3ZOV
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 6,259
- 7,015
Mapovu kama yote
Mapovu kama yoteIje kwenu kivipi? Nani awaletee?
Wabongo bana kila kitu mnadhani baraka kutoka Mawinguni au mnadhani wenzenu ni viumbe wa kipekee.
nyie kunawashinda kipi hapo, Si na nyie muwe mnaweka risiti kwa ajili ya kumbukumbu za malipo halafu mkizinguliwa muwe mnaenda Mahakamani kudai?
Hilo nalo mnataka Waganda wawaleteeni msaada??
CherehaniWanasomeshaga wa nn
Huku Bongo demu nwanachuo mmoja anasomeshwa na wanaume wanne na wote wanachangia gharama za ada, matumizi, na mahitaji mbalimbali halafu hawajuani wamepangwa kiufundi zaidi kila mmoja anaamini kwamba anasomesha mke mtarajiwaHii ikifanyika bongo wanawake matapeli wengi watalia
Mimi naonelea kama mke ni mama wa nyumbani na hamna house girl/boy basi mali ni pasu kwa pasu ila kama wapo wafanyakazi mali itakua kwa 'asilimia' kadhaa, na kama mke ana kazi na amechangia matumizi nyumbani basi mali ni pasu kwa pasu, na kama mke ana kazi na hachangii chochote basi ataondoka na vitu vyake alivyonunua tuu., au mwaonaje wadauHata kwetu hapa Sheria Iko hivyo. Ila shida Huwa inatokea sehemu mbili tofauti.
Wanandoa kushindwa kutoa ushahidi wanamna kilammoja alivyochangia kuipata Ile Mali ya wanandoa. Pia mitazamo ya watoa maamuzi. Kuna wanaosema huduma za nyumbani zinachangia kupata Mali na Kuna wanaopinga, hapa inategemea aliyesokiliza kesi Yako.
Sent from my TECNO KG5j using JamiiForums mobile app
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]Cherehani
Haya wale mnaosomesha wachumba mjitahidi kutunza risiti zenu ili mtuondolee usumbufu humu wa kutuomba ushauri mkishatendwa...Mahakama imemtaka Mwanamke mmoja wa Kanungu kulipa kiasi hicho cha fedha ikijumlisha fedha iliyotumika kumlipia ada ya masomo ya Stashahada pamoja na faini ya usumbufu na uchungu wa kisaikolojia alioupata mshitaki.
Richard Tumwine na Fortunate Kyarikunda wote ni Walimu walianzisha uhusiano wa kimapenzi Mwaka 2015 na Mwaka 2018 walifikia makubaliano ya kufunga ndoa lakini baadaye Fortunate akakataa mpango huo.
Moja ya ushahidi uliotolewa Mahakamani ni vielelezo vya malipo kutoka kwa Richard kwenda kwa Fortunate, ambapo pia Mahakama imemtaka Mwanmake huyo kulipa gharama za kisheria alizotumia Tumwine katika kuendesha kesi yake.
=========
Ugandan woman to pay fiancé $2,700 for failed marriage promise
A court has ordered a woman in Kanungu, Uganda to pay her former fiancé more than Ush10 million ($2,700) as compensation for breach of a promise to marry him.
Court records show that Richard Tumwine and Fortunate Kyarikunda, both teachers, started their relationship in 2015, and that they later entered a marriage agreement in 2018.
The court also heard that Tumwine, a teacher, financially supported Kyarikunda including sponsoring her for a diploma in law at the Law Development Centre where he spent more than USh9.4 million ($2,500).
Kanungu Grade One Magistrate Asanasio Mukobi held that since Kyarikunda did not fulfil the promise to marry, then Tumwine is entitled to re-imbursement of his USh9.4 million spent on her.
Mr Mukobi also ordered Kyarikunda to pay USh1 million ($271) to Tumwine as general damages for inconveniences and psychological anguish suffered.
The magistrate also ordered Kyarikunda to pay legal costs incurred by Tumwine in prosecuting his case.
“I note from the exhibit that several mobile money transfer transactions from the plaintiff’s cell phone in names of Richard Tumwine to the defendant’s cell phone in names of Fortunate Kyarikunda,” the magistrate observed.
The magistrate added: “From the exhibit, it is indicated as a budget for introduction for Fortunate Kyarikunda’s parents’ home and several items worth USh5 million ($1358) are indicated on the list and the comments of the defendant appreciating the budget and requesting for more financial support to enable her go to Rubanda is clearly indicated.”
During the hearing of the case, Tumwine told the court that the introduction ceremony was slated for February 2022 but it did not take place and there was no justifiable reason given.
Excuse
The court heard that Kyarikunda came up with an excuse that her parents have stated that their daughter should not get married to an older man, referring to Tumwine.
But the court held: “This is equally unreasonable, a misrepresentation and a fraud. In any case, the defendant had all the opportunity to reject the plaintiff’s love requests at the earliest point possible and avoid interfering with his financial obligations.”
The court observed that the two people were engaged in a love relationship and that from the exhibits presented, arrangements for an introduction ceremony were made.
“The defendant (Kyorikunda) suggested that it takes place in February 2022 and the said date passed despite the plaintiff’s preparations for the introduction. The excuse the defendant gave was that she could not get married to an old man, the plaintiff, as if she did not see young men during their over four years [of] courtship,” the magistrate said.
Source: theeastafrican
+++++++++++++
Court orders woman to pay Shs10m for breach of marriage promise
Court has ordered a woman in Kanungu District to pay her former fiancé more than Shs10 million as compensation for breach of the promise to marry him.
Court records show that Richard Tumwine and Fortunate Kyarikunda, both teachers started their love relationship in 2015 and that the duo later entered a promise to marry agreement in 2018.
The court also heard that Tumwine, a teacher at Kiringa Primary School, financially supported Kyarikunda- including sponsoring her for a diploma in law at the Law Development Center (LDC) where he spent more than Shs9.4 million.
Kanungu Grade One Magistrate Asanasio Mukobi held that since the promise to marry was not fulfilled by Kyarikunda to the detriment of Tumwine, then he is entitled to re-imbursement of his Shs9.4 million spent on her.
Mr Mukobi also ordered Kyarikunda to pay Shs1milllion to Tumwine as general damages for inconveniences and psychological anguish suffered.
The magistrate further ruled that Kyarikunda pays legal costs incurred by Tumwine in prosecution of his case.
“I note, from the exhibit, several mobile money transfer transactions from the plaintiff’s cell phone in names of Richard Tumwine to the defendant’s cell phone in names of Fortunate Kyarikunda,” the magistrate observed.
The magistrate added: “From the exhibit, it is indicated as a budget for introduction for Fortunate Kyarikunda’s parents home and several items worth Shs5million are indicated on the list and the comments of the defendant appreciating the budget and requesting for more financial support to enable her go to Rubanda is clearly indicated.”
At hearing of the case, Tumwine told court that the introduction ceremony was slated for February 2022 but it did not take place with no justifiable reason given.
The court heard that Kyarikunda came up with an excuse that her parents have stated that their daughter should not get married to an older man referring to Tumwine.
But the court held: “This is equally unreasonable, a misrepresentation and a fraud. In any case, the defendant had all the opportunity to reject the plaintiff’s love requests at the earliest point possible and avoid interfering with his financial obligations.”
The court observed that the two people were engaged in a love relationship and that from the exhibits presented, arrangements for an introduction ceremony were made.
"The defendant (Kyarikunda) suggested that it takes place in February 2022 and the said date passed despite the plaintiff’s preparations for the introduction. The excuse the defendant gave was that she could not get married to an old man, the plaintiff, as if she did not see young men during there over four years courtship,” the magistrate ruled.
But Uganda's former ethics minister and prominent women's rights activist Miria Matembe slammed the "one-sided" verdict.
It was "a classic case of how the judicial systems are tilted in favour of men," she said.
Source: Monitor
Hii safi! matapeli wanyoshwe tu.Mahakama imemtaka Mwanamke mmoja wa Kanungu kulipa kiasi hicho cha fedha ikijumlisha fedha iliyotumika kumlipia ada ya masomo ya Stashahada pamoja na faini ya usumbufu na uchungu wa kisaikolojia alioupata mshitaki.
Richard Tumwine na Fortunate Kyarikunda wote ni Walimu walianzisha uhusiano wa kimapenzi Mwaka 2015 na Mwaka 2018 walifikia makubaliano ya kufunga ndoa lakini baadaye Fortunate akakataa mpango huo.
Moja ya ushahidi uliotolewa Mahakamani ni vielelezo vya malipo kutoka kwa Richard kwenda kwa Fortunate, ambapo pia Mahakama imemtaka Mwanmake huyo kulipa gharama za kisheria alizotumia Tumwine katika kuendesha kesi yake.
=========
Ugandan woman to pay fiancé $2,700 for failed marriage promise
A court has ordered a woman in Kanungu, Uganda to pay her former fiancé more than Ush10 million ($2,700) as compensation for breach of a promise to marry him.
Court records show that Richard Tumwine and Fortunate Kyarikunda, both teachers, started their relationship in 2015, and that they later entered a marriage agreement in 2018.
The court also heard that Tumwine, a teacher, financially supported Kyarikunda including sponsoring her for a diploma in law at the Law Development Centre where he spent more than USh9.4 million ($2,500).
Kanungu Grade One Magistrate Asanasio Mukobi held that since Kyarikunda did not fulfil the promise to marry, then Tumwine is entitled to re-imbursement of his USh9.4 million spent on her.
Mr Mukobi also ordered Kyarikunda to pay USh1 million ($271) to Tumwine as general damages for inconveniences and psychological anguish suffered.
The magistrate also ordered Kyarikunda to pay legal costs incurred by Tumwine in prosecuting his case.
“I note from the exhibit that several mobile money transfer transactions from the plaintiff’s cell phone in names of Richard Tumwine to the defendant’s cell phone in names of Fortunate Kyarikunda,” the magistrate observed.
The magistrate added: “From the exhibit, it is indicated as a budget for introduction for Fortunate Kyarikunda’s parents’ home and several items worth USh5 million ($1358) are indicated on the list and the comments of the defendant appreciating the budget and requesting for more financial support to enable her go to Rubanda is clearly indicated.”
During the hearing of the case, Tumwine told the court that the introduction ceremony was slated for February 2022 but it did not take place and there was no justifiable reason given.
Excuse
The court heard that Kyarikunda came up with an excuse that her parents have stated that their daughter should not get married to an older man, referring to Tumwine.
But the court held: “This is equally unreasonable, a misrepresentation and a fraud. In any case, the defendant had all the opportunity to reject the plaintiff’s love requests at the earliest point possible and avoid interfering with his financial obligations.”
The court observed that the two people were engaged in a love relationship and that from the exhibits presented, arrangements for an introduction ceremony were made.
“The defendant (Kyorikunda) suggested that it takes place in February 2022 and the said date passed despite the plaintiff’s preparations for the introduction. The excuse the defendant gave was that she could not get married to an old man, the plaintiff, as if she did not see young men during their over four years [of] courtship,” the magistrate said.
Source: theeastafrican
+++++++++++++
Court orders woman to pay Shs10m for breach of marriage promise
Court has ordered a woman in Kanungu District to pay her former fiancé more than Shs10 million as compensation for breach of the promise to marry him.
Court records show that Richard Tumwine and Fortunate Kyarikunda, both teachers started their love relationship in 2015 and that the duo later entered a promise to marry agreement in 2018.
The court also heard that Tumwine, a teacher at Kiringa Primary School, financially supported Kyarikunda- including sponsoring her for a diploma in law at the Law Development Center (LDC) where he spent more than Shs9.4 million.
Kanungu Grade One Magistrate Asanasio Mukobi held that since the promise to marry was not fulfilled by Kyarikunda to the detriment of Tumwine, then he is entitled to re-imbursement of his Shs9.4 million spent on her.
Mr Mukobi also ordered Kyarikunda to pay Shs1milllion to Tumwine as general damages for inconveniences and psychological anguish suffered.
The magistrate further ruled that Kyarikunda pays legal costs incurred by Tumwine in prosecution of his case.
“I note, from the exhibit, several mobile money transfer transactions from the plaintiff’s cell phone in names of Richard Tumwine to the defendant’s cell phone in names of Fortunate Kyarikunda,” the magistrate observed.
The magistrate added: “From the exhibit, it is indicated as a budget for introduction for Fortunate Kyarikunda’s parents home and several items worth Shs5million are indicated on the list and the comments of the defendant appreciating the budget and requesting for more financial support to enable her go to Rubanda is clearly indicated.”
At hearing of the case, Tumwine told court that the introduction ceremony was slated for February 2022 but it did not take place with no justifiable reason given.
The court heard that Kyarikunda came up with an excuse that her parents have stated that their daughter should not get married to an older man referring to Tumwine.
But the court held: “This is equally unreasonable, a misrepresentation and a fraud. In any case, the defendant had all the opportunity to reject the plaintiff’s love requests at the earliest point possible and avoid interfering with his financial obligations.”
The court observed that the two people were engaged in a love relationship and that from the exhibits presented, arrangements for an introduction ceremony were made.
"The defendant (Kyarikunda) suggested that it takes place in February 2022 and the said date passed despite the plaintiff’s preparations for the introduction. The excuse the defendant gave was that she could not get married to an old man, the plaintiff, as if she did not see young men during there over four years courtship,” the magistrate ruled.
But Uganda's former ethics minister and prominent women's rights activist Miria Matembe slammed the "one-sided" verdict.
It was "a classic case of how the judicial systems are tilted in favour of men," she said.
Source: Monitor
Hata bongo mbona ipo iyo.Kenya wamefanya kweli
Sheria imebadilishwa, hakuna paso tena kwenye talaka
Mwanamke kama hajawekeza kitu anaondoka na sufuria lake tu View attachment 2498473
Kwani bongo uchumba unatambulika na serikali? Maana Uganda unatanmbulika.Mkuu hata bongo inawezekana. Ukimchumbia binti, chochote ulichompa katika uchumba na ambacho kilikuwa Kama moja wapo ya vitu ulivyofanya kwake kwa ahadi kuwa yeye ataolewa na wewe. Ikitokea akageuka kuwa hataki kuolewa na wewe anatakiwa avirudishe. That's is the law!