If God knows the future (omniscient), can you change your destiny?

If God knows the future (omniscient), can you change your destiny?

Sana Mkuu wangu, usichoke kutuoa darasa, madini unayotoa ni ya thamani sana. Kamwe usichoke.

Bila shaka Mtumishi. Tupo hapa tunaenda na hawa jamaa taratibu kuwafumbua macho.

Usiwe na shaka na huyu jamaa wa ligi, yeye yupo hapa masaa 24 kupunguza stress za maisha kwa kuonyesha CHUKI KUBWA kwa Mungu.
 
Sana Mkuu wangu, usichoke kutuoa darasa, madini unayotoa ni ya thamani sana. Kamwe usichoke.

This all is the same old faith based pie in the sky kool aid.

Slaves were enslaved with a promise to a better life in heaven, using bible verses. While living in a squalid subhuman bondage.

Some black people are still in mental slavery todate.

And.they are still.singing Kumbaya my lord, kumbaya.

Despite all that is evident.
 
Are you serious? I just did.
Did you actually red or just focus in counterattacking?

" Did you actually red".

Your vacuous retort betrays your imbecility.

If the laws of physics are so limited, how could you use them to make a case for the unlimited?
 
This all is the same old faith based poe in the sky kool aid.

Slaves were enslaved with a promise to a better life in heaven, using bible verses. While living in a squalid subhuman bondage.

Some black people are still in mental slavery todate.

And.they are still.singing Kumbaya my lord, kumbaya.

Despite all that is evident.

Dahh!!!!
 

Watu wameuawa na kuteswa na kusokomezwa miti matakoni kwa jina la huyu mungu.

Na bado hawakomi tu.

Kama.mungu yupo kwa nininkaruhusu mabaya yote ya dunia hii?

Hana uwezo wa kuyazuia?

Kama hana uwezo, kweli huyu ni mungu muweza yote?

Au ana uwezo anadengua tu?

Kama ana uwezo ila anadengua tu, kweli ana upendo wote?
 
Hato kujibu hii post yako

Mkuu kwanza nimecheka kile ulichoandika kwenye post #421 , maana ndio ukweli wenyewe haswaa!!

Jamaa wa ajabu sana mi nimemwambia mtoe Ishmael na kama ulivyosema hakujib, matokeo yake kaenda kuni_quote post ingine kabisa. Labda nisubiri pengine kwa ombi langu anaweza kukutoa kwenye ile list yake pendwa.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watu wameuawa na kuteswa na kusokomezwa miti matakoni kwa jina la huyu mungu.

Na bado hawakomi tu.

Kama.mungu yupo kwa nininkaruhusu mabaya yote ya dunia hii?

Hana uwezo wa kuyazuia?

Kama hana uwezo, kweli huyu ni mungu muweza yote?

Au ana uwezo anadengua tu?

Kama ana uwezo ila anadengua tu, kweli ana upendo wote?

Mkuu mbona rahisi tu, embu mtoe Ishmael kwenye ile list yako, nakuhakikishia utafurahi. Jaribu uone.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
" Did you actually red".

Your vacuous retort betrays your imbecility.

If the laws of physics are so.limited, how could you use them to make.a case for the unlimited?

Hahaaaa issues over substance. You may add a on red so it can be read.
If we go through your post in this thread there a lot of spell errors and gramma issues(When you wrote " If the laws of physics are so.limited, how could you use them to make.a case for the unlimited? " 1.why you have comma/period between so and limited 2.After comma why you didn't start with Capital letters) but since I understand your main point I let it go.


Please comment on what I presented regarding the existance of God.

Comments on what is not relevant when I referred the laws of physics to prove the Existence of God.

FYI.
I have seen you break communication through your English is not applied to me a lot of online dictionaries.
You try to insult , is not gonna work I'm not gonna get angry neither..nor react, I will respond.
You been asking for scientific prove , you have been given ...now comment on it.What you want?

Hii ni wanaodhani English itafanya point iwe nzito:Hata Machizi , mazuzu, wajinga nchi kama USA &UK wanaongea English...suala ni point za kueleweka
 
Mkuu kwanza nimecheka kile ulichoandika kwenye post #421 , maana ndio ukweli wenyewe haswaa!!

Jamaa wa ajabu sana mi nimemwambia mtoe Ishmael na kama ulivyosema hakujib, matokeo yake kaenda kuni_quote post ingine kabisa. Labda nisubiri pengine kwa ombi langu anaweza kukutoa kwenye ile list yake pendwa.

Silazimiki kumtoa yeyote kwenye ignore list yangu.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hahaaaa issues over substance. You may add a on red so it can be read.
If we go through your post in this thread there a lot of spell errors and gramma issues(When you wrote " If the laws of physics are so.limited, how could you use them to make.a case for the unlimited? " 1.why you have comma/period between so and limited 2.After comma why you didn't start with Capital letters) but since I understand your main point I let it go.


Please comment on what I presented regarding the existance of God.

Comments on what is not relevant when I referred the laws of physics to prove the Existence of God.

FYI.
I have seen you break communication through your English is not applied to me a lot of online dictionaries.
You try to insult , is not gonna work I'm not gonna get angry neither..nor react, I will respond.
You been asking for scientific prove , you have been given ...now comment on it.What you want?

Hii ni wanaodhani English itafanya point iwe nzito:Hata Machizi , mazuzu, wajinga nchi kama USA &UK wanaongea English...suala ni point za kueleweka

Thibitisha kwamba mungu yupo.
 
Thibitisha kwamba mungu yupo.





Kwa wanao discuss uwepo wa Mungu Muumba wa vyote..ningeweza changia namna hii kama huyo ndugu toka source therealtruth.org

The First Law of Thermodynamics

What is the truth of modern science regarding the origin of all matter in the universe? Do scientists tell us that it has always existed? Or have they determined that there was a moment in time in which all matter came into existence? The answer to the second question is, yes! But what is the proof that this is true?

The First Law of Thermodynamics is stated as follows: Matter and energy can be neither created nor destroyed. There are no natural processes that can alter either matter or energy in this way. This means that there is no new matter or energy coming into existence and there is no new matter or energy passing out of existence. All who state that the universe came into existence from nothing violate the first law of thermodynamics, which was established by the very scientific community who now seem willing to ignore it. In summary, this law plainly demonstrates that the universe, and all matter and energy within it, must have had a divine origin—a specific moment in which it was created by someone who was all-powerful.

With the coming of the Atomic Age, beginning with the discovery of radium in 1898 by Madame Curie, came the knowledge that all radioactive elements continually give off radiation. Consider! Uranium has an atomic weight of 238.0. As it decomposes, it releases a helium atom three times. Each helium atom has a weight of 4. With the new weight of 226.0, uranium becomes radium. Radium continues to give off additional atoms until eventually the end product becomes the heavy inert element called lead. This takes a tremendous amount of time. While the process of uranium turning into radium is very long, the radium turns into lead in 1,590 years.

What are we saying? There was a point in time when the uranium could not have existed, because it always breaks down in a highly systematic, controlled way. It is not stable like lead or other elements. It breaks down. This means there was a specific moment in time when all radioactive elements came into existence. Remember, all of them—uranium, radium, thorium, radon, polonium, francium, protactinium and others—have not existed forever. This represents absolute proof that matter came into existence or, in other words, matter has not always existed!

This flies directly in the face of evolutionary thought—that everything gradually evolved into something else. Here is the problem. You cannot have something slowly come into existence from nothing! Matter could not have come into existence by itself. No rational person could believe that the entire universe—including all of the radioactive elements that prove there was a specific time of beginning—gradually came into existence BY ITSELF!

Through your own efforts, try to build something—anything—from nothing. Even with your creative power engaged in the effort, you would never be able to do it. You will not be able—in a hundred lifetimes of trying—to produce a single thing from nothing! Then, can any doubter believe that everything in the entirety of the universe, in all of its exquisite detail, came into existence completely by itself? Be honest. Accept facts. This is proof that the existing natural realm demands the existence of a Great Creator!

The Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is best summarized by saying that everything moves toward disorder—or a condition known as entropy. This bears some explanation and we will consider several examples.

Remember that evolutionists teach that everything is constantly evolving into a higher and more complex order. In other words, they believe things continue to get better and better instead of worse and worse.

If water being heated on a stove is at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the burner is turned off, the temperature will drop instead of rise. It will move toward colder rather than hotter. If a ball is placed on a hill, it will always roll downhill and not uphill. Energy used to perform any particular task changes from usable energy to unusable in the performing of that task. It will always go from a higher energy level to a lower energy level—where less and less energy is available for use.

When applied to the universe, the second law of thermodynamics indicates that the universe is winding down—moving toward disorder or entropy—not winding up or moving toward more perfect order and structure. In short, the entire universe is winding down!

Even evolutionists admit that the theory of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics are completely incompatible with each other. Consider: “Regarding the second law of thermodynamics (universally accepted scientific law which states that all things left to themselves will tend to run down) or the law of entropy, it is observed, ‘It would hardly be possible to conceive of two more completely opposite principles than this principle of entropy increase and the principle of evolution. Each is precisely the converse of the other. As (Aldous) Huxley defined it, evolution involves a continual increase of order, of organization, of size, of complexity. It seems axiomatic that both cannot possibly be true. But there is no question whatever that the second law of thermodynamics is true’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967, p. 35).

Like a top or a yo-yo, the universe must have been “wound up.” Since the universe is constantly winding down, the second law of thermodynamics looms before us in the form of a great question: Who wound it up? The only plausible answer is God!

The Great Proof of Creation

We have established that creation demands a Creator. The next few paragraphs introduce some amazing scientific proofs of creation.

The theory of evolution is shot full of inconsistencies. Evolutionists have seized on many theories, within the overall theory of evolution, in an attempt to explain the origins of plants, animals, the heavens and the earth.

Over and over, these “theorists” try to explain how life evolved from inanimate material into more complex life forms until it reached the pinnacle—human beings.

Yet, as one geologist wrote, “It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as student…have been debunked” (Dr. Derek V. Ager, Dept. of Geology, Imperial College, London, The Nature of the Fossil Record, Proceedings of the Geological Assoc., Vol. 87, 1976, pp. 1132-1133).

Perhaps the biggest reason that so many theories within the overall theory of evolution collapse is because they contain terrible logic requiring great leaps in faith to believe. Here is one example of a “debunked” theory: “Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the chimpanzee is people’s closest relative. Yet regarding this we must observe the following: ‘Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Cholesterol level tests indicate that the garter snake is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man’s closest relative.’ ‘On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man’s closest relative’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967).
 
Kwa wanao discuss uwepo wa Mungu Muumba wa vyote..ningeweza changia namna hii kama huyo ndugu toka source therealtruth.org

The First Law of Thermodynamics

What is the truth of modern science regarding the origin of all matter in the universe? Do scientists tell us that it has always existed? Or have they determined that there was a moment in time in which all matter came into existence? The answer to the second question is, yes! But what is the proof that this is true?

The First Law of Thermodynamics is stated as follows: Matter and energy can be neither created nor destroyed. There are no natural processes that can alter either matter or energy in this way. This means that there is no new matter or energy coming into existence and there is no new matter or energy passing out of existence. All who state that the universe came into existence from nothing violate the first law of thermodynamics, which was established by the very scientific community who now seem willing to ignore it. In summary, this law plainly demonstrates that the universe, and all matter and energy within it, must have had a divine origin—a specific moment in which it was created by someone who was all-powerful.

With the coming of the Atomic Age, beginning with the discovery of radium in 1898 by Madame Curie, came the knowledge that all radioactive elements continually give off radiation. Consider! Uranium has an atomic weight of 238.0. As it decomposes, it releases a helium atom three times. Each helium atom has a weight of 4. With the new weight of 226.0, uranium becomes radium. Radium continues to give off additional atoms until eventually the end product becomes the heavy inert element called lead. This takes a tremendous amount of time. While the process of uranium turning into radium is very long, the radium turns into lead in 1,590 years.

What are we saying? There was a point in time when the uranium could not have existed, because it always breaks down in a highly systematic, controlled way. It is not stable like lead or other elements. It breaks down. This means there was a specific moment in time when all radioactive elements came into existence. Remember, all of them—uranium, radium, thorium, radon, polonium, francium, protactinium and others—have not existed forever. This represents absolute proof that matter came into existence or, in other words, matter has not always existed!

This flies directly in the face of evolutionary thought—that everything gradually evolved into something else. Here is the problem. You cannot have something slowly come into existence from nothing! Matter could not have come into existence by itself. No rational person could believe that the entire universe—including all of the radioactive elements that prove there was a specific time of beginning—gradually came into existence BY ITSELF!

Through your own efforts, try to build something—anything—from nothing. Even with your creative power engaged in the effort, you would never be able to do it. You will not be able—in a hundred lifetimes of trying—to produce a single thing from nothing! Then, can any doubter believe that everything in the entirety of the universe, in all of its exquisite detail, came into existence completely by itself? Be honest. Accept facts. This is proof that the existing natural realm demands the existence of a Great Creator!

The Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is best summarized by saying that everything moves toward disorder—or a condition known as entropy. This bears some explanation and we will consider several examples.

Remember that evolutionists teach that everything is constantly evolving into a higher and more complex order. In other words, they believe things continue to get better and better instead of worse and worse.

If water being heated on a stove is at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the burner is turned off, the temperature will drop instead of rise. It will move toward colder rather than hotter. If a ball is placed on a hill, it will always roll downhill and not uphill. Energy used to perform any particular task changes from usable energy to unusable in the performing of that task. It will always go from a higher energy level to a lower energy level—where less and less energy is available for use.

When applied to the universe, the second law of thermodynamics indicates that the universe is winding down—moving toward disorder or entropy—not winding up or moving toward more perfect order and structure. In short, the entire universe is winding down!

Even evolutionists admit that the theory of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics are completely incompatible with each other. Consider: “Regarding the second law of thermodynamics (universally accepted scientific law which states that all things left to themselves will tend to run down) or the law of entropy, it is observed, ‘It would hardly be possible to conceive of two more completely opposite principles than this principle of entropy increase and the principle of evolution. Each is precisely the converse of the other. As (Aldous) Huxley defined it, evolution involves a continual increase of order, of organization, of size, of complexity. It seems axiomatic that both cannot possibly be true. But there is no question whatever that the second law of thermodynamics is true’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967, p. 35).

Like a top or a yo-yo, the universe must have been “wound up.” Since the universe is constantly winding down, the second law of thermodynamics looms before us in the form of a great question: Who wound it up? The only plausible answer is God!

The Great Proof of Creation

We have established that creation demands a Creator. The next few paragraphs introduce some amazing scientific proofs of creation.

The theory of evolution is shot full of inconsistencies. Evolutionists have seized on many theories, within the overall theory of evolution, in an attempt to explain the origins of plants, animals, the heavens and the earth.

Over and over, these “theorists” try to explain how life evolved from inanimate material into more complex life forms until it reached the pinnacle—human beings.

Yet, as one geologist wrote, “It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as student…have been debunked” (Dr. Derek V. Ager, Dept. of Geology, Imperial College, London, The Nature of the Fossil Record, Proceedings of the Geological Assoc., Vol. 87, 1976, pp. 1132-1133).

Perhaps the biggest reason that so many theories within the overall theory of evolution collapse is because they contain terrible logic requiring great leaps in faith to believe. Here is one example of a “debunked” theory: “Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the chimpanzee is people’s closest relative. Yet regarding this we must observe the following: ‘Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Cholesterol level tests indicate that the garter snake is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man’s closest relative.’ ‘On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man’s closest relative’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967).

Sioni thibitisho kwamba mungu yupo.

Suala langu likikuwa kutaka uthibitisho kwamba mungu yupo.

Nipatie uthibitisho huo ulipo.
 
U
Sioni thibitisho kwamba mungu yupo.

Suala langu likikuwa jutaka uthibitishobkwamba mungu yupo.

Nipatie uthibitisho huo ulipo.

Nidhani unaweza kusoma na kuelewa.

Hilo bandiko nililoweka Ilinathibitisha kuwepo kwa Mungu na kupinga evolution.

Uthibitisho uko kwenye Laws of Physics kama vilivyoainishwa kwenye bandiko langu nalorudia kubandika mara zaidi ya tatu.Au unataka uambiwe imeandikwa kwenye jiwe fulani kuwa kuna Mungu au kitabu fulani.Tunaenda na reference inayokubaliwa na wengi..ukisema huamini na physics then I'll leave it others to debate.

Read again and tell me which part you are not agree with.

Usiseme huu sio uthibitisho .
 
U

Nidhani unaweza kusoma na kuelewa.

Hilo bandiko nililoweka Ilinathibitisha kuwepo kwa Mungu na kupinga evolution.

Uthibitisho uko kwenye Laws of Physics kama vilivyoainishwa kwenye bandiko langu nalorudia kubandika mara zaidi ya tatu.Au unataka uambiwe imeandikwa kwenye jiwe fulani kuwa kuna Mungu au kitabu fulani.Tunaenda na reference inayokubaliwa na wengi..ukisema huamini na physics then I'll leave it others to debate.

Read again and tell me which part you are not agree with.

Usiseme huu sio uthibitisho .

Laws za physics ndizo zinamthibitisha mungu?
 
Kiranga

Taja unataka uthibitisho uwe wa namna gani...kama hutaki wa namna hii.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom