Kiranga
Platinum Member
- Jan 29, 2009
- 89,019
- 156,726
You being or not being close to the center of political ativity is a moot point, because we are discussing ideas here.What does it take for you to understand that I am no where close to the center of political activity? I just have a full appreciation of the political landscape!
Defying oppressive laws is one of the basic steps of civil disobedience. Unapinga maandano yaliyopangwa yafanyike siku ya kile wanachoita uchaguzi. Ni wapi kwenye Katiba yetu haki ya kuandamana imepangiwa siku maalumu?
Civil disobedience can disrupt a lot of things, not just elections. Kama unaona disrupting elections sio sawa basi lazima uone pia kwamba disrupting productive activities sio sawa. Civil disobedience is, therefore, not acceptable to you at all.
You don’t need to tell anyone that you’re happy with the status quo, but any reasonable person can tell it. You have worked vehemently to oppose those who strive to bring change!
What would you do if you were at the centre of political activity? You are conveniently excusing yourself from this question.
One can defy oppressive laws without interfering with others right to vote, thinking otherwise is a non sequitur logical fallacy that is also a false dichotomy. There is no dichotomy here.
Where did I say civil disobedience sio sawa? Can you show me that part? Why are you strawman arguing?
Don't you know that a strawman argument is a logical fallacy?
Why do you think that anyone who disagrees with your position is working vehemently to oppose those who strive to bring change?
Who gave you the monoploly to that change?