Im thrilled by your well thought contributions
and your in future responses try to cover everything and Please DONT SIDESTEP MY QUESTIONS
..without wasting time, lets get the show on the road
.
Here you go again lumping me with CCM. I already told you that I am not emotionally attached to any political party. If a party messes up I criticize, if they do well I praise. Please let us not go there again. We have already discussed this. For you to rehash this argument (lumping me with CCM) here makes me question your attention span.
CCM may be marred in corruption but at least it is internally stable at the moment. CDM was stable. But CDM inside UKAWA is weakened and UKAWA is a powder vessel waiting to explode. I wanted to vote for CDM remember? But not in its current form.
According to your current stance, you are no longer sitting on the fence
.youve already uncloaked yourself just like me and youve dug in your heels with CCM (whose candidate you support)
.
When they say good stuffs about CCM (the party whose candidate you currently support) you are proud as a peacock, when the page is turned, you dont want it
.that is purely uncivilized and unethical
.
I know that youre trying to keep up the appearance for CCM, but lets not forget there is internal strife in the clunky CCM, though that often get concealed
.and thats why I said, it is easy to point fingers outwards than inwards
..
According to your hypothesis of replacement with viable opposition, CCM should still continuously rule despite their failure to deliver on their preceding promises???
YES or NO..If the answer is
YES, why do parties campaign
?? If the answer is
NO, why shouldnt we punish underperformance
??
Between Group
(A) and
(B) below, which one is will bring development to the people
??? A or B
Group A: Group of uncorrupt individuals in unison at this point and agreeing to disagree.
Group B: Group of corrupt persons working in tandem arrangement.
By the way, with regards to the explosion thing, you are chasing your own tail with the fear-mongering technique youve adopted
.try to have someone to take that bee out of your bonnet before it stings you
.
5 years is nothing if the alternative (UKAWA) will wreck this country from its core. You will not worry about traffic jams, drugs in hospitals,poverty, and any of these things if people are killing each other in the streets because the ruling elites in UKAWA are fighting in the ensuing power struggle that I predict will happen if UKAWA wins.
Don't lecture me about what is good for my people. Unlike others, the majority of my family members are very poor and are in dire need of an immediate relief. They are the ones in mind when I say I am scared of UKAWA . What I need in this country is change BUT change with stability. Honestly, I don't see stability with the current UKAWA.
When you dont see it, it doesnt mean it is not there
.instead it means your ability to see is limited by your imaginations and the dogmas that have been fed to you
.
Assuming UKAWA emerged extemporaneously as a macabre union is completely ridiculous
.it is a clear indication though that CCM and its supporters are appearing a moribund stage with all these rhetoric
These are attempts to enervate and frustrate UKAWA efforts, as it is now apparent that the union is a CCMs nemesis
..I hope everyone with an average intelligence will gingerly take all those allegations with a pinch of salt
.
Again I reiterate, the Libya, Egypt, Tunisia scaremongering examples are typical worn out dogmas that have consumed us for far too long
..They dont have a place now, they shouldnt have a place ever
..
What do you have to say say about Escrow, Richmond, Meremeta, Mwananchi Gold, Import Commodity Support (CIS), EPA, ANBEN, Simba Trust, Kinanas Ivory business, Magufulis Fake ferry boat and Kebbys Hotel, Selling of government residential houses, Ridhiwanis illegal drug business etc.
???Do you mean we shouldnt worry about these
??? YES or NO.If the answer is
YES, how can the government expenditure help fulfil the promises in campaigns
??, if the answer is
NO, why should we put back a corrupt system
??
Me, myself and I came up with these concerns. Are you now calling me a backroom boy? The Swahilis have a saying that goes like this: Akutukanaye hakuchagulii tusi. Really, Sir? Have we dragged ourselves to this dark alley now?
It is not you who is the backroom boy, but it is you who take in what backroom boys tell you
.BTW backroom boy is not an epithet
I repeat, NARC was similarly formed with remarkable celerity in the aftermath of the Kenyan constitutional referendum, they ended up winning the election of 2002 and ousting and annihilating KANU and bringing progress not disasters to the Kenyan people. Does your theory of quickly formed unions creating disasters holds here
???? YES or NO...If
YES, how
??..If
NO, why
??
Ooooh! It looks like I have touched a raw nerve here. Now I know for sure you are an UKAWA insider. Good. Please tell me, if you wish:
- Have you discussed modalities for power sharing between parties after elections?
- Do you care to share this detailed power sharing plan with us mere mortals?
I am not mocking you sir but these are my real concerns with UKAWA. I had already relented to Lowasa but later UKAWA derailed me. You will be doing many undecided people a great favor if you could answer the two simple questions.
UKAWA finished their negotiations months ago by
99%
that is remarkable and it counters your theory of unviable opposition.
TRUE or FALSE. If the answer is
TRUE, scrap that theory, if the answer is
FALSE, what is the strength of
1% over
99%??
This election is about us, not you and truly not me
.However you want the nuts and bolts with a power sharing plan beforehand, you say it concerns you
I will tell you that it is not necessary, it is not a concern for MAJORITY of both undecided and decided voters
.
History tells us, that is has never been
..
APC (Nigeria) didnt disclose their power sharing structure any time before the election
.
NARC (Kenya) didnt do it
the point Im making is that, it neither cost an election victory nor create a
disaster.
Please sir, if you wish to discuss ideas I will be here for you. These ad hominem (personal) attacks (...you should tell CCM...) against me are really beneath you.
Forming an alliance of multiple opposition parties and creating an entity that can act as a political unit takes more than a few months. If you are happy with the current UKAWA internal structure then so be it. Remember I told you here and now, if UKAWA wins this election then take a front row seat and observe the rupture of our dear nation called Tanzania.
As I said in my first response
disguised neutrality doesnt guarantee eschewal of CCMs downsides
.
Youve tarred UKAWA with the same brush and people like me are going to be here to counter those narratives
.
Using fantasies as a litmus test in this election is repugnant
.I gave you an anecdote in
BLUE about preliminary APC challenges
.I am putting it again so you dont ignore it
{The resolution to form APC (ruling party) in Nigeria was signed by Tom Ikimi, the who represented the ACN; Annie Okonkwo on behalf of the APGA; , Mallam Ibrahim Shekarau, the Chairman of ANPP's Merger Committee; and Garba Shehu, the Chairman of CPC's Merger Committee. Surprisingly, less than 2 years before the party's historic victory in the 2015 elections, TOP LEADERS Annie Okonkwo, Tom Ikimi and Ibrahim Shekarau resigned from the party and joined the PDP}
Does your theory of unviable opposition hold in this case
?? YES or NO..if the answer is
YES, tell me the disasters in Nigeria, if the answer is
NO, your theory is unfounded
.
You are not cooking UKAWAs goose here, you know that, they are full-fledged to take over the keys
and Im going to be here to try to make sure you can wrap your brain around that
.
Whereas I am inquisitive, I am not a gossipy person as you suggest I should be (a quidnunc). I asked you a simple question. Tell me how was CCM responsible for Slaa and Lipumba's departure. Remember, and this the God's truth, I am not a CCM insider. I observe and decide.
I said unequivocally that Slaa and Lipumba are gone like a shadow
there is a whole host of stuffs regarding their controversial resignations and your lack of information shouldnt be an excuse to try to get people back to the drawing board
.
I encourage you to keep your fingers on the pulse with regards to election issues in Tanzania so that you can make informed analysis in your future comments
..
Quite a mouthful here and thanks for the details.
I will respond to your last paragraph. Magufuli promising to establish a special corruption court is nonsense. The current courts and laws are adequate. It is just that the laws were not implemented. Now, the courts will not prosecute past presidents because of their immunity. They can prosecute anyone else BUT this will not happen under Magufuli's presidency. That is why I wanted CDM to take the helm until you guys came and bungled the whole shtick (performance) with UKAWA.
Youve swallowed your own pride
cons of being neutral, when you are sold on stuffs like this you crawl back to giving CDM credit and swiftly drop the green balls you were holding
..that is a cut under your feet
.bucking leaders of the party you support but not having the audacity to buck the system that breeds them is a red herring
..
Thanks, I am in the know.
However, know this: In political research (polling), opinions are transient (they change). They change with time, people's moods and information fed to them. That is why mass media advertisements play major role in campaigning up to the time of polling.
The independent company you outsourced this project to did their work and were paid good for them. However currently, the results given to you are irrelevant, and maybe false. They didn't anticipate CCM's response.
Next time you guys hire this firm, or any other firm for that matter, ask them to use a GAME THEORETIC APPROACH in their analysis.
I teach two, whole semester each, courses in GAME THEORY. They are welcome to sit in.
I noted the following:
RED: Nobody said the research was not a continuous process
..however research studies are not done daily, an adequate time has to be allocated, and the results can be of use for a very long period of time
..
BLUE: How can you tell that with certainty?
GOLD: There were more than one organization given the task
and research companies have their own methodologies
.If you are intending to question the research work why dont you doubt the whole research rather than just part of it (data analysis)
..Data analysis is not the only element in research that can render a study wrong.....
TURQUOISE: That is irrelevant information
..