I have not said that polygamy was an import from another country. It is an import from our own past. Note though that its justification does not stand or fall on its being from the past. Culture is dynamic. We move on with the good and abandon the bad. We have always done that.
Mkandara argues that we should not criticise our President for being a polygamist "because we have no law against polygamy". But that is holding the Presidency to a very low standard! We have no law against walking around with a running nose either, but we do not expect our President to exercise that liberty! Presidents are expected to be men or women of very high moral standards, and being promiscuous is not one of those!
Verily Verily argues that while our intentions might be good, polygamy cannot be done away with. Yes it can, and it has in fact been done away with in all developed countries. The only reason we continue to cling to it is because we are not only not developed, but we are not even developing (in some departments). We continue to cling to oppressive customs and traditions that lead some of us skin others, slaughter albinos and marry many wives.
The argument that has been advanced by some, repeatedly, that people enter into polygamous marriages willingly and there is therefore nothing wrong with the arrangement is fallacious. We have outlawed many things that are done willingly. Things like euthanasia and homosexuality are illegal in Tanzania and yet they are things that are normally done among consenting adults.
Pundit has accused me of trying to be more Catholic than the Pope! He wonders why I should be concerned about gender rights in a case where women seem to have no problem. Perhaps he missed my story about Malcolm X's categorization of Negroes. Please indulge me, for it seems to me that it is worth repeating. In one of his man fiery speeches, Malcolm X said: "There are House Negroes and Field Negroes. The House Negro loves his master. When the master is sick, he says "We sick, master?"". Would you not agree with me, dear Pundit, that the House Negro's human rights were being violated, irrespective of whether he complained or not?