Only centuries-late small11 fragments of Papayris were found and at a much latter date, which collectively were less than 2 pages altogether. A papayri (papyrus) is a scroll, which is equivalent to a letter-size page. The 11 fragments found were dated between
years 100 to 300.
So even those are not even original, but are copies of copies of copies of copies and documentations of oral church teachings and fabrications. At any rate, the 11 fragments of papayris found are. They're hardly worth showing or be given a URL-link. They hardly fill 2 pages when put together:
"The earliest extant fragment of the New Testament is the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, a piece of the
Gospel of John dated to the first half of the
2nd century."(
Dating the Bible - Wikipedia)
"The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear around 200, and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus dates to
the 4th century." (
Biblical manuscript - Wikipedia and
Google Search)
Six other small fragments found were dated to the
2nd or 3rd centuries. Not even worthy of being URL-linked:
The so-called"5800 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, with an astounding 2.6 million pages of biblical text" were all writings from
5th to the 19th century in so many languages.
Like all other false religions' writings, these are irrelevant writings of church fathers and people that are similar to articles Christians write today on blogs and websites.
They are totally irrelevant to the question at hand and have nothing to do with the earliest manuscripts that don't seem to to have ever existed, from the first place, during the time of Jesus and early believers