Nyaru-sare
JF-Expert Member
- Aug 2, 2019
- 5,261
- 3,679
Lakn pia nimekuwa na msisimko hapa kuhusu Cush na Eunuch, wengine wanasema ni haohao!
some say ni mjukuu wa Noah! ni kwa anaye jua tu!
some say ni mjukuu wa Noah! ni kwa anaye jua tu!
Sijamaliza kusoma hili andiko lako lote,lakini hadi nilipoishia naweza kusema yafuatayo.“Perhaps the more important reason the compilation and translation of the documents of the Bible in Ancient Egypt is very significant in this discussion is the fact that historians, Egyptologists, and biblical scholars have all found what they call numerous similarities between Ancient Egyptian and biblical literature. However, these scholars who were all raised in the biblical perception of things have never had the courage to state clearly and unequivocally that the Jewish scholars of the Bible in Alexandria took Ancient Egyptian documents and translated them for the Greeks as their own. Their findings however, confirm two main issues; either the biblical stories were taken directly from Ancient Egyptian literature or they were rewritten alongside existing Ancient Egyptian stories. One fact stands out clearly in the analysis of some of the documents of the Bible, and that fact is they were not original Jewish people’s documents.”
Nana Banchie Darkwah, Ph.D.
“The Africans who wrote the Bible: Ancient Secrets Africa and Christianity have never told”
Page 111
“I have focused on the African tribal names of the authors of the Old Testament because there is evidence that the names of the authors of the New Testament were clearly and deliberately concealed to forestall any future revelation as I am doing about the Old Testament. The Old Testament Bible introduced the foundations, concept, and practice of Christianity in Europe before anonymous writers wrote the New Testament. Here is an intriguing question about the Bible that exposes the pervading intent to deceive in the Bible. Why did scholars of the Old Testament include the real tribal [albeit transposed] names of the authors but the writers of the New Testament concealed their names? What made this necessary? Jewish scholars that compiled and translated the documents of the Old Testament into Greek convinced the Greeks that God-inspired ancient Jewish prophets and priests wrote the documents of the Bible. As a result, the Old Testament acquired a canonical credibility for having been Godly and true because ancient God-inspired prophets wrote it. The foundation of Christianity therefore began from the premise that it was God that inspired Jewish prophets to write the documents of the Old Testament. The question is did God inspire Moses to write Ancient Egyptian religious ideas, myths, and folk tales as they are found in the First Five Books of the Bible, or were these Ancient Egyptian religious documents that the scholars of the Bible plagiarized? What about the documents of the New Testament? Who did God inspire to write those and why have we never known the true identities of the authors?
“Historians and religious scholars agree that the New Testament was definitely not written by God-inspired prophets, but by contemporary Hellenized Jews in Ancient Egypt or Greece. Christianity as a religious doctrine and practice had already started from the Old Testament documents and the appearance of a new set of documents purported to be equally Godly and religious documents of the Afrim people became a major source of apprehension in early Christendom. The early church did not want to risk the growing credibility in its assertion that the Old Testament is the word and the work of God to bring in new documents that were surely written by contemporary scholars. So the names of the authors of the New Testament had to be concealed to make it possible to confer some of the growing credibility of the Old Testament onto the New Testament documents.”
“What is least pointed out about the New Testament is that Jewish priests and religious scholars found the New Testament to be the worst form of religious deception of the Greeks and later Europeans. As a result, Judaism never accepted the documents of the New Testament as part of its traditionally divine religious truths. That was enough to warn the Greeks that the New Testament documents must have been designed to commit a pious fraud as Judaism saw them. Nevertheless, these new documents became the spiritual inspiration and direction for the design of a new form of religion based upon the New Testament. Today, Christians around the world still do not know where these documents came from but they believe it, and they attribute the writers of the New Testament gospels to some fictitious Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. However, nobody knows who these authors were and most Christians know that these were not their real names, but it does not matter to them. This is because these documents have also been woven into the devotional faith of Christianity as holy and God-inspired documents.”
Nana Banchie Darkwah, Ph.D.
“The Africans who wrote the Bible: Ancient Secrets Africa and Christianity have never told”
Page 92
“Is it not interesting that the Ancient Egyptian document that existed before the Bible began with a God that was the ‘Creator of heavens and earth,’ and the biblical document also began with ‘God created the heaven and earth?’ Is it not interesting that the Ancient Egyptian document began with a God that created man and gave him life by breathing into his nostrils, and the biblical documents also told the story of a God that created man and ‘breathed into his nostrils the breath of life?’ Is it not interesting that the Ancient Egyptian document began with the imagination and conception of a God, His form, and capabilities, and the biblical document began with a God from nowhere? Could the scholars of the biblical documents have begun with a Christian God from nowhere because this God had already been imagined and personified by the Ancient Egyptians? Otherwise wouldn’t it have been more prudent for the Jewish scholars of the Bible to begin the biblical documents from the conception and personification of this God just as the Ancient Egyptians had done?”
“Anyone who knows the beginning documents of the Bible would think the Ancient Egyptian excerpts above are excerpts from the Bible, but they are not. These were the writings of Ancient Egyptians perception of God and religion thousands of years before the documents of the Bible came to be compiled, edited, rewritten, and translated in Ancient Egypt. Why would a modern Christian think these are biblical excerpts? It is because these are the exact foundations, concepts, and perceptions of God that the Bible propagates as Christianity today. Can you now guess where the biblical ideas of God and the story of creation must have originated from these few excerpts? We now know that what Christianity has long asserted, as the Hebrew God is a lie. This was the God the black people of Ancient Egypt had imagined and personified. The Jewish scholars of the Bible simply took and made this God their own before the Greeks and later Europeans.”
Nana Banchie Darkwah, Ph.D.
“The Africans who wrote the Bible: Ancient Secrets Africa and Christianity have never told”
Page 100
“Until now, nobody has performed a comparative analysis of Ancient Egyptian and biblical documents to reveal the true source of the documents of the Christian Bible. The Ancient Egyptian idea and document stating that ‘God is from the beginning’ was what became the biblical introduction of ‘In the beginning.’ The Ancient Egyptian idea that ‘God hath made the universe… He is the creator of what is in this world’ was what the Jewish scholars took for it to become the biblical version ‘God created heaven and earth.’ Is it not interesting that the Ancient Egyptians began their document with the conception of a God who was ‘from the beginning, and He had been from the beginning,’ and the biblical document also began with, ‘In the beginning…?’”
“Further comparative analysis of the Ancient Egyptian document above and the biblical documents reveal something else that has never been pointed out in support of Ancient Egyptian origin of the doctrines and documents of Christianity. It is clear that the Ancient Egyptian document above begins with the imagination and personification of the concept of God. This is because logically one cannot have a God creating everything in this world without first establishing how this God came to be. Because the Ancient Egyptians had to create the concept of religion from its very foundations, they began with how God came to be. However, the biblical documents do not begin with how this God came to be because the Ancient Egyptians had already created and personified him. Because the Jewish scholars of the Bible simply took the God the Ancient Egyptians had imagined and personified in their beliefs, the biblical document begins with a God seemingly from nowhere creating heaven and earth. The logic of the biblical God from nowhere did not become an issue for the Jewish scholars of the biblical documents because they were simply taking what the Ancient Egyptians had already established in concept, doctrines, documents, and sacramental practices. For such an enterprise, the Jewish scholars of the Bible did not have to go back to the beginning of the imagination and personification of this God, as the Ancient Egyptian had to do.”
Nana Banchie Darkwah, Ph.D.
“The Africans who wrote the Bible: Ancient Secrets Africa and Christianity have never told”
Page 100
“In this discussion, I have pointed out that the Jewish people of the Exodus were black people and they originated from the black tribes that were the Ancient Egyptians. As I have stated earlier, the Jewish scholars of the Bible at Alexandria did not have any body of religious documents ready to translate for the Greeks. There is no historical, biblical, or literary evidence of when, where, and how the authors of the Old Testament beginning from Moses wrote the books attributed to them. Remember that what these people supposedly wrote were not pieces of articles. They are considered books in the Bible. If Jewish prophets and priests created the books in the Old Testament, these books could not have been the only books created by these authors, and there should have been some evidence as to when, where, and how these authors created these and other books. Yet, there is no evidence as to when, where, and how these authors created these and other books. Yet, there is no evidence of such nature. What does it mean? It means the Jewish scholars of the Bible in Ancient Egypt did not have any body of Jewish religious documents from which the biblical documents could have been simply translated for the Greeks.”
“The body of religious documents, from which the biblical documents were compiled, edited, and translated were Ancient Egyptian documents. These documents were what the Jewish scholars of Ancient Egypt took and claimed as their own before the Greeks, but it was a lie. As a result, all that the Jewish scholars of the Bible did in Alexandria was to compile, rewrite, edit, and translate Ancient Egyptian religious documents that were available to them into Greek, and that became the Old Testament Bible. As the Jewish scholars took these Egyptians documents that were written mostly by the Akan people of Ancient Egypt, they simply transposed the Akan and other African tribal names of the original authors into Greek, and the names are still discernible.”
“I would like to emphatically state again that the concepts, doctrines, and documents that the Jewish scholars compiled into the Old Testament were not original Jewish religious concepts, doctrines, and documents. These concepts and documents were Ancient Egyptians in origin created by the Akan and other African tribes from which the Jewish people originated.”
“The Jewish scholars of the biblical documents were largely right in their calculations of the effectiveness of the foundations of their deception. These scholars knew that their deception would work because they were passing these documents on to people of a foreign land. In reality, these deceptions have worked because they have gone undiscovered in these foreign lands for the past two thousand years. How do we know all these? Again, the transposed African tribal names of the authors of the Old Testament reveal what must have happened for such African names to appear in the biblical documents, and the revelation of the Africans who wrote the Bible in the last chapter would finally confirm it all.”
“The Jewish scholars of the Bible first wrote a fictitious biblical history of the Jewish people around the African authors whose documents they chose as biblical documents. The Old Testament is therefore more about the history of the Jewish people woven around the religion espoused by the authors of the Old Testament Books. With the Old Testament history of the Jewish people in place and accepted as the absolute truth in Europe, Jewish historians began to extract their history from the biblical account, and early western historians also began to write every history around this biblical account. Through the Old Testament therefore Jewish scholars, Christianity, and historians simply claimed the authors of the Old Testament and their works as Jewish.”
Nana Banchie Darkwah, Ph.D.
“The Africans who wrote the Bible: Ancient Secrets Africa and Christianity have never told”
Page 90
“In Europe where the Bible was first hailed as the greatest book ever produced by God and man, there is today a dual perception of the documents of the Bible. There is the scholastic perception held by those who have delved deep into the history behind the documents of the Bible. These scholars have found out that the people, the history, and the documents of the Bible are not as sacred as the conspiracies of the priesthood have made them to be over the past two thousand years. What is sad about these findings is that they are not exposed to the public as mainstream knowledge about the Bible. Such a perception of the Bible of most western scholars is represented by what Will Durant wrote:
‘The Old Testament is not only law; it is history, poetry and philosophy of the highest order. After making every deduction for primitive legend and pious fraud, after admitting that the historical books are not quite as accurate or as ancient as our forefathers supposed, we find in them, nevertheless, not merely some of the oldest historical writing known to us, but some of the best (1935, p.339). [The History of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage].’
“This perception points out plainly that the foundations of the documents of the Bible originate from primitive legends and myths. They are theosophically fraudulent and historically inaccurate. Moreover, the documents of the Bible are not as old as Christian Europe has made them to be. There were older documents. Nevertheless, these are not what the custodians of the Bible would like the masses to know.”
“Of course, Christians who still believe that these documents were written with the spiritual guidance of God counter this perception. There is therefore the divine perception of the biblical documents that holds that the Bible is the most sacred religious documents ever written for the salvation of humans. This interpretive perception was originally created by the Catholic Church in its quest for religious and political domination of Europe. This perception gave the Church the right of dictatorship with the inherent right to extort, ex-communicate, and kill by the most atrocious means ever conceived by man. Unfortunately, this perception is still fervently guarded by the supposed religious mandates of the powerful Christians who stand to benefit most in wealth and power from the ignorance of the masses. The saddest part of the Christian argument is that they do not even know the origin of the God to whom they attribute the biblical documents and such fervency.
Nana Banchie Darkwah, Ph.D.
“The Africans who wrote the Bible: Ancient Secrets Africa and Christianity have never told”
Page 89
Kuna kitabu nilikisoma jaribu kufuatilia na tuambie kuna ukwel ndani yake?
We umesoma wapi ,kitabu gani ? Shule gani? Na mwalimu gani alikufundisha binadamu alikuwa nyani akabadilika? Na katika somo gani? Darasa gani?Mimi siamini kama binadamu wa kale alikuwa nyani. Kama alikuwa nyani basi hata sasa ni nyani na sio binadam. PERIOD.
Shuleni kuna hadithi za namna nyingi, tena nyingi za uongo na chache zenye kufundisha lakini tuna wajibu wa kutafuta ukweli beyond academic and religion walls. Hadithi na nadharia eti zamani mamba na mijusi walikuwa dinosaurs nk nk
Ukweli ni kwamba binadamu ni binadamu toka yule wa kwanza mpaka wa mwisho. Hakuna binadamu aliyekuwa nyani wakati wowote.
Maswali machache madogo:-
1) Kwanini nyani leo hawawi binadamu??
2) Halafu, nini kilitokea kukomesha huo utaratibu wa nyani kuwa binadam?
3) Na kama nyani alikuwa anakuwa binadamu, je baadaye huyu binadam alikuwa anakuwa nani sasa?
Nani amekudanganya Paulo alikuwa muitaliano rafiki anguUnasema nitumie wote walikuwa wa Mashsriki ya kati, mbona mtume Paulo alikuwa Mtume (Mzungu wa Italia ya Sasa. Kaisari alikuwa Mzungu pia. Ukiangalia miji kama Korintho na Thesalonike ni miji ya ulaya katika nvhi ya Ugiriki. Kwa hiyo wazungu ni watu wa kawaida kama wewe tu isipokuwa rangi tu ndiyo inayoleta tofauti. Pia ukisoma katika kitabu cha Mwanza utaona kuhusu wana wa Shemu, Yapheti na Hamu utaona ndio waliozaa wazungu, Waarabu na Waafrika. Nenda ukasome Biblia ili ujue kwa kind mambo haya
Sent from my TECNO-W3 using JamiiForums mobile app
Kwahiyo Mungu aliwashindwa maana plan yake ilifeli au sio??Kwa kutumia uwezo wao, walikwepa kuzamishwa na gharika kwa kujibadili na kuwa roho. Wapo mama mapepo na majini.
Sent from my TECNO-W3LTE using JamiiForums mobile app
Paulo ni myahudi nani alikuambia ametoka ulaya ?? Kipindi cha Roman empire watu walikuwa wanamove wayahudi unawakuta hadi Thessaloniki, efeso,pergamo na various part ila Paulo alikuwa ni myahudi kiasili na kidini pia ingawa alikuja kubadilisha dini
Mkuu sasa hivi hatumtegemei mzungu,kila kitu kimehamia China.Kila ninachokitumia hapa kimezalishwa China.Vya mzungu labda mitumba tu.Mzungu hutumia akili za wengine kuwatawala.Vyuo vikuu vya ulaya vimejaa wageni wa mabara mbalimbali wakati vyuo vikuu vyetu vimejaa wazawa, unafikiri mtakuwa saw a.China imestuka haitaki kutumika na iwapo mchina ataenda kusoma ulaya ataenda kwa musheni maalumu sio kama waafrika wanaenda kusoma ulaya ila hawajui wanaenda kufanya nini.Lini waafrika tutakuwa na upeo wa kugundua teknolojia, mapinduzi ya viwanda na siasa safi ili tuachane na mambo ya mzungu?
Au tutaendelea kuwa wanafiki huku tukimnanga ilihali bado tunahitaji msaada wake kwa yote hayo?
Let us wakeup and find our way
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Lini waafrika tutakuwa na upeo wa kugundua teknolojia, mapinduzi ya viwanda na siasa safi ili tuachane na mambo ya mzungu?
Au tutaendelea kuwa wanafiki huku tukimnanga ilihali bado tunahitaji msaada wake kwa yote hayo?
Let us wakeup and find our way
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
[emoji44][emoji44][emoji44][emoji44][emoji44][emoji44][emoji848][emoji848][emoji848][emoji848][emoji848][emoji144][emoji144][emoji144][emoji144][emoji144][emoji120][emoji120][emoji120]Biblia yenyewe katunga imeandikwa na mzungu,mzungu anaweza kuichezesha shere dunia kisha wote tukacheza,mzungu Leo hii akiamua bwana mshana awe rais wa Congo atakuwa,mzungu Leo hii anauwezo wa kuamua nani awe afe nani aishi,nenda iraki ukikutana na sadam kama yupo hai njoo nikupe zawadi na Libya hivyohivyo,mzungu anauwezo wa kuamua kuifilisi nchi yako ,kama huamini kaangalie Zimbabwe,tufanyeji jeuri yoote lakini hao watu waacheni ni namba zingine hizo kabisaaa,we MTU Alisha wahi kuwatawala then mkamfukuza ,harafu MTU huyohuyo anakuja kutalii katika nchi yako na unamfurahia,watu wengine wanaenda mbali zaidi wanaenda kuhifadhi mapesa kwenye nchi zao,hao ndo wazungu,upende usipende utawahitaji tu,kwanza usipofahamu lugha yao kazi hupati,KITUKO HIKI,mswahili anaajiliwa na mswahili mwenzake lakini wanataka kiingeleza
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Yusufu alikimbilia wapi ? Na eneo alipokimbilia lipo bara gani ?Kweli kiongozi Asili ya ulimwengu ni mashariki ya kati na si vinginevyo.Mitume wote wametoka hapo hakutoka hata mmoja Ulaya wala Amerika wala Africa japo haikuwepo zama hizo.
asante sana umemisaidia kuconnect baadhi ya doti na kupata majibu ya maswal yalio kiwa hayajibikView attachment 535737kuna vitu vingi vya kushangaza mno, ambavyo kutokana na kutwezwa na mahangaiko ya dunia tunakosa muda wa kuvitafakari
1. Dunia ya Mungu ilikuwa mashariki ya kati?
Hapa ndio kama Mungu alipatambua kama uumbaji wake! Si kwamba hakukuwa na maisha mengine la hasha yalikuwepo! Soma habari za Lilith au Kaini kwenda kuoa 'huko kwingine' baada ya kumuua ndugu yake!
2.Dini zote zinazoamini katika uwepo wa Mungu asili yake ni mashariki ya kati, hata katika misahafu tunachosoma kwa sehemu kubwa sana ni habari za mashariki ya kati..
Habari na matukio makuu ya dunia yote ni hapo
- Bustani ya Eden
- Mnara wa Babel
-Gharika ya Nuhu
-Sodoma na Gomorah etc etc
Kuna mahali kwenye kitabu cha Mithali tunaaswa kutafuta elimu hata mpaka China! Kwa hiyo hii ilikuwepo pia
3. Historia ya mzungu haiandikwi popote (I may be corrected) ama inaandikwa kwa uchache! Africa ilijulikana kwa Mungu(aliitambua pia) soma habari za mafarao na mfalme Suleiman na Cheopatra na asili zao!
4. Mzungu ni mvamizi wa dunia( possibly Alien ama mkuzimu) cha kushangaza mno ndio tunamchukulia kama uzao wa Mungu kutokana na yote aliyoyafanya ya kushangaza hapa duniani hasa kwenye tech
Kwa kutumia ufahamu wake na uwezo wake mkuu mzungu amejitahidi kuidanganya na kuiaminisha dunia kuwa yeye ndio kiumbe bora zaidi duniani( haya matangopori wamelishwa wengi na kuvimbiwa)
Kwa kutumia ushawishi wake huo ameweza kuigeuza historia ya dunia na kuweka mapicha yake kutuaminishaView attachment 535749
Mambo yote mabaya yana mkono wa mzungu...mipango ya muda mrefu na ya siri sana ya kutaka kuangamiza uzao wa dunia je ni hofu kuwa wenye dunia yao kuna siku watakuja kuamka na kufunuliwa ukweli?
Hofu ni ya nini mpaka alete utambulisho wa microchips mwilini?
Hofu ya nini mpaka aanzishe projects nyingi za kuleta na kueneza imani zinazopingana na Mungu?
Hofu ni ya nini mpaka yale mambo ambayo ni chukizo mbele za Mungu yeye ayashadadie kwa kiwango cha juu mno?
Hofu ni ya nini mpaka aendelee kuichonganisha na kuipiganisha mashariki ya kati kila uchao?
Utajiri wa dunia (mafuta na madini) kwa sehemu kubwa vinapatikana hapo mashariki ya kati na Africa! Huko kwingine Mungu hakukubariki! Huko ndiko alikotokea Lilith! Huko ndiko asili ya Kaini alikimbilia! Huko ndiko kulikolaaniwa na Mungu ndio maana hawakubarikiwa chochote cha asili (wengi hawatanielewa)
Huko ndiko walikotikea wale wanefili majitu makubwa
Kila kitu kina pande mbili hasi na chanya! Mzungu anajua upande wa hasi ni upi ndio maana haachi kuhangaika na kule kulikobarikiwa
WATASHINDANA LAKINI HAWATASHINDA! MUNGU HAJAWAHI KUSHINDWA
he!nikuambie unafahamu MTO Nile,unaanzia aftika mashariki na unaishia bahari ya mediterenia,unapita Misri,he unajua Yakobo/Israeli alikunywa maji ya Nile ,Musa,Joseph,Bikira maria,Kristu,niseme Ethiopia INA husika sana na imaniKweli kiongozi Asili ya ulimwengu ni mashariki ya kati na si vinginevyo.Mitume wote wametoka hapo hakutoka hata mmoja Ulaya wala Amerika wala Africa japo haikuwepo zama hizo.