Mimi jibu langu - na haya ni mawazo yangu tu:
Tarehe ile ya 28 Oktoba mimi niliandika
mada hii kuelezea mawazo yangu siku ile. Baadhi ya maswali yako yanajibika mle. Nitajinukuu kidogo tu na naamini hatuko mbali kifikra katika hili.
Juu ya Jecha na kufuta uchaguzi:
the only grave issue here is the authority of NEC or its chairman to nullify the whole election based on some irregularities that could have been dealt with otherwise. As I read Chairman Jecha?s letter to announce his decision I found nowhere in it where the chairman argued a point of law to defend his decision. He didn?t mention a single law to show that indeed he has the power to nullify the law. This does not mean he doesn?t or that NEC doesn?t have that authority. This means then that this question cannot be settled by politicians who would benefit either way with the decision. This issue should be sorted and settled in a court of law immediately. Everything else stands or falls on this point.
Nikaeleza tena kidogo kuwa:
What most people probably missed in Jecha?s reasoning for the cancellation of the Presidential results is the inference on who is responsible for meddling with the election process. If we were to believe his points of irregularities the whole mess started in Pemba. Point 2, 3, 4, 7 and 9 in his letter clearly accuse (not by mentioning names) that CUF which has an overwhelming presence in Pemba for interfering with the process. This was capped up with Seif declaring himself a winner and thus putting ZEC in crossfire. There was no way out for ZEC; declare Seif the winner and thus ignore those issues raised in points 2, 3, 4, 7 and 9 in his letter to the wrath of the ruling party or declare Shein the winner and ignore Seif?s allegations. To be between the rock and the hard place would have been a better than this position. He chose the way out ? nullify the whole process to the anger of probably both.
Nikatoa wito kuwa:
As I have said above the issue of ZEC power to nullify election is the fundamental one to be dealt here and as a matter of fact urgently.
Sasa, sijui kwanini unaweza kudhania kuwa sijajali sana hoja hii nzito ya masuala hayo. Lakini niliamini wakati ule na nikatoa neno la hekima tu kuwa:
Last note is that this issue is a Tanzanian issue and I believe with all the deficiencies we have in our legal system we still are capable of addressing them. Foreign entities should not be allowed to put undue pressure on the country. This is a very delicate time and we should expect our friends to refrain from inflaming the wounded sentiments of our people. They should be wise to let the Tanzanian people sort these things on their own.
Mkuu MM , nashukuru kwa maoni yako ingawa hayakujibu maswali haya kwa ukamilifu
1. Ni nani anayelalamika kuhusu kurugwa kwa uchaguzi?
2. Je, ni kweli Jecha alichukuliwa na 'vyombo' au si kweli?
3. Je, kuna kumbu kumbu za kikao cha tume kuhusu kufutwa uchaguzi?
4. Je, ni dai au madai gani yaliyoelezwa na tume a.k.a Jecha?
5. Sheria gani ya ZNZ inayosema tume inaweza kufuta uchaguzi wote?
6. Ni sharia gani ya ZNZ inayoeleza kuhusu uchaguzi wa marudio?
Kwa atakayekusoma vema na kwa kina, tayari ulishachukua upande(ni haki kwasasabu ni maoni yako). Ni vema niangalie maoni yako kwa msingi huo
1. Unapozungumzia 'nullification' iliyotokana na ZEC, nimekuuliza , je kuna kumbu kumbu zozote za kikao cha jumla cha ZEC kuhusu hilo?
2. '' This ....should be settle in court of law''
Swali lingine, Je, kifungu gani cha sheria kinaeleza masuala ya uchaguzi kutafutiwa ufumbuzi mahakamani?
Je, kipo kufungu kinachoeleza uamuzi wa tume kuweza kupingwa mahakamani?
Je, kifungu gani kinaeleza uchaguzi ukiwa na matatizo majimbo 2, 3,4 au 5 tume inapaswa kufuta matokeo ya Jumla?
Ni kifungu gani cha sheria kinachoeleza utaratibu wa kufuatwa baada ya matokeo ya jumla kufutwa?
3. ''
What most people probably missed in Jecha?s reasoning for the cancellation of the Presidential results is the inference on who is responsible for meddling with the election process. If we were to believe his points of irregularities the whole mess started in Pemba. Point 2, 3, 4, 7 and 9 in his letter clearly accuse (not by mentioning names) that CUF which has an overwhelming presence in Pemba for interfering with the process. This was capped up with Seif declaring himself a winner and thus putting ZEC in crossfire. There was no way out for ZEC; declare Seif the winner and thus ignore those issues raised in points 2, 3, 4, 7 and 9 in his letter to the wrath of the ruling party or declare Shein the winner and ignore Seif?s allegations. To be between the rock and the hard place would have been a better than this position. He chose the way out ? nullify the whole process to the anger of probably both''
Kama unakubali Jecha alifuta bila kunukuu kifungu cha sheria, je, bado unaamini ZEC ilifuta uchaguzi?
Na kama kulikuwa na malalamiko , nani alilamika kwa ZEC na kwa kumbu kumbu gani?
Kumbuka, kazi ya ZEC si kushiriki uchaguzi ni kusimamia uchaguzi, vipi ZEC iliona tatizo ikiwa hakukuwepo mlalamikaji?
Na ZEC inayolalamika irregularities, ni ipi ikiwa maeneo yanayolalamikiwa, ZEC ilitoa vyeti vya ushindi?
''Last note is that this issue is a Tanzanian issue and I believe with all the deficiencies we have in our legal system we still are capable of addressing them''
Katika maswali uliyouliza, hili linatoa jibu kwako kwanini CUF hawakwenda mahakamani
Defficiencies katika legal system yetu ambapo mwenyekiti wa NEC au ZEC pamoja na Majaji wakuu wanaweza kuwa 'wanachama' wa vyama vya siasa ''under cover'' umeli address vizuri sana
Je, bado unaamini katika CUF kwenda mahakamani?
Lakini pia kuna jingine ambalo hukujibu. Ikiwa Jecha aliyekuwa katika ulinzi wa Taifa na tume yake , aliweza 'kutekwa' bila serikali kujua tena wenzake wakiwa hawajui na ikiwa serikali haijakanusha hilo, nini kilishindikana kwa Jaji 'kutekwa' katika Jecha style?