Fidel80
JF-Expert Member
- May 3, 2008
- 21,947
- 4,470
Hehehee komredi bana...ngoja nitafute mchuchu nimege.
Hahahaha unakiu sana? Mi nataka nivute shuka mahouse girl na watoto wa geti wanafujo leo balaa.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hehehee komredi bana...ngoja nitafute mchuchu nimege.
Bu'yaka in fact I believe "Hodgepodge of potpourri" is OK as long as you remove the "a" part....
Bu'yaka in fact I believe "Hodgepodge of potpourri" is OK as long as you remove the "a" part....
Mtazamaji umedata wewe. Eti nini?
Even 'hodgepodge of potpourri' is still tautological.
It is just the same as saying 'beginner who has just started'.
Remember, it's not grammatically incorrect. It's just repetition in a way that is not necessary.
Kwa nini "hodgepodge of potpourri" iwe sahihi lakini "hodgepodge of a potpourri" isiwe sahihi?
Nikiwa na a potpourri, nikaja nikalichanganya zaidi ki- hodgepoge, hiyo si "hodgepodge of a potpourri" ?
hodge·podge/ˈhɑ:ʤˌpɑ:ʤ/ noun
[singular] chiefly US : a mixture of different things
▪ a hodgepodge of styles -called also (Brit) hotchpotch
pot·pour·ri/ˌpoʊpʊˈri:/ noun
plural pot·pour·ris
1 [count, noncount] : a mixture of dried flower petals, leaves, and spices that is used to make a room smell pleasant
2 [singular] : a collection of different things
▪ The festival was a musical potpourri-performances included folk, jazz, blues, and rap music. - often + of ▪ The book is a potpourri [=assortment, medley] of stories about family, religion, and food.
Mbona hizo ni definitions mbili tofauti?
Even 'hodgepodge of potpourri' is still tautological.
It is just the same as saying 'beginner who has just started'.
Remember, it's not grammatically incorrect. It's just repetition in a way that is not necessary.
Ngabu it may seem tautological when siphoned literally.... They are two separate entities having an almost similar "meaning in the mind perceiving" but completely different as much as both are on the basis of the disorderliness of the entity itself.
Right on! Right on!
Watanzania tunazuzuka sana na lugha hasa ya Kiingereza. Na ndiyo maana Nyerere na Mkapa wanaonekana kama vile ni majiniasi.
Na hapa ni hivyo hivyo. Ukitaka umwagiwe visifa vya uongo na kweli basi andika Kiingereza kutumia maneno ambayo hayatumiki katika maongezi au maandishi ya kawaida na baadhi watakuona wewe ni jiniasi.
Sasa kama jamaa ni jiniasi sijui Albert Einstein, Leonardo da Vinci, au Stephen Hawking ni kina nani....lol.
But what do I know...?
Lakini Nyerere alikuwa na mtizamo tofauti kuhusu matumizi ya lugha ya Kiingereza, angalia nukuu yake hapa chini.
"Tunao waswahili ambao jambo la kipumbavu likisemwa kiingereza lionekana la maana sana" J.K. Nyerere
Hivyo eeh? Haya basi nimekosea.
Serously tho, issue hapa si kwamba wether they are different or not?
Hivyo eeh? Haya basi nimekosea.
So you are saying that I'm wrong, correct?
Kumbe elimu kupitia mtandao ina challenge zake. Sasa umekosea nn tena NN au hutaki debate na Mangi lol . Hapa sasa kweli nimetada sijaelewa wich is right or wich is left kwa hiyo hojipiji of pot pouri .
But atleast nimetoka na mchonganishi
Saying YES you are wrong would be too general and it would be a wrong answer.... Your post carries weight on the following.
I would say YES you are wrong to think tha "Hodgepodge and Potpourri" can not be used in the same line.
- Hodgepodge can not be used with (a) Potpourri.
- You gave an example of "beginner who started" it is an unfair example to the matter.
- I qoute: "t's not grammatically incorrect. It's just repetition in a way that is not necessary"
I would say NO you are not wrong with numbe 2 & 3
Hapana, ni kweli they are different, usijidai kuyeyusha, ndo zetu wabongo, ama sijui miafrika!Kuna watu wengine inabidi tu kuwakubalia aisee. Chochote atakachosema we unakubali tu. Hupungukiwi na kitu ukimkubalia.