Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe

Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe

Mungu ashakuambia yeye Hana mwanzo Wala mwisho ila nashangaa nyinyi mnaitetea hyo natural power halaf et mnasema imetokea kwa bahati mbaya tu coz hakuna vithibitisho vya muendelezo wa hiyo natural power

Mm sifuati dini ila ninaamini mungu yupo na huyo ndiye aliyetuumba
Mungu amejileta wapi?
 
Kifo kimethibitishwa kibaioloji, kifizikia na kisayansi.

Zaidi, ni utimilifu wa second law of thermodynamics.

Sitarajii nitakufa siku moja.

Najua nitakufa siku moja.

Kufa ni jambo lililothibitishwa, si jambo la imani.

Wewe umethibitisha Mungu yupo?
Daahh shikamoo

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe
By Brandon Specktor, Senior Writer | October 17, 2018 04:23pm ET

Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe

In a new book that was published posthumously, Stephen Hawking, who died in March, wrote that it is impossible for God to exist in our universe.


From his desk at Cambridge University and beyond, Stephen Hawking sent his mind spiraling into the deepest depths of black holes, radiating across the endless cosmos and swirling back billions of years to witness time's first breath. He viewed creation as a scientist, and when he was called to discuss creation's biggest puzzles — Where do we come from? What is our purpose? Are we alone? — he answered as a scientist, often to the chagrin of religious critics.

In Stephen Hawking's final book "Brief Answers to Big Questions," published Tuesday (Oct. 16) by Bantam Books, the professor begins a series of 10 intergalactic essays by addressing life's oldest and most religiously fraught question of all: Is there a God? [Big Bang to Civilization: 10 Amazing Origin Events]

Hawking's answer — compiled from decades of prior interviews, essays and speeches with the help of his family, colleagues and the Steven Hawking Estate — should come as no surprise to readers who have followed his work, er, religiously.

  • aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzEwMi8yMTYvb3JpZ2luYWwvc3RlcGhlbi1oYXdraW5nLU9ORS1USU1FLVVTRS5qcGc=
Credit: Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images


"I think the universe was spontaneously created out of nothing, according to the laws of science," Hawking, who died in March, wrote. "If you accept, as I do, that the laws of nature are fixed, then it doesn't take long to ask: What role is there for God?"
In life, Hawking was a vocal champion of the Big Bang theory — the idea that the universe began by exploding suddenly out of an ultradense singularity smaller than an atom. From this speck emerged all the matter, energy and empty space that the universe would ever contain, and all that raw material evolved into the cosmos we perceive today by following a strict set of scientific laws. To Hawking and many like-minded scientists, the combined laws of gravity, relativity, quantum physics and a few other rules could explain everything that ever happened or ever will happen in our known universe.
"If you like, you can say the laws are the work of God, but that is more a definition of God than a proof of his existence," Hawking wrote.

With the universe running on a scientifically guided autopilot, the only role for an all-powerful deity might be setting the initial conditions of the universe so that those laws could take shape — a divine creator who caused the Big Bang to bang, then stepped back to behold His work.

"Did God create the quantum laws that allowed the Big Bang to occur?" Hawking wrote. "I have no desire to offend anyone of faith, but I think science has a more compelling explanation than a divine creator."
Hawking's explanation begins with quantum mechanics, which explains how subatomic particles behave. In quantum studies, it's common to see subatomic particles like protons and electrons seemingly appear out of nowhere, stick around for a while and then disappear again to a completely different location. Because the universe was once the size of a subatomic particle itself, it's plausible that it behaved similarly during the Big Bang, Hawking wrote.
"The universe itself, in all its mind-boggling vastness and complexity, could simply have popped into existence without violating the known laws of nature," he wrote.

That still doesn't explain away the possibility that God created that proton-size singularity, then flipped the quantum- mechanical switch that allowed it to pop. But Hawking says science has an explanation here, too. To illustrate, he points to the physics of black holes — collapsed stars that are so dense, nothing, including light, can escape their pull.
Black holes, like the universe before the Big Bang, condense into a singularity. In this ultra-packed point of mass, gravity is so strong that it distorts time as well as light and space. Simply put, in the depths of a black hole, time does not exist.

Because the universe also began as a singularity, time itself could not have existed before the Big Bang. Hawking's answer, then, to what happened before the Big Bang is, "there was no time before the Big Bang."

"We have finally found something that doesn’t have a cause, because there was no time for a cause to exist in," Hawking wrote. "For me this means that there is no possibility of a creator, because there is no time for a creator to have existed in."

This argument will do little to persuade theistic believers, but that was never Hawking's intent. As a scientist with a near-religious devotion to understanding the cosmos, Hawking sought to "know the mind of God" by learning everything he could about the self-sufficient universe around us. While his view of the universe might render a divine creator and the laws of nature incompatible, it still leaves ample space for faith, hope, wonder and, especially, gratitude.

"We have this one life to appreciate the grand design of the universe," Hawking concludes the first chapter of his final book, "and for that I am extremely grateful."
Originally published on Live Science.

cc James Comey

God is Magic
No science can prove the existence of magic.
No scientist can confirm the existence of God.
To him God is Impossible
That’s why God = Magic means is having the power to make impossible things happen.
What God did is impossible for human mind to comprehend . it is beyond human comprehension.
He could never have the mind of the creator, not even close. To God Stephen Hawking is still a tabula rasa.

However, "The Big Bang theory — the idea that the universe began by exploding suddenly out of an ultradense singularity smaller than an atom. "
Where did that “ultradense singularity smaller than an atom. " came from?

Will that "Big Bang" happen again?
If no, why not?


He said, "I think the universe was spontaneously created out of nothing, according to the laws of science,"

So he was thinking
Think = to believe that something is true,that a particular situation exists,that something will happen, etc: according to Merriam Webster Dictionary. So, he is still a believer like other religious believers.

If "universe was spontaneously created out of nothing"

Then, what is "an ultradense singularity smaller than an atom?"
How can nothing create something? Isn't that magic?

According to Merriam Webster Dictionary, the word nothing`
means empty space/ not anything.
 
Three things here;
1. With a high degree
2. With a low degree
3. With the lowest degree

1.IT person who create a system
2.A system user
3.A system

The "1" can create "3" and give restricted access to "2"
Once 2 become fully conversant with 3, it may reach a level that 2 things he has mastered 3. But remember 1 had given 2 a restricted access, meaning 2 literary knows 3 narrowly in the area it has access.

Think of God as 1 and a man as 2 and universe as 3
Thanks
 
God is Magic
No science can prove the existence of magic.
No scientist can confirm the existence of God.
To him God is Impossible
That’s why God = Magic means is having the power to make impossible things happen.
What God did is impossible for human mind to comprehend . it is beyond human comprehension.
He could never have the mind of the creator, not even close. To God Stephen Hawking is still a tabula rasa.

However, "The Big Bang theory — the idea that the universe began by exploding suddenly out of an ultradense singularity smaller than an atom. "
Where did that “ultradense singularity smaller than an atom. " came from?

Will that "Big Bang" happen again?
If no, why not?


He said, "I think the universe was spontaneously created out of nothing, according to the laws of science,"

So he was thinking
Think = to believe that something is true,that a particular situation exists,that something will happen, etc: according to Merriam Webster Dictionary. So, he is still a believer like other religious believers.

If "universe was spontaneously created out of nothing"

Then, what is "an ultradense singularity smaller than an atom?"
How can nothing create something? Isn't that magic?

According to Merriam Webster Dictionary, the word nothing`
means empty space/ not anything.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
To illustrate, he points to the physics of black holes — collapsed stars that are so dense, nothing, including light, can escape their pull.

This was his attempt to describe the Infinite process by a finite example. Does it make sense to you?

"I think the universe was spontaneously created out of nothing, according to the laws of science,"

Nothing is evolved unless it is involved. Nothing manifests in the effect unless it is in the cause.

In logical reasoning, the word “I think” is more or less an expression of someone opinions

That means those were Hawking's opinions
 
Well said Alisina,
Hawkins does not KNOW the difference between NOTHING AND ZERO.
FOR ME TO ACCEPT THE BIG BANG THEORY, FIRST I MUST BE GIVEN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ZERO AND NOTHING.
OR A DEFINITION OF A SUB ATOM.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Hawking ni mmoja kati ya maRole Model wangu, Ila hapo kwenye God Does Not Exist, siko pamoja naye.

Uwepo wa Mungu unathibitishwa na vitu vidogo sana na kama ukivitilia maanani.

Angalia.
Unategemea nini kwa mtu ambaye tangu azaliwe hakuwahi kuwa mtu wa kuhudhuria ibada, hakuwahi kuwa mtu wa kujihusisha na mambo ya Mungu?

Imani yoyote ile hupaliliwa, humwagiliwa, hutiwa mbolea ili ikue.

Na kwa hoja tu za kisomi, kila mtu anaweza kutetea imani yake., Ila ukweli utakapodhihirika kuwa MUNGU yupo, huna budi kutupilia mbali hoja zozote hata ziwe nzuri namna gani!

BTW, naona kuna watu wanaishi kwa kuiga misimamo ya wengine kisa tu watu hao wana nafasi fulani katika jamii - jambo ambalo halina afya.
 
Hawking ni mmoja kati ya maRole Model wangu, Ila hapo kwenye God Does Not Exist, siko pamoja naye.

Uwepo wa Mungu unathibitishwa na vitu vidogo sana na kama ukivitilia maanani.

Angalia.
Unategemea nini kwa mtu ambaye tangu azaliwe hakuwahi kuwa mtu wa kuhudhuria ibada, hakuwahi kuwa mtu wa kujihusisha na mambo ya Mungu?

Imani yoyote ile hupaliliwa, humwagiliwa, hutiwa mbolea ili ikue.

Na kwa hoja tu za kisomi, kila mtu anaweza kutetea imani yake., Ila ukweli utakapodhihirika kuwa MUNGU yupo, huna budi kutupilia mbali hoja zozote hata ziwe nzuri namna gani!

BTW, naona kuna watu wanaishi kwa kuiga misimamo ya wengine kisa tu watu hao wana nafasi fulani katika jamii - jambo ambalo halina afya.

Mkuu watu wanataka kujua asili ya huu ulimwengu. Vitabu vya dini havijaeleza kinagaubaka, watu hawajaridhishwa na maelezo yaliyomo kwenye hivi vitabu, ndo mana inatokea watu wanahoji Kama kuna Mungu?
 
Mkuu watu wanataka kujua asili ya huu ulimwengu. Vitabu vya dini havijaeleza kinagaubaka, watu hawajaridhishwa na maelezo yaliyomo kwenye hivi vitabu, ndo mana inatokea watu wanahoji Kama kuna Mungu?

Unajua Mkuu, unaweza ukawa unataka kujua asili ya ulimwengu halafu ukatafuta taarifa kwenye vyanzo visivyo sahihi!

Mwanadamu mwenzako, aliyezaliwa na mwanamke, anawezaje kukwambia eti Asili ya ulimwengu ni hivi na vile, na hapo anatumia uwezo wake wa kufikiri na majaribio kadhaa ya kisayansi.

Kama Sayansi ina uwezo wake kutuambia asili ya ulimwengu na vyote vilivyomo, mbona haiwezi kuumba uhai?

Namaanisha mbona Sayansi haijaweza kuumba kiumbe chochote kilicho hai, hata jani tu, achilia mbali uwezo wa kuendeleza uhai (life span?)

Nimesema Mungu anathibitishwa na vitu vidogo vidogo sana.
 
Unajua Mkuu, unaweza ukawa unataka kujua asili ya ulimwengu halafu ukatafuta taarifa kwenye vyanzo visivyo sahihi!

Mwanadamu mwenzako, aliyezaliwa na mwanamke, anawezaje kukwambia eti Asili ya ulimwengu ni hivi na vile, na hapo anatumia uwezo wake wa kufikiri na majaribio kadhaa ya kisayansi.

Kama Sayansi ina uwezo wake kutuambia asili ya ulimwengu na vyote vilivyomo, mbona haiwezi kuumba uhai?

Namaanisha mbona Sayansi haijaweza kuumba kiumbe chochote kilicho hai, hata jani tu, achilia mbali uwezo wa kuendeleza uhai (life span?)

Nimesema Mungu anathibitishwa na vitu vidogo vidogo sana.

Lakini mkuu hata hizi taarifa za uwepo wa ni binadam ndo ametuletea
.....
 
Lakini mkuu hata hizi taarifa za uwepo wa ni binadam ndo ametuletea
.....
Binadamu wametuletea ndio, Lakini kwa mfumo upi?

Wameyatoa vichwani mwao?

Mimi nita-base kwenye Biblia sababu ndio Kitabu nachokifahamu vyema.

Wafu wamefufuliwa, viwete wakatembea, wenye magonjwa wakapona, japo kwa wakati huu hayo mambo ni nadra ila hayo hayakupi dondoo?

Utasema ni hadithi za kutungwa, vipi tusiamini kuwa na ya akina Aristotle na Socrates na wengineo ni hadithi za kutungwa?
 
Binadamu wametuletea ndio, Lakini kwa mfumo upi?

Wameyatoa vichwani mwao?

Mimi nita-base kwenye Biblia sababu ndio Kitabu nachokifahamu vyema.

Wafu wamefufuliwa, viwete wakatembea, wenye magonjwa wakapona, japo kwa wakati huu hayo mambo ni nadra ila hayo hayakupi dondoo?

Utasema ni hadithi za kutungwa, vipi tusiamini kuwa na ya akina Aristotle na Socrates na wengineo ni hadithi za kutungwa?

Mkuu Kama wewe ni msomaji wa biblia na vitabu vingine vilivyo nje ya biblia, utagundua kwamba hadithi za kwenye biblia ni za kutunga.
......
 
Back
Top Bottom