Siri kubwa kuliko zote kuhusu dunia yetu tambarare

[abdulrahman Said]

Unajua nini miongoni mwa factors zinazofanya nisiamini nadharia za Dunia Tufe ni ukweli kwamba there's no evidence that Water can stick in a round-ball,... tena acha kuwa round bali unaambiwa inazunguka Kwa Kasi.... Na kumbuka unaambiwa sehemu kubwa ya Dunia ni Maji sasa Je unaweza kueleza ni Kwa namna gani maji yanastick kwenye round-ball inayozunguka?


Maelezo yako kimsingi yapo centered kwenye nadharia na husia,... huwezi kuthibitisha uwepo wa curvature Kwa maneno tu kama haya uliyoleta wewe.

Sasa unataka yamwagike yaende wapi? Shida watu mnahisi kitu kinaanguka anguka tu ! If there was no gravity tusongekuwa tunaongea hili swala la kuanguka! Sisi hatuanguki (ukiita kuanguka iyo ya literally, somehow unapunguza vitu ) but we are attracted by Earth's gravity, imagine uwe na very strong spherical magnetic ball chukuwa vmunga unga wa chuma usambaze kwenye hilo ball will it fall down? No simply because it is strongly attracted to the ball than does the Earth gravity. The same kwa water masses chukulia sasa dunia ndo iwe huo mpira then vuta picha wewe uko nje kabisa and you're observing them water kwenye uso wa dunia while being attracted strongly to the Earth unataka yaanguke maji yaanguke wapi sasa???
Ukija kwenye maji kuremain kwenye surface japo dunia inazunguka kwa spidi kubwa
I'll assume you have zero knowledge of relativity, imagine upo ndani ya gari linalotembea kwa constant speed alafu na wewe uko ndani huwa na wewe unaeliacha gari inatembea peke yako kwenye seat yako or you move along at 0 velocity relative to the car??? Unauliza kama mtoto wa darsa la pili
Earth ni inertia frame, it rotates at constant velocity and every thing on its surface moves along with Earth at exact the same speed thus relative motion kati ya Earth na vitu vilivuomo ndani ya earth ni zero thus they are stationary relative to the Earth surface

 

[Poor Brain]

DR Mambo Jambo
Umeona huku kuna mtu anakandwa sio mda 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

 

[abdulrahman Said]

Nimecopy wapi sasa,.... narudia kujibu swali Kwa lako Kwa kukumbusha kwamba kimsingi Jua halizami wala kuchomoza.... naamini unajua hili.

Kinachotokea ni illusion Tu inayotokana na refraction effect,... na sio kwamba kweli linazama au kuchomoza.

Jua linapokua kwenye point ya kuhama from one side of the earth to the other ndiyo hapo effect ya refraction inapochukua nafasi Kwa kusababisha illusion Kwa anaetazama depending on his/her line of sight.


NB:- Kwenye Dunia Tufe unaambiwa Jua lipo 93 Million miles away toka Duniani,.sasa ulipaswa ujue kabisa kwenye dunia Tufe kusema Jua linazama ndiyo haiingii akilini hasa ukizingatia umbali ambao Jua lipo,..so kimsingi Jua halizami wala kuchomoza Bali linasogea na kuhama Tu mbali na upande fulani wa Dunia.

Kwanini isiingie akilini? Unless una assume light can bend around the Earth curvity 😂😂

 

[Poor Brain]

abdulrahman Said huku umekuja kufanya nini wewe 😂😂😂😂😂😂

 

[abdulrahman Said]

Simple basics knowledge kuhusu hoja zangu ninazo....na ndiyo maana nikiwaomba uthibitisho hapa mnaanza kuleta hadithi tu mwanzo mwisho.


1. Thibitisha maji yanastick kwenye dunia tufe,.....show us how that works.
2. Thibitisha dunia inazunguka...Tuonyeshe means uliyotumia kujua inazunguka.

Sio hadithi,..lete uthibitisho.

How do you explain day and night? How do you explain seasons of the year??
Kwa sisi watu wa Hesabu kuna kitu tunaita periodicity. Let say una periodic function f->x ambayo iko na period of T, after T elapsed the function will repeat itself.
Tuanze, mimi nasema dunia inazunguka juwa kwenye eliptical orbit l at a period of 365 days, its motion is periodic as you can expect kitu kinachomove kwenye eliptical path obvious after some time kitarudi tena pale pale ukiobserve kila mwaka kuna kujirudia kwa hivi vipindi kipepuwe, vuli, kiangazi na masika don't you think some how the Earth is in some sort of a periodic motion around something???? Umepewa kichwa fikiria

 

[abdulrahman Said]

abdulrahman Said huku umekuja kufanya nini wewe 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Flat earthers wababaishaji sana kaka, wanafalsafa zao sijui zimetoka wapi. Hawa ndo kama washkaji wanaoamini mambo ya evolution 😅😅😅😅

 

[Poor Brain]

Flat earthers wababaishaji sana kaka, wanafalsafa zao sijui zimetoka wapi. Hawa ndo kama washkaji wanaoamini mambo ya evolution 😅😅😅😅

😂😂😂😂😂😂 Alafu majamaaa wapo serious na hawachekeshi hao kuwa nao makini

 

[DR Mambo Jambo]

DR Mambo Jambo
Umeona huku kuna mtu anakandwa sio mda 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

🤣🤣🤣🤣🙌🙌🙌

 

[DR Mambo Jambo]

abdulrahman Said huku umekuja kufanya nini wewe 😂😂😂😂😂😂

🤣🤣🤣🤣 nasubiri Wale wazee Waliosoma Phyzikia Waje wamnyonyoe..
Yeye ana swali.moja Tu la Day and Night watu walikuwa Na package ya maswali ila Huu uzi wanaukimbia

 

[hateeb10]

This shit sucks! Physics ya wapi hii inasema ukirusha jiwe there will still be an upward force acting on the stone halafu eti itakuwa reduced slowly na air resistance?? The moment umerusha jiwe juu with an upward forece Fu the force immediately cease to exist but only remains it's effect which is " a change in kinetic energy of the stone ie energy possessed due to motion/kitu chochote kinachomove kina hii energy it is a function of velocity(kwa lugha rahisi niseme spidi) na mass"
Secondly, umeclaim friction would gradually reduce the applied upward force to zero pia ni uongo kama unaforce mbili zina act kwenye system hakuna force itamreduce mwenzake instead each will add up following vector algebra to produce the net force (resultant force).
Keep in mind air resistance ni function of velocity means kama object inapungua speed (which is what happens kama itaend juu) air friction ndo ingekuwa inapungua sio hiyo force iliyotumika kupush jiwe ambayo wewe unasema itaendelea kubaki(which is not true, force inacease kuexist the moment umerusha jiwe)
The only force ambayo itabaki ni gravity which pulls the stone down the earth maybe na air resistance (depending on shape na size ya object but ni very small, keep in mind jiwe tayari lina kinetic energy kutokana na ile force this kinetic energy will be doing work against gravity kusukuma jiwe within the gravitational field of Earth wewe mwenyewe unajuwa kama unanishati ukifanya kazi means unatumia ile nishati kifanya kazi so itapungua, the same goes to kinetic energy ya ile jiwe itakuwa inapungua (hence velocity will be decreasing) till all kinetic energy is finished keep in mind gravity ni conservative force means unapofanya kazi against gravity you acquire potential energy so the last step ni kuwa kinetic energy yote itakjwa converted to potential energy + some lost due to air resistance. Kitu kikiwa at higher potential kinauwezo wa kumove kwenda kwenye low potential (moving from higher energy to lower energy region, chukulia mfano sumaku [tusifike huko] ) so kitakachofanyika ni reverse the gravitational potential energy will be converted back to kinetic energy which will provide backward falling ya jiwe to the ground
Maelezo yako ni uongo na sio sahihi

Usipate shida kuelezea sana,..Unachotakiwa ni kuthibitisha pasina shaka kwamba Dunia ni tufe linalozunguka,...

Kama huwezi kuthibitisha bali unatumia nadharia tu,.utakua huna tofauti na wenzako waliopita,..


NB:- Kuna uwezekano hujaelewa nini ulichobisha kwenye maelezo yako hapo,...Ni hivi jiwe ukilirusha juu kinacho determine jiwe litaenda umbali gani ni nguvu iliyotumika kurusha jiwe hilo,..sasa sijui unapata nguvu gani ya kubisha simple logic kama hiyo....Inashangaza.

 

[abdulrahman Said]

Usipate shida kuelezea sana,..Unachotakiwa ni kuthibitisha pasina shaka kwamba Dunia ni tufe linalozunguka,...

Kama huwezi kuthibitisha bali unatumia nadharia tu,.utakua huna tofauti na wenzako waliopita,..


NB:- Kuna uwezekano hujaelewa nini ulichobisha kwenye maelezo yako hapo,...Ni hivi jiwe ukilirusha juu kinacho determine jiwe litaenda umbali gani ni nguvu iliyotumika kurusha jiwe hilo,..sasa sijui unapata nguvu gani ya kubisha simple logic kama hiyo....Inashangaza.

Ningeuliza uthibitisho gani unaouhitaji? Probably wewe unahuo uthibitisho unaoonesha kwamba Earth ni flat, kama hauna hoja yako haitakuwa na msingi thereby following should be theories and Mathematical analysis & models to determine which of the two make more sense.

Tukirudi kwenye maelezo yako, Kwa sasa umeenda kinyume na ulichoelekeza ntahighlight maneno yako

" ukirusha Jiwe angani(means kuna force umetumia kurusha jiwe husika) air resistance itaslow down force iliyotumika kurusha hilo jiwe mpaka force husika ifike zero,.Then Jiwe linarudi chini kwa kuwa the applied force no longer exists" kuna some changes naona hpa but still Hii nayo ni uongo,

 

[abdulrahman Said]

Kwa kuongezea, Yeyote anayepinga uwepo wa gravity ni mwehu!

 

[hateeb10]

Ningeuliza uthibitisho gani unaouhitaji? Probably wewe unahuo uthibitisho unaoonesha kwamba Earth ni flat, kama hauna hoja yako haitakuwa na msingi thereby following should be theories and Mathematical analysis & models to determine which of the two make more sense.

Yap, tunaweza kuthibitisha flatness ya Dunia Kwa kutumia milango ya fahamu specifically MACHO,..sasa wewe tuambie apart from pictures & videos have you ever observed a ball-shaped earth with your own eyes?

Unaposhindwa kukubaliana na uhalisia wa kile unachokiona ndiyo unaamua kuamini nadharia sasa......kwa mfano nikuulize unasema Dunia inazunguka,. una ushahidi wowote? kwanini hutaki kukubali kwamba Dunia imetulia kama milango yako ya fahamu inavyokuambia??

Tukirudi kwenye maelezo yako, Kwa sasa umeenda kinyume na ulichoelekeza ntahighlight maneno yako

" ukirusha Jiwe angani(means kuna force umetumia kurusha jiwe husika) air resistance itaslow down force iliyotumika kurusha hilo jiwe mpaka force husika ifike zero,.Then Jiwe linarudi chini kwa kuwa the applied force no longer exists" kuna some changes naona hpa but still Hii nayo ni uongo,

Uongo upo wapi hapo? Narudia, force iliyotumika kurusha jiwe ndiyo ita determine jiwe litaenda mbali kiasi gani,......swali rahisi, watu wawili wakirusha jiwe kwa wakati mmoja possibly kuna jiwe ambalo litaenda mbali zaidi...JE, ni kitu gani kinasababisha utofauti wa umbali unaofikiwa na objects hizo mbili zilizorushwa?

na kitu gani kitapelekea tofauti ya objects hizo kuwahi kurudi chini?

 

[hateeb10]

Kwa kuongezea, Yeyote anayepinga uwepo wa gravity ni mwehu!

In 1915,.Einstein argued that gravity isn’t a force at all!

 

[abdulrahman Said]

Yap, tunaweza kuthibitisha flatness ya Dunia Kwa kutumia milango ya fahamu specifically MACHO,..sasa wewe tuambie apart from pictures & videos have you ever observed a ball-shaped earth with your own eyes?

Unaposhindwa kukubaliana na uhalisia wa kile unachokiona ndiyo unaamua kuamini nadharia sasa......kwa mfano nikuulize unasema Dunia inazunguka,. una ushahidi wowote? kwanini hutaki kukubali kwamba Dunia imetulia kama milango yako ya fahamu inavyokuambia??


Uongo upo wapi hapo? Narudia, force iliyotumika kurusha jiwe ndiyo ita determine jiwe litaenda mbali kiasi gani,......swali rahisi, watu wawili wakirusha jiwe kwa wakati mmoja possibly kuna jiwe ambalo litaenda mbali zaidi...JE, ni kitu gani kinasababisha utofauti wa umbali unaofikiwa na objects hizo mbili zilizorushwa?

na kitu gani kitapelekea tofauti ya objects hizo kuwahi kurudi chini?

Dogo ! So you claim macho yanakuonesha dunia ni duara? Bro tuanze kwanza hapo how do you think human see?
What we actually see is a reflection of light from the object kwenye Engineering na Mathematics hii inaitwa projection (For your time go and read)
Imagine usimame kwenye ghorofa lenye uso mpana na flat kwa juu ukiangalia chini macho yako yatakwambia kam ni rectangular block??? The only thing utaona kwa macho yako ni two dimensional surface do you think it is enough to conclude kwamba umesimama juu ya 2 dimensional surface na hakuna kitu kinaendelea kwa chini wala ujazo,
Hata chungwa ambalo unajuwa kabisa ni la sphere lichukuwe liweke mbaaali as long you can see unadhani utaona sphere lote ama duara? hapa hatuwezi tena kubaki na nadharia yako ya kusema dunia ni flat kwasababu macho yanakuonesha ni flat! I strongly deny that point maybe kama unanyingine otherwise tuendelee na theories!

Mkuu maneno yako yalisomeka kwamba force itaendelea kuexist kwenye jiwe mpka pale air resistance itaipunguza hadi kufika 0, usibadilishe maneno na huo ndio uongo niliomention force itacease kuexist that moment jiwe limeruka the only thing italisukuma jiwe ni energy impacted on the stone due to that force

 

[abdulrahman Said]

In 1915,.Einstein argued that gravity isn’t a force at all!

Einstein hakuconsider gravity kama force but alienda deep zaid akaconsider gravity as the curvature of space-time hii inathibitisha zaidi kama gravity ipo na inavuta vitu but the interaction is not as an invisible Force kama ilivyokuwa kwenye classical mechanics.
Chukulia unandoo kisha ifunike kitambaa then weka jiwe kitafanyaje?? Halafu chukuwa kajiwe kingine kadogo weka pembeni yake katafanyaje? Katavutwa kuelekea kwa jiwe kubwa. Einstein alitoa interpretation zaidi kuhusiana na gravity not merely considering it as an invisible force which attracts things together
But all interpretation za newtonian mechanics na general theory of relativity still zinakubali kuwa gravity pulls things with masses together na gravity ipo sasa wewe unataka kukataa haipo kwa kigezo gani?
Gravity ipo na inaattract things with masses together, wether uikonsider kama Force or curvature of space-time still inaattract vitu vyenye mass kwa pamoja na chenye mass kubwa ndo kinatoa attraction kubwa zaidi

 

[hateeb10]

Dogo ! So you claim macho yanakuonesha dunia ni duara? Bro tuanze kwanza hapo how do you think human see?
What we actually see is a reflection of light from the object kwenye Engineering na Mathematics hii inaitwa projection (For your time go and read)
Imagine usimame kwenye ghorofa lenye uso mpana na flat kwa juu ukiangalia chini macho yako yatakwambia kam ni rectangular block??? The only thing utaona kwa macho yako ni two dimensional surface do you think it is enough to conclude kwamba umesimama juu ya 2 dimensional surface na hakuna kitu kinaendelea kwa chini wala ujazo,
Hata chungwa ambalo unajuwa kabisa ni la sphere lichukuwe liweke mbaaali as long you can see unadhani utaona sphere lote ama duara? hapa hatuwezi tena kubaki na nadharia yako ya kusema dunia ni flat kwasababu macho yanakuonesha ni flat! I strongly deny that point maybe kama unanyingine otherwise tuendelee na theories!

Mkuu maneno yako yalisomeka kwamba force itaendelea kuexist kwenye jiwe mpka pale air resistance itaipunguza hadi kufika 0, usibadilishe maneno na huo ndio uongo niliomention force itacease kuexist that moment jiwe limeruka the only thing italisukuma jiwe ni energy impacted on the stone due to that force

Umeandika maelezo mengi ila hujajibu maswali ya msingi,...nimekuuliza hivi:-
1. Ni mlango gani wa fahamu, au chombo gani umetumia ukajithibitishia pasina shaka kwamba Dunia ni tufe?

2. Kwa kuwa milango ya fahamu inatuonyesha Dunia Imetulia (stationary),...Tuambie ni mechanism gani umetumia ukajithibitishia pasina shaka kwamba Dunia Ina move?


NB:- Ili mjadala uwe na tija inabidi tuzivunje vunje hoja kwa maswali fikirishi,... ambayo yatatusaidia kutupa majibu ya yale yanayotatiza.

 

[hateeb10]

Mkuu maneno yako yalisomeka kwamba force itaendelea kuexist kwenye jiwe mpka pale air resistance itaipunguza hadi kufika 0, usibadilishe maneno na huo ndio uongo niliomention force itacease kuexist that moment jiwe limeruka the only thing italisukuma jiwe ni energy impacted on the stone due to that force

No nadhani hujanipata,..nilichomaanisha ni kwamba effects ya force iliyotumika kurusha jiwe itaendelea kuwepo na ndiyo Ina determine how far jiwe litaenda...so nikasema air resistance Ina act against the force iliyotumika kurusha jiwe ambapo effect ya force husika itapunguzwa up to zero........sasa uongo upo wapi hapo?

 

[hateeb10]

Einstein hakuconsider gravity kama force but alienda deep zaid akaconsider gravity as the curvature of space-time hii inathibitisha zaidi kama gravity ipo na inavuta vitu but the interaction is not as an invisible Force kama ilivyokuwa kwenye classical mechanics.
Chukulia unandoo kisha ifunike kitambaa then weka jiwe kitafanyaje?? Halafu chukuwa kajiwe kingine kadogo weka pembeni yake katafanyaje? Katavutwa kuelekea kwa jiwe kubwa. Einstein alitoa interpretation zaidi kuhusiana na gravity merely considering it as an invisible force which attracts things together
But all interpretation za newtonian mechanics na general theory of relativity still zinakubali kuwa gravity pulls things with masses together na gravity ipo sasa wewe unataka kukataa haipo kwa kigezo gani?
Gravity ipo na inaattract things with masses together, wether uikonsider kama Force or curvature of space-time still inaattract vitu vyenye mass kwa pamoja na chenye mass kubwa ndo kinatoa attraction kubwa zaidi

Wewe tukio gani ukiliona unasema hili limetokana na gravity...

Unazungumziaje density,...?
Je, huoni hicho unachoita gravity actually ni density tu inafanya kazi muda wote?

 

[milele amina]

Haya , padr.. kalamba asali