Hawezi kukuelewa.... but in quantum mechanics... electron can exist in various points at the same time.
I have been thinking a lot about quantum mechanics, particularly this question. I have yet another quantum mechanics book - "The Quantum Story: A History in 40 Minutes"- to finish before the end of the year just to understand it better. If you have a worthy title please do recommend.
If God has any hope in my heart, it will not come from the Bible, the Dhamapada, the Tripitaka, The Quran, The Tibetan Book of The Dead, The Egyptian Book of The Dead, The Bhagavad Gita, The Upanishads - all of which I have read from cover to cover and dismissed. God in the context of an omniscient, omnipotent and omni benevolent godhead- . God will have to come from Quantum Physics or its derivative Grand Unifying Theory -in a sense that transcends unifying Relativity and Quantum Physics and ventures into unifying God and Science in a way that will make us understand God's mind as per the closing sentences of Professor Stephen Hawking in "A Brief History of Time: From The Big Bang To Black Holes". The last bastion of restoring this confidence is Science, even as one needs faith to pursue science.
Your succinct post shows you are learned. At least to the extent of knowing that we are still challenged by logical contradictions in science. But it does not show that these challenges are inherent or simply due to the poverty of our minds.
I respect learned people. I respect anybody who dare to discuss quantum mechanics.
From Heisenberg, particularly the Uncertainty Principle, what I have gathered is that it is not so much that electrons and similar particles can be -some say must be- at more than one position at any particular time, as it is that we do not have the capacity to accurately measure both the position x and momentum p of a particle.
In other words, it is quite possible that the particles have definite position, we just do not have precise enough tools to measure both the particles' position and momentum at the same time.
On that note, I have observed that even in the much simpler question of optics, we cannot focus on the foreground and background.
I read some 7 years ago, and this needs scholarly verification, that the Uncertainty Principle was not caused by some inadequacy in our measurement or tools, that it was an inherrent fact of our universe.
That could very well vindicate contradiction.
But to quote Albert Einstein, "God does not play dice".
A probabilistic universe in which uncertainty sits at the base, quite part from vindicating a godhead by way of allowing contradiction, would actually prove further that God does not exist and the entire charade is a product of things that are infinitely more comolex than the entire God idea.
Maybe God needs a God. His God needs a God. His God's God need a God, ad infinitum, ad nausea.
In a way that the word and idea of God is reduced to a very small wheel in an almost infinite machine.
I haven't even touched on "spooky action at a distance" also known "Quantum Entanglement", which would make two distinct electrons act as one.
How do you say one electron can be at two different places if you cant even show that one electron cannot act like two electrons with the same characteristics at two different places?
See
NIST Team Proves 'Spooky Action at a Distance' is Really Real
CC
Kikwajuni One The Transporter always am a Winner UHURU JR impongo