Let me get this straight about the COVID-19 vaccine

[The choosen one]

When you say it might be intended at DNA rewriting so it is the same as DNA editing, am totally discombobulated! May be the editing of the DNA is focused at malformation of brain cells so that we and our future generations will not have ability to ask questions esp. during bullying kind of elections I don't know.

The world needs to be arranged in a new order, the order that was not existed before,thats why people should be mutated so that they can fit in luciferic dominion.

Too dangerous God help us

 

[Mathanzua]

UPDATES:

AIRLINE PILOT WHO HAD A HEART ATTACK ON THE FLIGHT DECK SPEAKS OUT ABOUT THE FORCED VAX & HOW IT DESTROYED HIS LIFE (Video)​

 

[Mathanzua]

Doctor Who Warns of Covid Vax Dangers Says Pfizer Offered Him $1 Million​

March 28, 2022 NewsWars

Dr. Paul Alexander, Youtube



Dr. Paul Alexander is a COVID-19 Consultant Researcher in evidence-based medicine (EBM), Research Methodology, and Clinical Epidemiology and informally provided support to some members of the US Congress and Senate. Dr. Alexander said that Pf!zer offered him $1 million dollars and a $50,000 per month job to keep quiet about the dangers of Covid injections.

He rejected the offer because he believes that by accepting the money, he would be expected to stop exposing the negative health effects of Covid shots.

 

[Mathanzua]

Midazolam Used To Prematurely End Lives Of Thousands You Were Told Died Of COVID-19 - We Can Prove It! » Sons of Liberty Media​

In March 2020 the British people were told that they must “stay at home” in order to “protect the NHS” and “save lives”. They were also told that the authorities needed just “three weeks to flatten the curve”.
Why were the British people instructed to stay at home? Because of the threat of a new and emerging virus which we’re told originated in the city of Wuhan, China. A virus which has claimed the lives of 173,000 to date in the United Kingdom, or so we’re told.
But what if we could prove to you that you gave up two years of your life due to a lie? But not just any lie, a lie that has involved prematurely ending the lives of thousands upon thousands of people, who you were told died of Covid-19. A lie that has involved committing one of the greatest crimes against humanity in living memory. A lie that has required three things – fear, your compliance, and a drug known as Midazolam…
Authorities state that Covid-19 is an infectious disease caused by a new coronavirus dubbed SARS-CoV-2. The World Health Organisation (WHO) tell us that “most people infected with the COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment”. However they state that “older people, and those with underlying medical problems like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer are more likely to develop serious illness”.
We’re told that serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency. Therefore typical symptoms include breathlessness, cough, weakness and fever. We’re also told that people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failure and who do not receive intensive care, develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.

Pneumonia is an inflammation of one or both lungs, usually caused by an infection. It causes the alveoli (air sacs) inside the lungs to fill with fluid, making it harder for them to work properly. The body sends white blood cells to fight the infection, and while this helps kill the germs it can also make it harder for the lungs to pass oxygen into the bloodstream.
Pneumonia is not a new condition that has appeared due to Covid-19. In 2019 alone, the year prior to the alleged emergence of Covid-19, 272,000 people were admitted to hospital with pneumonia. According to the British Lung Foundation in 2012, 345 people per every 100,000 had one or more episodes of pneumonia. This equates to around 225,000 people suffering pneumoni at least once.
The British Lung Foundation also show us that the majority of cases of pneumonia occur in those who are aged 81 and over. For instance in 2012 1,838 people in every 100,000 people over the age of 81 developed pneumonia, this equates to around 60,000 people over the age of 81 in today’s numbers based on there being around 3.2 million people over the age of 80 in the UK.
Source – British Lung Foundation
They also tell us that In 2012 there were 28,592 deaths from pneumonia, which equates to 5.1% of all deaths that occurred that year.

So as you can see deaths due to pneumonia have not just suddenly started to happen because of the alleged emergence of a new disease called Covid-19, we’ve been living with them all of our lives, they just haven’t been thrust in front of you 24/7 on the television, or the front page of every newspaper like they have with alleged Covid-19 deaths.
But for us to prove to you that you given up fifteen months of your life due to a lie that involved prematurely ending the lives of thousands upon thousands of people we first need you to understand which age group has been most affected by Covid-19 according to official statistics.

The above graph is a heat map showing deaths within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 by date of death and age of the person. This data can be seen at the UK Gov’s. coronavirus dashboard here. Whats pretty clear from this data is that the most alleged Covid deaths have occurred in people aged 90+. The next age group with the most deaths being 85 – 89, then 80 – 84 and so on and so on. There’s a general decrease in the number of deaths up to about the 65-69 age group but then we see a dramatic fall to pretty much zero in anyone aged under about the age of 60.

This heat map shows that there have generally been no more than 9 deaths in a single day of anyone aged between 60 – 64. In the 65-69 year old group there have been no more than 20 deaths a day. In the 70-74 year old group no more than 27 deaths in a day. In the 75-79 group no more than than 48 deaths in a day, at it’s highest. It isn’t until we get to the 85-89 year old group that we start to see a large increase in the number of alleged Covid deaths. 179 deaths in a day at its highest. Then we have the 90+ age group which has seen no more than 379 deaths in a single day at it’s highest.
So what we’re seeing here is that is a negligible amount of “Covid” deaths in anyone under the age of 60. But we’re really not seeing very many “Covid” deaths in anybody aged between 60 and 80. What we are seeing is a much higher amount of “Covid” deaths in people aged over 85. But what’s so strange about that?
Well nothing when we consider the average life expectancy in the UK is 81 years of age. Plus the fact this is also in line with what we have seen in cases / deaths due to pneumonia in previous years. Don’t forget serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency.
Which begs the question of why the entire nation has had to stay at home, social distance, wear a mask, wash their hands, and live under dictatorial tyranny for fifteen months because people who have lived longer than the average life expectancy in the UK have died or are dying? Dying of pneumonia from which we see tens of thousands of deaths every year.
We cannot deny that 2020 did see excess deaths, and you would believe this is due to the hospitals being overwhelmed? Except they weren’t.
NHS data shows us that during the height of the “first wave” between April and June 2020 there were 58,005 beds occupied which equated to 62% occupancy. This is 30% down on the same time frame in the previous year.

• In 2017, April-June there were on average a total of 91,724 beds occupied which equated to 89.1% occupancy.
• In 2018, April-June there were on average a total of 91,056 beds occupied which equated to 89.8% occupancy.
• In 2019, April-June there were on average a total of 91,730 beds occupied which equated to 90.3% occupancy.
• In 2020, April-June there were on average a total of 58,005 beds occupied which equated to 62% occupancy.

It also shows us that A&E attendance during the height of the first wave was 57% down on the previous year.

• 2018 – April – 1,984,369 attended A&E
• 2019 – April – 2,112,165 attended A&E
• 2020 – April – 916,581 attended A&E

Which begs the question of what exactly were we protecting the NHS from? It seems to have had a holiday.
But there were 41,627 more deaths than the five year average up to the 1st May 2020, and the vast majority of these occurred in April. An April which saw A&E attendance down 57% compared to the previous year and bed occupancy down 30% compared to the previous year. 33,408 of these excess deaths mentioned Covid-19 on the death certificate, the vast majority of which occurred in those over the age of 85.

However data taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows us that during April 2020 there were 26,541 deaths that occurred in care homes, an increase of 17,850 on the five-year average. This is half the amount of alleged Covid-19 deaths during the same period.

Why did so many people die in care homes when hospitals were far from overwhelmed? Surely if they have developed serious complications due to Covid-19 they would require urgent medical attention and hospital treatment?
Because don’t forget we’re told that serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency. Therefore typical symptoms include breathlessness, cough, weakness and fever. We’re also told that people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failure and who do not receive intensive care, develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.
Why were these people in care homes and not in hospital?
They were in care homes because Matt Hancock gave the order to put them there…

On the 19th March a directive was sent out to the NHS which required them to discharge all patients who they deemed to not require a hospital bed. They declared that transfers from the ward must happen within one hour of that decision being made to a designated discharge area, and that discharge from hospital should happen within 2 hours. NHS trusts were told that “they must adhere” to the new directive.
This was done to allegedly free up beds, of which they estimated would amount to an extra 15,000 free beds within just one week of the directive being implemented.
It freed up so many beds that bed occupancy during April – June 2020 was 30% down on the previous year. Why on earth would these people already be in a hospital bed if they did not need to be? You attend hospital because you require medical treatment, not because you want a lie down and a good nights sleep.
This directive meant that people who required medical treatment and attention were discharged into Care homes in the thousands.
But Matt Hancock’s abandonment of the elderly and vulnerable didn’t end there. Whilst the NHS was busy discharging patients who required medical treatment into care homes under his directive, Matt Hancock and the Department of Health were busy trying to source them all a certain drug known as midazolam.
Midazolam is a commonly used drug in palliative care and is considered one of the four essential drugs needed for the promotion of quality care in dying patients in the United Kingdom. Think of it as diazepam on steroids.
Midazolam is also a drug that has been used in executions by lethal injection in the USA, combined with two other drugs. Midazolam acts as a sedative to make the prisoner unconscious. The other drugs then stop the lungs and heart working. However it has been the source of controversy as several prisoners took a long while to die and appeared to be in pain when midazolam was used.
Midazolam can also cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing that may lead to permanent brain injury or death.
UK regulators state that you should only receive midazolam in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the equipment that is needed to monitor your heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if your breathing slows or stops.
A doctor or nurse should watch you closely after you receive this medication to make sure that you are breathing properly because midazolam induces significant depression of respiration. Your doctor should also be made aware if you have a severe infection or if you have or have ever had any lung, airway, or breathing problems or heart disease.
Midazolam is also used before medical procedures and surgery to cause drowsiness, relieve anxiety, and prevent any memory of the event. It is also sometimes given as part of the anesthesia during surgery to produce a loss of consciousness.
Midazolam is also used to cause a state of decreased consciousness in seriously ill people in intensive care units who are breathing with the help of a machine.
Midazolam should be used with extreme caution in patients who have chronic renal failure, impaired hepatic function, or impaired cardiac function. It should also be used with extreme caution in obese patients, or elderly patients.
What are some of the most important points you should take from this?

• Midazolam induces significant depression of respiration
• UK regulators insist midazolam should only be administered in a hospital or doctor’s office under the supervision of a doctor or nurse to monitor the breathing of the patient in order to provide life saving treatment to the patient if breathing slows or stops.
• Midazolam should be used with extreme caution in elderly patients

Serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency. Therefore typical symptoms include breathlessness, cough, weakness and fever. We’re also told that people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failure and who do not receive intensive care, develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.
Midozalam induces significant depression of respiration.
Knowing that would you use midazolam to treat people who were suffering pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency allegedly due to Covid-19?
Source – US National Library of Medicine
Well Matt Hancock and friends certainly seem to think so.

Source
The above exchange took place in a parliamentary committee meeting on the 17th April 2020 between Matt Hancock and Dr Evans, who is a fellow Conservative MP.
The following is an extract from an article which confirms the United Kingdom purchased two years worth of Midazolam in March 2020 and were looking to purchase much more –
Supplies of the sedative midazolam have been diverted from France as a “precaution” to mitigate potential shortages in the NHS caused by COVID-19, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has told The Pharmaceutical Journal.
A spokesperson from Accord Healthcare, one of five manufacturers of the drug, told The Pharmaceutical Journal that it had to gain regulatory approval to sell French-labelled supplies of midazolam injection to the NHS, after having already sold two years’ worth of stock to UK wholesalers “at the request of the NHS” in March 2020.
The DHSC said the request for extra stock was part of “national efforts to respond to the coronavirus outbreak”, which included precautions “to reduce the likelihood of future shortages”.
Why on earth would the United Kingdom need to purchase two years worth of Midazolam, a drug associated with respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest, to treat a disease that causes respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest?
Source – US National Library of Medicine
This document produced by the NHS states that Midazolam should be used for comfort at end of life care due to Covid-19 to ease fear, anxiety and agitation. Source

This NHS document states that midazolam should be used for sedation prior to the patient requiring mechanical ventilation, something we know has been required in hospitals for people who have developed severe pneumonia, of which we are told is due to Covid-19. However it also states that midazolam should only be used if 1st line and 2nd line drugs do not provide adequate sedation, but does include the caveat that midazolam alone can be added to 1st line drugs to reduce Propofol infusion rates. Source
This NHS document states that midazolam should be used for sedation prior to having a operation. Source

The same document also provides confirmation that midazolam has the potential to impair the respiration system, particularly in the presence of disease or old age. It clearly states that dosage should be kept to a minimum and shoud be within the manufacturer’s guidelines.

The document also provides a helpful table confirming dosage of midazolam for the elderly or unwell should be no more than 0.5mg – 1 mg, side effects include cardiorespiratory depression and the drug should be used with caution in those suffering respiratory disease.

This article confirms that over 2 million operations were cancelled at the end of March 2020 to free up beds for at least three months for “coronavirus” patients. – Source

Can you see the contradictions here? A policy that has been in place prior to the alleged emergence of Covid-19 clearly states that midazolam can be used for sedation, however dosage should be reduced to 0.5mg in the elderly or unwell due to possible side effects which include cardiorespiratory depression, and extreme caution should be used in administering midazolam to patients suffering respiratory disease.
However a policy created for treating patients allegedly suffering anxiety due to Covid-19, which we’re told is a respiratory disease, clearly states to treat said patient with a starting dose of 2.5mg of Midazolam, or 1.25mg if the patient is “particularly frail”, but to bump this up to 5 – 10mg if the patient is “extremely distressed”. Even the starting dose for the particularly frail is 0.25mg higher than the maximum recommended to administer to the elderly or unwell in sedation guidelines.
Who is responsible for making this decision and publishing these guidelines? And why is nobody holding them to account?
Two years worth of Midazolam was purchased in March 2020, however at the same time operations were cancelled for a minimum of three months, therefore Midazolam was not required for use in sedation prior to operations. Guidelines published prior to the alleged pandemic clearly state that Midazolam should be used in extremely low doses in the elderly or unwell, and should be used with extreme caution in those suffering respiratory disease due to side effects which include respiratory depression. We’re told Covid-19 is a respiratory disease and complications present pneumonia and severe respiratory distress. Therefore considering all of this the purchase of two years worth of Midazolam seems to be an awful waste of money, doesn’t it? As there doesn’t seem to be much they could possibly use it for within the guidelines
Well we can confirm it was definitely used as we have seen the prescription data.
But we’d just like to remind you of the important warning applied to Midazolam courtesy of the US National Library of Medicine –
Midazolam injection may cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing that may lead to permanent brain injury or death. You should only receive this medication in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the equipment that is needed to monitor your heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if your breathing slows or stops. Your doctor or nurse will watch you closely after you receive this medication to make sure that you are breathing properly.
So can Matt Hancock explain why during April 2020 out of hospital prescribing for Midazolam was twice the amount seen in 2019?

According to official data in April 2019 up to 21,977 prescriptions for Midazolam were issued, containing 171,952 items, the vast majority being Midazolam Hydrochloride. However in April 2020 45,033 prescriptions for Midazolam were issued, containing 333,229 items, the vast majority being Midazolam Hydrochloride. That is a 104.91% increase in the number of prescriptions issued for Midazolam and a 93.85% increase in the number of items they contained. But these weren’t issued in hospitals, they were issued by GP practices which can only mean one thing, they were issued for end of life care.

The above is a graph displayed on the UK Government website displaying deaths within 28 days of a positive test result for Covid-19 by date of death.
The following graph has been created using data on the amount of Midazolam solution produced each month from January 20219 through to March 2021.

Can you spot the difference? We couldn’t either because there isn’t one.
The spikes in production of Midazolam solution match the spikes of alleged Covid deaths within 28 days of a positive test.
April 2020 – huge surge in Midazolam prescriptions out of hospital and huge surge in production of Midazolam solution.
April 2020 – huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.
January 2021 – huge surge in production of Midazolam solution.
January 2021 – huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.
We’re told that serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency. Therefore typical symptoms include breathlessness, cough, weakness and fever. We’re also told that people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failure and who do not receive intensive care, develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.
Midazolam Hydrochloride is associated with respiratory depression and respiratory arrest, especially when used for sedation in noncritical care settings. In some cases, where this was not recognized promptly and treated effectively, death or hypoxic encephalopathy has resulted. Intravenous midazolam hydrochloride should be used only in hospital or ambulatory care settings.
NHS policy prior to the emergence of Covid-19 states –
Dosage should be reduced to 0.5mg in the elderly or unwell due to possible side effects which include cardiorespiratory depression, and extreme caution should be used in administering midazolam to patients suffering respiratory disease.
NHS policy after the emergence of Covid-19, an alleged respiratory disease states –

Hospitals beds in April 2020 30% were down compared to the previous year.
A&E attendance was 57% down in April 2020 compared to the previous year.
Care home deaths were 205% up in April 2020 compared to April 2019.
The vast majority of alleged Covid deaths are people over the age of 85.
Can you not see a strong correlation here between the over prescribing of Midazolam and the seemingly premature ending of life, with the associated deaths being put down as Covid-19?
Did you really believe there’s a virus so clever that it knows to kill people who are disabled? Just look at the ONS statistics. Three in every five alleged Covid-19 deaths occurred in those who suffered learning difficulties and disabilities (see here).

In relation to deaths of people with learning difficulties the ONS said – ‘the largest effect was associated with living in a care home or other communal establishment.‘
Having a learning difficulty and being in care doesn’t mean you are more likely to die of Covid-19. What it means is that you are much more likely to have a DNR order placed on you without informing yourself or your family, which Carers / NHS staff then use as permission to put you on end of life care, which involves the administration of Midazolam.
We know this happened because an Amnesty report and CQC report said so.

The amnesty report states that –
‘Care home managers and staff and relatives of care home residents in different parts of the country told Amnesty International how, in their experience, sending residents to hospital was discouraged or outright refused by hospitals, ambulance teams, and GPs. A manager in Yorkshire said: “We were heavily discouraged from sending residents to hospital. We talked about it in meetings; we were all aware of this.”’
‘Another manager in Hampshire recalled:
There wasn’t much option to send people to hospital. We managed to send one patient to hospital because the nurse was very firm and insisted that the lady was too uncomfortable and we could not do any more to make her more comfortable but the hospital could. In hospital the lady tested COVID positive and was treated and survived and came back. She is 92 and in great shape.
She explained that:
There was a presumption that people in care homes would all die if they got COVID, which is wrong. It shows how little the government knows about the reality of care homes.‘

‘The son of one care home resident who passed away in Cumbria said that sending his father to hospital had not even been considered:
From day one, the care home was categoric it was probably COVID and he would die of it and he would not be taken to hospital. He only had a cough at that stage. He was only 76 and was in great shape physically. He loved to go out and it would not have been a problem for him to go to hospital. The care home called me and said he had symptoms, a bit of a cough and that doctor had assessed him over mobile phone and he would not be taken to hospital. Then I spoke to the GP later that day and said h would not be taken to hospital but would be given morphine if in pain. Later he collapsed on the floor in
the bathroom and the care home called the paramedic who established that he had no injury and put him back to bed and told the carers not to call them back for any Covid-related symptoms because they would not return. He died a week later.
He was never tested. No doctor ever came to the care home. The GP assessed him over the phone. In an identical situation for someone living at home instead of in a care home, the advice was “go to hospital”. The death certificate says pneumonia and COVID, but pneumonia was never mentioned to us.’
‘A care home manager in Yorkshire told Amnesty International:
In March, I tried to get [a resident] into hospital—the ambulance had employed a doctor to do triage but they said, “Well he’s end of life anyway so we’re not going to send an ambulance” … Under normal circumstances he would have gone to hospital … I think he was entitled to be admitted to hospital. These are individuals who have contributed to society all their lives and were denied the respect and dignity that you would give to a 42-year-old; they were [considered] expendable.‘
The CQC felt it necessary to issue a statement in August 2020 addressing the issue of innapropriate DNR’s being placed on care home residents without informing the resident or their family –
‘It is vitally important that older and disabled people living in care homes and in the community can access hospital care and treatment for COVID-19 and other conditions when they need it during the pandemic … Providers should always work to prevent avoidable harm or death for all those they care for. Protocols, guidelines and triage systems should be based on equality of access to care and treatment. If they are based on assumptions that some groups are less entitled to care and treatment than others, this would be discriminatory. It would also potentially breach human rights, including the
right to life, even if there were concerns that hospital or critical care capacity may be reached.’
That statement was issued because the CQC found that 34% of people working in health and social care were pressured into placing ‘do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ (DNACPR) orders on Covid patients who suffered from disabilities and learning difficulties, without involving the patient or their families in the decision.
The evidence is all there to see in the public domain and thankfully, a team of people are gathering said evidence and analysing it, so that justice can be sought for the people that have had their lives ended prematurely via the use of inappropriate DNR orders, used as permission to start end of life treatment which included a drug called Midazolam. A drug that is associated with respiratory depression and respiratory arrest, the exact same symptoms of complications due to the alleged Covid-19 disease, especially when used for sedation in noncritical care settings.
A drug which was ordered by UK authorities in March 2020 at a quantity to cover a usual two year supply. A two year supply that seems to have been depleted by October 2020 according to NHS documents –

Source
But once replenished the stocks were again depleted by the beginning of February 2021 according to official NHS documents
Source
It was decided in 2013 after a review that the ‘Liverpool Care Pathway‘ was to be abolished. The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was a scheme that we’re told intended to improve the quality of care in the final hours or days of a patient’s life. It’s alleged aim was to ensure a peaceful and comfortable death. The LCP was a guide to doctors, nurses and other health workers looking after someone who was dying on issues such as the appropriate time to remove tubes providing food and fluid, or when to stop medication.
The reason it was decided it should be abolished is that the review found hospital staff wrongly interpreted its guidance for care of the dying, leading to stories of patients who were drugged and deprived of fluids in their last weeks of life.
The government-commissioned review, headed by Lady Neuberger, found that poor training and a lack of compassion on the part of nursing staff was to blame. Harrowing stories from families revealed they had not been told their loved one was expected to die and, in some cases, were shouted at by nurses for attempting to give them a drink of water. Nursing staff had wrongly thought, under the LCP guidance, that giving fluids was wrong.
The review made 44 recommendations, including the phasing out of the LCP over six to twelve months as individual care plans for the dying were brought in. It stated that only senior clinicians must make the decision to give end-of-life care, along with the healthcare team, and that no decision must be taken out of hours unless there is a very good reason.
The evidence suggests that the Liverpool Care Pathway returned with a vengeance in April 2020 under the direction of the Health Secretary Matt Hancock, Government Advisors and NHS Chiefs, and it looks as if it was used to manipulate you into giving up two years of your life under the pretence that you were staying at home, to protect the NHS and save lives.
But the evidence suggests that in reality you were ordered to stay at home, to protect the NHS, so that they could prematurely end the lives of the elderly and vulnerable and tell you that they were Covid deaths.
Midazolam. It should be the word that is on everyone’s lips. We’re sure it will be now.

 

[Mathanzua]

HOMEHEALTHMiami Open Carnage: 15 Fully Vaxxed Tennis Players Unable to Finish Contests.

Miami Open Carnage: 15 Fully Vaxxed Tennis Players Unable to Finish Contests.​

April 3, 2022 We Love Trump, Australian Sports Yahoo, WA Post and CNN

Paula Badosa, Wiki



The tennis world has reacted with shock after 15 players retired/ withdrew from the Miami Open, including the favorites, Paula Badosa from Spain and Jannik Sinner from Italy. Both played in the Australian Open which required them to be fully vaccinated. According to this source that listed all of the competitors who withdrew, all of them received the experimental injection.

Rafael Nadal recently lost his match in Palm Desert after having chest pain.
Other athletes have recently had unusual health issues, including three professional cyclists who recently suffered cardiac-related events, and two of them died. A 23-year old Romanian water polo player died during a game while suffering chest pains.
The tennis world has been shocked this week at the Miami Open.
Fans witnessed an unprecedented number of withdrawals/retirements from the tournament at Hard Rock Stadium.


The most shocking moments of the event occurred when both favorites, Italian Jannik Sinner and Spaniard Paula Badosa retired from their quarterfinal contests on the same day.
Yahoo Sport reported:

Soon to be World No.3, Badosa was in tears as she was forced to bow out of the quarter-final after not feeling well against American Jessica Pegula.
On Monday, Badosa admitted she wasn’t sure if she could compete in her fourth round match that she subsequently won.
However, the Spaniard was in obvious discomfort when she retired sick at 4-1 in unfortunate circumstances for the in-form star.
On the men’s side of the draw, Italian phenom Sinner was also forced to retire against World No.103 Francisco Cerundolo.
Right after an impressive display to defeat Aussie Nick Kyrgiosin the Fourth Round, Sinner was in pain due to blisters on his foot.
Cerundolo admitted it was ‘strange’ seeing his friend hardly walking on the other side of the court.

While Sinner and Badosa were the most stunning retirees of the tournament, over a dozen other competitors suffered early exits.
The Yahoo article referenced 15 total withdrawals/retirements during the Miami Open.
As Free West Media noted, “What is going on?” someone asked.
I’ve scanned the results of the men’s and women’s fields to find the 15 withdrawals/retirements during the Miami Open.
From the men’s side:

• Mats Moraing (Germany)
• Holger Rune (Denmark)
• Jan-Lennard Struff (Germany)
• Reilly Opelka (United States)
• Jannik Sinner (Italy)

From the women’s side:

• Maryna Zanevska (Belgium)
• Caroline Garcia (France)
• Clara Tauson (Denmark)
• Dalma Galfi (Hungary)
• Anna Kalinskaya (Russia)
• Karolina Muchova (Czech Republic)
• Katerina Siniakova (Czech Republic)
• Victoria Azarenka (Belarus)
• Anhelina Kalinina (Ukraine)
• Paula Badosa (Spain)

Here’s the elephant in the room the mainstream media refuses to discuss.
Based on U.S. requirements, all of the listed players, except for Opelka, must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 to compete in the Miami Open.
Opelka competed in the

 

[Mathanzua]

OPERATION AZOVSTAL
Putin’s VERY “Special Military
Operation” to Protect Russia and
Expose the Global Biowar
Against Humanity​

---

Azovstal Iron and Steel Works in Mariupol, Ukraine under attack by the Russian military

---

Russia was forced to launch its “special military operation” in Ukraine to terminate the raging
biowar waged by the US-UK-NATO-UKRAINE
bioterrorist group — from its secret underground operational headquarters located at the Azovstal
Iron and Steel Works in Mariupol, Ukraine —
against the people of Donbass and western Russia.​

~~~ END OF STORY ~~~​

---

State of the Nation

Here’s why Russia was forced to invade Ukraine.​

The epic battle for Mariupol really concerned the Russian war on the Pentagon-sponsored bioweapon labs hidden in the bowels of the Azovstal Steel Plant, as well as the many other heretofore secret biolabs scattered across the country.​

To date, the Russian military has shut down 30 plus bioweapon laboratories across the Ukraine. However, the main bioweapon lab being systematically used to carry out future bioterrorist operations in Donbass and western Russia is strategically located in Mariupol at the massive Azovstal complex.

---

KEY POINT: The city of Mariupol is situated less than 40 miles from the Russian border, which is why Azovstal was selected to house one of the largest bioweapon labs in the world. Not only was it based right in Donbass, but Azovstal was the closest biolab from which to launch bio-attacks against Russia. See: Massive Bioweapon Lab at Azovstal Steel Works in Mariupol Exposed by Russian Military (Video)

---

This is why Russia is so determined not to blow up Avozstal or even neutralize the 1000 plus Azov Nazis holed up there behind human shields—innocent Ukrainian citizens. The women and children, in particular, were likely forced into the sprawling Azovstal plant as a defensive stratagem against an all-out Russian attack. But it’s the US and NATO military leaders, Western intel agents, AFU officers and Ukraine soldiers in Azovstal that Russia really wants and is willing to protect, especially those who are privy to the bioweaponry evidence and bioterrorist operations.

Putin knows exactly what the Azovstal biolabs were up to. He also needs to preserve the evidence so he can show the whole world what the US-UK-UA-NATO bioterror group was planning to unleash in both Donbass and Russia.

This is precisely why the Azov Nazis were given such free rein to terrorize the citizens of Mariupol. They were acting on orders from their NATO command, Pentagon masters and CIA overlords to exert absolute control over the Azovstal bioterror crime scene. Isn’t that why these hardcore Neo-Nazis are called the Azov Regiment and Azov Battalion? These battle-hardened mercenaries were put there to provide brutal defensive and protective services for the Zio-Anglo-American bioterrorist operations.

What was the Kremlin to do?

Permit this bioterror group to continue their slow-motion genocide of the Donbass citizenry?! See: HARD PROOF that Zelensky’s Azov Neo-Nazis are committing genocide against the Ukraine citizenry (Video)

Not only did Putin strike first and hard to terminate the ongoing genocide and future biowar, he also has repeatedly told the world community of nations the purpose of Russia’s “special military operation”.

---

Any president or prime minster would be fully justified in taking the
same military measures to shut down a genocide-in-progress.​

---

The courageous decision made by Putin et al. to invade was most certainly the result of a broad collective agreement across the entire Kremlin leadership. After all, Moscow is only 280 miles from the Ukrainian border as the crow flies, so they knew they were facing dire existential threats of the highest order from NATO and the more dangerous bioterror group.

Extremely aggressive moves and maneuvers by NATO only confirmed Putin’s worst fears, as did the several overtures to expand NATO membership in order to further surround Russia.

However, it was the expeditious uncovering of the Ukraine bioweapon labs that really proved Putin right in his mission to shut the whole genocidal enterprise down—FOR GOOD!

Vast tunnel system and bioweapon lab complex built underneath the Azovstal steel manufacturing complex.

---

BOTTOM LINE: Russia had no choice but to invade Ukraine to carry out multiple “special military operations” to protect its sovereignty and safeguard it citizenry.​

---

Not only that, but “Russia’s intervention in Ukraine is [PERFECTRLY] legal under international law “.

 

[Mathanzua]

Midazolam used to prematurely end lives of thousands you were told died of COVID-19.​

If you have listened to The Sons of Liberty radio on Saturday mornings at 8am EST, you would have heard for more than 2 years from our nurse and nutritionist Kate Shemirani that midazolam and morphine were the preferred drugs to murder patients in the past and they were the very drugs being used during the scamdemic we affectionately refer to as CONvid-1984. Now, the evidence is clear that many thousands we were told died of the CONvids especially in British care homes,actually died from midazolam poisoning.

Remember Wayne Smith? He was a gentleman from the United Kingdom who spoke openly about what took place with his father and how he believes he was murdered by those who were supposed to be taking care of him!

 

[Mathanzua]

EXPOSING FALSEHOODS AND REVEALING TRUTHS:
Fully vaccinated young adults suffer 73% increase in heart attacks & strokes and 92% higher mortality rate compared to the unvaccinated!!!!

Fully Vaccinated Young Adults suffer 73% increase in Heart Attacks & Strokes and 92% higher Mortality Rate compared to Unvaccinated​

And it will only get worse over time as per rising all-cause mortality trends.​

by THE EXPOSÉ
Official figures show there has been a 67% increase compared to the historical average in the number of people aged 15 to 44 suffering heart attacks, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases since this age group was first offered the Covid-19 injection in Scotland.
And further analysis shows this issue is actually getting worse, with the numbers for 2022 so far revealing a 73% increase against the historical average.
Meanwhile, data published by the Office for National Statistics show that between January 2021 and January 2022, double vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds in England were on average 92% more likely to die than unvaccinated young adults of the same age.
This is either a terrible coincidence or the smoking gun that proves the damage the Covid-19 injections have done and are doing to the population.

​

It is now well known that a possible severe consequence of getting the Covid-19 injection is that one may develop either myocarditis or pericarditis, or in some cases both. We know this because the authorities have had to admit it occurs, although as expected have downplayed it as extremely rare. This probably means it is much more common than people realise.
In simple terms, myocarditis is an autoimmune disease that causes inflammation of the heart muscle. This inflammation enlarges and weakens the heart, creates scar tissue and forces it to work harder to circulate blood and oxygen throughout the body. (source)
Whilst Pericarditis is an autoimmune disease causing inflammation of the pericardium, a sac-like structure with two thin layers of tissue that surround the heart to hold it in place and help it work.
Here’s how both autoimmune diseases have affected people in the USA according to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), where just 1-10% of adverse reactions are actually reported [2SG: as per large Harvard study reporting to VAERS was discovered to be under 1%.] –

​

Here’s how those unprecedented amounts of cases of myo/pericarditis reported to VAERS have been distributed by age –

​

As you can clearly see, the two autoimmune conditions are much more likely to occur in younger age groups, and the UK Medicine Regulator has admitted this is the case –

​

You may have noticed how the UK Medicine Regulator, the MHRA, stated how “most of these cases [of Myocarditis] were mild”. So nothing to worry about then? Unfortunately not.
A mild case of myocarditis or pericarditis does not exist. You only get one heart, and it is incapable of regenerating/ repairing once damage has been done. Ongoing cardiovascular medication or even a heart transplant may be needed.
Overall, myocarditis which can cause dilated cardiomyopathy, is thought to account for up to 45 percent of heart transplants in the U.S. today. (source)
Myocarditis can permanently damage your heart muscle, possibly causing:

• Heart failure. Untreated, myocarditis can damage your heart’s muscle so that it can’t pump blood effectively. In severe cases, myocarditis-related heart failure may require a ventricular assist device or a heart transplant.
• Heart attack or stroke. If your heart’s muscle is injured and can’t pump blood, the blood that collects in your heart can form clots. If a clot blocks one of your heart’s arteries, you can have a heart attack. If a blood clot in your heart travels to an artery leading to your brain, you can have a stroke.
• Rapid or irregular heart rhythms (arrhythmias). Damage to your heart muscle can cause an arrhythmia.
• Sudden cardiac death. Certain serious arrhythmias can cause your heart to stop beating (sudden cardiac arrest). It’s deadly if not treated immediately.

[2SG: Myocarditis decreases lifespan for all sufferers, and in many cases significantly decreases lifespan; a child’s life expectancy with myocarditis is around 10 years from diagnosis.]
With all that being said the following data that has been published by Public Health Scotland should come as no surprise.
Public Health Scotland (PHS) has a not very well known database presenting figures on the wider impact to the health service due to measures imposed in the name of Covid-19. The database is called ‘COVID-19 wider impacts on the health care system‘.
We have previously researched the data contained within the database to reveal a huge upsurge in cases of ovarian cancer across Scotland since the introduction of the Covid-19 injections. It just so happens that a study conducted by Pfizer reveals the mRNA Covid-19 injection accumulates in the ovaries.
But this time we decided to analyse the data for cardiovascular cases across Scotland. Cardiovascular diseases are conditions that affect the structures or function of your heart, such as:

• Abnormal heart rhythms, or arrhythmias
• Aorta disease and Marfan syndrome
• Congenital heart disease
• Coronary artery disease (narrowing of the arteries)
• Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
• Heart attack
• Heart failure
• Heart muscle disease (cardiomyopathy)
• Heart valve disease
• Myocarditis
• Pericardial disease
• Peripheral vascular disease
• Rheumatic heart disease
• Stroke
• Vascular disease (blood vessel disease)

For the ‘out of hours’ category, and the ‘ambulance service’ category, PHS provides a breakdown by age. Meaning we can assess the number of cardiovascular cases among adults aged 15 to 44.
Here is how Public Health Scotland present the data on the number of cases requiring out-of-hours care across Scotland –

​

​

As you can see from the above the weekly number of cases has been highest among 15-44-year-olds since the beginning of the pandemic, but that gap between all other age groups suddenly got much bigger in 2021.
This is confirmed by the second graph above which shows the percentage change in cardiovascular cases against the 2018-2019 historical average. From around July 2021 there has been a huge spike in cardiovascular cases among 15-44-year-olds that should set alarm bells ringing and deserves further attention. So that’s exactly what we gave it.
We extracted the data and produced a series of charts in order to present the figures provided by Public Health Scotland much more clearly and to attempt to understand the severity of what has been occurring since the introduction of the Covid-19 injections.
The following chart shows the number of people aged 15-44 requiring out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases per week from the week ending 4th July 2021 to the week ending 20th Feb 2022, as well as the 2018-2019 historical average per week among the same age group –

​

The historical average shows that there have been anywhere from around 60 to just over 100 cardiovascular cases among 15 to 44-year-olds requiring out-of-hours treatment across Scotland. But the data for 2021 and 2022 shows that there have been anywhere from around 110 cases to 185 cardiovascular cases among 15 to 44-year-olds requiring out-of-hours treatment.
So the number of cases have essentially doubled.
The following chart shows the number of people aged 15-44 requiring an ambulance for cardiovascular cases per week from the week ending 4th July 2021 to the week ending 21st November 2021 (the most up to date data), as well as the 2018-2019 historical average per week among the same age group –

​

The historical average shows that there have been anywhere from around 185 to just over 250 people aged 15-44 requiring an ambulance for cardiovascular cases per week across Scotland. But the data for 2021 and 2022 shows that there have been anywhere from around 290 cases to 390 people aged 15-44 requiring an ambulance for cardiovascular cases per week.
So cases haven’t quite doubled but they’ve still increased quite dramatically.
The following chart shows percentage change in the number of people aged 15-44 requiring out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases per week from the week ending 4th July 2021 to the week ending 20th Feb 2022, compared to the 2018-2019 historical average per week among the same age group –
Here we can see that the number of cases requiring out-of-hours care has been higher throughout this entire period, ranging from a 35% increase in a single week to a staggering 117% increase in a single week compared to the historical average.
The following chart shows the percentage change in the number of people aged 15-44 requiring an ambulance for cardiovascular cases per week from the week ending 4th July 2021 to the week ending 21st November 2021 2018-2019 , compared to the historical average per week among the same age group –

​

Again we can see that the number of 15 to 44-year-olds requiring an ambulance has been higher than the historical average throughout the entire period, ranging from a 23% increase in a single week to an 82% increase compared to the historical average.
The following chart shows the number of people aged 15-44 requiring out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases per month from July 2021 to February 2022, as well as the 2018-2019 historical average per month among the same age group –

​

January has seen the most cases both historically and in 2022, but the difference here is that 2022 saw a 78.07% increase on the historical average, this was not however the worst increase seen since July 2021.
The following chart shows the percentage change in the number of people aged 15-44 requiring out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases per month from July 2021 to February 2022, as well as the 2018-2019 historical average per month among the same age group –

​

The biggest increase was actually recorded in September 2021, with a 82% increase recorded against the historical average. This was closely followed by December 2021 with an 81% increase against the historical average. The smallest increases were recorded in both October and November 2021, but these months still saw a 50% and 49% increase against the historical average.
The following chart shows the number of people aged 15-44 requiring an ambulance for cardiovascular cases per month from July 2021 to February 2022, as well as the 2018-2019 historical average per month among the same age group –

​

June 2021 saw the most people aged 15-44 requiring an ambulance due to an issue such as suffering a heart attack, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, or stroke with 1,772 cases. But the historical average shows that October is usually the month where the highest number of people requiring an ambulance is recorded.
Unfortunately, Public Health Scotland are yet to publish any further data on the ambulance service past November 2021, but we will most likely find a huge jump in cases again as was seen with people requiring out-of-hours treatment.
The following chart shows the percentage change in the number of people aged 15-44 requiring an ambulance for cardiovascular cases per month from July 2021 to February 2022, compared to the 2018-2019 historical average per month among the same age group –

​

The largest increase was again recorded in September 2021, with a 82% increase against the historical average. This was followed by July 2021 which saw a 71% increase and then August 2021 which saw a 66% increase. The lowest percentage change was again recorded in October and November 2021, but these months still saw a 50% and 49% increase.
The following chart shows the number of people aged 15 to 44 requiring an ambulance or out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases in different time periods –

​

What we can clearly see above is the number of out-of-hours cases between 27th June and 21st November 2021, 27th June and 26th December 2021, 27th December and 20th February 2022, and 27th June 2021 and 20th February 2022 compared to the historic average.
As well as the number of people requiring an ambulance between 27th June and 21st November 2021 as well as the historic average. And finally the combined number of out of hours cases and ambulance cases between 27th June and 21st November 2021 compared to the combined historic average.
As you can see 2021 and 2022 has seen substantially more cardiovascular cases among 15 to 44-year-olds in all date-ranges. But what we’re really interested in seeing here is the percentage change compared to the historic average.
The following chart shows the percentage change in the number of people aged 15 to 44 requiring an ambulance or out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases in different time periods –

​

Because the ambulance data currently only goes as far as 21st November 2021 we’ve calculated the same time period for out-of-hours cases.
What we can see here is that between 27th June and 21st November, the number of people requiring an ambulance due to suffering a heart attack, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, stroke etc., increased by 50%, whilst the number of out-of-hours cases in the same time frame increased by 63%.
With both ambulance figures and out-of-hours figures combined up to 21st November, we can see that there was a 53.45% increase against the historic average. But when combining the ambulance figures with the full amount of out-of-hours figures up to 20th February 2022, we can see there was a 57% increase against the historic average.
The number of people aged 15-44 requiring out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases between 27th June 2021 and 20th February 2022, saw a 67.36% increase against the historical average. But what we’re most interested in is how the figures for 2022 so far stack up against the figures for the second half of 2021.
The out-of-hours data shows that there was a 65.45% increase in the number of people requiring out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases in the second half of 2021. But the data for 2022 so far shows that things are actually getting worse rather than improving.
The number of people aged 15-44 requiring out-of-hours treatment for cardiovascular cases between 27th December and 20th February 2022 was 73% higher than the historical average in the same time frame.
The big question of course is, why?
Official figure from the Office for National Statistics can most likely answer that question.
he Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK. It is responsible for collecting and publishing statistics related to the economy, population and society at national, regional and local levels.
Its latest dataset on deaths in England by vaccination status can be found here. It contains a large amount of data on age-standardised mortality rates for deaths by vaccination status between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022.
The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years among adults aged 18 to 39 in England. The data has been extracted from table 2 of the ONS dataset.

​

The green line is the mortality rate among the unvaccinated, which while fluctuating has remained pretty stable throughout. The other lines however represent different vaccination statuses, and they are extremely concerning.
The orange, yellow, and pink lines represent mortality rates within 21 days of receiving a first, second or third dose. And they reveal that the risk of death increases significantly immediately after vaccination.
But the most concerning figures are the mortality rates among those vaccinated at least 21 days ago, which you can see more clearly in the following chart –

​

Around June 2021, there is a cross over from those who’ve received one dose to those who’ve received two doses in terms of the increased mortality rate against the unvaccinated. This obviously tallies with when each injection was administered to this age group. But what’s most concerning here is that the second injection seems to make things much worse in terms of the risk of death.
In January 2021 the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among the unvaccinated equated to 67.7. This then fell month on month to 33.1 in May, before increasing again in June to 44.8. The same however cannot be said for those who had received a single dose at least 21 days prior to their death.
In January 2021 the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among the partly vaccinated equated to 119.9. Meaning the mortality rate was 77% higher than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated. This then fell to 68.3 deaths per 100,000 in February, before climbing to 90.1 in March, then 108.8 in April.
This means at this point the mortality rate among the partly vaccinated was 193.3% higher than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated. But not long after following the second dose being administered things get even worse.
The highest mortality rate among the double vaccinated (at least 21 days ago) occurred in September 2021, with 125.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years. In the same month, the mortality rate among the unvaccinated equated to 46.8. Meaning the double vaccinated mortality rate was 169% higher than the unvaccinated mortality rate.
But the largest statistical difference occurred in November 2021. The mortality rate among the unvaccinated equated to 33.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years, whereas the mortality rate among the double vaccinated equated to 107. A difference of 220.4%.
With –

• Myocarditis; an autoimmune condition that causes inflammation of the heart, being a known side-effect of the Covid-19 injections,
• Data showing a 73% increase in the number of people aged 15 to 44 suffering heart attacks, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases since this age group was first offered the Covid-19 injection,
• And further data showing fully vaccinated young adults are on average 92% more likely to die than unvaccinated young adults.

It would appear we have the smoking gun that proves the damage the Covid-19 injections have done and are doing to the population.

 

[Mathanzua]

British Government Admits: COVID-19 Vaccines PERMANENTLY DAMAGE Natural Immune System​

WORLD HAL TURNER 17 MAY 2022 HITS: 597

The UK government admits that the COVID-19 Experimental mRNA "vaccine" has damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-dosed.
The government has confessed that double-vaxxed (or more) people, will never -- ever -- be able to acquire full natural immunity to COVID variants - or possibly any other virus.

Keen observers of this COVID debacle are now saying "The real pandemic will now begin" because all the people whose immune systems are permanently damaged, may not be able to fight-off any future viral infection!
In its Week 42 "COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report," (Direct Link HERE) the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that:

"N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of [the vax]."
It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially - get this - permanent.
What does this mean? Well, we know that the wacky vax does not prevent infection or transmission of the China virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaxxed adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaxxed ones).

The British now find that the vax interferes with the body's ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus.

In particular, vaxxed persons do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein - the envelope of the virus (which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people).

In the long term, the vaxxed are far more susceptible to any mutations in the COVID spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more.

The unvaccinated, on the other hand, gain lasting - if not permanent - immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once.

A win-win for those who kept their heads, and didn't buy-into all the COVID hype.

A no-win for those who went with the crowd, or were willfully obtuse, intellectually lazy, or arrogant.

 

[mwengeso]

British Government Admits: COVID-19 Vaccines PERMANENTLY DAMAGE Natural Immune System​

WORLD HAL TURNER 17 MAY 2022 HITS: 597

The UK government admits that the COVID-19 Experimental mRNA "vaccine" has damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-dosed.
The government has confessed that double-vaxxed (or more) people, will never -- ever -- be able to acquire full natural immunity to COVID variants - or possibly any other virus.

Keen observers of this COVID debacle are now saying "The real pandemic will now begin" because all the people whose immune systems are permanently damaged, may not be able to fight-off any future viral infection!
In its Week 42 "COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report," (Direct Link HERE) the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that:

"N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of [the vax]."
It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially - get this - permanent.
What does this mean? Well, we know that the wacky vax does not prevent infection or transmission of the China virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaxxed adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaxxed ones).

The British now find that the vax interferes with the body's ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus.

In particular, vaxxed persons do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein - the envelope of the virus (which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people).

In the long term, the vaxxed are far more susceptible to any mutations in the COVID spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more.

The unvaccinated, on the other hand, gain lasting - if not permanent - immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once.

A win-win for those who kept their heads, and didn't buy-into all the COVID hype.

A no-win for those who went with the crowd, or were willfully obtuse, intellectually lazy, or arrogant.

If that is true, the world is facing a historic unprecedented catastrophe

 

[Mathanzua]

If that is true, the world is facing a historic unprecedented catastrophe

Mwengeso this is true, independent scientists knows it,the WHO knows it,CDC knows it, Is European Medicines Agency knows it.The intention of the NWO elite is to exterminate most of the human race(what they call useless eaters).

 

[Mathanzua]

If that is true, the world is facing a historic unprecedented catastrophe

We are facing an unprecedented catastrophe indeed Mwengeso.The WHO knows it,the CDC knows it and the European Medicines Agency(EMA) knows it.The aim of the NWO Elite is to exterminate most of the human race or what they sarcastically call "useless eaters".

 

[Mathanzua]

Get it straight kama nani? Juha wewe

Ujuha wangu ni nini,tell me.

 

[Mathanzua]

This is the big ugly truth that many people will have trouble facing in Tanzania and elsewhere:​

Only some independent physicians have been heroic during the pandemic.In some of my past posts, I have spoken about the failure of most Physicians to truly understand pandemic issues and think and act independently to serve the public.Instead they have served the interests of Big Pharma, their Corporate Employers and Government Agencies.But these are clearly the big pushers of the fake COVID Vaccines!

Most Physicians do not follow or know the medical research on many pandemic issues. They either do not have the time or interest or skills to independently follow medical research. Instead they rely on the WHO,Big Pharma,the Mainstream Media,International Medicines Agencies and Government Agencies for information.

The most common explanation for why physicians have not spoken up about the weaponization and manipulation of public health information and policies during the Corona crisis is that they are deeply indebted due to loans taken out to enable their extended and expensive education, and have no other choice but to comply with the fake narrative of the Corona Virus Disease imposed on them by their employers, insurance agencies, Bankers and other host institutions like Private Hospital Chains.

They have a profound financial conflict of interest,so they either had to comply or go bankrupt and be out of employment. In large part, the physicians and medical scientists who have spoken up about the compromised medical ethics, regulatory standards, mis or disinformation propagated by governments and WHO (including intentionally withheld or manipulated medical and epidemiological information), have been financially independent, often seniour with high status or established independent medical practices, or otherwise have been decoupled from mechanisms or institutions which have been weaponized to force compliance with centralized edicts. In other words, the majority of those who have spoken out have freedom to speak BECAUSE they are relatively or fully financially independent.

In a book titled "Pandemic Blunder" released about 1.5 years ago,attention has been given to innovative doctors who, starting in March 2020, were saving patients with generics.They still are saving lives with generics like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. They have withstood the ugly politics of the pandemic. Unlike the majority of doctors, they truly follow the science and the data.

Ordinary people will not easily find a doctor who can see past the mountain of pandemic propaganda and lies that is rampant in the public health and medical establishments.
So the doctors we normally see to manage our illnesses, should not be seen as competent with regards to pandemic or plandemic issues. That truth is very difficult to swallow. This however means that people must work hard themselves to find pandemic or plandemic truths on sites.That millions have died from the "Vague and Bizarre COVID" is proof that putting all your trust in most Physicians can be fatal.

 

[Mathanzua]

Big Pharma boss caught FAKING his COVID vaccination status:He injected himself with salt water instead.Now facing criminal charges.This proves that the so called are not fit for human use!!!​

While the WHO and our political leaders want us to trust in the COVID vaccines and push for legal measures to force it upon us, it seems even Big Pharma executives don’t even trust the safety of the vax.

Police have charged Jose Maria Fernandez Sousa-Faro, the president of European pharmaceutical behemoth PharmaMar, with being falsely vaccinated against COVID-19. Dr. Sousa-Faro is embroiled in a European controversy involving individuals, many of whom are well-known figures, being added to the National Immunization Registry in exchange for large sums of money.

According to police sources and El Periodico de Espana, Sousa-Faro arranged to be injected with a saline solution instead of a COVID-19 vaccination and spent hundreds of euros to have his name added to Spain’s immunization register.

Dr. Sousa-Faro is one of almost 2,200 celebrities and European elites who have been erroneously vaccinated against Covid, according to a list compiled by National Police.

Jose Maria Fernandez Sousa-Faro, president of European pharmaceuticals giant PharmaMar, has been charged by police with being falsely vaccinated against Covid-19. Dr. Sousa-Faro has been caught up in a scandal in Europe involving people being added to the National Immunization Registry in exchange for large sums of money, with many of them familiar faces and household names.

Police allege that Sousa-Faro arranged to be injected with a saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccination and paid thousands of dollars to have his name added to Spain’s immunization register, as confirmed by police sources and reported by El Periodico de Espana.

Dr. Sousa-Faro is among more than 2,200 celebrities and European elites on the list drawn up by National Police of those falsely vaccinated against Covid.

According to El Mundo, Spanish police carried out the investigation called Operation Jenner which uncovered the vast network of celebrities and elites who have paid money to have their names fraudulently entered on the National Immunization Register, despite refusing to be vaccinated.

Euro Weekly News report: The leader of the network was a nursing assistant at the La Paz University Hospital, where he is accused of charging more than €200,000 euros for fraudulently registering 2,200 people as vaccinated in the National Registry against Covid-19. He has been arrested and is currently in custody.

Among those accused are Bruno González Cabrera, a defender who played for Betis, Getafe, Levante and Valladolid. Fabio Díez Steinaker in beach volleyball, runner-up in Europe and fifth in the Sydney Olympic Games. The former Valencian boxer and wrestler José Luis Zapater, alias Titín, who starred in more than a thousand fights.

The famous people invesitaged so far includes: José María Fernández Sousa-Faro, President of PharmaMar, Trinitario Casanova, one of the richest men in Spain, Kidd Keo, trap singer in English and Spanish, Anier, rap singer, Jarfaiter, rap singer, Veronica Echegui, actress, Bruno Gonzalez Cabrera, soccer player, Fabio Díez Steinaker, former beach volleyball Olympian, José Luis Zapater, alias Titín, former boxer, Camilo Esquivel, recognized and prestigious doctor.

According to the police who are investigating the 2,200 false Covid-19 vaccination certificates, the fee was dependent on your social standing. The more important you were, the higher the price.

__

 

[Mathanzua]

PFIZER VAX CAUSING GLOBAL BABY DIE-OFF​

Posted on June 1, 2022 by State of the Nation
FacebookTwitterPinterestRedditEmailPrint

Share
Submitted by Harold Saive

Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide: Dr. Naomi Wolf on the Pfizer “Confidential Report”
It’s Really True: They Know they are Killing the Babies​

Pfizer lies revealed are stunning.​

“…babies are dying disproportionately, during and after 2021, in highly vaccinated countries, and that newborns are dying disproportionately if they have vaccinated mothers versus unvaccinated mothers.”​

Naomi Wolf: I’ve been silent for some weeks. Forgive me.
The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because recently I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway.
The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, as you may know, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years.
By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed. And our experts are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms. You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.
The lies revealed are stunning.
Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide: Dr. Naomi Wolf on the Pfizer "Confidential Report" - Global Research

 

[Mathanzua]

Overall deaths in Australia,where nearly everyone is vaccinated are spiking!​

Add Australia to the countries seeing an unusual surge in deaths from all causes following mass mRNA shot campaigns .​

The Australian government reported on May 25 that deaths in Australia were 21 percent above normal in early 2022. Even excluding Covid deaths, deaths were more than 10 percent above normal.
SOURCE
Victoria, Australia’s second-most-populated state, offers an even grimmer picture. Unlike the national government, Victoria publishes monthly death figures in near-real time. On Thursday, it reported 4,312 deaths in May, 27 percent above the average of May 2020 and 2021 – the equivalent of 45,000 extra deaths in the United States.
SOURCE

The Australian death spike is particularly striking, because Australia had no excess deaths – and little Covid – in 2020 and much of 2021. Thus the usual alternative explanations cannot hold. The spike cannot be the result of delayed medical care or “long Covid” (whatever long Covid is). Australia’s weather and geography are also very different than the European countries now reporting excess deaths.

Further, the Australian data show that most excess deaths in January and February 2022 were NOT cardiac. Deaths from cancer were slightly above average, but the biggest jumps were in deaths from diabetes and dementia, both almost 30 percent above normal.
Reports in scientific journals and in the federal VAERS database have highlighted cases of severe diabetic dysregulation following the mRNA shots. Anecdotal stories of elderly people suffering rapid mental deterioration, especially after a second or booster shot, are also common.

Even as non-Covid deaths rise, Covid deaths have also soared in Australia this year – reaching levels far higher than they were before Australia began vaccinated.
For much of 2020 and 2021, Australia happily traded its civil liberties for “donut days,” when it had no new reported coronavirus infections, much less deaths.
With the arrival of the mRNA vaccines, most Australians – and Covid authoritarians everywhere – believed Australia had made the right bet. SureThey had given up a couple of years of freedom – in return for a Covid-free paradise forever.
Australians eagerly accepted Covid vaccinations and are vaccinated at rates significantly higher than Americans. 95 percent of people 16 and over in New South Wales, the country’s largest state, have been vaccinated. 64 percent have been boosted.

Yet despite (or because of) these very high vaccination rates, the arrival of Omicron has led to a relentless wave of infections and deaths across Australia.
native advertising

Australia now has reported the equivalent of about 125,000 American Covid deaths, and the vast majority have happened this year.
That figure is still far lower than the United States’s total, of course. But for the first time since Covid began, Australia now has significantly more daily deaths than the United States on a per-capita basis.
And the widespread boosters have made no difference. New South Wales reported on Thursday that 82 of the 98 people who died of Covid in the week ending May 28 were vaccinated, including 64 who had received at least one booster.
Maybe even more stunning, of 41 people admitted to intensive care units, only two were known to be unvaccinated. (The status of 11 other patients was unknown. In the United States, all would simply be valled unvaccinated. Despite its authoritarianism, Australia is much more honest in its reporting than the Centers for Disease Control.)
—
Because Australia had so little Covid before vaccinations began, it offers perhaps the clearest picture anywhere of the overall benefits and risks of widespread mRNA shots. Australians are being exposed to Covid largely after being vaccinated. The shots had plenty of time to work their magic.
If magic is the right word.

 

[Rasterman]

Ndugu unaongelea hizo kitu wakati hata ile ya Madagasca ilienda kuchukuliwa kwa gharama kubwa na WHO waliipinga ila mlikunywa kwa mbwembwe, sasa sijui huu uzi wako unamlenga nani?

😅😅😅

 

[Mathanzua]

72% of Americans are now saying no to C-19 vaccines!

 

[mwengeso]

PFIZER VAX CAUSING GLOBAL BABY DIE-OFF​

Posted on June 1, 2022 by State of the Nation
FacebookTwitterPinterestRedditEmailPrint

Share
Submitted by Harold Saive

Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide: Dr. Naomi Wolf on the Pfizer “Confidential Report”
It’s Really True: They Know they are Killing the Babies​

Pfizer lies revealed are stunning.​

“…babies are dying disproportionately, during and after 2021, in highly vaccinated countries, and that newborns are dying disproportionately if they have vaccinated mothers versus unvaccinated mothers.”​

Naomi Wolf: I’ve been silent for some weeks. Forgive me.
The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because recently I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway.
The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, as you may know, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years.
By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed. And our experts are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms. You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.
The lies revealed are stunning.
Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide: Dr. Naomi Wolf on the Pfizer "Confidential Report" - Global Research

Why is the scientist world silent?

Why governments of developed, industrialised and super powers silent?