Kama Mungu hayupo, binadamu katokea wapi?

[Jimena]

Wana hoja gani? mungu anaanzia kwenye ubongo wako.akili ikikataa bas amin uwepo wa mungu. na ukiiset kama yupo basi utaamin uwepo wake

Hawana hoja yoyote hekaya tu mkuu ndo zinazoendelea

 

[REALITY]

Life originates from a single cell, In fact, life also evolved according to the evolution biology. When Big Ban happened Oxygen wasn't supporting life .Richard Dwarkin has a sophisticated account of origin of life. The issues raised of cats and Dogs is the matter of genes, biology explains that very well.

Source of bigbang

 

[REALITY]

Wana hoja gani? mungu anaanzia kwenye ubongo wako.akili ikikataa bas amin uwepo wa mungu. na ukiiset kama yupo basi utaamin uwepo wake

akili ni nini?na kwanini umweleze Mungu ilhali humjui?umejuaje anaanza?sifa za ambaye humjui umezitoa wapi?kwanini liwepo neno ambalo uwakilisha ambacho hakipo?na kwanini upinge ambacho hukifahamu?eti tu kwasababu hukijui ,kama unataka mtafute maana yupo kila mahala ,ukijua kinachofikiri ufikiri unafikiria kufikiri kwanini unafikiri ndo uje hapa

 

[kichekoh]

akili ni nini?na kwanini umweleze Mungu ilhali humjui?umejuaje anaanza?sifa za ambaye humjui umezitoa wapi?kwanini liwepo neno ambalo uwakilisha ambacho hakipo?na kwanini upinge ambacho hukifahamu?eti tu kwasababu hukijui ,kama unataka mtafute maana yupo kila mahala ,ukijua kinachofikiri ufikiri unafikiria kufikiri kwanini unafikiri ndo uje hapa

Mkuu kwani mi nimebisha kama mungu yupo? Ila mungu nnayemfikiria mimi tofauti na wewe.
We unaweza uka-imagine kwamba mungu ni object may be inayoonekana na kushikika. Lakini mi naamini mungu ni nguvu kuu kuliko kitu chochote, ambacho nguvu zimegawanywa katika kila kiumbe. Ndo mana nikasema hata wewe ni sehemu ya uungu. Na kuna mambo katika mwili wako unaamsha hizo nguvu kwa kiwango cha juu na unakua na power ya kufanya vingi.
Ndo mana hata Yesu aliweza kufufua watu na kutembea juu ya bahari, sio kama we huwezi, uaweza sana ila issue ni kuzi-activate nguvu ulizonazo kwenye mwili wako.

 

[REALITY]

Mkuu kwani mi nimebisha kama mungu yupo? Ila mungu nnayemfikiria mimi tofauti na wewe.
We unaweza uka-imagine kwamba mungu ni object may be inayoonekana na kushikika. Lakini mi naamini mungu ni nguvu kuu kuliko kitu chochote, ambacho nguvu zimegawanywa katika kila kiumbe. Ndo mana nikasema hata wewe ni sehemu ya uungu. Na kuna mambo katika mwili wako unaamsha hizo nguvu kwa kiwango cha juu na unakua na power ya kufanya vingi.
Ndo mana hata Yesu aliweza kufufua watu na kutembea juu ya bahari, sio kama we huwezi, uaweza sana ila issue ni kuzi-activate nguvu ulizonazo kwenye mwili wako.

umejuaje kama namrefer katika hizo perception zako?hatuwezi kufanana naye hata siku mmoja maana yeye ndo kaumba tena kwa mfano wake akimaanisha anamifano mingi ya kumuumbia binadamu ila kachugua mfano mmoja ambao tupo tulivyo ,kingine mwanadamu kuwa na power of will lazima iwe interacted na spiritual atmospher na inaweza kuwa evil or good katika conduct.kingine humans cant resurrect sahau

 

[descarte]

Source of bigbang

What do you mean?I haven't got you well

 

[REALITY]

What do you mean?I haven't got you well

bingbang ina chanzo like reactions of hydrogens and blah blah or energy forces ,maybe you tell me source ya hizo energy ni nini

 

[descarte]

bingbang ina chanzo like reactions of hydrogens and blah blah or energy forces ,maybe you tell me source ya hizo energy ni nini

It just happened,
You may call it "Nothingness" if you will
All in All the world just came from nothing because total energy of universe is Zero. Physics can prove that.
Come to your argument of the source, such an argument presupposes a certain source which is transcendental.
It is a fake argument

 

[kichekoh]

Safi kabisa, unasema mungu hatuwezi fanana hata kidogo. Lakin huyo huyo mungu ndo aliwaambieni "Na tuumbe mtu kwa mfano wetu" au hujawahi ona hilo andiko? Sasa huoni maneno yenu yanajikanganya?

 

[Mzee Wa Chuga]

Ni kweli kabisa kabisa unavyosema Dr. Aluta, ukiona gari barabarani ujue limeundwa na hata wazee wa busara walishasema "ukiona vyaelea ujue vimeundwa."

Vile vile ukiona kuna Mungu anaelea elea hewani ujue ameundwa. Sasa tuambie, Mungu na yeye kaundwa na nani?

Tukumbuke kama wakristo wanaesmaalipozaliwa yesu ndio pale ilipoanza kuhesabiwa miaka pia wanasema yesu kazaliwa tar.25 Dec.lakini nimetafuta kwenye bible sikuliona hilo kwa ujumla dini ni biashara

 

[REALITY]

Safi kabisa, unasema mungu hatuwezi fanana hata kidogo. Lakin huyo huyo mungu ndo aliwaambieni "Na tuumbe mtu kwa mfano wetu" au hujawahi ona hilo andiko? Sasa huoni maneno yenu yanajikanganya?

hayajikanganyi soma my previous statement,hapo juu nimekuelezea andiko lina maana gani

 

[REALITY]

It just happened,
You may call it "Nothingness" if you will
All in All the world just came from nothing because total energy of universe is Zero. Physics can prove that.
Come to your argument of the source, such an argument presupposes a certain source which is transcendental.
It is a fake argument

bible says in the begining there was word and the word was from nothing and the word was in GOD,Word is sound,sound is frequency,frequency is waves,waves is energy,energy is matter,matter is source of we,cosmic and cosmos all this was from nothing but in GOD,do you know what is nothing to begin with?

 

[descarte]

bible says in the begining there was word and the word was from nothing and the word was in GOD,Word is sound,sound is frequency,frequency is waves,waves is energy,energy is matter,matter is source of we,cosmic and cosmos all this was from nothing but in GOD,do you know what is nothing to begin with?

The hypothesis of God doesn't work here
In fact, Bible isn't the book of science, it is the book of faith. So it is not considered as the book of science or philosophy.
In fact, the things you qouted are from the book of Myth in the bible.
You quoted Bible as a book which atheists do not believe

 

[Free ideas]

There is no god either you like or not

 

[REALITY]

The hypothesis of God doesn't work here
In fact, Bible isn't the book of science, it is the book of faith. So it is not considered as the book of science or philosophy.
In fact, the things you qouted are from the book of Myth in the bible.
You quoted Bible as a book which atheists do not believe

hahaha bible is a codec message from higher celestial levels to earthly individuals as whole in different chains of knowledge whether science,theology,philosophy,metaphysics,ontology,psychology,to be clear bible was once a torah which was thunderprinted at mt.sinai from outerspace anyway what is nothing to start with?

 

[REALITY]

There is no god either you like or not

hahaha upo mtoto wa bigbang kama god sawa ila si GOD

 

[REALITY]

Tukumbuke kama wakristo wanaesmaalipozaliwa yesu ndio pale ilipoanza kuhesabiwa miaka pia wanasema yesu kazaliwa tar.25 Dec.lakini nimetafuta kwenye bible sikuliona hilo kwa ujumla dini ni biashara

HAHAHA mkuu hizo holidays ni za wapagani hakuna sehemu jesus claimed people to celebrate his birth afteral humans are born and jesus was GOD

 

[muxar]

Humu ndo Jf bwana,hakuna mungu ambaye haonekani ila bado raia wanasema wametumia AKILI kung'amua hayo au Akili za wanasayansi.

Akili hizo hizo ambazo nazo hazionekani ndo zinathibitisha kutokuwepo kwa Mungu,hivi sisi wanaadamu tuna akili kweli?

 

[descarte]

hahaha bible is a codec message from higher celestial levels to earthly individuals as whole in different chains of knowledge whether science,theology,philosophy,metaphysics,ontology,psychology,to be clear bible was once a torah which was thunderprinted at mt.sinai from outerspace anyway what is nothing to start with?

Who cares? Whether it was once a Torah or what.
Oooh "Bible is a codec message from higher celestial levels to earthly individuals as whole in different chains of knowledge"
SO what?
Bible is a book of faith and relevant to Christians not to atheists or Buddhists.
Bible is a irrational book if you considered it as a book of science.
In science, for something to be scientific should fit within the principle of *Falsification* that whenever one claims something, his argument should be falsifiable. This qualifies an argument as a good argument. GOD Hypothesis isn't a good argument because it is not falsifiable. It fits all the arguments. It claim to be the primordial source of everything in a universe.

 

[REALITY]

hahaha he doesnt fit you know why because you dont know what you are laying under hypothesis ,GOD is anything source of everything whatever you think it might have been a reason of everything in cosmos we term it or give it a word GOD,,all your arguments are wright in your own scientific perception and whoever shares it too,GOD is beyond thinking,knowlegde and time. anythng human does are just 0.09 out of 100 of nature ,to start with do you know what is nothing?