Lukaku, Morata na Lacazette: Nani mkali zaidi?
Lukaku, Morata na Lacazette: Nani mkali zaidi?
- Thread starter EMT
- Start date
EMT
Platinum Member
- Jan 13, 2010
- 14,477
- 15,325
- Thread starter
- #44
Haya bana. Lingine ni kuwa Lakaku ana-fit style ya Mounrinho. Kama alivyosema mwenyewe:
“Romelu is not a player that participates a lot in the build-up play. He is a player that normally plays in the last third. We had so many opponents last season that decided clearly to defend, closing spaces, playing with lots of defenders and defensive midfield players.
"We needed a target man, which is not Martial or Rashford. We have good options, good players, but a target man, a clear number nine, one who is comfortable to play in the box, we thought that was Romelu.”
I feel sorry for those two young boys though. Sort like he is doing what he did at Chelsea?
PowerWithin
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 8, 2014
- 646
- 501
Binafsi napenda kuchangia huu mjadala kwa kuangalia angle hizi hapa:
Kati ya Everton na R.Madrid ipi timu kubwa zaidi; bila shaka ni R Madrid nikiwa na maana kuwa kuna a very strong squad yenye build up ya goli kuanzia kwa golikipa hadi strikers. R Madrid hawana tofauti sana na Juventus; lakini Everton haipo level sawa na Juve wala R Madrid
Kwa maneno mengine Morata ana sapoti kubwa sana uwanjani kuliko alivyo Lukaku kutokana na tofauti pamoja na uwezo wa timu husika. Bado Lukaku ameng'ara zaidi ya Morata anayecheza sambamba na Ronaldo ama Benzema ama Gareth Bale; huku Lukaku akipambana kama jeshi la mtu mmoja.
Cha ajabu ni kwamba pamoja na kuwa Morata amekuwa kwenye timu kubwa kubwa bado ameshindwa kuwa kwenye strong first team akiwa Juve na hata R Madrid; yaani amekuwa kama sup kwenye timu zake; wakati Lukaku akifanikiwa kuwa kwenye first team na kufanikiwa pia kuibeba Everton
Ninachokiona ni kuwa ukweli ni kuwa Juve na R Madrid ni timu kubwa na imara zaidi ya Chelsea; na kama Morata alishindwa kung'aa vema na R Madrid kiasi cha kuweza kuwa chaguo namba moja basi nahofia kuwa Chelsea ndo atapotea zaidi maana nature ya ligi ya epl ni tofauti na ligi alizowahi kuzicheza hapo awali kuanzia timu yenyewe hadi uwezo wa mchezaji mmoja mmoja.
Kuhusu Lukaku; ni matumaini yangu huenda akarekebisha matatizo yake ya first touch na kumfanya kuwa kati ya wachezaji wakubwa sana Duniani kwa kuwa sasa ana sapoti ya nguvu kuanzia akina Pogba, Miki, Lingaard, Valencia, Blind, Bailly, Lindelof, Martial nk nk jambo ambalo hajawahi kukipata hapo awali tangu amekuwa mchezaji imara na tegemeo kwenye timu husika.
Huenda wazungu wakajitoa ufahamu kuhusu uwezo wa Lukaku dhidi ya Morata kutokana na rangi ya Lukaku.
Kati ya Everton na R.Madrid ipi timu kubwa zaidi; bila shaka ni R Madrid nikiwa na maana kuwa kuna a very strong squad yenye build up ya goli kuanzia kwa golikipa hadi strikers. R Madrid hawana tofauti sana na Juventus; lakini Everton haipo level sawa na Juve wala R Madrid
Kwa maneno mengine Morata ana sapoti kubwa sana uwanjani kuliko alivyo Lukaku kutokana na tofauti pamoja na uwezo wa timu husika. Bado Lukaku ameng'ara zaidi ya Morata anayecheza sambamba na Ronaldo ama Benzema ama Gareth Bale; huku Lukaku akipambana kama jeshi la mtu mmoja.
Cha ajabu ni kwamba pamoja na kuwa Morata amekuwa kwenye timu kubwa kubwa bado ameshindwa kuwa kwenye strong first team akiwa Juve na hata R Madrid; yaani amekuwa kama sup kwenye timu zake; wakati Lukaku akifanikiwa kuwa kwenye first team na kufanikiwa pia kuibeba Everton
Ninachokiona ni kuwa ukweli ni kuwa Juve na R Madrid ni timu kubwa na imara zaidi ya Chelsea; na kama Morata alishindwa kung'aa vema na R Madrid kiasi cha kuweza kuwa chaguo namba moja basi nahofia kuwa Chelsea ndo atapotea zaidi maana nature ya ligi ya epl ni tofauti na ligi alizowahi kuzicheza hapo awali kuanzia timu yenyewe hadi uwezo wa mchezaji mmoja mmoja.
Kuhusu Lukaku; ni matumaini yangu huenda akarekebisha matatizo yake ya first touch na kumfanya kuwa kati ya wachezaji wakubwa sana Duniani kwa kuwa sasa ana sapoti ya nguvu kuanzia akina Pogba, Miki, Lingaard, Valencia, Blind, Bailly, Lindelof, Martial nk nk jambo ambalo hajawahi kukipata hapo awali tangu amekuwa mchezaji imara na tegemeo kwenye timu husika.
Huenda wazungu wakajitoa ufahamu kuhusu uwezo wa Lukaku dhidi ya Morata kutokana na rangi ya Lukaku.
Consultant
JF-Expert Member
- Jun 15, 2008
- 11,503
- 20,892
ze-dudu
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 26, 2014
- 17,640
- 22,748
ze-dudu
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 26, 2014
- 17,640
- 22,748
umeua[emoji23] [emoji23] hata sijui umetokea wapi jeshi langu......
sent from my iphone 7 nimeinunua SAPNA pale POSTA
Rejao
JF-Expert Member
- May 4, 2010
- 9,219
- 4,064
Nzi the point hapa ni kwamba tunawafananisha hawa wawili regardless ya clubs tunazozisupport. Kwangu mimi kama Arsenal fan nimefurahia usajili wa Lukaku kwenda Man Utd cuz najua nitarelax when we play against Man Utd. Kwenye career ya Lukaku hajawahi kutusumbua kabisa Arsenal na huwa siku zote anafichwa. Hii ni kwasababu ya uwezo wake mdogo na hawezi kujiongeza!! Morata ni mtu ambaye ana uwezo wa kucreate chance na kuscore kitu ambacho Lukaku hawezi.
Issue nyingine tena ni kwenye price, ukiangalia wachambuzi wengi ulaya kila mtu analalamikia price ya Lukaku. Maana yake pamoja na kwamba number zake za magoli ni nzuri lakini bado hakubaliki na haaminiki.
Chenua Nkuchebe
Member
- Jul 18, 2017
- 90
- 119
Katika hii thread hapo kuna jitambi na mimba hapo hapo kuna mshambuliaji na mfungaji. Kwa maono yangu mimi Lukaku ni mfungaji ila Moratta ni mshambuliaji.
Welcome Chelsea Moratta. Hujapotea Njia. Ahsanteni
Welcome Chelsea Moratta. Hujapotea Njia. Ahsanteni
Kanali G
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 21, 2013
- 9,898
- 14,413
Tungeelewa zaidi kama tungeambiwa hayo magoli yamepatikana baada ya kila mmoja kucheza mechi ngapi
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Kunguru Mjanja
JF-Expert Member
- Aug 22, 2012
- 2,046
- 3,971
Morata ajawahi kucheza Uingereza na Lukaku amecheza na kufunga magoli zaidi ya 20 kwenye ligi hiyo. Morata ni mara ya kwanza (msimu uliopita)kwenye uchezaji wake kuvuka magoli zaidi ya 15.
FINISHING
Over the past three seasons, Lukaku has scored more goals per 90 minutes than Morata – 0.51 against 0.33 for the Spaniard – although the 2016/17 was different. Used as an impact sub off the bench, the Real Madrid attacker actually out-scored the Belgian with 1.01 goals per 90 versus 0.69.
In the box, the Everton striker was still more efficient, however. He converted 30% of his shots in the area. Morata managed to convert 27.08%. Over the past three seasons, Lukaku has taken more shots in total too – 3.22 per 90 versus 2.17, or 2.22 on target against 1.40. He has the variety too, with 11 headed goals, 15 off his right and 27 off his left in the league since August 2014.
Winner: Lukaku
HOLD UP PLAY
The Spaniard is without doubt the superior option when it comes to playing with his back to goal. Lukaku prefers to get a run on defences, whereas Morata has shown his value as a centre-forward who can bring others into play, especially during his two year stint at Juventus.
However, the statistics paint a more complex picture that might otherwise be assumed. Over the past three years, Morata has drawn more fouls per 90 than Lukaku (1.90 versus 0.80) and done more when it comes to defensive work, winning tackles and making interceptions (0.81 against 0.23), while the Belgian has actually created more chances (1.30 to 1.03 for the Spaniard) and completed more passes in the final third (10.04 to 6.96).
Despite the Real Madrid attacker recording more assists per 90 (0.26 to 0.16), Lukaku has actually played more through balls too – 20 in total, or 0.19 per 90, to three for Morata, or 0.07. Even so, these numbers must be considered in the context of each players’ respective styles of play and performances.
Winner: Morata.
MOVEMENTS
Here, Lukaku comes into his own. Not only has he shown his ability to pop up in dangerous areas more often than Morata, taking 0.65 shots from “big chances” – situations in which a player finds themselves in a position to shoot from very close range or with only the ‘keeper to beat – over the past three seasons, he has also taken carved out 20 goal-scoring opportunities on the counter-attack, or 0.19 per 90.
Morata, meanwhile, has averaged 0.37 “big chances” and 0.07 chances on the counter per 90, although unleashed off the bench and in a more aggressive role for Madrid last season, the Spaniard actually took on more “big chances” (1.01 per 90 to 0.66) than the Belgian. He is no slouch.
Winner: Lukaku
DUES
A category in which the Belgian just about pips his rival. With his quick feet, he can turn defenders inside out to force back lines to implode, and completed 1.74 take ons per 90 last season (1.18 in the final third) compared to 1.48 (1.08) for Morata. Over the past three seasons, it’s a similar story: 1.44 (1.00) for Lukaku, 1.27 (0.79) for the Spaniard.
In the air, it’s closer still, although not in the way that may be obvious. While the Everton striker rules over Morata through the sheer number of aerial duels won (2.81 versus 0.85 over the last three seasons) for success rate, the Spaniard shows the value of quality, over quantity, completing 46.99% of his headers to 39.97% for Lukaku.
Winner: Lukaku
BIG MOMENTS
The Spaniard’s record is hard to beat. He has already scored more Champions League goals than Diego Costa, and in 2015 found the back of the net in both of the semi-finals and in the final against Barcelona for Juventus. Last season in La Liga, only Lionel Messi and Neymar scored more goals in the last 10 minutes of games than the Real Madrid striker.
Lukaku can be the man of the moment too, however. No player scored more goals from “big chances” in the Premier League last season. He was tied with Harry Kane on 18. The Belgian also topped the charts for goals in the final 10 minutes of action too, with nine – five more than Morata managed in Spain. Against tired legs, his underrated dribbling abilities, movement and capacity to catch teams on the break cannot be dismissed.
Winner: Morata
FINISHING
Over the past three seasons, Lukaku has scored more goals per 90 minutes than Morata – 0.51 against 0.33 for the Spaniard – although the 2016/17 was different. Used as an impact sub off the bench, the Real Madrid attacker actually out-scored the Belgian with 1.01 goals per 90 versus 0.69.
In the box, the Everton striker was still more efficient, however. He converted 30% of his shots in the area. Morata managed to convert 27.08%. Over the past three seasons, Lukaku has taken more shots in total too – 3.22 per 90 versus 2.17, or 2.22 on target against 1.40. He has the variety too, with 11 headed goals, 15 off his right and 27 off his left in the league since August 2014.
Winner: Lukaku
HOLD UP PLAY
The Spaniard is without doubt the superior option when it comes to playing with his back to goal. Lukaku prefers to get a run on defences, whereas Morata has shown his value as a centre-forward who can bring others into play, especially during his two year stint at Juventus.
However, the statistics paint a more complex picture that might otherwise be assumed. Over the past three years, Morata has drawn more fouls per 90 than Lukaku (1.90 versus 0.80) and done more when it comes to defensive work, winning tackles and making interceptions (0.81 against 0.23), while the Belgian has actually created more chances (1.30 to 1.03 for the Spaniard) and completed more passes in the final third (10.04 to 6.96).
Despite the Real Madrid attacker recording more assists per 90 (0.26 to 0.16), Lukaku has actually played more through balls too – 20 in total, or 0.19 per 90, to three for Morata, or 0.07. Even so, these numbers must be considered in the context of each players’ respective styles of play and performances.
Winner: Morata.
MOVEMENTS
Here, Lukaku comes into his own. Not only has he shown his ability to pop up in dangerous areas more often than Morata, taking 0.65 shots from “big chances” – situations in which a player finds themselves in a position to shoot from very close range or with only the ‘keeper to beat – over the past three seasons, he has also taken carved out 20 goal-scoring opportunities on the counter-attack, or 0.19 per 90.
Morata, meanwhile, has averaged 0.37 “big chances” and 0.07 chances on the counter per 90, although unleashed off the bench and in a more aggressive role for Madrid last season, the Spaniard actually took on more “big chances” (1.01 per 90 to 0.66) than the Belgian. He is no slouch.
Winner: Lukaku
DUES
A category in which the Belgian just about pips his rival. With his quick feet, he can turn defenders inside out to force back lines to implode, and completed 1.74 take ons per 90 last season (1.18 in the final third) compared to 1.48 (1.08) for Morata. Over the past three seasons, it’s a similar story: 1.44 (1.00) for Lukaku, 1.27 (0.79) for the Spaniard.
In the air, it’s closer still, although not in the way that may be obvious. While the Everton striker rules over Morata through the sheer number of aerial duels won (2.81 versus 0.85 over the last three seasons) for success rate, the Spaniard shows the value of quality, over quantity, completing 46.99% of his headers to 39.97% for Lukaku.
Winner: Lukaku
BIG MOMENTS
The Spaniard’s record is hard to beat. He has already scored more Champions League goals than Diego Costa, and in 2015 found the back of the net in both of the semi-finals and in the final against Barcelona for Juventus. Last season in La Liga, only Lionel Messi and Neymar scored more goals in the last 10 minutes of games than the Real Madrid striker.
Lukaku can be the man of the moment too, however. No player scored more goals from “big chances” in the Premier League last season. He was tied with Harry Kane on 18. The Belgian also topped the charts for goals in the final 10 minutes of action too, with nine – five more than Morata managed in Spain. Against tired legs, his underrated dribbling abilities, movement and capacity to catch teams on the break cannot be dismissed.
Winner: Morata
spea mkononi
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 5, 2015
- 345
- 324
Kisu Cha Ngariba
JF-Expert Member
- Jun 21, 2016
- 22,135
- 48,827
Appearance ni kutokana na uwezo wa mchezaji,kama hana uwezo hawezi kucheza.