Hapa vipi?
10.(1) A person shall not unlawfully deal with or possess: (a) (b) a device, including a computer program, that is designed or adapted for the purpose of committing an offence;
Ina maana kuwa na uTorrent, Tor, Decryption software, Wireless sniffing tools, hata kama ni for educational purposes ni kosa?
Kwasababu hizi zote zinaweza kutumika kufanya illegal access e.t.c
snipa Richard Njunwa Wamavoko Good Guy Dreson4 Kiranga Nyani Ngabu
Hapo hata web browser kugusa inaweza kuwa kosa la jinai.
As we know, in law, ignorance is no defense.
Sasa mtu atajuaje software yoyote anayoitumia haijawa adapted kuweza ku commit an offence bila ku step through the source code?
Hivi hawa wanaotunga sheria hizi wanajua kwamba ukiondoa Microsoft na wajanja wachache virtually the entire computing world has no access to Microsoft Operating System code, because Microsoft is not an open source system. Sasa wanatunga sheria ya kututaka tujue software ikoje wakati kuna software kibao zimefungwa, hatujui at the code level zinafanya kazi vipi?
The law is supposed to make things clear, yet this one has a cyclic and redundant logic. What exactly is "unlawfully deal with or posses"? What makes a dealing unlawful in this context? Does the word "unlawful" extend to "or posses" or is it limited to "deal with"? This could make a big difference in an actual case.
Mtu asiye na elimu ya computer akiwa na computer yake iliyovamiwa na virusesbikafanywa bot (adapted for the purpose of commiting an offense) mtu huyo kama hajui yote hayo, ana makosa au hana?
Kuna watu wengi sana computer zao ni ma bot hata hawajui, wanasema tu "computer hii siki hizi iko so slow halafu ina ma pop up kibao"
The kicker is, unakita mbunge anayepitisha hizi sheria hajui hata open source system ni zipi na proprietary systems ni nini.
Scratch that, mbunge kama Majimarefu hata kitumia scientific calculator mgogoro, let alone computer.