Is Tanzania ousting Kenya as East Africa's powerhouse?
Is Tanzania ousting Kenya as East Africa's powerhouse?
- Thread starter Xplorer
- Start date
NairobiWalker
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 14,267
- 14,890
Apparently those Kenyans in brothels are preferred by Tanzanian employers over Tanzanian graduates.
Geza Ulole
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 65,136
- 91,917
NairobiWalker kenyan men r getting married right now, Dhuks is looking for a man to marry him in Philadelphia
Aerial highlights from our first few tests with the DJI Inspire 1 for Odyssey Safaris in Tanzania.
Shot exclusively with the Inspire 1
Single Controller / Monitored with an iPhone 6 Plus
Locations:
Lake Manyara
Serengeti
Ngorongoro Crater
Serengeti Sopa Lodge
Music: Lebo M. - The Lion Sleeps Tonight
Source: DJI 1 Inspire // Tanzania EletricPeakCreative
Geza Ulole
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 65,136
- 91,917
Tanzania could be ousting Kenya as East Africa's powerhouse
www.ippmedia.com/news/tanzania-could-be-ousting-kenya-east-africas-powerhouse
Despite having the largest population in East Africa, the country has often been sidelined in regional politics. While Kenya's influence surged, Tanzania was accused of being too slow and cautious when it came to plans for regional integration and infrastructure.
But since Magufuli's surprise election win last October, it seems Kenya could be losing its grip on East African politics as Tanzania increasingly presents itself as a viable alternative for regional cooperation, according to a report by the German news channel Deutsche Welle (DW).
Just recently, the Ugandan government announced it would route that country's valuable oil exports through Tanzania rather than Kenya, opting for a pipeline to the port of Tanga.
A study commissioned by the Ugandan government in March found that the pipeline route through Tanzania was cheaper and would be in operation more quickly than the Kenyan option. The decision was a blow for Kenya, which will now have to go through with its own ambitious oil pipeline project alone, or find new partners.
An international railway project championed by Kenya has also come up against difficulties as regional players consider their options. Widespread media reports claimed that Rwanda was pulling out of plans to develop rail links to Indian Ocean ports through Kenya in favour of routes through Tanzania.
But the Rwandan government has now said it plans to continue with both routes.
Magufuli's new approach
The readiness of Uganda and Rwanda to embark on projects and agreements with Tanzania, particularly when it means breaking off deals with Kenya, is a mark of the shift of influence within the region.
Kenyan political analyst and commentator Martin Oloo told DW that President Magufuli's pragmatic, hands-on approach is making this possible. "It is changing the way business can be done; in a more efficient and effective way," Oloo said.
One of Magufuli's key policies is cracking down on corruption in government. "What is endearing him to his own people, and perhaps what is making sense economically for the region, is that business can be done in cheaper ways, business can be done by minimizing corruption," Oloo said.
"And corruption is expensive (for) countries where there is runaway corruption, like in Kenya. That's impeding its competitiveness, its relevance within the region," he added.
Stability and growth
But Tanzania's recent political gains are not only down to Magufuli's leadership style. The country has enjoyed a steady growth rate of 6-7 per cent over the past decade, and is already starting to overtake Kenya economically.
"Magufuli's performance will only be helping that to happen faster," Oloo said.
Despite widespread poverty, long term political stability has provided a solid foundation for growth and development in the country.
When it comes to stability, Kenya is struggling. Security has become a growing fear, not only for Kenyans but also investors. The country's border with Somalia makes it vulnerable to attacks from Somali terrorist group Al-Shabaab, making Tanzania an attractive alternative.
"You can decide to look at Kenya as a powerhouse maybe on the economic side, but you've got to accept that Tanzania is a powerhouse in terms of stabilizing these countries," said Richard Shaba, program coordinator at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Tanzania, a German political foundation.
"We take most of the refugees. We do most of the reconciliation whenever these countries have a problem," Shaba told DW.
What's next for East Africa?
In the face of these difficulties, Kenya will now have to up its game if it wants to retain its regional strength.
"What should be worrying Kenyans is that we need to take on runaway corruption, we need to improve efficiency, we need to make ourselves competitive within the region," said analyst Oloo.
"And unless we do that, then our neighbors like Tanzania and Rwanda are actually going to run away with the opportunities."
If the latest developments in terms of regional cooperation are anything to go by,
that is already happening. But according to Shaba, even Magufuli's unconventional
approach won't completely change Tanzania's traditionally-guarded politics when it comes to cooperation and integration in East Africa.
"I think Tanzania will pursue more or less the same regional politics - being a bit cautious - because when the East African Community collapsed in 1977, we got our
fingers burned very badly," he told DW. "Willingness is always there, but the approach will be cautious."
www.ippmedia.com/news/tanzania-could-be-ousting-kenya-east-africas-powerhouseDespite having the largest population in East Africa, the country has often been sidelined in regional politics. While Kenya's influence surged, Tanzania was accused of being too slow and cautious when it came to plans for regional integration and infrastructure.
But since Magufuli's surprise election win last October, it seems Kenya could be losing its grip on East African politics as Tanzania increasingly presents itself as a viable alternative for regional cooperation, according to a report by the German news channel Deutsche Welle (DW).
Just recently, the Ugandan government announced it would route that country's valuable oil exports through Tanzania rather than Kenya, opting for a pipeline to the port of Tanga.
A study commissioned by the Ugandan government in March found that the pipeline route through Tanzania was cheaper and would be in operation more quickly than the Kenyan option. The decision was a blow for Kenya, which will now have to go through with its own ambitious oil pipeline project alone, or find new partners.
An international railway project championed by Kenya has also come up against difficulties as regional players consider their options. Widespread media reports claimed that Rwanda was pulling out of plans to develop rail links to Indian Ocean ports through Kenya in favour of routes through Tanzania.
But the Rwandan government has now said it plans to continue with both routes.
Magufuli's new approach
The readiness of Uganda and Rwanda to embark on projects and agreements with Tanzania, particularly when it means breaking off deals with Kenya, is a mark of the shift of influence within the region.
Kenyan political analyst and commentator Martin Oloo told DW that President Magufuli's pragmatic, hands-on approach is making this possible. "It is changing the way business can be done; in a more efficient and effective way," Oloo said.
One of Magufuli's key policies is cracking down on corruption in government. "What is endearing him to his own people, and perhaps what is making sense economically for the region, is that business can be done in cheaper ways, business can be done by minimizing corruption," Oloo said.
"And corruption is expensive (for) countries where there is runaway corruption, like in Kenya. That's impeding its competitiveness, its relevance within the region," he added.
Stability and growth
But Tanzania's recent political gains are not only down to Magufuli's leadership style. The country has enjoyed a steady growth rate of 6-7 per cent over the past decade, and is already starting to overtake Kenya economically.
"Magufuli's performance will only be helping that to happen faster," Oloo said.
Despite widespread poverty, long term political stability has provided a solid foundation for growth and development in the country.
When it comes to stability, Kenya is struggling. Security has become a growing fear, not only for Kenyans but also investors. The country's border with Somalia makes it vulnerable to attacks from Somali terrorist group Al-Shabaab, making Tanzania an attractive alternative.
"You can decide to look at Kenya as a powerhouse maybe on the economic side, but you've got to accept that Tanzania is a powerhouse in terms of stabilizing these countries," said Richard Shaba, program coordinator at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Tanzania, a German political foundation.
"We take most of the refugees. We do most of the reconciliation whenever these countries have a problem," Shaba told DW.
What's next for East Africa?
In the face of these difficulties, Kenya will now have to up its game if it wants to retain its regional strength.
"What should be worrying Kenyans is that we need to take on runaway corruption, we need to improve efficiency, we need to make ourselves competitive within the region," said analyst Oloo.
"And unless we do that, then our neighbors like Tanzania and Rwanda are actually going to run away with the opportunities."
If the latest developments in terms of regional cooperation are anything to go by,
that is already happening. But according to Shaba, even Magufuli's unconventional
approach won't completely change Tanzania's traditionally-guarded politics when it comes to cooperation and integration in East Africa.
"I think Tanzania will pursue more or less the same regional politics - being a bit cautious - because when the East African Community collapsed in 1977, we got our
fingers burned very badly," he told DW. "Willingness is always there, but the approach will be cautious."
mwaswast
JF-Expert Member
- May 12, 2014
- 12,780
- 6,480
Hahahaha Geza ulole knocks on the doors of brothels as much as he spews hate hate on Kenyans otherwise if your job at WFP is over try the same brothels as a reporter.
mwaswast
JF-Expert Member
- May 12, 2014
- 12,780
- 6,480
Go back to sleep man you were just having a sweat dream.Tanzania could be ousting Kenya as East Africa's powerhouse
Despite having the largest population in East Africa, the country has often been sidelined in regional politics. While Kenya's influence surged, Tanzania was accused of being too slow and cautious when it came to plans for regional integration and infrastructure.
But since Magufuli's surprise election win last October, it seems Kenya could be losing its grip on East African politics as Tanzania increasingly presents itself as a viable alternative for regional cooperation, according to a report by the German news channel Deutsche Welle (DW).
Just recently, the Ugandan government announced it would route that country's valuable oil exports through Tanzania rather than Kenya, opting for a pipeline to the port of Tanga.
A study commissioned by the Ugandan government in March found that the pipeline route through Tanzania was cheaper and would be in operation more quickly than the Kenyan option. The decision was a blow for Kenya, which will now have to go through with its own ambitious oil pipeline project alone, or find new partners.
An international railway project championed by Kenya has also come up against difficulties as regional players consider their options. Widespread media reports claimed that Rwanda was pulling out of plans to develop rail links to Indian Ocean ports through Kenya in favour of routes through Tanzania.
But the Rwandan government has now said it plans to continue with both routes.
Magufuli's new approach
The readiness of Uganda and Rwanda to embark on projects and agreements with Tanzania, particularly when it means breaking off deals with Kenya, is a mark of the shift of influence within the region.
Kenyan political analyst and commentator Martin Oloo told DW that President Magufuli's pragmatic, hands-on approach is making this possible. "It is changing the way business can be done; in a more efficient and effective way," Oloo said.
One of Magufuli's key policies is cracking down on corruption in government. "What is endearing him to his own people, and perhaps what is making sense economically for the region, is that business can be done in cheaper ways, business can be done by minimizing corruption," Oloo said.
"And corruption is expensive (for) countries where there is runaway corruption, like in Kenya. That's impeding its competitiveness, its relevance within the region," he added.
Stability and growth
But Tanzania's recent political gains are not only down to Magufuli's leadership style. The country has enjoyed a steady growth rate of 6-7 per cent over the past decade, and is already starting to overtake Kenya economically.
"Magufuli's performance will only be helping that to happen faster," Oloo said.
Despite widespread poverty, long term political stability has provided a solid foundation for growth and development in the country.
When it comes to stability, Kenya is struggling. Security has become a growing fear, not only for Kenyans but also investors. The country's border with Somalia makes it vulnerable to attacks from Somali terrorist group Al-Shabaab, making Tanzania an attractive alternative.
"You can decide to look at Kenya as a powerhouse maybe on the economic side, but you've got to accept that Tanzania is a powerhouse in terms of stabilizing these countries," said Richard Shaba, program coordinator at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Tanzania, a German political foundation.
"We take most of the refugees. We do most of the reconciliation whenever these countries have a problem," Shaba told DW.
What's next for East Africa?
In the face of these difficulties, Kenya will now have to up its game if it wants to retain its regional strength.
"What should be worrying Kenyans is that we need to take on runaway corruption, we need to improve efficiency, we need to make ourselves competitive within the region," said analyst Oloo.
"And unless we do that, then our neighbors like Tanzania and Rwanda are actually going to run away with the opportunities."
If the latest developments in terms of regional cooperation are anything to go by,
that is already happening. But according to Shaba, even Magufuli's unconventional
approach won't completely change Tanzania's traditionally-guarded politics when it comes to cooperation and integration in East Africa.
"I think Tanzania will pursue more or less the same regional politics - being a bit cautious - because when the East African Community collapsed in 1977, we got our
fingers burned very badly," he told DW. "Willingness is always there, but the approach will be cautious."
Mwekahazina.
New Member
- Jan 18, 2015
- 2
- 1
We live in a global village,Tanzania is just but one of our neighbours among nations we trade with.If they can mind their business and stop blaming it on Kenya that would be refreshing.Otherwise for all i care is work to make Kenya better for our kids and generations to come.
Is Tanzania ousting Kenya as East Africa's powerhouse? WHO GIVES A HOOT!!
Is Tanzania ousting Kenya as East Africa's powerhouse? WHO GIVES A HOOT!!
What makes it more advance?
Geza Ulole
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 65,136
- 91,917
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
May. 24, 2016, 5:00 am
By KENNETH OKWAROH
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
The failure of the Government of Kenya to secure construction of the pipeline to transport crude oil from Uganda via Lamu port signals of the decline of Kenya’s political and economic influence in East Africa.
With more news that South Sudan seems not keen on a pipeline with Kenya and that Tanzania and Uganda have signed a new agreement to construct a parallel railway line from Arusha to Musoma, effectively making the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) non-viable the writings are clear on the wall. The Empire is falling!
But how did Kenya get to this point where it is outmanoeuvred by its ‘strategic good’ neighbours? Where has the country erred? Has someone entered the game that is outwitting Nairobi? Or has the country’s henchmen grossly overestimated their influence in the East African region all this while?
In the past, Kenya has been perceived as an influential economic and political player in East Africa on accounts of its arguably diversified economy, expansive territory and large population. This has also been because of Kenya’s role as a regional hub for transport, communication, trade and investment with Kenya’s landlocked neighbours. So what changed?
Perhaps if we consider the important things that a country requires in order to be influential – what political scientists call geo-economic power; we could begin to understand when the rains began to beat Kenya.
Normally, a country draws geo-economic power from its geography and natural resources, strength of its economy and character of its population. These depend almost entirely on effectiveness of its government.
To begin with, Kenya’s economy has been considered the most diversified and robust in East Africa. In fact its GDP remains the largest. However this will cease to guarantee Kenya’s influence in the future if things proceed as they do.
Economic growth trends show that Kenya has been eclipsed by its neighbours. In countries like Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda the economy grew at an average rate of about 7.0% over the past decade while Kenya’s grew at just about 5.0%. In fact the IMF projects that Tanzania and Rwanda will see more robust economic developments the countries continue to further diversify their economies, improve investment climate and strategically invest proceeds from exploiting natural resources.
Secondly, influential countries derive their power from exploiting strategic assets in terms of the size of their territory and the character of their geography. For Kenya, these no longer provide any substantive competitive advantage. Why? Because Tanzania which is emerging as an arch rival is double the size of Kenya (947.3 km 2), has a far more advantageous proximity to the sea and is harbouring multiple valuable natural resources including natural gas that far outstrip what we have in Kenya.
In fact while its neighbours seem to benefit from their geography, Kenya has allowed its long porous border with Somalia to cause more trouble than advantage.
And perhaps the most important thing is that Kenya’s neighbours seem to get the hang of what to do with their geography while Kenyans are consumed in selfish private interest. Uganda is positioning itself as a strategic node in an ambitious trans-African transport and communications network from the Indian Ocean coast through to the Atlantic coast. Tanzania on the other side is elbowing Kenya to emerge as the preferred port of entry into this transport network. This could explain the shift of the pipeline to Tanga route and the new railway line deal between Uganda and Tanzania. Meanwhile Kenya’s misfortune is that partners fear that Kenyans will grossly inflate land rates in anticipation for compensation as they do every while a piece of infrastructure is in the offing.
By far the most important aspect of geo-economic power is effectiveness of government. This is perhaps the strongest indicator of the decline of Kenya’s influence. An effective government is necessary for strategising to exploit national assets to achieve sustained economic growth. It is also necessary for building strong institutions, inculcating strategic national ideas and connecting with the people.
For Kenya, over the five decades of its existence, successive administrations have been distracted by sub-national politics, focused on individual and sectarian interest. Kenyans have been endlessly bickering about ethnicity while their rivals are consolidating democratic gains and building strong institutions. Whilst Tanzania has had four successive peaceful political transitions, the Kenyan experience has been marred by intense political contestations which have deeply divided the country and destabilised its national institutions.
Such inadequacies in governance have prevented Kenya from focusing on long term strategic goals upon which its geo-economic power in the future would be based. A good example is how petty politics has ensured that Kenya’s northern frontier is cut off for decades without infrastructure and security. It was no surprise therefore that some of the reasons cited by Uganda against construction of the oil pipeline through Kenya were that the Government of Kenya would not guarantee its safety (from Al Shabab) and that it would cost more to construct due to remoteness of the north resulting from decades of politically motivated neglect by government.
Moreover, influential countries thrive on governments that unite people around specific strategic ideas that drive and sustain their economic and political power. Americans thrive on the idea of democracy and individual freedom which are believed to be significant facilitators of US geo-economic power. Democracy has opened up markets and new frontiers for American enterprises. Individualism is argued to have facilitated innovation and private enterprise that have driven the economic successes in the US.
In Kenya, despite operating on an ambitious constitutional dispensation, there appears to be little resonance with specific national ideals amongst the public. Kenya continues to project a destructive image of corruption, ethnocentrism and political bigotry. These toxic ideas prevent inculcation of a true sense of nationhood and concord between the people and government.
Nonetheless some people will argue that the Government of Kenya has the Vision 2030 and that it has invested substantively in mega infrastructure – highways, railways, ports and power plants. Fair enough, but have Kenyans internalised the vision and implications of the massive infrastructure investments? Why then would they brag about eight-lane superhighways connecting Nairobi to sub-optimal growth areas while farmers cannot transport cane, potatoes, milk and maize to the market or factory because of bad roads? Why would Kenyans be obsessed with tech cities when they export raw coffee and tea with no value addition and dairy farmers spill milk due lack of processing capacity? If Kenya truly understands the value of its investments, how could it afford to lose out on the oil pipeline which was considered an anchor infrastructure for broader goals like the US$23 billion Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) Corridor?
Lastly, a country’s population provides significant advantages in terms of human capital that can be exploited to improve the economy. In East Africa, Kenya remains one of the states with the largest population occupied by about 45.5 million people. In the past it has exploited this through its relatively robust education system to develop a substantively literate population and qualified workforce, attracted investment and encouraged innovation.
However, again Kenya’s neighbours appear to have caught up with it in nearly all development indicators in the education sector. According the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (2015), Kenya is almost at par with other East African states in many crucial indicators like adult literacy, per-capita expenditure in education and enrolment in tertiary institutions among others.
Moreover, even just by sheer numbers, population projections show that Tanzania will overtake Kenya by 2030 and Uganda shall have closed in. While population can be a source of trouble if not well managed, it can also provide strategic advantages in terms of consumption (markets) and production (labour) like in India and China.
Perhaps Kenya’s diplomatic arrogance is also to blame. Some people view Kenya’s recent exploits at the International Criminal Court (ICC) and hosting of some high profile global meetings as a show of might, others see no merit in terms of strategic national gains. The tale is also told of Kenyan diplomats and negotiators who show up at international forums ill equipped and incapable of cutting favourable deals because people are employed based not on their qualifications but on who they know in the ruling elite. No wonder, Kenya’s alliances with developing countries are weak and its partnerships with developed nations are chaotic if not short sighted.
In sum Kenya seems to have lost hold on most of the things that allowed it competitive edge over its neighbours and geo-economic rivals in the past like effective institutions, political stability, robust economy, human capital and strategic positioning in East Africa. This is especially because its neighbours appear to be improving their quality of government and maximising on their strategic advantage while Kenya is consumed in sub-national politics that is taking the country nowhere at least if it does not destroy it.
Until Kenya reroutes the focus of government to the 'people' and not the interests of a minority elite that seem to have hijacked government - Kenya is an empire in decline both economically and politically. Proceeding this way, it will be difficult to project Kenya’s ideas and interest in East Africa and broader in the international arena in the future.
The author is a research associate and Director for Policy and Research for Africa Centre for people Institutions and Society (Acepis). He tweets @okwaroh
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
nomasana, sam999, NairobiWalker, hbuyosh, msemakweli, simplemind, Kimweri, Bulldog, MK254,Kafrican, Ngongo, Ab_Titchaz, mtanganyika mpya, JokaKuu, Ngongo, Askari Kanzu, Dhuks, Yule-Msee, waltham, Mzee, mombasite gabriel, Juakali1980 , Boda254, mwaswast, MwendaOmo, Mwanakijiji, Iconoclastes, oneflash, Kambalanick, 1 Africa, saadeque, burukenge, nyangau mkenya, Teen-Upperhill Nairobi, kadoda11
May. 24, 2016, 5:00 am
By KENNETH OKWAROH
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
The failure of the Government of Kenya to secure construction of the pipeline to transport crude oil from Uganda via Lamu port signals of the decline of Kenya’s political and economic influence in East Africa.
With more news that South Sudan seems not keen on a pipeline with Kenya and that Tanzania and Uganda have signed a new agreement to construct a parallel railway line from Arusha to Musoma, effectively making the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) non-viable the writings are clear on the wall. The Empire is falling!
But how did Kenya get to this point where it is outmanoeuvred by its ‘strategic good’ neighbours? Where has the country erred? Has someone entered the game that is outwitting Nairobi? Or has the country’s henchmen grossly overestimated their influence in the East African region all this while?
In the past, Kenya has been perceived as an influential economic and political player in East Africa on accounts of its arguably diversified economy, expansive territory and large population. This has also been because of Kenya’s role as a regional hub for transport, communication, trade and investment with Kenya’s landlocked neighbours. So what changed?
Perhaps if we consider the important things that a country requires in order to be influential – what political scientists call geo-economic power; we could begin to understand when the rains began to beat Kenya.
Normally, a country draws geo-economic power from its geography and natural resources, strength of its economy and character of its population. These depend almost entirely on effectiveness of its government.
To begin with, Kenya’s economy has been considered the most diversified and robust in East Africa. In fact its GDP remains the largest. However this will cease to guarantee Kenya’s influence in the future if things proceed as they do.
Economic growth trends show that Kenya has been eclipsed by its neighbours. In countries like Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda the economy grew at an average rate of about 7.0% over the past decade while Kenya’s grew at just about 5.0%. In fact the IMF projects that Tanzania and Rwanda will see more robust economic developments the countries continue to further diversify their economies, improve investment climate and strategically invest proceeds from exploiting natural resources.
Secondly, influential countries derive their power from exploiting strategic assets in terms of the size of their territory and the character of their geography. For Kenya, these no longer provide any substantive competitive advantage. Why? Because Tanzania which is emerging as an arch rival is double the size of Kenya (947.3 km 2), has a far more advantageous proximity to the sea and is harbouring multiple valuable natural resources including natural gas that far outstrip what we have in Kenya.
In fact while its neighbours seem to benefit from their geography, Kenya has allowed its long porous border with Somalia to cause more trouble than advantage.
And perhaps the most important thing is that Kenya’s neighbours seem to get the hang of what to do with their geography while Kenyans are consumed in selfish private interest. Uganda is positioning itself as a strategic node in an ambitious trans-African transport and communications network from the Indian Ocean coast through to the Atlantic coast. Tanzania on the other side is elbowing Kenya to emerge as the preferred port of entry into this transport network. This could explain the shift of the pipeline to Tanga route and the new railway line deal between Uganda and Tanzania. Meanwhile Kenya’s misfortune is that partners fear that Kenyans will grossly inflate land rates in anticipation for compensation as they do every while a piece of infrastructure is in the offing.
By far the most important aspect of geo-economic power is effectiveness of government. This is perhaps the strongest indicator of the decline of Kenya’s influence. An effective government is necessary for strategising to exploit national assets to achieve sustained economic growth. It is also necessary for building strong institutions, inculcating strategic national ideas and connecting with the people.
For Kenya, over the five decades of its existence, successive administrations have been distracted by sub-national politics, focused on individual and sectarian interest. Kenyans have been endlessly bickering about ethnicity while their rivals are consolidating democratic gains and building strong institutions. Whilst Tanzania has had four successive peaceful political transitions, the Kenyan experience has been marred by intense political contestations which have deeply divided the country and destabilised its national institutions.
Such inadequacies in governance have prevented Kenya from focusing on long term strategic goals upon which its geo-economic power in the future would be based. A good example is how petty politics has ensured that Kenya’s northern frontier is cut off for decades without infrastructure and security. It was no surprise therefore that some of the reasons cited by Uganda against construction of the oil pipeline through Kenya were that the Government of Kenya would not guarantee its safety (from Al Shabab) and that it would cost more to construct due to remoteness of the north resulting from decades of politically motivated neglect by government.
Moreover, influential countries thrive on governments that unite people around specific strategic ideas that drive and sustain their economic and political power. Americans thrive on the idea of democracy and individual freedom which are believed to be significant facilitators of US geo-economic power. Democracy has opened up markets and new frontiers for American enterprises. Individualism is argued to have facilitated innovation and private enterprise that have driven the economic successes in the US.
In Kenya, despite operating on an ambitious constitutional dispensation, there appears to be little resonance with specific national ideals amongst the public. Kenya continues to project a destructive image of corruption, ethnocentrism and political bigotry. These toxic ideas prevent inculcation of a true sense of nationhood and concord between the people and government.
Nonetheless some people will argue that the Government of Kenya has the Vision 2030 and that it has invested substantively in mega infrastructure – highways, railways, ports and power plants. Fair enough, but have Kenyans internalised the vision and implications of the massive infrastructure investments? Why then would they brag about eight-lane superhighways connecting Nairobi to sub-optimal growth areas while farmers cannot transport cane, potatoes, milk and maize to the market or factory because of bad roads? Why would Kenyans be obsessed with tech cities when they export raw coffee and tea with no value addition and dairy farmers spill milk due lack of processing capacity? If Kenya truly understands the value of its investments, how could it afford to lose out on the oil pipeline which was considered an anchor infrastructure for broader goals like the US$23 billion Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) Corridor?
Lastly, a country’s population provides significant advantages in terms of human capital that can be exploited to improve the economy. In East Africa, Kenya remains one of the states with the largest population occupied by about 45.5 million people. In the past it has exploited this through its relatively robust education system to develop a substantively literate population and qualified workforce, attracted investment and encouraged innovation.
However, again Kenya’s neighbours appear to have caught up with it in nearly all development indicators in the education sector. According the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (2015), Kenya is almost at par with other East African states in many crucial indicators like adult literacy, per-capita expenditure in education and enrolment in tertiary institutions among others.
Moreover, even just by sheer numbers, population projections show that Tanzania will overtake Kenya by 2030 and Uganda shall have closed in. While population can be a source of trouble if not well managed, it can also provide strategic advantages in terms of consumption (markets) and production (labour) like in India and China.
Perhaps Kenya’s diplomatic arrogance is also to blame. Some people view Kenya’s recent exploits at the International Criminal Court (ICC) and hosting of some high profile global meetings as a show of might, others see no merit in terms of strategic national gains. The tale is also told of Kenyan diplomats and negotiators who show up at international forums ill equipped and incapable of cutting favourable deals because people are employed based not on their qualifications but on who they know in the ruling elite. No wonder, Kenya’s alliances with developing countries are weak and its partnerships with developed nations are chaotic if not short sighted.
In sum Kenya seems to have lost hold on most of the things that allowed it competitive edge over its neighbours and geo-economic rivals in the past like effective institutions, political stability, robust economy, human capital and strategic positioning in East Africa. This is especially because its neighbours appear to be improving their quality of government and maximising on their strategic advantage while Kenya is consumed in sub-national politics that is taking the country nowhere at least if it does not destroy it.
Until Kenya reroutes the focus of government to the 'people' and not the interests of a minority elite that seem to have hijacked government - Kenya is an empire in decline both economically and politically. Proceeding this way, it will be difficult to project Kenya’s ideas and interest in East Africa and broader in the international arena in the future.
The author is a research associate and Director for Policy and Research for Africa Centre for people Institutions and Society (Acepis). He tweets @okwaroh
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
nomasana, sam999, NairobiWalker, hbuyosh, msemakweli, simplemind, Kimweri, Bulldog, MK254,Kafrican, Ngongo, Ab_Titchaz, mtanganyika mpya, JokaKuu, Ngongo, Askari Kanzu, Dhuks, Yule-Msee, waltham, Mzee, mombasite gabriel, Juakali1980 , Boda254, mwaswast, MwendaOmo, Mwanakijiji, Iconoclastes, oneflash, Kambalanick, 1 Africa, saadeque, burukenge, nyangau mkenya, Teen-Upperhill Nairobi, kadoda11
Xplorer
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 607
- 857
- Thread starter
- #111
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
May. 24, 2016, 5:00 am
By KENNETH OKWAROH
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
The failure of the Government of Kenya to secure construction of the pipeline to transport crude oil from Uganda via Lamu port signals of the decline of Kenya’s political and economic influence in East Africa.
With more news that South Sudan seems not keen on a pipeline with Kenya and that Tanzania and Uganda have signed a new agreement to construct a parallel railway line from Arusha to Musoma, effectively making the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) non-viable the writings are clear on the wall. The Empire is falling!
But how did Kenya get to this point where it is outmanoeuvred by its ‘strategic good’ neighbours? Where has the country erred? Has someone entered the game that is outwitting Nairobi? Or has the country’s henchmen grossly overestimated their influence in the East African region all this while?
In the past, Kenya has been perceived as an influential economic and political player in East Africa on accounts of its arguably diversified economy, expansive territory and large population. This has also been because of Kenya’s role as a regional hub for transport, communication, trade and investment with Kenya’s landlocked neighbours. So what changed?
Perhaps if we consider the important things that a country requires in order to be influential – what political scientists call geo-economic power; we could begin to understand when the rains began to beat Kenya.
Normally, a country draws geo-economic power from its geography and natural resources, strength of its economy and character of its population. These depend almost entirely on effectiveness of its government.
To begin with, Kenya’s economy has been considered the most diversified and robust in East Africa. In fact its GDP remains the largest. However this will cease to guarantee Kenya’s influence in the future if things proceed as they do.
Economic growth trends show that Kenya has been eclipsed by its neighbours. In countries like Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda the economy grew at an average rate of about 7.0% over the past decade while Kenya’s grew at just about 5.0%. In fact the IMF projects that Tanzania and Rwanda will see more robust economic developments the countries continue to further diversify their economies, improve investment climate and strategically invest proceeds from exploiting natural resources.
Secondly, influential countries derive their power from exploiting strategic assets in terms of the size of their territory and the character of their geography. For Kenya, these no longer provide any substantive competitive advantage. Why? Because Tanzania which is emerging as an arch rival is double the size of Kenya (947.3 km 2), has a far more advantageous proximity to the sea and is harbouring multiple valuable natural resources including natural gas that far outstrip what we have in Kenya.
In fact while its neighbours seem to benefit from their geography, Kenya has allowed its long porous border with Somalia to cause more trouble than advantage.
And perhaps the most important thing is that Kenya’s neighbours seem to get the hang of what to do with their geography while Kenyans are consumed in selfish private interest. Uganda is positioning itself as a strategic node in an ambitious trans-African transport and communications network from the Indian Ocean coast through to the Atlantic coast. Tanzania on the other side is elbowing Kenya to emerge as the preferred port of entry into this transport network. This could explain the shift of the pipeline to Tanga route and the new railway line deal between Uganda and Tanzania. Meanwhile Kenya’s misfortune is that partners fear that Kenyans will grossly inflate land rates in anticipation for compensation as they do every while a piece of infrastructure is in the offing.
By far the most important aspect of geo-economic power is effectiveness of government. This is perhaps the strongest indicator of the decline of Kenya’s influence. An effective government is necessary for strategising to exploit national assets to achieve sustained economic growth. It is also necessary for building strong institutions, inculcating strategic national ideas and connecting with the people.
For Kenya, over the five decades of its existence, successive administrations have been distracted by sub-national politics, focused on individual and sectarian interest. Kenyans have been endlessly bickering about ethnicity while their rivals are consolidating democratic gains and building strong institutions. Whilst Tanzania has had four successive peaceful political transitions, the Kenyan experience has been marred by intense political contestations which have deeply divided the country and destabilised its national institutions.
Such inadequacies in governance have prevented Kenya from focusing on long term strategic goals upon which its geo-economic power in the future would be based. A good example is how petty politics has ensured that Kenya’s northern frontier is cut off for decades without infrastructure and security. It was no surprise therefore that some of the reasons cited by Uganda against construction of the oil pipeline through Kenya were that the Government of Kenya would not guarantee its safety (from Al Shabab) and that it would cost more to construct due to remoteness of the north resulting from decades of politically motivated neglect by government.
Moreover, influential countries thrive on governments that unite people around specific strategic ideas that drive and sustain their economic and political power. Americans thrive on the idea of democracy and individual freedom which are believed to be significant facilitators of US geo-economic power. Democracy has opened up markets and new frontiers for American enterprises. Individualism is argued to have facilitated innovation and private enterprise that have driven the economic successes in the US.
In Kenya, despite operating on an ambitious constitutional dispensation, there appears to be little resonance with specific national ideals amongst the public. Kenya continues to project a destructive image of corruption, ethnocentrism and political bigotry. These toxic ideas prevent inculcation of a true sense of nationhood and concord between the people and government.
Nonetheless some people will argue that the Government of Kenya has the Vision 2030 and that it has invested substantively in mega infrastructure – highways, railways, ports and power plants. Fair enough, but have Kenyans internalised the vision and implications of the massive infrastructure investments? Why then would they brag about eight-lane superhighways connecting Nairobi to sub-optimal growth areas while farmers cannot transport cane, potatoes, milk and maize to the market or factory because of bad roads? Why would Kenyans be obsessed with tech cities when they export raw coffee and tea with no value addition and dairy farmers spill milk due lack of processing capacity? If Kenya truly understands the value of its investments, how could it afford to lose out on the oil pipeline which was considered an anchor infrastructure for broader goals like the US$23 billion Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) Corridor?
Lastly, a country’s population provides significant advantages in terms of human capital that can be exploited to improve the economy. In East Africa, Kenya remains one of the states with the largest population occupied by about 45.5 million people. In the past it has exploited this through its relatively robust education system to develop a substantively literate population and qualified workforce, attracted investment and encouraged innovation.
However, again Kenya’s neighbours appear to have caught up with it in nearly all development indicators in the education sector. According the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (2015), Kenya is almost at par with other East African states in many crucial indicators like adult literacy, per-capita expenditure in education and enrolment in tertiary institutions among others.
Moreover, even just by sheer numbers, population projections show that Tanzania will overtake Kenya by 2030 and Uganda shall have closed in. While population can be a source of trouble if not well managed, it can also provide strategic advantages in terms of consumption (markets) and production (labour) like in India and China.
Perhaps Kenya’s diplomatic arrogance is also to blame. Some people view Kenya’s recent exploits at the International Criminal Court (ICC) and hosting of some high profile global meetings as a show of might, others see no merit in terms of strategic national gains. The tale is also told of Kenyan diplomats and negotiators who show up at international forums ill equipped and incapable of cutting favourable deals because people are employed based not on their qualifications but on who they know in the ruling elite. No wonder, Kenya’s alliances with developing countries are weak and its partnerships with developed nations are chaotic if not short sighted.
In sum Kenya seems to have lost hold on most of the things that allowed it competitive edge over its neighbours and geo-economic rivals in the past like effective institutions, political stability, robust economy, human capital and strategic positioning in East Africa. This is especially because its neighbours appear to be improving their quality of government and maximising on their strategic advantage while Kenya is consumed in sub-national politics that is taking the country nowhere at least if it does not destroy it.
Until Kenya reroutes the focus of government to the 'people' and not the interests of a minority elite that seem to have hijacked government - Kenya is an empire in decline both economically and politically. Proceeding this way, it will be difficult to project Kenya’s ideas and interest in East Africa and broader in the international arena in the future.
The author is a research associate and Director for Policy and Research for Africa Centre for people Institutions and Society (Acepis). He tweets @okwaroh
The Empire is falling: Why Kenya’s influence in East Africa is on a downward spiral
nomasana, sam999, NairobiWalker, hbuyosh, msemakweli, simplemind, Kimweri, Bulldog, MK254,Kafrican, Ngongo, Ab_Titchaz, mtanganyika mpya, JokaKuu, Ngongo, Askari Kanzu, Dhuks, Yule-Msee, waltham, "]Mzee Mwanakijiji"]Mzee Mwanakijiji[/URL]Mzee, mombasite gabriel, Juakali1980 , Boda254, mwaswast, MwendaOmo, Mwanakijiji[/URL], Iconoclastes, oneflash, Kambalanick, 1 Africa, saadeque, burukenge, nyangau mkenya, Teen-Upperhill Nairobi, kadoda11
another one of their own!
Geza Ulole
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 65,136
- 91,917
halafu angalia wanavyoparuana at comments section, damn over 100 comments on the subject!
Have u secured money for your sgr?
Geza Ulole
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 65,136
- 91,917
mwaswast
JF-Expert Member
- May 12, 2014
- 12,780
- 6,480
local contractors????
Xplorer
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 607
- 857
- Thread starter
- #117
“Sina uhakika kwamba mmejipangaje wakandarasi wa Tanzania katika kuhakikisha hiyo kazi mnaipata ya kujenga bomba kutoka Hoima nchini Uganda hadi Tanga.
“Nitasikitika sana kilometa zote 1,410 pasiwepo mkandarasi hata mmoja wa kutoka Tanzania, wenzetu wanajipanga, na ninavyoona wakandarasi wa Tanzania wameendelea sana, lakini nashindwa kuelewa kuna tatizo gani linatufanya kutojua changamoto zinazotukabili.
tumejipanga kujenga reli ya kati (Standard Gauge) kwenye bajeti ya mwaka huu tunaanza na kilometa 100, lakini kuna fedha nyingine zitatolewa na serikali ya China, tutajenga zaidi ya kilometa 1,200 (Standard Gauge, Central Corridor) itakayounganisha Mwanza, Kigoma, Burundi na Rwanda. Wakandarasi wa Tanzania mmejipangaje? " Rais John Pombe Magufuli (26th May2016)
Geza Ulole
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 65,136
- 91,917
he was mobilizing them to merge and vie for upcoming lucrative SRG project!
mwaswast
JF-Expert Member
- May 12, 2014
- 12,780
- 6,480
Mtatii huyu msanii wenyu.