Prove huo uongo " in tunkum sadiqeen"
Hao waliohadithia kuhusu aisha ndio Hao Hao wamekuadithia kuwa msile nguruwe
na wakaotwa Sahih, nimekuambia weka source zako za 18 years old tusome hahaha huna ushahidi na umaogopa
Vipi Mtume wako mudy kwenda kwa mke wa zayd mkwewe kisha akasex nae then akasema Allah alipuliza upepo pazia Zaynab akiwa hana nguo za ndani akapata nyege kisha akaja kumuona mke wa mwanae Zayd hahaha
Quran 33:37
Nimeisha kuambia wewe Kenge Qur'an na Mtume pia wanazikataa hadithi ambazo hazikubaliani na Qur'an sa wewe unatulazimisha tuzikubali hizo hadithi au huyo Bukhairi wapi alimsikia Aisha akisema hayo aliolewa ana miaka 6 uthibitisha wake upo wapi? Alikuwa na nani time Aisha kamwambia alikuwa ana umri wa miaka 6 hahaha.
Mimi nakupa jibu ndani ya Qur'an kwamba hadithi hata Mtume Muhammad alisema wasiziamini hata kama yeye kaziongea kwanini jiulize hapo.
Je, Qur'an inakataza au kuruhusu ‘ndoa za utotoni’? Je, ridhaa ya mwanamke ni muhimu kwa mkataba halali wa ndoa?
Qur'an ndio kamilifu. Hadith ini za ukweli kiasi ambazo zinakubaliana na Qur'an
(Sura Haqqah: 51)
Mwenyezi Mungu anasema katika Qur'an kuwa ni ufafanuzi wa MAMBO YOTE (16:89). Hili halijasemwa kuhusu Hadithi. Qur'an ina UKWELI WOTE lakini Hadithi hazikuwahi kuitwa kuwa ni za Kweli kabisa.
Hadithi ni za kweli baada ya mchakato unaostahiki wa uhakika na hata baada ya mchakato huo, hauwezi kufikia kiwango cha Qur'an. Hili linathibitishwa na Qur'an. Hili hata linathibitishwa na Hadithi zenyewe.
We know very well how the Prophet Muhammad forbade and prohibited the recording of hadith along with the Qur'an.
“Do not write anything from me; whoever has written anything from me other than the Qur’an, let him erase it..”
(Narrated by Muslim, al-Zuhd wa’l-Raqaa’iq, 5326)
Kwa nini alisema hivyo? Fikiri vizuri Kama alifikiri Qur'an na Hadithi viko sawa kwa nini atakataza uandishi wa Hadith wakati Qur'an ilikuwa unafanyika. Jibu ni rahisi sana ni kwa sababu alijua kwamba Qur'an imekingwa kabisa na uwongo wowote. Wakati Hadithi utaingizwa uwongo Kwa hiyo Qur'an ni tofouti na hadithi.
And that is why the Hadith collections were compiled some 200 years after the Prophet. Whereas the Qur'an was compiled BY THE PROPHET HIMSELF see the difference.
Katika sheria ndani ya desturi ya Kislamu
Kwa wazi tunaweza kuona kwamba kuna daraja katika elimu ya Kiislamu ambayo imeanzishwa kwanza na Qur'an yenyewe na hata kwa kauli za Mtume pamoja na Maswahaba.
Hata na prove kwamba Aisha hakuolewa kutokana na hadithi za uhakika sii unazo ogota wewe. Wewe unadhani na sisi hatuwezi kucopy hadithi za kweli ambazo ukizitama zinaenda kabisa na Qur'an sio hadithi zako.
As Dr. Mawlana Fazlur Rahman Ansari Al-Qadri explains in his Quranic Foundations:
“…the Qur’an is absolutely authentic, while even the best Hadith literature is only relatively authentic — namely, authentic only in a qualified manner. And, of course, every student of Islam knows all the mischief in the field of Hadith perpetrated by the forces of counter-revolution in the very early period of Muslim history, — a mischief which emerged in the form of sects and schisms, and which forged the Traditions relating to certain aspects of Islamic life and history to an extent that the confusion created thereby has continued to plague the Muslim society up to the present day.
In conclusion, it is the function of the Qur’an to sit in judgment on the Hadith, and not vice versa; thus, a basic study of Islam in the perspective of the Qur’an emerges as the fundamental necessity…”
(Quranic Foundations and Structure of Muslim Society, Vol 1, pxxviii)
INTERNALIZE THIS:
BECAUSE THE QURAN IS WAY HIGHER IN AUTHORITY AND AUTHENTICITY AS COMPARED TO THE HADITH. IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE QURAN TO SIT IN JUDGMENT OF THE HADITH. MEANING THE QURAN WILL INFORM US WHICH HADITH IS CORRECT AND WHICH IS NOT. IT IS NOT THE PURPOSE OR PLACE OF THE HADITH TO SIT IN JUDGMENT OF THE QURAN. THE HADITH DOES NOT ENJOY THAT HIGHER STATUS ABOVE THE QURAN. NOTHING IS ABOVE THE QURAN.
Now keeping all of this in mind what is the methodology to study any subject within Islam? Are Islamic texts like novels? Are all Islamic texts on the same level of veracity and authority? NO !
Methodology to understand any subject within Islam
Step 1: Go straight to the Quran first. Not the Hadith.
When we need to study a subject, first we have to understand it from the lens of the Quran. WHEN YOU SEE A SCHOLAR GO TO A HADITH DIRECTLY WITHOUT CONSULTING THE QURAN. YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS PERSON HAS NO CLUE ABOUT ISLAM.
It is utter disrespect towards the Quran if you bypass the Quran and go straight to the hadith to understand a subject. It is even more disrespectful, if you go to biological surveys or data on a subject, before consulting the Quranic take on an Islamic matter.
Step 2: Don’t take the Quran out of context. Read the Quran AS A WHOLE, NOT IN PARTS.
You cannot take an ayat of the Quran in isolation from the rest of the Quran. You have to build a ‘system of meaning’ by collecting all of the ayaat that talk about the particular subject and then only can you understand the subject correctly.[1] And isn’t that true for all books? You cannot take any line in a book in isolation from the rest of the text. You have to consider the context. But in the Quran you have to consider the entire Quran as a holistic organism where one part of it explains and complements the other. Allah Most High says the Quran is like the night sky. For a traveler to get the right direction, he has to consider all the star positions and their relations with each other. Otherwise, he will never be able to find his way. [2]
Step 3: Go to the Hadith now.
Only after establishing the correct view from the Quran can you now move to the Hadith. Only after building the ‘System of Meaning’ with regards a subject can you now move to the Hadith. It is utter ignorance and disrespect towards the Quran when you find scholars consulting the Hadith first and giving it more importance than the Quran. The Quran is the direct Speech and Attribute of Allah. How can you even think of ignoring that and still call your self a student of Islam?
Step 4: Collect all the Hadith that fit the System of Meaning derived from the Quran.
Lastly, we need to collect all the Hadith that fit and complement the meanings and conclusions that were derived from the Quran. THE PURPOSE OF THE HADITH IS NOT TO SIT IN JUDGMENT OF THE QURAN. The Quran because of being the Absolute Truth can sit in judgement over the Hadith. So most of the time we find the Hadith complementing and explaining the Quran. But sometimes (very rarely) we find a Hadith that conflicts with the Quran. What to do in that situation? What if the Hadith has entered into a Sahih Collection? In such a situation we take the guidance of the Quran and the Prophet and we side with the Quran and not with the Hadith because the Quran sits in judgment over the Hadith. The Hadith cannot sit in judgment over the Quran and overrule or override the Quranic narrative. That is disrespecting the Speech of Allah.
Now let’s move on to a classic example of this conflict between a Hadith and the Quran.
Understanding Sayyidah Aisha (ra)’s age through the Quran
If we want to study the subject of marriage (Nikah) in Islam, we need to take the right methodology. Let’s go to the Quran first. Collect all the ayaat that talk about marriage and build the ‘System of Meaning’. You will be compelled to see that WHENEVER THE QURAN MENTIONS MARRIAGE (NIKAH) IT ALWAYS RELATES IT WITH NISA (WOMEN). NEVER WITH CHILDREN (ATFAL). And we know that the Prophet (saw) was the Quran personified. He would never go against the Quran. So when we find the Hadith that says that the Prophet married Aisha (ra) when she was a 9-year-old CHILD, THAT HADITH IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE QURAN.
All of these ayaat talk about marriage. And all of these ayaat imply marriage is to be done with women (females who have attained puberty) Meaning females who have:
1. Started their menstrual cycles
2. Developed natural feelings of attraction towards the opposite gender
3. Most importantly developed their free will and consent.
A child neither feels any sexual attraction nor has a matured free will to consent to something.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Press enter or click to view image in full size
So clearly we can see the Quran does NOT define marriage as a union between a man and a child. It defines marriage or nikah to be a union between a mature man and a mature woman. Lets take one of these ayaat:
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Translation: And do not marry WOMEN (NISA) that your fathers married, unless it be a thing of the past; surely that is indecent and hateful; an evil way. (4: 22)
So child marriage is out of the question according to the Quran. Whenever Nikah is mentioned it is always mentioned with Nisa (women) never with children.
The Qur’an states:
وَابْتَلُوا الْيَتَامَىٰ حَتَّىٰ إِذَا بَلَغُوا النِّكَاحَ فَإِنْ آنَسْتُمْ مِنْهُمْ رُشْدًا فَادْفَعُوا إِلَيْهِمْ أَمْوَالَهُمْ
And test the orphans maturity until they reach “marriageable age”. Then if you perceive in them sound judgment, release their property to them… (Qurān 4:6)
The consensus on what constitutes ‘marriageable age’ is post puberty.
The laughable argument about early menstruation in arid Medieval Arabia
Now there are some who would get absurd data on biological and evolutionary variations and Pew Research from the US to somehow prop this Hadith up and place it over the Quran by trying to prove that Aisha (ra) had reached puberty at 9 years. It shouldn’t be difficult to see how this is nothing short of disregarding the Quran when they use bizarre and irrelevant data about so called isolated cases of “variations” in menstruation to take a solitary hadith to refute and overrule the Quran. Then why do they have issues when Muslim Homosexuals use bizarre scientific “data and statistics” to prove how Homosexuality is genetic, natural and a product of Evolution? And therefore, reconcilable with the Quran?
For those of us who still have some common sense and understand that the Quran is the supreme authority in Islam, we know that a 6 year old or a 9 year old is a child. A 9 year old is not a woman. By every consideration of climatic conditions, cultural impact or evolutionary dynamics, historically and presently 9 year olds have always been children.
If you want to think that somehow girls had early menstruation at the age of 9 in the Medieval Arabia, that is a figment of your imagination. And we are not entitled to take your imaginations and conjecture (dhan) over irrefutable arguments from the Book of Allah.
What is a woman according to the Quran?
The Quran doesnt even leave it to us to define what a woman is. The Quran defines a woman for us. Read this ayat:
Quran 2:223
“Your wives are a ‘tilth’ for you….” (2:223)
Notice again the word used again is NISA ie women.
What is tilth? Cultivated land, the state of aggregation of a soil especially in relation to its ‘suitability for crop growth’. Meaning just like tillage has a potential for the growth of crops, your wives have potentiality and suitability for bearing your children. Can a child have a child? No. Only women who have undergone a biological change after menstruation have the ‘potential’ of bearing life. A child doesn’t have that capability or potential.
The woman’s consent is critical for a valid marriage
Why was child marriage so common in all pre-modern cultures? Primarily because women had no honor in society. They were treated like cattle. Their consent wasn’t deemed important, let alone necessary for a marriage to be conducted. ISLAM CAME TO CHANGE THAT.
