Kesi iliyofungiliwa na Adv Kisabo kuhusu walipo kina Soka kusililizwa kesho Dar mahakama Kuu

Kesi iliyofungiliwa na Adv Kisabo kuhusu walipo kina Soka kusililizwa kesho Dar mahakama Kuu

R

Retired

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Posts
44,629
Reaction score
83,056
Mlio Dar fikeni kwa wingi!

Polsi tusiwalaumu, huenda kuna amri toka kwa wakubwa zao kuwa washikilie/waue. Kama IGP, Waziri Masauni, and all other top authorities wamekaa kimya, means wanahusika na amri hizi!
 
Kesi muhimu hii kisheria na kikatiba. Yaani wamlete Deus Soka au mwili wake mahakamani, kwa kuwa wao ndiyo waliomwita kituoni. Na ni washukiwa namba moja.

Kiini cha HABEAS CORPUS : kuwa wewe uliyemkamata mtu lazima una mwili, na kwa kuongeza, tuletee mwili mahakamani mbele ya jaji / hakimu tumuone.


Maana mmekuwa mna mficha kiongozi wa CHADEMA kamanda Deus Soka kiasi mke, wazazi, ndugu, jamaa, marafiki na chama hatujui yupo wapi tangu apokee simu kutoka kituo cha Polisi Changombe wilaya ya Temeke mkoa wa Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Habeas corpus ilitoka kwa neno la Kilatini ambalo limetafsiriwa kwa urahisi kuwa, una mwili, na kwa kuongeza, kuulete mwili. Kiini cha hati au amri ya habeas corpus ilikuwa kuhakikisha unamleta mtu katika mahakama ya sheria na Serikali ili kuwezesha uchunguzi wa kimahakama kuhusu sababu za kufungwa kwake / kuwekwa mahabusu. Maombi ya amri hiyo, kwa kawaida yalielekezwa kwa wakala wa Serikali, ambapo mwombaji alikuwa na sababu ya kuamini kwamba mtu aliyepotea, alikuwa chini ya ulinzi wa wa kwanza. Maandiko ya habeas corpus yalikuwa chemchemi ya uhuru, ngome dhidi ya kufungwa kinyume cha sheria kwa wale ambao wangekuwa huru. Iliwakomboa wanyonge kutoka kwa vifungo vya wale ambao walikuwa na mamlaka juu ya raia

Latin term habeas corpus :

  1. Habeas corpus originated from a Latin maxim which simply translated to, you have the body, and by extension, produce the body. The essence of a writ or order of habeas corpus was to secure the production of a person in a court of law by the State so as to facilitate a judicial inquiry into the reasons for his/her incarceration. The application for such an order, was usually directed at an agency of the State, where the applicant had reason to believe that the missing person, was in the custody of the former. The writ of habeas corpus was a fountain of liberty, a bulwark against illegal confinement of those, who would otherwise be free. It liberated the oppressed from the dungeons of those who wield authority over the citizenry.
Source : Kenya Law: Weekly Newsletter 020/23-24
 
bagamoyo said:
Kesi muhimu hii kisheria na kikatiba. Yaani yamlete Soka au mwili wake mahakamani, kwa kuwa wao ndiyo waliomwita kituoni. Na ni washukiwa namba moja.

Kiini cha HABEAS CORPUS : kuwa wewe uliyemkamata mtu lazima una mwili, na kwa kuongeza, tuletee mwili mahakamani mbele ya jaji / hakimu tumuone.


Maana mmekuwa mna mficha kiongozi wa CHADEMA kamanda Deus Soka kiasi mke, wazazi, ndugu, jamaa, marafiki na chama hatujui yupo wapi tangu apokee simu kutoka kituo cha Polisi Changombe wilaya ya Temeke mkoa wa Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Habeas corpus ilitoka kwa neno la Kilatini ambalo limetafsiriwa kwa urahisi kuwa, una mwili, na kwa kuongeza, kuulete mwili. Kiini cha hati au amri ya habeas corpus ilikuwa kuhakikisha unamleta mtu katika mahakama ya sheria na Serikali ili kuwezesha uchunguzi wa kimahakama kuhusu sababu za kufungwa kwake / kuwekwa mahabusu. Maombi ya amri hiyo, kwa kawaida yalielekezwa kwa wakala wa Serikali, ambapo mwombaji alikuwa na sababu ya kuamini kwamba mtu aliyepotea, alikuwa chini ya ulinzi wa wa kwanza. Maandiko ya habeas corpus yalikuwa chemchemi ya uhuru, ngome dhidi ya kufungwa kinyume cha sheria kwa wale ambao wangekuwa huru. Iliwakomboa wanyonge kutoka kwa vifungo vya wale ambao walikuwa na mamlaka juu ya raia

Latin term habeas corpus :

  1. Habeas corpus originated from a Latin maxim which simply translated to, you have the body, and by extension, produce the body. The essence of a writ or order of habeas corpus was to secure the production of a person in a court of law by the State so as to facilitate a judicial inquiry into the reasons for his/her incarceration. The application for such an order, was usually directed at an agency of the State, where the applicant had reason to believe that the missing person, was in the custody of the former. The writ of habeas corpus was a fountain of liberty, a bulwark against illegal confinement of those, who would otherwise be free. It liberated the oppressed from the dungeons of those who wield authority over the citizenry.
Source : Kenya Law: Weekly Newsletter 020/23-24
Click to expand...

CHADEMA WANAMTAKA KIONGOZI WA CHADEMA WILAYA YA TEMEKE AACHILIWE KUTOKA MIKONONI MWA WALIOMFICHA


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mBHp4HC_hg0
 

TOKA MAKTABA​

21 August 2024
Deusdedith Soka: Haijalishi Watatutesa Kiasi Gani ni Lazima Tuipiganie Nchi Yetu


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IBiQWxmh8qQ

Mwanaharakati, Deusdedith Soka, siku kadhaa kabla ya kuripotiwa kuchukuliwa na watu wasiojulikana alifanya mahojiano na The Chanzo.

Na kusema kuwa amekuwa akikumbana na vitisho mbalimbali vya kutaka kumdhuru ili kuirudisha nyuma nia yake ya kupambania demokrasia nchini lakini suala hilo halitamrudisha nyuma kamwe.

Deus Soka ambaye pia ni Mwenyekiti wa Baraza la Vijana wa Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (BAVICHA) wilaya ya Temeke, aliyasema hayo Agosti 16, 2024, wakati alipozungumza nasi kwenye mahojiano maalum.

Mazungumzo hayo pia yaligusia mpango wake wa kuandaa maandamano yaliyopangwa kufanyika Agosti 26, 2024, kwa ajili ya kuishinikiza Serikali ichukue hatua kukomesha matukio ya utekaji pamoja na kurejesha mchakato wa kuipatia Tanzania Katiba Mpya.
 
Retired said:
Mlio Dar fikeni kwa wingi!

Polsi tusiwalaumu, huenda kuna amri toka kwa wakubwa zao kuwa washikilie/waue. Kama IGP, Waziri Masauni, and all other top authorities wamekaa kimya, means wanahusika na amri hizi!
Click to expand...
Usi shangae waka achiliwa leo usiku.
 
CCM haitaki kufuata sheria, ni utemi utemi.
 
28 Agosti 2024

Baada ya jaji wa mahakama kuu kusoma uamuzi wake, wadau watoa maoni...

KIMEWAKA! EX MEYA WA UBUNGO AFUNGUKA MAZITO MARA BAADA YA HUKUMU YA SOKA | "WAMEHALALISHA UTEKAJI"​


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ykdKBpmql7g

Suala hili sasa limebaki mikononi mwa wananchi maana mihimili yote yaani mhimili wa Bunge umekataa kujadili utekaji au kumhoji waziri, mhimili wa mahakama nao umetoa uamuzi kuegemea upande wa serikali, na mhimili wa serikali kuu inasema vyombo vyake kama Polisi havihusiki na kutekwa kwa Deus Soka na wenzie wakili

Meya mstaafu Boniface Jacob anaongeza kuwa sasa wananchi hawana mtetezi, na jukumu lililobaki ni wananchi kutafuta jinsi ya kujilinda dhidi ya watu wasiojulikana wanaoendeleza Wimbi la kuteka na kupoteza watu ...
 
REJEA MUHIMU: 17.10.2023
Pale aliyeshikiliwa na Polisi kinyume na sheria akashinda ombi lake la kufikishwa mahakamani kutoka anaposhikiliwa :

Habeas Corpus / Mlete Mtuhumiwa Mahakamani

Pale mahakama kuu ilipokubaliana na mleta maombi ya kutaka Mahakama Kuu itamke ameshikiliwa isivyo halali kisheria na kikatiba :

Pale jaji W.P. Dyansobera alipotoa hukumu kuwa mtuhumiwa anashikiliwa kinyume na sheria :


IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
(DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)
AT PAR ES SALAAM
MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2023

ZAKARIA ANTHONY KAPAMA...................... APPLICANT


VERSUS


OFFICER COMMANDING STATION
OYSTERBAY(OCS)...........1st RESPONDENT

REGIONAL POLICE COMMANDER
OF KINONDONI..................... 2nd RESPONDENT


INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE OF TANZANIA..... 3rd RESPONDENT


THE ATTORNEY GENERAL............4th RESPONDENT


RULING
16th & 17th October, 2023
DYANSOBERA, J.:

This is an application filed under Section 390 (1) (a) and (b) of the
Criminal Procedure Act [Cap.20 R.E.2022] whereby the applicant herein is seeking the following orders:

1. That this Honourable court be pleased to order the applicant
be released from the unlawful custody or detention of the
respondents forthwith.
2. That in the alternative thereof, this Honourable court be
pleased to order the appearance of the respondent before this

Page 1


Honourable Court to show cause why the corpus of the
applicant who is unlawfully detained d not be set at liberty.

3. That this Honourable court be pleased to issue an order
prohibiting the respondent from unlawfully detaining the
applicant for a longer period than permitted by law.

4. This court be pleased to issue an order compelling the
respondent to discharge their duties in accordance of with the
applicable law.

5. That any other order that this Honourable court deems fit to
grant.
An affidavit supporting the application has been sworn and filed by learned Advocate, Mr. Deogratias Alex Butawantemi. Although the respondents through Messrs. Clement Masua and Erick Bakilana, both
learned State Attorneys, intimated to file a counter affidavit, they have
not lived to their word.

At the time of hearing of this application, the applicant was
represented by Mr. Deogratias Alex Butawantemi. The respondents, though served, did not appear.

Submitting in support of the application, he argued as follows.
According to the court's order made last time, the respondents were to file their counter affidavit but none has been filed. In that respect, the court is invited to invoke its powers and by on the strength of the case of
Sisto Katabi @ Macho v. Republic, Misc. Criminal Application No. 63
of 2020, at p.3 and find that the application has not been factually opposed.

Counsel for the applicant prayed the court to grant the orders
prayed for under the Chamber summons and, in particular, to order the

Page 2


corpus of the applicant one Zakaria Kapama be released from unlawful custody or detention of the respondents, prohibiting the respondent from
unlawfully detaining the applicant for longer period than is required by law and issue an order compelling the respondents to discharge their
duties in accordance to the law applicable in our jurisdiction.

On the court's power to issue directions of nature of habeas corpus, Section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap. 20 R.E.2022] is clear and
provides as hereunder: -
390.-(1) The High Court may, whenever it thinks fit, direct-

(a) that any person within the limits of Mainland Tanzania be
brought up before the court to be dealt with according to law;

(b) that any person illegally or improperly detained in public or
private custody within such limits be set at liberty;

(c) that any prisoner detained in any prison situate within such limits be brought before the court to be there examined as a witness in any matter pending or to be inquired into in such court;

(d) that any prisoner detained as aforesaid be brought before a
court-martial or any commissioner acting under the authority or any commission from the President for trial or be examined touching any
matter pending before such court-martial or commissioner
respectively;

(e) that any prisoner within such limits be removed from one
custody to another for the purpose of trial; and

(f) that the body of a defendant within such limits be brought in ona return of cepi corpus to a writ of attachment.

Page 3

On the definition of the parameters of the writ of habeas corpus adsubjiciendum was well elaborated in the case of Joviah Karuhanga
v. the Inspector General of Police, M.C. 86 of 2013 thus:
The purpose for a writ habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is to review the legality of the applicant's arrest, imprisonment and detention and challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue holding the applicant. It ensures that a prisoner can be released
from unlawful detention i.e., detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence or detention incommunicado. The detention must therefore be forbidden by law.

In the case under consideration, it is averred in the supporting
affidavit that the applicant one Zacharia Anthony Kapama is the Director of Nezak Investment Limited, the company which also owns KP Motors. It deals with business of importation of motor vehicles.

On 29th September, 2023 the police arrested the applicant and put him under custody and is still within their custody at Oyster Bay Police Station. It is further averred that the applicant is being detained without being granted police bail or being arraigned in a competent authority.

It is also averred that the detention is unlawful,
as pointed out earlier, at the time of hearing this application, the
respondents were summoned but they did not make appearance in court and there is no counter affidavit filed to counter the contents in the
applicant's affidavit. As rightly pointed out by Mr. Deogratias Alex Butawantemi, the applicant's learned Counsel and on the authority of the case of Sisto Katabi @ Macho v. R., Miscellaneous Criminal Application

Page 4


Number. 63 of 2020, 'failure to file a counter affidavit is a signification that the
application is not factually opposed'.

Having heard the submission of the applicant's learned Counsel and after taking into account the unopposed applicant's affidavit filed in support of the application, I am in no doubt that the applicant's detention
is unlawful and this is a fit case where the provisions of Section 390 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (supra), should be invoked.
Accordingly, the application is granted and acting under paragraph (a) of sub-section (1) of section 390 of the Act, I make an order against the respondents that the applicant be brought up before this court to be dealt with according to law.

This order to be complied with not later than after tomorrow.
It is so ordered. Ck . f

W.P. Dyansobera
JUDGE
17.10.2023

Page 5

Source : Zakaria Anthony Kapama vs. Officer Commanding Station Oyterbay (OCS) & 3Others) (Misc. Criminal Application No. 132 of 2023) [2023] TZHC 21830 (17 October 2023)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register