Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are keen in knowing how Tanzanian elections are rigged pay attention to the pleadings and the evidence being hotly argued in our High Courts: Polling supervisors are always under immense duress to announce rigged results in favour of the ruling party regardless of position contested.

In a specific case of TANDAHIMBA, the presidential results were rigged in the constituent forms, and NEC announced rigged results until they were shamed by web transparency.

In most other constituency presidential, parliament and division electoral results were deprived of transparency and now we have a leadership which we are not sure it truly capture the will of the voters cast in ballot box.
 

1. Gossips and speculations are just that; they shouldn't be repackaged and offered as evidence in support of anything! Is this the first time CCM ha lost an election case? Better yet, how did the loss of the two parliamentary seats in question differ from the loss of each and every parliamentary seat that the opposition coalition won in the 2015 election and the responsible DED was not sacked?

2. As a matter of fact, NEC officials and deputies thereof are currently presidential appointees, directly or indirectly, and so are DEDs. That said, how would a returning officer who isn't a DED enhance the NEC's ability to conduct a free and fair election?
 


You still are in the dark no wonder you dismiss serious matters as gossips and speculations.

Decisions in a courtroom never encroach on NEC powers of determining electoral winners based on election law. Having this hindsight you were dead wrong to deduce ccm two election losses as a result of court decisions.

More paramount, the TANDAHIMBA case study cited was presidential outcome unrelated to the constituency election dispute now decided by the High Court. So as I have indicated early a little humility than presuming knowhow which you lack could have deeply mitigated your hopeless situation.

That returning officer was victimized for doing her job. Had her court deposition favoured CCM she would have kept her job. Her reappointment confirmed beyond reasonable doubt was meritorious until the cat came out of the bag: She is opposition sympathizer!


If you were conversant with my early assertions NEC reforms require parliamentary vetting after equal opportunity is afforded to all qualified candidates interested to fill vacancies there. The NEC apex be formed by stakeholders which include political parties, NGOs among others.

There will be presidential appointments after parliamentary vetting and the appointees afforded with security of tenure available to the High Court judges. Just before the commencement of the last election, the then president Kikwete hazardously changed the composition of the commissioners of NEC in a manner which impute an exertion to rig the election. Security of tenure will not only castrate an overzealous president from interfering with the integrity of election but also will assure commissioners they are above political intrigues and manipulations let alone intimidation of reprisals while serving there

NEC should employee its own staff like in Kenya and cease from outsourcing the local government as its election implementing agent.

The rest of your comments are highly misconceived of the meaningful reforms demanded and required at NEC.
 

This is rather a bunch of malarkey, fraught with internal inconsistencies and a lack of directional consistency! Unless and until you free yourself from the partisanship yoke, your ability to make an impartial and objective analysis will remain severely constrained and, therefore, of little or no relevance.

Mbilinyi was not the first, and won't be the last, DED to declare an opposition political candidate victorious, nor was she the first DED to testify in an election case, effectively defending her own decision to declare the opposition candidate a winner. Each and every DED who declares one political candidate victorious over another (or others) is a potential defendant in an election case. There's no reasonable cause to believe that a DED would testify against her own decision, whether good or bad!

Because of your inability to see the forest for the trees, you previously argued that NEC wouldn't be able to conduct a free and fair election unless it severed its functional relationship with the local government machinery, as though NEC itself were outside the presidential span of control. After realizing that your prescription was really a sham, you're now cunningly moving away from it in a desperate move to come up with a plausible prescription!

You won't move me to respond to this kind of moving target again!
 
Please when will you begin to back your postulations with facts and anecdotes? The rest of your contributions are irrelevant in that discourse. In fact since independence no presidential appointee got the sack in less than two days after being appointed because of the ccm hostile evidence!

I am throwing a gauntlet at you to refute this averment with concrete facts. Please save me from misplaced conjurations of yours!
 
One thing I know: CCM biggest threat to its quest of perpetual stay in power ironically is the Magufuli administration ironclad lockdown against the opposition.

Most voters are asking themselves whether illegal suspension of some parts of the constitution like multiparty democracy will enhance or weaken the rule of law which is a key ingredient for equity development.

Without checks and balances well enshrined in our constitution the lofty objects of sustainable development now being volubly brandished by the rulers of the day are unachievable!
 
Development paradigm which is centred on people has a minimum of four characters namely:-

1) Multiparty democracy

2) Accountability

3) Interactive dialogue or participation, and,

4) Transparency

Anybody who claims we need to trust him to lead us to the Promised Land has either no inkling of what meaningful development is or he is simply selfish and consequently unfit to lead.
 


After this arrest, Tundu Lissu has garnered more than 82 million hits.
He is really getting the kick thanks to his tormentors
 
You sound like a well rehersed songbird! What do you mean by poverty line if your govt. refuses to ratify ILO minimum wage standards? If patients who need emergency surgery at the biggest hospital in the country have to wait in cue for weeks?
It's not a matter of statistics, GDP, and the rest. The fact is that: There are no jobs for millions of young people and their numbers are swelling every year! To make matters worse many of them are semi literate, have none of the skills required by foreign capital investment. You can't feed them words and promises of hope.
However, if you revamp the mineral exploitation agreements to make sure Tz gets its fare share of the proceeds thereof you wouldn't have to keep increasing taxes on everything, and incomes of your poor, miserable workforce, killing the goose that's laying your golden egg.
 

Magufuli is now the weakest president of all time because he fears the opposition to the extent of trampling their constitutional rights under multiparty imperatives.

A weakened leader banishes rivals in a forlorn hope his weaknesses can be cloaked under the carpet.

A strong leader nurtures his rivals to strengthening himself from critical acclaims.
 
It is too surreal to see our inchoate democracy is backsliding because of a very weak, low self-esteem and incompetent leadership on a precipice of ceding power to the opposition.

The only way they can stay in power is either electoral rigging and/ or a clampdown on multiparty democracy.
 
From gentler police with a caring eye to serve its people to a brutal force maiming, killing and arraigning its people. Gratuitous force seem now to be the enduring cliché to our police force.

What is the difference between a colonial force and ours beats me! One thing the two forces share are their unwavering commitment to protect, defend and marshal the rulers of the day.

"Polisi jamii" remains misunderstood and completely work not even started let alone "work in progress" .

The way we recruit and promote members of the police force do not involve its main clientele which is us no wonder they never serve us but those who determine their pay cheque!

Genuine reforms to our police will begin in earnest when the recruitment and promotion of its members involve US and not THEM alone!
 

Is someone sane reading and understanding this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…