Is non theism mindless?

Is non theism mindless?

Why should that be mindless? I understand that non-theism is the attitude of rejecting god and since the concept of god isn't universal, there are many reasons why individuals should examine their faiths and rejected them if they deemed them Insufficient. Take for example majority of people of North Korea. They have been brainwashed to believe that their dear Leaders (Kim dynasty) are indeed divine.

Non theism is utterly mindless. You have no evidences or arguments.
Electrochemical mind = No free-will, no moral duties, no moral truth. No actual meaning or purpose to life. All is electrochemical illusion. That's why none of you can answer my challenges on the merits.



Based on the definition, North Koreans who reject the divine power of the Kim(s) are non-theists. Would you call them mindless? A Hindu who rejects a Hindu god is non-theists. So is the Masai who rejects the Masai god.
As long as you live inconsistently with your non theism, you can enjoy the wonder and purpose of God's provision, while keeping your head in the sand, ignoring to the logical implications of if non theism.

When you think about non theism is where the Nihilistic trouble immediately begins. But non theism is a mindless faith.
 
Where did you plagiarize this stuff from?
God Hater and worker of Iniquity: This is not a homosexual club.

You can't answer my questions. You evade every point I make.
I completely refute all the sloppy-thinking rubbish you offer

You have no answers and no good arguments for No God.
 
Na kingine ni kuwa anaetumia lugha ya matusi humu ni yeye na si mtu mwingine.
Nionyeshe maana ya Matusi kwenye Sayansi wewe Mpinga Mungu. You are a filthy and serial liar just like Satan "Your Deity"
 
teh teh teh DO NOT PANIC mdau..
You are creating a God to fit the arguments against him, this is moving the goal posts. You cant demonstrate that the universe began to exist, so asserting that it needs an intelligent being to kick it off is not a valid argument. The argument who created God is only invalid if you define him as first cause, you cant define the God for someone else's question, only for your own. So your question is nonsensical.
It has not been demonstrated that the universe has a beginning, only the time probably had a beginning. You're simply asserting it. We have no examples of anything other than the universe so we can only theorise things outside of it, not demonstrate them.
The concept of an eternal universe is far more likely than an eternal being. Because we have no evidence that an eternal being could exist.
All of your arguments are based on assertions not logic. Then you build complex arguments on top of these assertions in the hope that no one will notice.

The problem with him is that, he wants others to view things and understand them basing on his perspective.
Instead of presenting unquestionable proof, he just concludes without connecting details he claims back his god's existence to that god!
 
The problem with him is that, he wants others to view things and understand them basing on his perspective.
Instead of presenting unquestionable proof, he just concludes without connecting details he claims back his god's existence to that god!

You were proven wrong in your attempt to criticize my logic. You cannot demonstrate any problems whatsoever. You don't even attempt to after being proven wrong. You just make empty claims posturing for the audience hoping they won't notice. How cheesy.
 
God Hater and worker of Iniquity: This is not a homosexual club.

You can't answer my questions. You evade every point I make.
I completely refute all the sloppy-thinking rubbish you offer

You have no answers and no good arguments for No God.

You are a faggot and your god is a homo.

Now go suck his little dick.
 
You are a faggot and your god is a homo.

Now go suck his little dick.
= mindless

Your posts don't add anything, answer anything, or shed any light on anything.

You hate me. I get it. So what?
 
I understand that non-theism is the attitude of rejecting god and since t.

Defining non theism as something other than a position that God doesn't exist is just dishonest sophistry. Non theism is not a psychological condition of lacking belief - it is the position that God does not exist.

You can't engage, much less refute, my arguments and evidences.
 
You have neither provided nor produced any physical evidence, thus far, establishing the existence of god.



You expect physical evidence of a non-physical being?

That's like expecting to find water with your metal detector.

You non theists provide no evidences, just excuses for why you shouldn't have to justify your position of 'No God exists'.

Intellectual laziness is not evidence.
 
mimi sio mindless man, wewe vipi..
why not have a real conversation?? Are you afraid you might learn something??

Thats what surprises Me, these people seem so incapable of engaging in a serious conversation, when it appears we are getting somewhere, they begin to act childishly!
 
Matusi ni nini ?
Mbona huelezi mkiulizwa ninyi mindless

Matusi ni lugha au vitendo vinavyotumika mahali pasipostahili dhidi ya mtu mwingine asieviridhia kwa nia ya kumdunisha au kumuudhi.
 
Cureone;God is "the uncaused cause "
By the way brother God is spirit and doesn't dwell in a physical world,just like the way we understand feelings in life that's how any reasonable human being could fathom the existence of our God.
But like I said earlier that some truths are not meant for everyone
 
Sorry mdau wangu..
But I honestly do not see how that follows.Saying something cannot come from nothing doesn't mean God came from nothing.

"Something" is for matter " God is the inventor / Creator of Time, matter and space He is not part of " something "
 
Back
Top Bottom