You can be polite and still make your point across; just saying.
On the subject of corruption.
I do not disagree that poverty could be one of the indicators or consequences of corruption. What I disagree with you is the premise that corruption equals poverty and vice versa. That would imply that rich countries are not corrupt or do not have corrupt people. Quite the contrary, a lot of countries that are also very rich have been associated with corruption, very grand corruption in fact. The difference is the type of corruption and where the loot goes.
I am not being an idiot by challenging your oversimplification in equating poverty to corruption.