Who created God? Who made him? Where did he come from?

Who created God? Who made him? Where did he come from?

he created by him self.

GOD is above the 'need to be created!'
For the 'need to be created' is part of properties of 'CREATURES!'
So to ask for God's creator is to redefine God as a creature and that God ceases to be God but a god!
 
Thibitisha uumbaji wake

Tunaishi kwenye ulimwengu ambamo maisha yanaendana na mda, hadi dunia ina mwanzo kutokana na kwamba ina umri. Lakini Mungu ndiye aliumba Muda , kuishi kwake hakutegemei Muda wala Kuumbwa kwa sababu alikuwepo kabla ya Muda. Vitu vyote vilivyo ndani ya Muda ameviumba na vina mwisho.
 
Tunaishi kwenye ulimwengu ambamo maisha yanaendana na mda, hadi dunia ina mwanzo kutokana na kwamba ina umri. Lakini Mungu ndiye aliumba Muda , kuishi kwake hakutegemei Muda wala Kuumbwa kwa sababu alikuwepo kabla ya Muda. Vitu vyote vilivyo ndani ya Muda ameviumba na vina mwisho.

Je kama vitu/viumbe vina muda wa kuwepo,je Mungu ni KITU,KIUMBE,NAFSI,DHAHANIA,FIKRA,WAZO,NGUVU ama lah,tuanzie hapo kwanza.Na kumbuka ukisema kila kitu kina mwanzo,basi lazima mungu wako pia awe na mwanzo.
 
Je kama vitu/viumbe vina muda wa kuwepo,je Mungu ni KITU,KIUMBE,NAFSI,DHAHANIA,FIKRA,WAZO,NGUVU ama lah,tuanzie hapo kwanza.Na kumbuka ukisema kila kitu kina mwanzo,basi lazima mungu wako pia awe na mwanzo.

Kitu chochote kilichoumbwa ndani ya Mda kina mwanzo na Mwisho, Mungu hayupo ndani ya mda , yeye aliumba muda alivoanza kuumba ulimwengu! Kwa kila jambo tunalofanya duniani linakwenda na Muda , Ila yeye alikuako kabla ya Muda kwa hiyo hapimwi kwa muda , Na alikuwapo kabla ya Mwanzo . Mungu ni Roho iliyo Hai.
 
The universe is the way it is ,
whether we like
it or not. The existence or nonexistence of
a creator is independent
of our desires . A world without God or
purpose may seem harsh
or pointless, but that alone doesn ' t
require God to actually exist.
 
Mungu hachunguziki. Ukuu wake ni mkubwa mno kiasi cha kwamba akili zetu hazina uwezo wa kumchunguza. Tumshukuru kwa kutuumba kwa jinsi ya ajabu.

kama hachunguziki kwa hiyo hajulikani na umekili kwa akili zetu za kibinadam hatuwez sasa ww umetumia akili gani kumjua hadi kujua kwamba amekuumba?
 
Kitu chochote kilichoumbwa ndani ya Mda kina mwanzo na Mwisho, Mungu hayupo ndani ya mda , yeye aliumba muda alivoanza kuumba ulimwengu! Kwa kila jambo tunalofanya duniani linakwenda na Muda , Ila yeye alikuako kabla ya Muda kwa hiyo hapimwi kwa muda , Na alikuwapo kabla ya Mwanzo . Mungu ni Roho iliyo Hai.

weather ni kabla ya muda or whatever jaribu kutuambia chanzo chake au kuna uwezekano kitu kikatokea tu bila chanzo?
 
weather ni kabla ya muda or whatever jaribu kutuambia chanzo chake au kuna uwezekano kitu kikatokea tu bila chanzo?

Kabla ya Muda kuna chanzo gani tena wakati chanzo kinapimwa kwa muda?
 
kama hachunguziki kwa hiyo hajulikani na umekili kwa akili zetu za kibinadam hatuwez sasa ww umetumia akili gani kumjua hadi kujua kwamba amekuumba?

kwasababu amesema yeye,na pili mwenye hekima hujua njia
 
God exist by the necessity of his
own nature, and deriving from himself all moral
and intellectual perfection.
 
You cannot say that human beings did not come from "nothing" and then claim that your god came from "nothing."
 
  • God, as creator of time, is outside of time. Since therefore He has no beginning in time, He has always existed, so doesn't need a cause.
The Bible informs us that time is a dimension that God created, into which man was subjected. It even tells us that one day time will no longer exist. That will be called "eternity." God Himself dwells outside of the dimension He created (2 Timothy 1:9, Titus 1:2). He dwells in eternity and is not subject to time. God spoke history before it came into being. He can move through time as a man flips through a history book.
 
  • God, as creator of time, is outside of time. Since therefore He has no beginning in time, He has always existed, so doesn't need a cause.
The Bible informs us that time is a dimension that God created, into which man was subjected. It even tells us that one day time will no longer exist. That will be called “eternity.” God Himself dwells outside of the dimension He created (2 Timothy 1:9, Titus 1:2). He dwells in eternity and is not subject to time. God spoke history before it came into being. He can move through time as a man flips through a history book.

Prove that God exists !
 
Simply:

  • Creation of the universe in a defined order, designed of earth and the solar system is a remarkable evidence.
  • Initiate life to all living organisms.

What?,only that can prove his Existence ?,,then truly he doesn't exist !,take this

Many believers will say, "It is impossible for
you to prove that God (Allah, Ra, Vishnu,
whatever) does not exist. There is no way to
prove that something does not exist." This is
a silly argument for the following reason.
Imagine that we have a conversation one day
and I say to you, "I believe in the
gerflagenflopple. You cannot prove that the
gerflagenflopple does not exist, therefore it
exists." You can see that this is ridiculous.
Just because I have invented something out of
thin air does not mean that its non-existence
is suddenly unprovable. There has to be some
evidence that the gerflagenflopple exists in
order to assert its existence. Since there is
not, it is quite easy to say that the
gerflagenflopple is imaginary.
Now let's imagine that we have a
conversation one day and I say to you, "I
believe in Leprechauns. You cannot prove that
Leprechauns do not exist, therefore they
exist." You actually have heard of
Leprechauns. There are lots of books, movies
and fairy tales dealing with Leprechauns.
People talk about Leprechauns all the time.
Leprechauns even have a popular brand of
breakfast cereal. But that does not mean that
Leprechauns exist. There is no physical
evidence for the existence of Leprechauns. Not
a single bit. Therefore, it is obvious to any
normal person that Leprechauns are
imaginary.
If you think about it, you will realize that there
is no difference between God and Leprechauns.
Lots of people talk about God as though he
exists, but there is no actual evidence for
God's existence. For example:
God has never left any physical evidence of
his existence on earth.
All historical gods were imaginary and we
know it. (see this page )
None of Jesus' "miracles" left any physical
evidence either. (see this page )
God has never spoken to modern man, for
example by taking over all the television
stations and broadcasting a rational
message to everyone.
The resurrected Jesus has never appeared
to anyone. (see this page )
The Bible we have is provably incorrect and
is obviously the work of primitive men
rather than God. (see this page )
When we analyze prayer with statistics, we
find no evidence that God is "answering
prayers." (see this page )
Huge, amazing atrocities like the Holocaust
and AIDS occur without any response from
God.
And so on…
There is absolutely no evidence indicating that
God exists. There is a tremendous amount of
empirical evidence that God does not exist.
Therefore we can conclusively say that God is
imaginary. That is the only thing that a
rational person can say.
Another angle
Here is a second way to look at the same
question.
With every other object and phenomenon in
our experience, we use the scientific method to
determine whether it exists or not. For
example, X rays are invisible, but we know
that they exist. We can devise scientific
experiments to prove that they exist. Then,
once proven to exist, X-rays can be used
predictably in all sorts of beneficial ways.
If you would like to hypothesize that God
exists, then you should say to yourself, "Let's
devise a repeatable scientific experiment to
provide evidence that God exists." Every
experiment we devise demonstrates, yet again,
that God is imaginary.
Isn't it odd that God, unlike everything else in
our universe, has been put into a special
category? When we talk about God, we are
supposed to do so "philosophically." Why?
Why not treat God just like all other objects
and devise experiments to detect his presence
or absence?
The classic religious response is, "God must
remain hidden . If he proved his existence, that
would take away faith." This is clever -- here
we have an object named God that proves its
existence by completely hiding its existence.
Of course, in the real world, any object that
provides no evidence for its existence is
classified as imaginary.
Even more interesting, this object called God,
which is supposedly hiding its existence
completely, is in the meantime supposedly
writing books, answering prayers and
incarnating itself. How can that be? This
obvious contradiction shows how imaginary
God is. When we look at prayer scientifically,
we find that "answered prayers" are actually
nothing but coincidences . When we look at the
Bible scientifically, ethically or rationally, we
find that the Bible is wrong . When we look at
all of Jesus' miracles scientifically, we find
that none of them left behind any scientific or
historical evidence. Nor, for that matter, did
Jesus, nor did Jesus' resurrection . Strangely,
not a single historical source independent of
the Bible ever mentions the resurrection.
The reason why we can find no empirical
evidence for God's existence is not because
"God is a magical being completely able to
hide from us." It is because God is imaginary.
 
Back
Top Bottom