What is Logic ? Where logic come from ? How do you measure it ?
Ngoja nikwambie kitu, an argument from ignorance is arguing God exists because not proven false, and that is obviously what we are not doing here. Also, it is a matter of logic and inferring. There is no reason to assume logic is about space-matter-time. That is absurd.
the structure of reasoning..
if the truth is and should be defined as any coherent aspect of reality.
unahitaji tafsiri ya neno "truth"
or what does your question even mean???
Ngoja tunaabudu mizimu tuwaangalie tu nyie wasomi na wajua dini za kimapokeo pyuuuuuuuuuu!!!!
teh teh teh Cureone wenzio wote wamekimbia, wewe bado upo..!!
Good.
So, what cause did God begin from?
still missing the point. The point of the "who caused God", rebuttal, is a rhetorical question describing that an external being is simply moving the goal post out into some intangible realm, where one cannot even reason to exist in the first place. To say "MUNGU yupo,na haitaji kuhakikishwa" Doesnt say anything that is valuable to a discussion of origins. Its incredulously circular..!!
naamini Mungu yupo lakini pamoja na kuamini usinilitee weak points,nitazikataa tu. Ni lazima ufahamu ukijadili masuala ya kiimani kwa majibizano hutapata majibu. Nitaendelea kutoa mawazo hadi pale mtakaponihitaji kuelezea juu ya uwepo wa Mungu.
Ngoja nikwambie kitu, an argument from ignorance is arguing God exists because not proven false, and that is obviously what we are not doing here. Also, it is a matter of logic and inferring. There is no reason to assume logic is about space-matter-time. That is absurd.
Defining non theism as something other than a position that God doesn't exist is just dishonest sophistry. Non theism is not a psychological condition of lacking belief - it is the position that God does not exist.
You can't engage, much less refute, my arguments and evidences.
You got spanked by the evidence. You can't engage them either, much less refute them. You are just as frustrated and silly as DirkSir;
It isn't too late to start retaking your medication. I have posted one post, you have answered me twice. It doesn't make sense.
With regard to the subject at hand, I believe you are confused and more importantly you aren't helping your own religion. Non theism covers a range of scenarios and what you have just described is a part of it, not the only one. It seems to me that your world is divided between those believe that God exists and those who don't.
The truth is a third of the world population believes in something else other than your God. They have their own deities. In the case that an individual from this population decides to take a position that his or her deity doesn't exist, by definition the individual is a non-theist too. Would you call this individual mindless?
Believing the existence of God isn't an argument or evidence. So there's nothing to engage or refute.
You got spanked by the evidence. You can't engage them either, much less refute them. You are just as frustrated and silly as Dirk
You got spanked by the evidence. You can't engage them either, much less refute them. You are just as frustrated and silly as Dirk
Nope, logic demands that anything that BEGINS to exist requires a cause to explain it's existence. Something cannot come from nothing.
The Creator has no beginning. No Creator is required.
The Universe began to exist. A Creator is required.
You still have no argument.
Sir;
It isn't too late to start retaking your medication. I have posted one post, you have answered me twice. It doesn't make sense.
With regard to the subject at hand, I believe you are confused and more importantly you aren't helping your own religion. Non theism covers a range of scenarios and what you have just described is a part of it, not the only one. It seems to me that your world is divided between those believe that God exists and those who don't.
The truth is a third of the world population believes in something else other than your God. They have their own deities. In the case that an individual from this population decides to take a position that his or her deity doesn't exist, by definition the individual is a non-theist too. Would you call this individual mindless?
Believing the existence of God isn't an argument or evidence. So there's nothing to engage or refute.
Anakupa za chembe waona nyotanyota Tu...