russian hands. The main frontline hasn't moved much during the last day. The front has been stabilised by the RuAF.

How did it happen?
Russia has been preparing for a Sumy offensive and been conducting mine clearing operations in the area in preparation for this. RuAF underestimated Ukrainian willingness to conduct offensive operations. Mainly since Ukraine needs every available military unit elsewhere on the front. RuAF therefore didn't increase troop levels at the border, even though they reduced the minefields.

The Russian forces in the Kursk region was mainly situated far from the border and also partly dispersed. The reason for this was to be out of range from Ukrainian artillery and FPVs, and at the same time don't give tempting targets for Ukrainian medium range assets, as HIMARS. Other Russian units were situated even further back from the front, either in the Belgorod region or further back in Russia.

Both sides employ the same attack tactics when they launch major attacks. You can't build up large troop concentrations, since the enemy immediately will know of your plans and can start weakening the troop concentrations. You must start the attack with the units that are close to the frontline and fast move forward a second, and then a third echelon. But the reserves will be situated far back and it will take some time to deploy them. It is also important not to allow the enemy to get air superiority over the terrain. Otherwise you might get your reserves depleted on the way forward.

Ukraine avoided a build up of large forces near the border, but secretly sent DRG units to the border, often in civilian cars and clothes. UkrAF probably used a rotation time near the border to launch their offensive. Then they would have had double the amount of troops near the border when they attacked.

From nowhere a couple of thousand soldiers attacked over the border and into Russian territory. Ukrainian forces avoided fighting over (weak) Russian strongholds and bypassed these to get as deep as possible into Russian territory. They could then surprise and ambush the meagre Russian reinforcements in the area. The second echelon of Ukrainian troops handled remaining Russian forces near the border.

After some logistical problems Russian reinforcements from the rest of the Kursk region is now to a large extent at the front or preparing to deploy. This has stabilised the front and no major changes will occur for some days. But the frontline might fluctuate a little the coming days. Both sides have probably 10 000 men each on the front, but RuAF will still have an air advantage.
 
Usiwaamini Warusi hata kidogo, waongo sana.
 
Post

See new posts
Conversation
Mikael Valtersson
@MikaelValterss1
ANALYSIS: KURSK OFFENSIVE PART 2, AUG 10th 2024
A new front is bad news for Ukraine, but UkrAF did the best they could in a bad situation and chose the time and place of the new front. As a bonus they got good media in the West and spread some doubts among prorussians.

I have already talked about what has happened and how this happened in a previous tweet. In this analysis we will look at Ukrainian goals, future developments and consequences for the war.

Why did UkrAF attack?
Ukraine awaited a Russian offensive in the Sumy area. The partial demining of the border area was a clear sign of this. But RuAF lack of forces near the border gave UkrAF an opportunity to act. Some say that it would have been better to send Ukrainian units to the hard pressed Ukrainian fronts in the south instead of using the units at the Kursk front. But Ukraine had limited opportunities to choose, since they already had to keep forces in the Sumy area to stop an expected Russian offensive. By attacking first, when they were offered an opportunity, they could choose the time and place when they had to meet the RuAF. A bonus was that at least the initial phase of the Sumy battle would be fought on Russian soil.

As extra bonuses, Ukraine could get a PR victory by invading Russia, bolstering Ukrainian morale and maybe sow doubt among Russian public opinion. Something akin to the result of the Tet offensive in Vietnam in 1968.

Some analysts have said that this is a good way to force a hard decision on the Russian leadership. Shall Russia withdraw volunteer forces from the Eastern front or use badly motivated conscripts at the Kursk front. I believe this to be a non existent question. RuAF has volunteer units enough in the Kursk and Belgorod regions and in the central reserve. Besides that, Russian conscripts and the Russian population are probably very willing to let the conscripts fight if the Motherland is invaded.

Other reasons for the Ukrainian offensive are allegedly to take territory, or even the Kursk NPP, to use as a bargaining chip. This is also unlikely, since Russia probably will double down to retake the lost territories. Ukraine can be content if it takes 2-3 months for Russia to reclaim the area.

What will happen now?
Both sides will move troops to the Kursk front. Ukraine has already moved some forces from the Kharkov front and more will be moved. Russia will do the same, so large scale fighting on the Kharkov front might stop for the time being. UkrAF will have much less reserves to send than RuAF. This means that over time Russian superiority in resources will grow in the area. To offset this Ukraine might take a chance the upcoming week and try to expand their foothold a bit before Russia can strengthen their frontlines. The drawback is that Ukraine might lose a lot of valuable soldiers and weaponry if they fail. Play safe and dig defences or gamble?

What will long term consequences be?
UkrAF are already hard pressed along the entire frontline and another frontline will increase the pressure on Ukrainian resources. A saving factor for Ukraine is that they already had too many resources around Kharkov. They are better used in the Sumy area than around Kharkov. But best of all for Ukraine would have been if they could have withdrawn half of the forces in the North, i.e.around 40 000 men, and strengthen the failing Ukrainian defence lines in the South.

We will probably see a hard attritional battle in the Sumy/Kursk regions for a number of months. At the same time Ukrainian lines will crumble in the South. The opening of fighting at the Sumy/Kursk frontline, has probably doomed the Southwestern part of Donetsk region, including the city of Pokrovsk.

RuAF has 600K men at the frontline in Ukraine, against 400K in the UkrAF. In a worst case scenario for Ukraine, Russia might start using conscript forces in the war. We might soon see 800K Russians against 400K Ukrainians at the front.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…