Charles Darwin 3rd Degree MM aliefanikiwa kuupotosha ulimwengu kwa Illuminati agenda

Defeated [emoji817] [emoji818]
 

Nikisema sijui majibu ya maswali yote hayo, kutokujua huko kunathibitisha kuwepo kwa Mungu?
 
Defeated [emoji817] [emoji818]

Kama unatafuta ligi unaweza kuona niko defeated.

Kama unatafuta kuelewa, kutafuta nani kawa defeated kwenyewe ni kuwa defeated.

Ukweli unabaki kuwa hilo swali halieleweki. Sasa mtu anayeuliza swali lisiloeleweka sijui anam defeat nani na kivipi.
 
Kumbe tumeanzia mbali hivyo!!! Kiroboto???[emoji15] [emoji15]
 
Sifa Za ALLAH(SUBHANAH WA'TAALA).
1.Hajazaa
2.Hajazaliwa
3.Hakuna anaefananae hata mmoja.
4.Yeye peke ndo anastahiki kuabidiwa.
5.Halali(usingizi) wala hasinzii
6.Hanywi,hali chochote kile
@@@@Sifa zote ni za ALLAH@@@
 
Kweli imekuwaje hakuna samaki tena wanaobadilika saivi na kuwa kiboko au tembo au nyau au mwewe au nyani na hakuna nyani anayebadilika na kuwa mwanadamu nini kimekuwepo zamani saivi hakipo???

Kiranga tunataka majibu tafadhali.
The change is so gradual that you cannot notice in a single life time. And anyway kuna evidences nyingi kama fossils record, embrology, comperative biochemistry

NWO is just a conspiracy theory there is no such a thing
 
Mambo ya evolution....bado kabisa sijashawishika nayo.
Evolution, and science in general, has a lot to cover.

I certainly do not profess to be an expert. There is a lot I am learning myself.

So I am not one of those people who would endorse science religiously. That is an oxymoron.

Having said that, on a scale of 'ridiculousness to soundness", evolution is much more plausible than creation by this omniscient, omnipotent, Omni benevolent godhead.

For starters it does not- to my knowledge- have unresolved fundamental contradictions that plague this Godhead.
 
Having said that, on a scale of 'ridiculousness to soundness", evolution is much more plausible than creation by this omniscient, omnipotent, Omni benevolent godhead.

Couldn't agree with you more on that one!

Creationism is laughable.
 
Couldn't agree with you more on that one!

Creationism is laughable.
I am comfortable with a theory not having all the answers right now, as long as it is converging towards an answer in a coherent, testable, predictable, logical and margin of error reducing way.

The god idea does none of that.

The thing with science deniers is they want science to be a replacement for their fantasy of a God.

Science does not work like that.

The moment science cannot explain the beginning of life or the universe, they take that as a confirmation that God exists.

They are like "You see, you don't know the answer, it must be God".

It is like someone asking you "What is the exact number of the square root of two to the billionth degree?

And you saying "I don't know the answer to that"

And him saying "You see, you don't know, it must be 10.000 all the way, because you do not know the answer"

I am like dude, how do you get that perfect ten? Can you show me the math?

The fact that I do not know the exact square root of 2 does not mean I will not know a certain type of wrong answer when I see it. For starters, I know that the answer cannot be bigger than 2. The square root of a number cannot be bigger than the number itself.

The fact that I do not know the way the universe began does not mean that if you tell me it was started by Jomo Kenyatta, the first president of Kenya, I should just accept that, just because I do not know the right answer.
 
bacteria anabadirika kuwa aaina nyingine ya bacteria na hata DNA zao zinabadirika ili wakabiriane na mazingira,sasa kwanini hizo bacteria au virus hazibadiriki hata ziwe panya?uyo darwin ni kiazi mbatata na wewe unaekubaliana nae ni kiazi ccm
 
bacteria anabadirika kuwa aaina nyingine ya bacteria na hata DNA zao zinabadirika ili wakabiriane na mazingira,sasa kwanini hizo bacteria au virus hazibadiriki hata ziwe panya?uyo darwin ni kiazi mbatata na wewe unaekubaliana nae ni kiazi ccm
Kuna kitu kinaitwa CENTRAL DOGMA OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY(CDMB): kwenye hiyo CDMB kuna DNA, RNA na PROTEIN.Kazi ya DNA ni kutengeneza RNA na kuiwekea formular ya kutengeneza PROTEIN, na kazi ya RNA ni kutengeneza PROTEIN.Kazi ya PROTEIN ni kutengeneza phenotypic features yaani physical body parts of an organism.Kama mazingira yatasababisha mfumo wa DNA ubadilike, ina maana mfumo wa RNA ni lazima utabadilika na mwishowe shape ya PROTEIN lazima itabadilika.Haya mabadiliko yatasababisha phenotypic changes zitokee.Kwa hiyo viumbe wawili wa jamii moja, wanaweza kuwa tofauti kama watawekwa kwenye mazingira tofauti na kuathiriwa nayo.Nia ya Bacteria kubadilika siyo awe kama panya bali aweze kuadapt kwenye mazingira yaliyobadilika.Sasa kama unakubali kuwa kuna mabadiliko ya DNA, yanayoleta mabadiliko ya RNA ambayo yatasababisha mabadiliko ya PROTEIN,...na mabadiliko ya PROTEIN yatasababisha Phenotypic changes yaani kiumbe kuonekana tofauti na jamii ya mwanzo, je wewe huungi mkono Evolution?


Je unaamini hii kitu:

ORIGINAL ORGANISM--->DNA CHANGES--->RNA CHANGES--->PROTEIN CHANGES--->PHENOTYPIC CHANGES--->NEW ORGANISM?
 
Naomba nikupatie hii link utapata majibu sahihi. Pia utajifunza kuwa kila mada inayozungumzia mutation lazima ikiambie umuhimu wake kudhibitisha evolution ifanyavyo kazi na DNA

DNA and Mutations

Mutation and Evolution
Mutation yenyewe ni DELETERIOUS, Inasababisha aging, cancer na Infectious deseases. Mutation haiboreshi kiumbe wala kusababisha kiumbe kipya kinachojitegemea. Na hakuna kipya kinachoongezeka badala kupungua kwa kilichokuwepo.
uthibitisho wa evolution kwa kupitia mutation ni outdated version of current scientific findings. Na kama ingekuwa hivyo viumbe wasingekuwepo.

Darwinists claim we evolved from the simplest form of bacterial life to ever more complex forms of life. The most basic bacteria had less than 500 genes; man has over 22 thousand. In order for bacteria to evolve into man, organisms would have to be able to add genes. But there is no genetic mechanism that adds a gene. (Mutations change an existing gene but never add a gene.) This means there is no mechanism for Darwinian Evolution and this is a fatal flaw in the Theory of Evolution.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…