Kwanini Nchi nyingi zenye asili ya Uislam zinakumbwa na Vita sana?


Hakuna anayejua kuhusu mwandishi wa "Injili ya Yohana":

Nani aliiandika.

Ni watu wangapi waliandika.

Lini Ilipoandikwa.

Wapi iliandikwa.

Pia, mtu anaposoma injili hii, angeona mara moja kwamba haikuandikwa na Yohana mwenyewe.

Wakristo wanasema kwamba ilikuwa ni Yohana Mtume akiandika kuhusu Yohana Mbatizaji. Ushahidi katika nukuu hapo juu unathibitisha wazi kwamba huu ni uwongo wa kukata tamaa!

Ninawasilisha kwenu kwamba hakuna Yohana aliyeandika chochote!

Hebu tuangalie mistari ifuatayo kutoka ndani ya hii injili:

"Na huu ndio ushuhuda wake Yohana, Wayahudi walipotuma makuhani na Walawi kutoka Yerusalemu ili wamwulize, Wewe u nani? (Kutoka Biblia ya King James Version, Yohana 1:19)"

Yohana akawajibu, akasema, Mimi nabatiza kwa maji, lakini amesimama mmoja wenu, msiyemjua ninyi;

"Kwa maana Yohana alikuwa bado hajatupwa gerezani. (Kutoka Biblia ya King James Version, Yohana 3:24)"

na kadhalika...

Yeyote aliyeandika injili, je aliteuliwa au kuongozwa na MUNGU ?

Ikiwa ndio, basi mtu huyo ni nani?

Haiwezi kuwa Yohana kwa kuwa ni dhahiri kabisa kutoka kwenye aya zilizopo hapo juu na nyingi zaidi katika injili yote kwamba Yohana hakuwa mwandishi asilia.

Mtu anapaswa kuwa na upendeleo wa dhihaka na kipofu katika imani ili kukataa hilo.

Vipi kuhusu aya hizi maarufu zaidi:

“Hapo mwanzo kulikuwako Neno, naye Neno alikuwako kwa Mungu, naye Neno alikuwako Mungu alikuwa na mamlaka (neno hilohilo la Kigiriki linalotumiwa kumaanisha utawala wa shetani [2] [3]). (Kutoka katika Biblia ya King James Version, Yohana 1:1)"

“Kwa maana jinsi hii Mungu aliupenda ulimwengu, hata akamtoa Mwanawe pekee, ili kila mtu amwaminiye asipotee, bali awe na uzima wa milele. (Kutoka Biblia ya King James Version, Yohana 3:16)”

Mistari hii ni wazi iliandikwa na watu wa ajabu na si na yeyote wa wanafunzi wa awali wa Yesu.

Kwa hiyo, ni kufuru kuzingatia aya kama za Kimungu na kujaribu kuthibitisha kwamba Yesu ndiye Muumba wa Ulimwengu kupitia hizo.

Uongo wa utatu ulizaliwa kati ya miaka ya 150 hadi 300.

Inawezekana kabisa na kuna uwezekano mkubwa kwamba kanisa fulani liliandika kile kinachoitwa "Injili ya Yohana" kutoka kwa sehemu ambazo waliipata.

Ona kwamba kuna "barua" 24,000 au karatasi zilizopatikana ambazo hazikujumuishwa katika Agano Jipya la leo, ambayo ina maana kwamba sehemu ambazo zilitumika kuandika "Injili ya Yohana" na vitabu vingine vyote na injili za Agano Jipya zina shaka sana. na hazina uthibitisho wowote kwamba ziliandikwa na yeyote wa wanafunzi wa awali wa Yesu.

Injili ya Yohana iliandikwa juu ya Yohana lakini sio na "Mtakatifu Yohana" wa asili.

Tofauti kubwa na ufisadi mkubwa!

Huwezi kuzingatia takataka kama Maneno Matakatifu ya MUNGU Mwenyezi.
 
Huihui2 said:
Acha kupiga porojo kwa mambo usoyajua na ambayo yako juu ya uwezo wako. Kunywa maji ulegeze makali ya swaumu
Click to expand...


Doomed, says Bishop​


 
Njaa inakusumbua. Nakupuuza kuanzia sasa.

Muhammad claimed homosexuality was wrong, he himself was involved in homosexual behavior.

Sunan Abi Dawud 5224,Narrated Usayd ibn Huday

AbdurRahman ibn AbuLayla, quoting Usayd ibn Hudayr, a man of the Ansar, said that while he was given to jesting and was talking to the people and making them laugh, the Prophet poked him under the ribs with a stick. He said: Let me take retaliation. He said: Take retaliation. He said: You are wearing a shirt but I am not. The Prophet then raised his shirt and the man embraced him and began to kiss his side. Then he said: This is what I wanted, Messenger of Alla


Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2732,Narrated 'Aisha

A man kissing Muhammad's bare ches
"Zaid bin Harithah arrived in Al-Madinah while the Messenger of Allah was in his house. So he went and knocked at the door, so the Messenger of Allah stood naked, dragging his garment - and by Allah! I did not see him naked before nor afterwards - and he hugged him and kissed him.

Naked Muhammad kissing another man. Muhammad was a pedophile and a homosexua

Muhammad dragged a boy into his tent and sodomised him, his followers standing outside heard the screams of the boy. But Muhammad would or should be more correctly labelled as a pedophile. I he was bisexual he needs to throw himself off a roof as his taught to do. It could be that Muhammad didn't want competition from other homosexuals so Allah sent down another convenient revelation via Gabriel to endorse Muhammad's peculiaritie

The other mention of Muhammad's homosexuality was when reproached by wives who asked him why gifts were being sent to Aisha's (his child bride) tent and not to their tents, he replied that Aisha was his favourite because when he is dressed in her robes, he received more revelations then when he was dressed in their robes. Check out more on this via David Wood's apologetic YouTube channel. If its in the Qur'an someone certainly put it in their.

If the Quran are the holy words of Allah, then we can genuinely acknowledge that Allah thought his prophet was a shirt-lifter, pillow-biter, ummm, Batted for the same tea

If this were not true, than why is it 1. In Tue Qur'an? and 2. Supported by multiple Hadith'

Certainly Muslims would denounce such an assertion, unless they can come up with incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, it is what it i

Big apologies to anyone named after Muhammad, don't blame me, blame your parents……have a real good day, Jesus love you all, over and out.
 



The Gospel of Mark:


This gospel is the oldest and is supposedly the most original one in the New Testament.



"Although the book is anonymous, apart from the ancient heading "According to Mark" in manuscripts, it has traditionally been assigned to John Mark, in whose mother's house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"


"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"


  • We certainly do not know whether Mark was the author or not! The quote clearly states "no direct internal evidence of authorship". Also, the so-called unanimous testimony of the early church:

    - Does not prove that the author was Mark.

    - Nor does it prove that other people did not alter and modify the book, especially when the book was written at least 40-50 years after Christ. We don't even know if Mark even wrote the book.


"Traditionally, the gospel is said to have been written shortly before A.D. 70 in Rome, at a time of impending persecution and when destruction loomed over Jerusalem. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"





"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"


"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted in the best manuscripts. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"


"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by someone other than Mark. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"


So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written. And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?
 


A new captured image of this book's corruption: Gospel of Mark








The above text reads: "The most reliable early manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."


Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient witnesses"?


According to the early Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie.

The so-called "gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated and shown in the sections later on.

People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books. They are neither original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.

If the "gospel of Mark" was indeed Divine and from GOD Almighty, then we wouldn't have this corruption, that they're admitting above, in it.
 

The Gospel of John:


Here is what the Bible's theologians and historians said about this gospel:


"Many scholars of the past two centuries have denied that John wrote this book, partly because of their belief that the author fabricated many details such as the miracles and the discourses of Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). (The Holman Illustrated Study Bible, ISBN: 978-1-58640-275-4, Gospel of John, Page1540)"


"Critical Analysis makes it difficult to accept the idea that the gospel as it now stands was written by one person. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"


"Within the gospel itself there are also some inconsistencies. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"


"To solve these problems, scholars have proposed various rearrangements that would produce a smoother order. However, most have come to the conclusion that the inconsistencies were probably produced by subsequent editing in which homogeneous materials were added to a shorter original. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"


"Other difficulties for any theory of eyewitness authorship of the gospel in its present form are presented by its highly developed theology and by certain elements of its literary style. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"


"The gospel contains many details about Jesus not found in the synoptic gospels. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"


"The final editing of the gospel and arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D. 90 and 100. Traditionally, Ephesus has been favored as the place of composition, though many support a location in Syria, perhaps the city of Antioch, while some have suggested other places, including Alexandria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1136)"
 


The Gospel of Luke:


"The identification of Luke as the author is primarily based on the "we" passages in Acts (beginning in Acts 16:10), which indicate that Luke was associated with Paul in his ministry and wrote down the account of his activities. (The Amplified Bible, Page 1153)"


The only proof that they have about Luke being the sole author of this gospel is a weak speculation on "we". This is absurd at best! This speculation shows:


  1. The gospel was likely to have been altered or written by others beside Luke.
  2. It's place of documentation is unknown.
  3. It's date of documentation is also unknown.

It is also worth mentioning that the author of the book of Acts is also unknown as shown above:


"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"


So their whole speculation is absurd at best!​


There is a serious forgery about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't! Let us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bible:


Luke 24


44 He said to them, "This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.


Luke 24:44-48 says that it is written in the Law of Moses (i.e., the Torah) that Jesus will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the entire Old Testament (not just in the 5 books of Moses that make up the Law of Moses or the Torah) do you have that?! Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day resurrection?


In fact, in my article Answering Isaiah 53, I clearly proved that the Old Testament actually confirms the Noble Quran's claims about Jesus never got crucified! Let alone dying and resurrecting on the third day!


Anyway, Let us see what the NIV Bible's theologians said about this book:


"The author's name does not appear in the book, but much unmistakable evidence points to Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1529)"


Again, we don't know for sure whether it was Luke or not who wrote the "Gospel of Luke" since his name doesn't appear in the Book. The Gospel itself seems to be a compromising one to the Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him). Let us look at the following:


"Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (Luke 1:3)"


Few problems with this Gospel from the quote above:


1- The author was not inspired, and knew for sure that he was not inspired by GOD Almighty to write the Book since he didn't mention about any divine inspiration, and he said "...since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning..." Where do we see GOD's inspiration in this?


2- The author wrote it for the purpose of "his most excellent Theophilus." Since when we compromise GOD Almighty and document His Holy Words for the purpose of other higher (in rank) human beings?


I say it again, I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!


Also, beside, what evidence are they talking about?! The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).

So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering as the True Living Word of GOD (Luke 2:52: GOD forgave Jesus' sins and was "charitable" with him).
 
Huihui2 said:
Acha kupiga porojo kwa mambo usoyajua na ambayo yako juu ya uwezo wako. Kunywa maji ulegeze makali ya swaumu
Click to expand...



A serious forgery in Luke 24:44-48 about Jesus'"resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the Old Testament when it wasn't!


Let us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bibles:


Luke 24


44 He said to them, "This is what I told you while Iwas still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law ofMoses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer andrise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to allnations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.



There is a serious forgery in Luke 24:44-48! It says that it is written that Jesus will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the Old Testament do you have that?!

Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day resurrection?


Anyway, the Gospel of Luke is not really authentic.

According to the theologians of the NIV Bible, most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people.

No one knows who wrote these books!
 
Jagina said:
Huko ndiko mnakokimbilia umeshindwa na hoja , mimi nakuwekea ushahidi wa hao waliokuandikia hizo biblia wanavyokuambia , matusi na kejeli nakupa uhuru hiyo ni choice au labda ndiyo mafundisho ya kanisa lenu
Click to expand...
Usiwe una copy na kupste hoja za watu wengine
Tumia utetezi wako hakuna mtu anamda wa kusoma hayo mavitu yako unayocopy na kupaste sababu siyo ya kwako
 
Reactions: 511
Tumia utetezi wako usitumie mgongo wa watu wengine
Tatizo lako unakariri kila kitu ndo maadhara ya kukariri juzuu ukiwa mdogo
 
Reactions: 511
HII NI DINI YA HAKI YA MNYAAZI INASAMBAA KWA NAMNA YOYOTE ILE, MTU AKILETA ZA KULETA ATAPIGWA TU. SISI SIYO KAMA NINYI MAKAFIR MNAFUNDISHANA UPENDO. SISI TUNATIANA ADABU KWA KWENDA MBELE. HAKUNA MASIKHARA
 
Reactions: 511
mkorinto said:
Tunaomba injili halisi ya Yesu na torati ya Mussa,popote pale ilipo.

Kwanini ni vigumu??wakati tayari unafahamu si halisi??

Yeye mwenyewe ana kesi ya kujibu,kwanini aruhusu watu waandike na ana uwezo wa kuandika yaliyotoka kwake???
Click to expand...
Huyo hajui chochote zaid ya kucopy na kupaste hakuna mtu anayemda wa kusoma huo ujinga wake ambao anachukua kwa watu wengine
 
mkorinto said:
Mimi wala mchungaji wangu hatuna cha kuongeza hapo.

Ninachotaka kujua ni injili tatu tofauti ulizozitaja.
Click to expand...
Ukielewa jambo huitaji kutumia ma-article ya watu wengine kulielezea
Unatumia lugha nyepesi na fupi ukishaona huwezi klielezea jambo kwa lugha nyepesi na fupi hujalielewa umekariri

Kuifahamu biblia inahitajika neema kubwa sana ya Mungu mfano shetani hakujua Yesu atafukukua siku ya tatu na atamnyanganya fungua za uzima wa mauti
Kufa kwa Yesu kuliandikwa kwenye biblia lakin shetan hakuona huo mstari na hakuulewa

Laiti angefahamu maandiko angemlinda Yesu kwa gharama yote asife mslabani kwa sababu kufa kwa Yesu msalaban ni hasara kubwa sana shetani

Ndo kama huyo jamaa anafikiri kusoma biblia ndo kuijua
 
Uislamu ni dini ya amani na upendo
Uislamu na ugaidi ni mbali mbali

Hili tumelisema sana ila hamuelewi tu
 
Unajua ukikuta muislam anashupaza shingo kwamba Yesu hakufa unasikitika kwamba hajui hii ina maana gani kwetu.

Ndio sababu hata mtume wao huwa tunamuona ni wakala wa shetani sababu,yuko nyuma ya agenda kubwa kabisa kinyume na ushindi wa wokovu wa msalaba.
 
Reactions: 511
Yesu asingepita msalaban work done ilikuwa equal to zero
Watu wanadhan Yesu alikuja kufanya miujiza lile sio lengo bali ni kupita msalabani
 
Unaokota matakataka kwenye Internet na kuyaweka bila kutumia akili. Unatupotezea muda na kujaza server za JF na pumba
 
Reactions: 511
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…