Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

[Gavana]

Riwaya hizo! HAHAHAAA.
Jibu why mamako awe sawa na sheitwani??

Endelea kupata dose ya nguvu

Sex and the City

"Now concerning the matters about which you wrote. It is good for a man NOT to have sexual relations with a woman." – 1 Corinthians 7.1.
"Paul's apparently grudging attitude to marriage provided celibate fanatics in later Christian generations with plenty of ammunition to support their body-hating, women-hating philosophies, their monkish despairs, their flagellations, their hairshirts, their cells and their vows."
– A.N. Wilson, Paul - The Mind of the Apostle, p162.​

Paul gives general rules on marriage in 1 Corinthians 7 ("marry rather than burn"), castigates immorality in 1 Corinthians 6.13-20 ("your body is a temple") and rages over an instance of incest in 1 Corinthians5. He devotes a whole chapter of Corinthians to the condemnation of a member who "has had his father's wife"!

Paul uses the scandal as a foil to condemn all "fornication" and there is no Christian forgiveness here. The saints are to keep separate from fornicators and the wicked are to be "put away" (1 Corinthians5.13). In Romans, Paul confesses the torments of his own "concupiscence" and makes a rhetorical appeal for "delivery from the body of death."

"For I know that in me , that is, in my flesh, dwells no good thing ... I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." – Romans 7.18,24.​

And the point of all this puritanical zeal? Nothing in the demeanor, dress or word of the saints can be allowed to jeopardize imminent judgement and the hoped for salvation. Paul presents himself as a role model for the new church. A celibate, such as himself, is not distracted from the Lord's work.

"He who is unmarried cares for the things of the Lord, how he may please the Lord. But he who is married cares about the things of the world, how he may please his wife ... The unmarried woman cares about the things of the Lord ... but she who is married cares about the things of the world, how she may please her husband. This I say ... that you may serve the Lord without distraction." – 1 Corinthians 7.32,35.​

The doctrine of abstinence was calculated to rein in free spirits and provide the church with a cadre of unwed Christ-devotees.

This gave early Christianity a considerable organizational advantage over the pagan cults, whose part-time priests for the most part had families and took an active role in the business and pleasures of secular society.

In time, although the doctrines of celibacy and denial would vex the brotherhood with psycho-sexual disorders, it would ensure that Church property would never be threatened by the claims of off-spring and dependents.

As befits a church bent on mass recruitment rather than fidelity to principle, if members of the brethren already had pagan spouses, husbands and wives were, it seems, "sanctified by their partner" (1 Corinthians 7.14) – a remarkable compromise to the harsh precepts of "justification".

Paul had little knowledge of or empathy for Greek culture and dismissed Greek religion as mere idolatry.

But the pragmatic evangelist clearly had his sights on the children of "mixed" marriages, anticipating the Jesuits by more than fourteen centuries – "give me a child until he is seven, and I will give you the man".

 

[Gavana]

Hey Abdul!
can you explain what is it then?

Take it easy endelea kupata dose

Christian conduct - the Pauline taboos

To distance themselves from "Jewish practices" Jewish-Christian males were directed to give up praying with a mantle over their head.

​

"Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonours his head ... A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man."– 1 Corinthians 11.4,7.​

Paradoxically, although men were instructed by Paul to uncover their heads, women were directed to cover theirs. But the paradox is only apparent because men and women – in this world – were never equals.

​

"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God ... For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man." – 1 Corinthians 11.3-9.​

Unlike Jewish males, Christianized Jewish women were not required to make a public display of rejecting Jewish ways. Within Judaism women were already subordinate to men. As the inferior sex, women were segregated in the synagogue and took no part in public worship.

Headcovering symbolized female submission to male authority and Paul was content with this part of the Jewish legacy. He even provided his own remarkable justification:

​

"For this cause ought the woman to have a sign of authority on her head, because of the angels."​

– 1 Corinthians 11.10.​

Loose hair was the sign of a loose woman (Numbers 5.18). For the Pauline churches, modesty and quiet humility were the required order, not the spontaneous exuberance of the traditional cults.Ironically, when it came to salvation, good behaviour actually mattered not a jot .

 

[Kisoda2]

Endelea kupata dose ya nguvu

Sex and the City

​

"Now concerning the matters about which you wrote. It is good for a man NOT to have sexual relations with a woman." – 1 Corinthians 7.1.​

"Paul's apparently grudging attitude to marriage provided celibate fanatics in later Christian generations with plenty of ammunition to support their body-hating, women-hating philosophies, their monkish despairs, their flagellations, their hairshirts, their cells and their vows."​

– A.N. Wilson, Paul - The Mind of the Apostle, p162.​

Paul gives general rules on marriage in 1 Corinthians 7 ("marry rather than burn"), castigates immorality in 1 Corinthians 6.13-20 ("your body is a temple") and rages over an instance of incest in 1 Corinthians5. He devotes a whole chapter of Corinthians to the condemnation of a member who "has had his father's wife"!

Paul uses the scandal as a foil to condemn all "fornication" and there is no Christian forgiveness here. The saints are to keep separate from fornicators and the wicked are to be "put away" (1 Corinthians5.13). In Romans, Paul confesses the torments of his own "concupiscence" and makes a rhetorical appeal for "delivery from the body of death."

​

"For I know that in me , that is, in my flesh, dwells no good thing ... I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." – Romans 7.18,24.​

And the point of all this puritanical zeal? Nothing in the demeanor, dress or word of the saints can be allowed to jeopardize imminent judgement and the hoped for salvation. Paul presents himself as a role model for the new church. A celibate, such as himself, is not distracted from the Lord's work.

​

"He who is unmarried cares for the things of the Lord, how he may please the Lord. But he who is married cares about the things of the world, how he may please his wife ... The unmarried woman cares about the things of the Lord ... but she who is married cares about the things of the world, how she may please her husband. This I say ... that you may serve the Lord without distraction." – 1 Corinthians 7.32,35.​

The doctrine of abstinence was calculated to rein in free spirits and provide the church with a cadre of unwed Christ-devotees.

This gave early Christianity a considerable organizational advantage over the pagan cults, whose part-time priests for the most part had families and took an active role in the business and pleasures of secular society.

In time, although the doctrines of celibacy and denial would vex the brotherhood with psycho-sexual disorders, it would ensure that Church property would never be threatened by the claims of off-spring and dependents.

As befits a church bent on mass recruitment rather than fidelity to principle, if members of the brethren already had pagan spouses, husbands and wives were, it seems, "sanctified by their partner" (1 Corinthians 7.14) – a remarkable compromise to the harsh precepts of "justification".

Paul had little knowledge of or empathy for Greek culture and dismissed Greek religion as mere idolatry.

But the pragmatic evangelist clearly had his sights on the children of "mixed" marriages, anticipating the Jesuits by more than fourteen centuries – "give me a child until he is seven, and I will give you the man".

This is not the answer to my concern!
So Abdul, uko poa tu iwapo mamako anapita kwa mtaa kisha mzee shomvi amwangalie kwa matamanio(Kama stater/ viagra/kichocheo) kisha azame ndani kwenda kula uroda na mkewe. kisa kamuangalia mamako aua mkeo akipita nje. Kisa muhammad amesema mwanamke ni sheitwani??

 

[Kisoda2]

Take it easy endelea kupata dose

Christian conduct - the Pauline taboos

To distance themselves from "Jewish practices" Jewish-Christian males were directed to give up praying with a mantle over their head.

​

"Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonours his head ... A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man."– 1 Corinthians 11.4,7.​

Paradoxically, although men were instructed by Paul to uncover their heads, women were directed to cover theirs. But the paradox is only apparent because men and women – in this world – were never equals.

​

"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God ... For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man." – 1 Corinthians 11.3-9.​

Unlike Jewish males, Christianized Jewish women were not required to make a public display of rejecting Jewish ways. Within Judaism women were already subordinate to men. As the inferior sex, women were segregated in the synagogue and took no part in public worship.

Headcovering symbolized female submission to male authority and Paul was content with this part of the Jewish legacy. He even provided his own remarkable justification:

​

"For this cause ought the woman to have a sign of authority on her head, because of the angels."​

– 1 Corinthians 11.10.​

Loose hair was the sign of a loose woman (Numbers 5.18). For the Pauline churches, modesty and quiet humility were the required order, not the spontaneous exuberance of the traditional cults.Ironically, when it came to salvation, good behaviour actually mattered not a jot .

Hahahaaa ndio maelezo ya hadith hayo?

Ijumaa Kareem kamata hiyo.
Na hivi leo mtakuwa wengi mkibinuka kwenye masinagogi yenu. mjadiliane hapo.

 

[Che mittoga]

Waislamu wapi ? Unajua chochote kuhusu maulidi ? au unabweka bweka tu

Juzi tu tumesheherekea sikukuu ya Maulidi na tukapumzika kwenda kazini.
Nimejaribu kuitafuta kwenye Qurani sijaiona, Maulidi
Unamaana ni sherehe ya kujitungia tu ?
Jibu basi mtaalamu kama kuna aya tuambie.
Kama hamna si unasema tu hamna.

 

[Gavana]

This is not the answer to my concern!
So Abdul, uko poa tu iwapo mamako anapita kwa mtaa kisha mzee shomvi amwangalie kwa matamanio(Kama stater/ viagra/kichocheo) kisha azame ndani kwenda kula uroda na mkewe. kisa kamuangalia mamako aua mkeo akipita nje. Kisa muhammad amesema mwanamke ni sheitwani??

Dose inafanya kazi vizuri , yaani hata Roho Mtakatifu wako anakuongoza namna hii , nakupa 5

Endelea kupata dose


The threat of free spirits

Divine Grace was a "gift" from God.

Paul recognized a variety of such "gifts" including healing, the working of miracles, the discernment of spirits, even sexual continence.

But there is no freedom here – "gifts of the spirit", it seems, are for the edification of the church, not the individual.

Most assuredly, the individual is NOT at liberty to follow his own fancy (as did the Quakers, for example, with their "inner light" in a later age). Spontaneity was to be restrained by obedience to Christ under the direction of the church and its hierarchs.

​

"For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous." – Romans 5.19.​

​

"And we will be ready to punish every act of disobedience, once your obedience is complete."​

– 2 Corinthians 10.6.​

"Speaking in tongues" was a case in point. Clearly, "tongues" must have been a popular pastime among the first Christians, delirious with the newly imbibed Spirit! But Paul warns the brethren about excesses of enthusiasm. Babbling in an incomprehensible language, says the apostle (in perhaps his wisest comment), would discourage potential recruits:

​

"He who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him ... Those who are uninformed or unbelievers, will they not say that you are out of your mind?" – 1 Corinthians 14.2,23.​

Untroubled by modesty, Paul reminds his readers that he speaks in tongues "better than them all" (1 Corinthians 14.18) and cautions, "If anyone speaks in a tongue ... but there is no interpreter, let him keep silent in church!"

Paul's gift of choice for the brethren was prophecy, a gift that once had been a regular dispensation from the Almighty to the Jews but not vouchsafed for centuries. No matter – the ancient Jewish prophets could be repurposed for the Christian cause, their every utterance pre-figuring and anticipating the Lord Christ Jesus.

Prophecy, said Paul, was "a comfort to men" and of direct benefit to the church. It was by reinterpreting ancient prophecy – not the presentation of tangible evidence – that the Christians "proved" the existence of their "historical Jesus" – and still do!

​

"If all prophesy, an unbeliever ... falling down on his face, will worship God." – 1 Corinthians 14.23-25.​

​

"Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies." – 1 Thessalonians 5.18-20.​

As it happen, in the 2nd century proto-orthodoxy faced one of its greatest challenges from prophecy, in the guise of a rival faction to which prophecy was its raison d'être.

In Galatia, in particular, Montanism threatened would-be orthodoxy on two fronts. An unrestrained "gift of prophecy" threw down the gauntlet to the doctrinal certainties of Catholicism.

Compounding the mischief, the soothsayers were women who took leading positions in the movement. Doubtless these sibyls were following the ancient traditions of Phrygia, entering drug-induced frenzies in order to utter incoherent babble. Minders would then interpret the prophecies for a gullible audience.

Such spontaneous "outpourings of the Spirit" and new revelations from Heaven were not to be countenanced in a disciplined Pauline church.

The battle with the soothsayers reached its climax in the second half of the 2nd century. Montanism even attracted into its ranks Tertullian, the "father of Latin theology" who defected from the Catholics because of their lax ways. In the 3rd century Montanism was marginalised as a heresy but it lingered on for centuries.

 

[Gavana]

Hahahaaa ndio maelezo ya hadith hayo?

Ijumaa Kareem kamata hiyo.
Na hivi leo mtakuwa wengi mkibinuka kwenye masinagogi yenu. mjadiliane hapo.

[MED]XjNOQbXx-aY[/MEDIA]

ONGEZA NA HII DOSE

Keeping women in their place

The dispute over the role of women in the early church occurred precisely because in a number of Christian sects women had a role, often an important one, such as prophetess or apostle. The challenge went wider than Montanism.

Female leaders were common in the Gnostic Christian sects which most vociferously challenged Catholicism.

Foremost of them was the church of Marcion.

Infamously, in the orthodox Pauline church, women were to have no voice:

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted for them to speak ... And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home." – 1 Corinthians 14.34,35.​

However, the above passage is a notorious interpolation, based on an even more misogynistic passage to be found in the fake epistle to Timothy (1 Timothy 2.11-15). The "original Paul" speaks approvingly of females speaking in church (albeit with covered heads) even in the same Corinthian epistle (1 Corinthian 11.5)! In 2 Timothy "Paul" castigates women for their moral corruption of men whereas in Romans 16.7 "Paul" sends his salutations to a female apostle named Junia† and several other women.

How is it, then, that "Paul" can be on both sides of the "women's rights" issue?

Precisely because the corpus of Pauline "correspondence" was the battleground between orthodoxy and its enemies in a struggle for scriptural authority waged throughout the 2nd century. Each skirmish and engagement left its residue of redaction in the written record.

The Christian Gnostics, detached entirely from carnality, were able to accept an equality of the sexes quite radical for the ancient world. Catholicism, socially conservative and authoritarian, felt threatened by the sacred feminine. Ultimately, the Marcion church was subsumed into Catholicism, leaving only a trace of "difficult readings" in the Pauline epistles.

 

[Gavana]

This is not the answer to my concern!
So Abdul, uko poa tu iwapo mamako anapita kwa mtaa kisha mzee shomvi amwangalie kwa matamanio(Kama stater/ viagra/kichocheo) kisha azame ndani kwenda kula uroda na mkewe. kisa kamuangalia mamako aua mkeo akipita nje. Kisa muhammad amesema mwanamke ni sheitwani??

ENDELEA KUPATA DOSE YA NGUVU YA KUMTOA ROHO MTAKATIFU WAKO CHUMBANI KWA ASKOFU WAKO




Seed Faith - Original Recipe

​

"Now concerning the collection for the saints. As I directed the churches of Galatia, so you also are to do. On the first day of every week, each one of you should set aside a sum of money in keeping with his income" – 1 Corinthians." 16.1,2.​

​

"Don't you know that those who work in the temple get their food from the temple, and those who serve at the altar share in what is offered on the altar? In the same way, the Lord has commanded that those who preach the gospel should receive their living from the gospel."​

​

– 1 Corinthians 9.13-14.​

Paul is arguably the first Christian fund-raiser and author of the seed faith scam so close to the heart of American evangelicals.

Following the theological discourse on the resurrection of 1 Corinthians 15, what follows is a prosaic appeal for church funds (no reference to "the poor" here!).

But Paul returns to the subject of fund-raising in 2 Corinthians. He wants money, in large amounts, and uses a variety of verbal stratagems to extract loot from his community.

Paul cites the example of Christ:

​

“For you know the generous act of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich.”​

– 2 Corinthians 8.7.​

He appeals to self-interest: A bountiful return is promised:

​

"But this I say, He which sows sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which sows bountifully shall reap also bountifully. Every man according as he purpose in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loves a cheerful giver."​

– 2 Corinthians 9.6,7.​

He chides the Corinthians with an unfavourable comparison: Paul cites the generous example of the Macedonians, spontaneous and giving beyond their means. "See that you abound in this grace also", says our determined fundraiser (2 Corinthians 8.7).

Paul uses flattery backed up by threats: He says that he has been boasting to the Macedonians that the Corinthians have been "ready since last year.” He doesn't want to be embarrassed by an empty boast so to make certain he has sent “the brethren” to communicate his sense of urgency and to "make up the bounty." – 2 Corinthians 9.2-5.

It is doubtful that Paul – or whoever wrote in his name – ever supported himself by manual labour.

It is clear that many of the elements of chicanery which will enrich the Church in the coming centuries were already in place at the birth of Christianity.

​

 

[Gavana]

Kambishie allah uongeze nusu kg ya uasi na mikufuru [emoji53] Hayo maelekezo si ya mgen unae nikoromea [emoji12] utakula sana mwaka huu ubongo na hashua za inzilView attachment 950888 [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji106]

MATHEW 4:9 SHETANI KAJICHUKULIA KIFAA CHAKE , ANAKWENDA KUMUONYESHA MJI😛😛😛😛


Shetani kavaa chupi tu😛😛😛😛

 

[mgen]

SHETANI KAJICHUKULIA KIFAA CHAKE , ANAKWENDA KUMUONYESHA MJI😛😛😛😛


Shetani kavaa chupi tu😛😛😛😛

Safari ya miraji ya baba fatuma [emoji38] [emoji38] hapo anaelekea mbingu ya ngapi [emoji351] [emoji348]

 

[Gavana]

Safari ya miraji ya baba fatuma [emoji38] [emoji38] hapo anaelekea mbingu ya ngapi [emoji351] [emoji348]

MATHEW 4:9 SHETANI AKIWA NA KIFAA CHAKE , ANAMTEMBEZA MJINI 😛😛😛

 

[masoud mshahara]

Juzi tu tumesheherekea sikukuu ya Maulidi na tukapumzika kwenda kazini.
Nimejaribu kuitafuta kwenye Qurani sijaiona, Maulidi
Unamaana ni sherehe ya kujitungia tu ?
Jibu basi mtaalamu kama kuna aya tuambie.
Kama hamna si unasema tu hamna.

Muongozo wa Muislam ni Quran na sunah , rudi tena kwenye sunah tarehe ya kuzaliwa mtume wetu mbona ipo wala haiitaji kutungwa na masheikh

 

[masoud mshahara]

Ooh Asante kwa kukiri 1&3. Hiyo ya pili mnajificha nayo sana. ila Huyo ndiye baba yake Qathem aka Muhammad. According to, according to, according to your history books from your great Scholars. and by the way, Muhammada alizalia 4 years baada ya babake(Mzee Abdulat) kufariki. great miracle is it?

Kama alishakuwa mtume iweje atake kujiua? au JINN subiani alimpanda kichwani akasahau kuwa yeye ni mtume, mpaka alipokuja Jinn makata kumshuhudia tena na kushikilia shuka jamaa asiruke.
Najaribu kuwaza nje ya computer hapa, vipi Jibril angekamatwa na traffic njiani ame over-speed kuwahi Mudi asijirushe kwenye jabali. Ina maana leo mgekuwa hamna tena mtume!!

Nguo za kike, sikusema mie, kajisemea mwenyewe. Sasa kama unabisha na bwanako kazi ni kwako.
Deal with it.
“She told that the people used to choose: ‘A’isha’s day to bring their gifts, seeking thereby to please God’s messenger. She said that God’s messenger’s wives were in two parties, one including ‘A’isha, Hafsa, Safiya, and Sauda, and the other including Umm Salama and the rest of God’s messenger’s wives. Umm Salama’s party spoke to her telling her to ask God’s messenger to say to the people, “If anyone wishes to make a present to God’s messenger, let him present it to him wherever he happens to be.” She did so and he replied, “Do not annoy me regarding ‘A’isha, for inspiration has not come to me when I was in any WOMAN’S GARMENT (Thawb) but ‘A’isha’s.” They then called Fatima, sent her to God’s messenger, and she spoke to him, but he replied, “Do you not like what I like, girlie?” She said, “Certainly,” so he said, “Then love this woman.” (Bukhari and Muslim.)

Au hayo maneno ni mlevi wa kojo la Ngamia anasema hapo kwenye mkolezo?

MAJIBU; kwanza umeshindwa kuthibitisha kwamba kutamani kujiua ni kosa , ndio maana hata SAMSON aliamua kujiua mwenyewe kwa kudondosha nguzo ilo ndio la kushangaza wewe unashangaa kutamani badala ya kushangaa waliofanya !!, labda nikupe MAARIFA ambayo hukuwa nayo MTUME alianza kupokea WAHYI akiwa na bi khadija tu huyo Aisha wala hakuwepo kabisa, kwahiyo hoja yako inakuwa imekufa labda nikuulize swali nenda kwenye Wikipedia tuletee maana ya "THAWB " hapa zote labda ninaweza kukupa muongozo ujinga ukutoke ahahahaaajaauaaaua ahahaahaahhajajajaja

 

[masoud mshahara]

Come and Join us LIVE on youtube. then give us your challenge now!

Hii ni hoja au tangazo? ahahahhaahhahaahahahhah leta hoja humu au unataka viewers youtube

 

[masoud mshahara]

Elezea maana yake basi! unalia nini?
Bwanako kapewa makavu live, unaunya unya tu. Lete maana.

Makavu yapi ? leta swali lako tukupe tiba mbadala wewe unaambiwa ulete swali kwangu una mbwela mbwela nini mdogo wangu

 

[masoud mshahara]

Anhaaa, You are not Abdul anymore?
Umetukanwa wapi?
Huyo Masoud ndio cha matusi siyo, Anhaaa!!
Lete maana ya hiyo kitu. ndiyo maana ya mjadala.
Allah anatutukana na kutita majina yakila uchafu wote duniani, Najisi, Filthy, waste creatures etc. na mnatulaani kila saa mkiswali. hayo hamuoni?

Masoud ndio kiboko ya wazushi na kila aina ya uchafu

 

[mgen]

Muongozo wa Muislam ni Quran na sunah , rudi tena kwenye sunah tarehe ya kuzaliwa mtume wetu mbona ipo wala haiitaji kutungwa na masheikh

Wewe umeona dosari gani ktk Sherehe ya kukumbuka Kuzaliwa kwa Yesu [emoji351] [emoji346]

 

[masoud mshahara]

Wewe umeona dosari gani ktk Sherehe ya kukumbuka Kuzaliwa kwa Yesu [emoji351] [emoji346]

Tarehe 25/December nani kamiambia muichague iwe tarehe ya kukumbukwa kuzaliwa kwa Yesu ?

 

[mgen]

Tarehe 25/December nani kamiambia muichague iwe tarehe ya kukumbukwa kuzaliwa kwa Yesu ?

Mungu Mwenyewe [emoji106] [emoji117]

 

[masoud mshahara]

Mungu Mwenyewe [emoji106] [emoji117] View attachment 953294

Ahahahahaahahaahaha Ahahahahhaah haya maneno alikuwa anaambiwa Petro sasa nionyeshe wapi Petro alimiambia nyie tarehe 25/December muadhimishe kuzaliwa kwa Yesu, kama haitoshi katika wale wanafunzi 12 wa Yesu nitajie walau mmoja aliofanya utaratibu huo ahahahahahhahahaha unaleta janja janja hapa ahahaahahahahahahajajjajj