peleka mgongo wa ngisi na dudu washa kuzimu [emoji15] [emoji12] wee kila chaka kojo linauma [emoji12]
The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been "altered":
The subject of Mankind's Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have taken a closer look at this subject.
Its seems it's not only your site that brings this subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.
For example, an article in the Catholic Encyclopaedia that mentioned in regard to the 'Theophilus' mentioned in Luke's Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of The Bible? article) testifies to this fact (
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: New Testament):
"IV. TRANSMISSION OF THE TEXT
No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--
all have been in some way altered.
The material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various manuscripts of the same work.
To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies.
To exempt the sacred writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence."
Lets just go through that again -
"No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author--all have been in some way altered."
All have been in some way altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any muslim, to follow an impure book?
When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur'an, there's no contest!