S.H Amon apoteza jengo la ghorofa nane Kariakoo

Hapo ndio kwao kwa mama yake mzazi.

Mshughulishaji said:

Hata hii ya hapa TUKUYU?

Click to expand...

Erythrocyte said:

Taarifa kutoka Mahakama ya Rufaa inaonyesha kwamba Mbunge wa Mstaafu wa ccm Mh Sauli Henry Amon , ameshindwa kesi Mahakamani baada ya Familia ya Bushiri Pazi kurejeshewa nyumba iliyouzwa kwa mnada mwaka 2001 .

Ilikuwa hivi , Kampuni ya S.H.AMON ilishinda mnada wa nyumba namba 113 , Kitalu 4 , Block 17 ambayo ilikuwa mali ya Bushiri Pazi , iliyokuwa Kariakoo , Ilala , DSM , S.H.AMON alilipa Tsh mil 105 katika mnada uliofanyika 13/5/2001 , hii ilikuwa nyumba ya kawaida tu , baada ya kuinunua Sauli akaibomoa na kuporomosha jengo la ghorofa nane .

Mnada huo ulipingwa Mahakamani na Bushiri Pazi , ambaye alidai haukuwa halali , Baada ya danadana nyingi za kisheria kwenye Mahakama mbalimbali kwa miaka 20 , Hatimaye Ndugu Bushiri Pazi amerejeshewa nyumba yake , ila sasa si ile ya chini tena , ni ghorofa 8 .

View attachment 2203933

Chanzo : KYELA FM

Click to expand...

Hahahaa Haki imetendeka

Ardhi huwa ni kichekesho, unanunua unalipa kodi na takataka zote zote ardhi halafu miaka kumi unakuja kusikia kina mgogoro.

Dhuruma ni dhambi yenye karma mbaya sana MUNGU wetu sote.

... wazee wa Kariakoo sio wa mchezo mchezo.

Jengo amekaa nalo kwa miaka zaidi ya 20, huyu alishapata faida "nadhani" hana cha kupoteza.

Kutaka mali kihuni. Huo mnada uliitishwa na mahakama?

Chiwa said:

kwa kadri ya kumbukumbu zangu hii ni nyumba ya pili huyu jamaa anapoteza mahakamani nyingine alipoteza akiwa amejenga ukuta sheria ikapita naye

Click to expand...

Basi atakuwa wale wanaojiamulia Mambo bila kushirikisha washauri wa kisekta mfano wanasheria.

mbingunikwetu said:

Tusimulie mgogoro ulikuwaje hadi kupelekea nyumba hiyo kupigwa mnada?

Click to expand...

Watoa taarifa hawakufafanua ila Bushiri Pazi alidai mnada uliouza nyumba yake haukuwa halali

Miaka 20 hajapata tu faida?
Miaka 20? Hana cha kupoteza.

Erythrocyte said:

Taarifa kutoka Mahakama ya Rufaa inaonyesha kwamba Mbunge wa Mstaafu wa ccm Mh Sauli Henry Amon , ameshindwa kesi Mahakamani baada ya Familia ya Bushiri Pazi kurejeshewa nyumba iliyouzwa kwa mnada mwaka 2001 .

Ilikuwa hivi , Kampuni ya S.H.AMON ilishinda mnada wa nyumba namba 113 , Kitalu 4 , Block 17 ambayo ilikuwa mali ya Bushiri Pazi , iliyokuwa Kariakoo , Ilala , DSM , S.H.AMON alilipa Tsh mil 105 katika mnada uliofanyika 13/5/2001 , hii ilikuwa nyumba ya kawaida tu , baada ya kuinunua Sauli akaibomoa na kuporomosha jengo la ghorofa nane .

Mnada huo ulipingwa Mahakamani na Bushiri Pazi , ambaye alidai haukuwa halali , Baada ya danadana nyingi za kisheria kwenye Mahakama mbalimbali kwa miaka 20 , Hatimaye Ndugu Bushiri Pazi amerejeshewa nyumba yake , ila sasa si ile ya chini tena , ni ghorofa 8 .

View attachment 2203933

Chanzo : KYELA FM

Click to expand...

Umekosea kuripoti, hajarudishiwa nyumba ni amerudishiwa kiwanja, hivyo SH Amin, yuko free kuyachukua majengo yake, hivyo jamaa kubaki na kiwanja chake kirudishwe ile nyumba aliyoinunua.
P

Lycaon pictus said:

Kutaka mali kihuni. Huo mnada uliitishwa na mahakama?

Click to expand...

Matajir wengi bongo dhulmaa

Ova

Kashaija72 said:

Basi atakuwa wale wanaojiamulia Mambo bila kushirikisha washauri wa kisekta mfano wanasheria.

Click to expand...

Mbaya zaidi alikuwa anashindana na watoto wa jaji ambayo wazazi wao walifariki wakiwa wadogo sana

aise said:

Miaka 20 hajapata tu faida?
Miaka 20? Hana cha kupoteza.

Click to expand...

... nyumba haina tofauti na mke. Huwezi kusema kwa sababu nimeshazaa naye watoto wa kutosha hata akiolewa na jirani yangu poa tu! Inauma usiombe hata kama ilisharudisha mtaji!

Tanzil : Hamisi Bushiri Pazi &; Others vs Saul Henry Amon &; Others (Misc. Land Application 794 of 2016) [2018] TZHCLandD 88 (13 April 2018); | Tanzlii

KESI HII IMEPITA KWINGI, HATIMAYE HAKI IMEPATIKANA


HISTORIA:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
(LAND DIVISION)
AT DAR ES SALAAM
MISC LAND APPLICATION NO. 794 OF 2016
HAMISI BUSHIRI PAZI......................................... ^APPLICANT
HAMISI BUSHIRI PAZI (As the administrator of the estate of the
deceased NEEMA BUSHIRI PAZI)...........................2nd APPLICANT
HAMISI BUSHIRI PAZI (As the administrator of the estate of the
deceased MWAJUMA BUSHIRI PAZI)......................3rd APPLICANT
STUMAI BUSHIRI PAZI.........................................4™ APPLICANT
HATUJUANI BUSHIRI PAZI...................................5™ APPLICANT
VERSUS
SAUL HENRY AMON............................................1st RESPONDENT
S. H. AMON ENTERPRISES
COMPANY LIMITED............................................2nd RESPONDENT
MUSA HAMISI KAZUBA...................................... 3rd RESPONDENT
KASSIM ALLY OMARI (As the administrator of the estate of the
deceased TATU BUSHIRI PAZI)............................4™ RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL..................................... THIRD PARTY
RULING
27/03/2018 & 13/04/2018
M. G. MZUNA, J
Hamisi Bushiri Pazi, in his personal capacity as well as the administrator of
the estate of the late Neema Bushiri Pazi and Mwajuma Bushiri Pazi has
instituted this application together with Stumai Bushiri Pazi and Hatujuani
Bushiri Pazi. The application is for extension of time within which to lodge a
notice of appeal in Land Case No. 185/2004.

The application is preferred under section 11(1) of the Appellate
Jurisdiction Act, Cap 141 RE 2002. It is against the four respondent namely
Paul Henry Amon, S. H. Amon Enterprises Company Limited, Musa Hamisi
Kazuba and Kassim Ally Omari (as the Administrator of the estate of the
deceased Tatu Bushiri Pazi). The Attorney General has been joined as the
3rd party.
The application is accompanied with the affidavit deponed by Mr. Hamisi
Bushiri Pazi. Reading from paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the said affidavit it
seems that the delay was caused by striking out a certificate of delay
because it did not cite the names of the parties to the case and never
mentioned the name of the 3rd party to the case.
The applicants prays for this court to grant their application because there
are serious questions of law worth the attention and adjudication of the
Court of Appeal.
The applicants are represented by Ms. Dorah Malaba, the learned counsel
while the 1st and 2nd respondents were represented by Mr. Kalolo, the
learned counsel. The 3rd and forth respondents were unrepresented.
Before hearing could commence, it came out that all the respondents
except the 3rd respondent who did not enter appearance, never objected
the application.
Reading from the filed affidavit, I find that there is some force or point to
ponder which merits the application. The delay was not caused by dilatory
conduct.
2

For the above stated reasons, time is hereby extended for 10 days period
so as to allow the applicant lodge the notice of appeal. The same to be
field on or before 23rd April 2018. This application is hereby granted with
no order for costs.
M. G. Mzuna
JUDGE
13/ 04/2018

mrangi said:

Je mwenyewe aliyejenga akiamua kuivunja vp?
Sheria ina mruhusu

Ova

Click to expand...

TADPOLE said:

Kutoka nyumba chakavu ya udongo mpaka kumiliki ghorofa tusikate tamaa wadau,ipo siku tutatoboa tu hata ikiwa uzeeni..ingekuwa mimi hapo muda huohuo nataka nione mikataba ya wapangaji hili nianze kula hela za kodi

View attachment 2203922

Click to expand...

Aisee!
Ni maumivu kwa Amon ila chereko kwa akina Pazi

Pascal Mayalla said:

Umekosea kuripoti, hajarudishiwa nyumba ni amerudishiwa kiwanja, hivyo SH Amin, yuko free kuyachukua majengo yake, hivyo jamaa kubaki na kiwanja chake kirudishwe ile nyumba aliyoinunua.
P

Click to expand...

Haya sawa .

mrangi said:

Lazima awaiting mpunga sasa

Ova

Click to expand...

Nje ya mada, kwa wenye uelewa: Hivi entity kama benki ikiendesha mnada wa nyumba ya mtu aliyeshindwa kulipa deni na mahakama baadae ikasema mnada ulifanyika ndivyo sivyo, hivyo nyumba inatakiwa irudi kwa wenyewe, mimi mnunuzi nitapoteza? Gharama zangu nani atalipa na hasa kama nimeshaendeleza?