If God knows the future (omniscient), can you change your destiny?

Wewe thibitisha Mungu hayupo...otherwise yupo.

Sio kila usichokiona hakipo

Kama mungu hayupo, hawezi kuthibitishika kwamba hayupo.

Kwa sababu visivyopo havithibitishiki kwamba havipo.

Kwa sababu havipo ili kuthibitishika.

Ni kweli, sio kila nisichokiona hakipo.

Lakini pia sio kila nisichokiona kipo.

S ?
Alipo anza kujibu kwa kutumia "KAMA" teyari amesha tumia assumption na post yake yote ina base kwenye assumption na inakuwa fallacious.
 

haujaAdress swali langu la logic.

and tunapotofautiana ni pale wewe unapoona ulimwengu ambamo kifo kingetokea ni ulimwengu mkamilifu.
 
haujaAdress swali langu la logic.

and tunapotofautiana ni pale wewe unapoona ulimwengu ambamo kifo kingetokea ni ulimwengu mkamilifu.

Unatafsirije ukamilifu?

Nikisema kuwa mwili wako umekamilika kwa kuwa na viungo vyote ninakuwa na maana kuwa huwezi kupoteza kimoja?
 
Kwa wanao discuss uwepo wa Mungu Muumba wa vyote..ningeweza changia namna hii kama huyo ndugu yoka source therealtruth.org

The First Law of Thermodynamics

What is the truth of modern science regarding the origin of all matter in the universe? Do scientists tell us that it has always existed? Or have they determined that there was a moment in time in which all matter came into existence? The answer to the second question is, yes! But what is the proof that this is true?

The First Law of Thermodynamics is stated as follows: Matter and energy can be neither created nor destroyed. There are no natural processes that can alter either matter or energy in this way. This means that there is no new matter or energy coming into existence and there is no new matter or energy passing out of existence. All who state that the universe came into existence from nothing violate the first law of thermodynamics, which was established by the very scientific community who now seem willing to ignore it. In summary, this law plainly demonstrates that the universe, and all matter and energy within it, must have had a divine origin—a specific moment in which it was created by someone who was all-powerful.

With the coming of the Atomic Age, beginning with the discovery of radium in 1898 by Madame Curie, came the knowledge that all radioactive elements continually give off radiation. Consider! Uranium has an atomic weight of 238.0. As it decomposes, it releases a helium atom three times. Each helium atom has a weight of 4. With the new weight of 226.0, uranium becomes radium. Radium continues to give off additional atoms until eventually the end product becomes the heavy inert element called lead. This takes a tremendous amount of time. While the process of uranium turning into radium is very long, the radium turns into lead in 1,590 years.

What are we saying? There was a point in time when the uranium could not have existed, because it always breaks down in a highly systematic, controlled way. It is not stable like lead or other elements. It breaks down. This means there was a specific moment in time when all radioactive elements came into existence. Remember, all of them—uranium, radium, thorium, radon, polonium, francium, protactinium and others—have not existed forever. This represents absolute proof that matter came into existence or, in other words, matter has not always existed!

This flies directly in the face of evolutionary thought—that everything gradually evolved into something else. Here is the problem. You cannot have something slowly come into existence from nothing! Matter could not have come into existence by itself. No rational person could believe that the entire universe—including all of the radioactive elements that prove there was a specific time of beginning—gradually came into existence BY ITSELF!

Through your own efforts, try to build something—anything—from nothing. Even with your creative power engaged in the effort, you would never be able to do it. You will not be able—in a hundred lifetimes of trying—to produce a single thing from nothing! Then, can any doubter believe that everything in the entirety of the universe, in all of its exquisite detail, came into existence completely by itself? Be honest. Accept facts. This is proof that the existing natural realm demands the existence of a Great Creator!

The Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is best summarized by saying that everything moves toward disorder—or a condition known as entropy. This bears some explanation and we will consider several examples.

Remember that evolutionists teach that everything is constantly evolving into a higher and more complex order. In other words, they believe things continue to get better and better instead of worse and worse.

If water being heated on a stove is at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the burner is turned off, the temperature will drop instead of rise. It will move toward colder rather than hotter. If a ball is placed on a hill, it will always roll downhill and not uphill. Energy used to perform any particular task changes from usable energy to unusable in the performing of that task. It will always go from a higher energy level to a lower energy level—where less and less energy is available for use.

When applied to the universe, the second law of thermodynamics indicates that the universe is winding down—moving toward disorder or entropy—not winding up or moving toward more perfect order and structure. In short, the entire universe is winding down!

Even evolutionists admit that the theory of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics are completely incompatible with each other. Consider: “Regarding the second law of thermodynamics (universally accepted scientific law which states that all things left to themselves will tend to run down) or the law of entropy, it is observed, ‘It would hardly be possible to conceive of two more completely opposite principles than this principle of entropy increase and the principle of evolution. Each is precisely the converse of the other. As (Aldous) Huxley defined it, evolution involves a continual increase of order, of organization, of size, of complexity. It seems axiomatic that both cannot possibly be true. But there is no question whatever that the second law of thermodynamics is true’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967, p. 35).

Like a top or a yo-yo, the universe must have been “wound up.” Since the universe is constantly winding down, the second law of thermodynamics looms before us in the form of a great question: Who wound it up? The only plausible answer is God!

The Great Proof of Creation

We have established that creation demands a Creator. The next few paragraphs introduce some amazing scientific proofs of creation.

The theory of evolution is shot full of inconsistencies. Evolutionists have seized on many theories, within the overall theory of evolution, in an attempt to explain the origins of plants, animals, the heavens and the earth.

Over and over, these “theorists” try to explain how life evolved from inanimate material into more complex life forms until it reached the pinnacle—human beings.

Yet, as one geologist wrote, “It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as student…have been debunked” (Dr. Derek V. Ager, Dept. of Geology, Imperial College, London, The Nature of the Fossil Record, Proceedings of the Geological Assoc., Vol. 87, 1976, pp. 1132-1133).

Perhaps the biggest reason that so many theories within the overall theory of evolution collapse is because they contain terrible logic requiring great leaps in faith to believe. Here is one example of a “debunked” theory: “Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the chimpanzee is people’s closest relative. Yet regarding this we must observe the following: ‘Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Cholesterol level tests indicate that the garter snake is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man’s closest relative.’ ‘On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man’s closest relative’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967).
 

Nimewauliza hilo swali mara mia kidogo hapa hawajaweza kulijibu kikamilifu.

Wengine walisema mungu hakuumba kifo, shetani ndiye kazi yake.

Nikawauliza huyo shetani aliumbwa na mungu au kajiumba mwenyewe? Kama kaweza kufanya kifo, amefanya kifo katika ulimwengu gani? Ulimwengu wake au ulioumbwa na mungu?

Kama mungu ndiye muumba wa ulimwengu, na kaweka mipaka ya nini kinawezekana na nini hakiwezekani, mwanzo kabisa alikuwa na uwezo wa kuumba ulimwengu ambao kifo, magonjwa na mabaya yote yasingewezekana.

Kwa nini hakufanya hivyo?

Uwezo alikuwa nao, nia alikuwa nayo, upendo alikuwa nao, kwa nini kaachia kifo na magonjwa namabaya yawezekanike katika ulimwengu wake?

Sijapata jibu mpaka leo.

This question blows hole in the idea that god is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and omni benevolent.

Because the for are inconsistent with how the universe is.

Mungu huyu hawezekaniki kuwapo, akiwapo atajipinga yeye mwenyewe.

Huku ana upendo mkuu, huku karuhusu ulimwengu wenye mabaya yote haya hata pale alipokuwa na uwezo wote pamoja na upendo wote wa kuzuia hayo.

Contradictory.
 
Unatukia Wikipedia sana...ipo kazi

Unatukia maana yake nini?

Hiyo Wikipedia wajomba kuelewana kazi, unataka niweke articles za JSTOR?

Ushaelewa "deus ex machina" ni nini na inahusikaje hapa?
 
THAT IS MY QUESTION. If he is incomprehensible, kwanini tutwishwe mzigo kumjua?

1. If you can use Physics or Math or whatever kumtafuta Mungu na ukampata, then that is a wrong God.
2. Kama unaweza kumfananisha na kitu au whatever, then that is a wrong God.

Yeye alisha sema kwenye Isaiah:
Who do you compare me with?

ISAIAH 40:17, 18, 19
Here is Your God!
…17All the nations are as nothing before Him, They are regarded by Him as less than nothing and meaningless. 18To whom then will you liken God? Or what likeness will you compare with Him?19As for the idol, a craftsman casts it, A goldsmith plates it with gold, And a silversmith fashions chains of silver.…
 
THAT IS MY QUESTION. If he is incomprehensible, kwanini tutwishwe mzigo kumjua?

Halafu tusipomjua na kumfuata tuambiwe tunafanya dhambi na tutachomwa moto kwa kutomjua mungu ambaye hajulikaniki?

Hafuati logic wala formula tunayoielewa?

Huku ana mapenzi makuu, huku karuhusu ulimwengu uwe na maovu yasiyomithilika.

Is this fair to us?

Does this god really exist au ni stories tu?
 
THAT IS MY QUESTION. If he is incomprehensible, kwanini tutwishwe mzigo kumjua?

NB: You need Him, He doesn't need you for Him to be God.

Just like education, you need education and education doesn't need you. SAME LOGIC
 

"You won't answer any of my questions yet you can't restrain yourself from replying to my posts." kwa kuwa sitojibu maswali yako ndo ulitaka nikae kimya? u are doing the same thing rafiki, nimekwambia sikujibu lakini bado unaendelea kuniuliza maswali. Calling me a nincompoop wont get u any answers, sasa sijui unataka majibu au unachukizwa tu na sisi tunaoamini uwepo wa Mungu. Im a believer and you? I dont know, since "I dont have the ability to know where u are standing".

"Pick one. Do you want to answer my questions or not? Right now you are contradicting yourself." again, the answer is no.

tuendelee kuchat bas my fellow nincompoop.
 

if God beyond logic? or does he defy logic? those two are not the same....

yes i see we cannot use logic to explain his timeless "nature"

but untill you answer my first question, we will have no way to know the other of his characteristics
 

Daudi,................... Selah
 

Kujibu hata ukireply post bila kujibu maswali umeninibu.

Umeniambia hunijibu halafu umenijibu.

How contradictory.
 

so he defies logic and is above logic?
 
Kwanini unataka Mungu aumbe ulimwengu ambao kifo hakikuwezekana?

its not about me (well it is considering its not my choice to exist). its about him. why mseme ni All-loving kisha atengeneze kifo/uwezekano wa kifo?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…