1. Yap kuna nadharia watu wanakurupuka tu mfano ndiyo hizo ambazo haziwezi kuthibitishika ikiwemo evolution, dunia tufe linalozunguka pamoja na gravity.Kila nikiisoma tena hii comment yako naona nabishana na mtu wa aina gani!
"Uthibitisho nilio nao ni wa kitafiti sio nadharia"
1. Wewe unadhani nadharia huwa ni mtu anakurupuka tu kisha anaitoa?
2. Umeamini utafiti wa uyo ofsa halafu huamini utafiti wa NASA 😂😂😂
Anyway, nakusubiri unielezee huo utafiti ulifanywaje, na akaconclude vipi kama dunia ni flat, natumaini hakuna nadharia kwenye huo utafiti otherwise haitoeleweka unabishana kwasababu gani.
This is the dumbest comment ever!Actually hiyo unayoita upthrust inaweza kutokea hata kwa object ambayo ni non-fluid kwa mfano chukua object ambayo imetengenezwa kwa elastic material let's say ngoma(drum) imetengenezwa kwa material ngumu ambayo inavutika,..kisha chukua jiwe lenye uzito wa wastani kisha liweke kwa kukandamiza juu katikati ya ile ngoma kama unazamisha hivi,..then achia ,.in seconds utaona jiwe likisukumwa kwa nguvu huenda hata likasukumwa juu mbali............Sasa mfano huo ndiyo utumie kujua kwamba hiyo unayoita upthrust kiuhalisia ni resistance tu ya object moja against object nyingine kwenye ku occupy space,..and that's why ukiweka kitu kwenye maji kitasukumwa juu na maji na sio kwamba kuna force ya ajabu inayoitwa upthrust force ndiyo inasukuma vitu,...Hahh naamini umeelewa sasa twende hatua nyingine si ndiyo?
NB: Ukihitaji mifano zaidi ya hicho unachoita upthrust force nitakupatia,.ondoa shaka kabisa.
Narudia tena, unless umeobserve dunia from space tunaweza kuongea otherwise kusema umeobserve na wewe uko hapa hapa ni upuuzi. Toa uthibitisho wako sio kusema umeona kwa machoTafiti nimefanya mimi mwenyewe,...nadhani hujaelewa niliposema kwamba miongoni mwa aina za research kuna hii inayoitwa "OBSERVATIONAL RESEARCH" ambayo hata wewe unaweza ukaifanya.........
Flat earth inakaririshwaje sasa? ukweli kwamba dunia ipo flat na haizunguki ni kitu ambacho una observe kila siku,...sasa hapo kuna haja kweli ya mtu kuja na kukufundisha ukariri kwamba dunia ni flat na haizunguki??
Hivi kilichokufanya ufikirie kwamba nimeleta thesis ya mtu ni nini?..........kuwa makini,read between the line brother.
Hata hivyo vifaa vya kupimia vinategemea milango ya fahamu ili viwepo, kutumika na kutafsiriwa matokeo yake,..na kwa kuongezea hivyo vifaa bado havijathibitisha kwamba dunia ni tufe linalozunguka..........
NB; Wewe huo uthibitisho kwamba dunia ni tufe linalozunguka umeupata kwa kutumia kifaa gani?
Kwaiyo kufikiria kwako ndo huko kusema dunia ni flat kwasababu umeona kwa macho ni flat, and you dare calling that stupidity critical thinking? PumbaafKuna sehemu nimesema Physics peke yake ndiyo ya kukariri?......concern yangu ni kwamba unatakiwa ku reason kila kitu..........sio kwamba utakachofundishwa ndiyo unabeba kama kilivyo..........ubongo uliopewa utakua wa kazi gani sasa kama unaacha wengine wafikirie 100% on your behalf...?
NB: Mimi naunga mkono juhudi na mapinduzi mbalimbali ya kimaarifa na vumbuzi za kisayansi ambazo zimeleta matokeo chanya duniani,..lakini kwa critical thinker huwezi kufunga mlango wa kufikiria against what you have been taught kwasababu hata ukisoma historia, critical thinkers walikuepo miaka na miaka na ndiyo sababu nadharia mbalimbali zimekua zikifa na kuibuka nyingine kutokana na uwepo wa critical thinkers those who argued against the mainstream idea and theories............
Narudia,..kinachofanya kitu kirudi juu sio the so called upthrust force bali ni resistance ya object moja against object nyingine kwenye ku occupy space,...hujiulizi kwanini object ikifika juu inatulia(inaelea) hiyo upthrust force inakua imeenda wapi mpaka ishindwe kuivuta object husika juu zaidi?This is the dumbest comment ever!
I assume you don't know about restoring forces and elastic potential energy.
Ngoja nikupe utofauti wa hizo force mbili. Iyo uliyoisema hapo kiwango chake kinaongezeka kadiri unavyozidi kusukuma kwenda chini, upthrust kitu kikishazama chote tu haiongezeki, 2. Iyo unayoisema pia inaweza kusukuma vitu kwenda juu ama chini sio juu peke yake, chukuwa spring au mpira weka jiwe livute kwa juu litalirudisha chini tofauti na upthrust yenyewe inasukuma vitu juu peke yake.
Kwenye upthrust hakuna potential energy inayohifadhiwa kwenye hiyo uliyoitaja kuna potential energy inayohifadhiwa
Kasome physics kijana
Vizuri sana,..Wewe unaesema DUNIA NI TUFE LINALOZUNGUKA ULI OBSERVE FROM SPACE...?Narudia tena, unless umeobserve dunia from space tunaweza kuongea otherwise kusema umeobserve na wewe uko hapa hapa ni upuuzi. Toa uthibitisho wako sio kusema umeona kwa macho
Nimekuoa mifano hai unaleta blah blah
Hahh tatizo la ignorance ni kumfanya muathirika wake kujihisi confident......... wewe unaona macho hayawezi kutupa uhalisia wa umbo la dunia, si ndiyo?.........sasa mbona ukiulizwa utuambie umejuaje kama dunia ni tufe linalozunguka hujibu una ruka ruka,.......? what's wrong?!Kwaiyo kufikiria kwako ndo huko kusema dunia ni flat kwasababu umeona kwa macho ni flat, and you dare calling that stupidity critical thinking? Pumbaaf
Narudia, chukua jiwe weka kwenye spring vita juu litabaki juu kama ilivyo kwenye maji?Narudia,..kinachofanya kitu kirudi juu sio the so called upthrust force bali ni resistance ya object moja against object nyingine kwenye ku occupy space,...hujiulizi kwanini object ikifika juu inatulia(inaelea) hiyo upthrust force inakua imeenda wapi?
Thus why nafikiria zaidi ya nnachokiona, siwezi kuconclude kama dunia ni tufe ama flat simpky kutokana na kuona nikiwa chini.Vizuri sana,..Wewe unaesema DUNIA NI TUFE LINALOZUNGUKA ULI OBSERVE FROM SPACE...?
Unataka kujibiwa kwa milango ya fahamu, sasa wewe unavyojiona upo normal? Au unadhani kila mtu anaconclude baada ya kuangalia dunia akiwa chini kama wewe?Hahh tatizo la ignorance ni kumfanya muathirika wake kujihisi confident......... wewe unaona macho hayawezi kutupa uhalisia wa umbo la dunia, si ndiyo?.........sasa mbona ukiulizwa utuambie umejuaje kama dunia ni tufe linalozunguka hujibu una ruka ruka,.......? what's wrong?!
Anhaa vizuri kumbe hauna uhakika kama ni tufe ama la,...........sasa ngoja nikueleweshe ndugu yangu yaamini macho yako na fikra zako kisha tumia logic utaelewa vizuri...Thus why nafikiria zaidi ya nnachokiona, siwezi kuconclude kama dunia ni tufe ama flat simpky kutokana na kuona nikiwa chini.
Unajiita critical thinker kwa kuconclude kulingana na unavyoona, Are you even a scientist?
Tulia,..kabla hatujaenda kwenye mathematical reasonings and imaginary calculations,...unakubali kwamba kwenye uhalisia hauna uthibitisho kwamba dunia ni tufe linalozunguka,..?Unataka kujibiwa kwa milango ya fahamu, sasa wewe unavyojiona upo normal? Au unadhani kila mtu anaconclude baada ya kuangalia dunia akiwa chini kama wewe?
Toa huo upuuzi wa milango ya fahamu twende kwenye Mathematical reasoning and strong arguments wewe utoe facts zako tuzi evaluate na mm nitoe zangu sio unaruka ruka tu
Mzee nimekwambia macho hayawezi kuthibitisha,Anhaa vizuri kumbe hauna uhakika kama ni tufe ama la,...........sasa ngoja nikueleweshe ndugu yangu yaamini macho yako na fikra zako kisha tumia logic utaelewa vizuri...
Kwa mfano jiulize If you dig deep down from where you stand, will you arrive in Finland, based on the belief that the Earth is ball-shaped?
Jiulize logical questions,....kama macho hutaki kuyaamini logic je?
Iyo akili yako inayokwambia dunia ni flat kwasababu unaona ni flat ndo haiitajiki hapa, kama unaubongo uchengenue utoe facts sio maelezo kama ya mtoto wa darasa la piliTulia,..kabla hatujaenda kwenye mathematical reasonings and imaginary calculations,...unakubali kwamba kwenye uhalisia hauna uthibitisho kwamba dunia ni tufe linalozunguka,..?
Kitendo cha kushindwa kuthibitisha hoja zako kwenye uhalisia,..ni ishara tosha kwamba unaamini vitu kwa kutumia imaginary calculations ulizofundishwa,....kwenye uhalisia huoni kilichopo kwenye makaratasi.
NB: Hata mimi nilifundishwa dunia ni tufe linalozunguka kama wewe ulivyofundishwa,..lakini nilivyofikiria kiundani zaidi it does'nt make sense siku nikipata uthibisho kwenye uhalisia nitaamini, kwasasa hapana,.....Earth is flat and stationary as it appears to be....NASUBIRI UTHIBITISHO, HUMBLY KABISA NASUBIRI!
Hakuna sehemu nimesema density inavuta vitu chini,...bali ni kwamba The denser the object, the higher the likelihood that it will sink or drop, and vice versa,.......mfano A person weighing 98 kilograms climbing onto the back of a person weighing 20 kilograms is like objects with greater weight that tend to sink or be less able to carry load, depending on their molecular density.Iyo resistance ya object moja against nyingine kwenye ku-occupy space wewe uliisikia wapi mzee? Seems hata iyo observation yako uliconclude kama hivyo.
Bila kupoteza muda nipe maelezo kuhusian na maneno yako kuwa density ndo inavuta vitu chini, nimekuuliza kwanini isiwe rangi