Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

😂😂😂
IMG_20241229_130809.jpg
 
The Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) projects in Kenya and Tanzania are significant infrastructural developments in East Africa, each with distinct characteristics in terms of cost, length, and operational specifics.

Kenya's SGR:

Phases and Costs:

Phase 1: The Mombasa to Nairobi line spans approximately 472 kilometers and was constructed at a cost of $3.6 billion.

Phase 2A: Extending from Nairobi to Naivasha, this segment covers about 120 kilometers and had an estimated cost of $1.5 billion.


Cost per Kilometer:

Phase 1: Approximately $7.63 million per kilometer.

Phase 2A: About $12.5 million per kilometer.


Operational Details:

Kenya's SGR utilizes diesel-powered locomotives.

The design accommodates double-stacked shipping containers, enhancing cargo capacity.



Tanzania's SGR:

Phases and Costs:

Dar es Salaam to Morogoro: This segment covers 300 kilometers and was constructed at a cost of $1.2 billion.

Overall Project: The entire SGR project in Tanzania is planned to span approximately 2,102 kilometers, with an estimated total cost of $10.04 billion.


Cost per Kilometer:

Dar es Salaam to Morogoro segment: Approximately $4 million per kilometer.

Overall project: About $4.78 million per kilometer.


Operational Details:

Tanzania's SGR is designed to be electrified, which is generally more cost-intensive but offers benefits such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and potentially lower long-term operational costs.



Comparison:

Cost Efficiency: On a per-kilometer basis, Tanzania's SGR appears to be more cost-effective, especially considering its electrified nature, which typically incurs higher initial expenses. In contrast, Kenya's SGR has faced scrutiny for its higher costs, with some reports indicating it is among the most expensive railway projects globally on a per-kilometer basis.

Operational Scope: Kenya's SGR currently operates between Mombasa and Naivasha, totaling approximately 592 kilometers. Tanzania's project, upon completion, aims to cover over 2,100 kilometers, extending its reach to neighboring countries like Rwanda, Burundi, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, thereby enhancing regional connectivity.

Technological Considerations: The choice between diesel and electric systems reflects differing strategic priorities. Electric railways, like Tanzania's, offer environmental benefits and can be more efficient in the long term, while diesel systems, as used in Kenya, may have lower initial infrastructure costs but higher fuel expenses and environmental impacts over time.


In summary, while both nations have invested heavily in modern railway infrastructure to boost economic growth and regional trade, Tanzania's SGR demonstrates a more cost-effective approach per kilometer, with the added advantage of electrification. Kenya's SGR, despite its higher costs, offers features like double-stacking capabilities that enhance its cargo handling capacity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register