permanides
JF-Expert Member
- May 18, 2013
- 12,484
- 15,297
Naona Urusi anahamia kwenye magendo
Naona Urusi anahamia kwenye magendoWhat's the story with parallel imports to Russia?
Let's explain in simple terms.
The Ministry of Industry and Trade proposes to abolish liability for parallel imports - that is, companies will be able to import goods into Russia without the permission of the copyright holder.
[emoji3502]Any goods or only according to the list of very necessary - the government will think.
That is, if a certain Western company announced its withdrawal from Russia, its goods can be bought in another country, and then imported into Russia for sale - even without the permission of this company.
Pros:
- lower product prices
- expansion of the range
Minuses:
- weakening quality control
- decrease in the quality of after-sales support
What is important:
[emoji3502] In the EAEU countries, there is already a procedure in which a product imported with the permission of the copyright holder into the territory of any of the participating countries can then freely circulate throughout the entire EAEU.
That is, even now no one interferes with importing goods, for example, to Kazakhstan, and then selling it to Russia.
[emoji3502] If parallel imports are legalized in the Russian Federation, then the products of companies that slammed the Russian door can enter the Russian Federation through Uzbekistan or Azerbaijan. Or Ethiopia, for example. From anywhere.
[emoji3502]For this whole story to work, you need the agreement of all the member countries of the EAEU. Plans to legalize parallel imports from the FAS RF were born back in 2014, but not all EAEU countries agree with this.
Sasa kati ya sisi na wewe mwenye uelewa mdogo ni nani? EU imeondoa only seven Banks kwenye mfumo wa SWIFT we waja kutwambia Russia nzima kaondolewa kwenye mfumo wa SWIFT. Sasa tukuulize swali hapo hapo Russia kuna Bank 7 tu?Tatizo lenu ni uelewa mdogo, Russia hajawahi kuwekewa vikwazo kama alivyowekewa sasa hata mwenyewe anakiri hilo sasa wewe wa Tandika kwa Mchambia Chupa ndio upinge.
Russia hawezi kufanya import/export trade kwa sababu hayuko kwenye SWIFT meaning his foreign exchange reserve of USD 640 billion is stuck and its gold worth over USD 100 billion is frozen by the US, sijui kama unaelewa chochote hapo.
Asilimia 90 ya ndege za abiria za Russia haziwezi kuruka na shirika la ndege la Russia limekuwa Insolvent na Moscow Stock Exchange ndio hiyo inachechemea.
Hiki ulichokiandika umejisoma mzee wangu maana aibu naona mimiUkweli usemwe, ndani ya wiki 4 hizi kuchapo kimetembea, ni vile urusi hana media coverage kubwa kama west, Bbc, Cnn nk wanchukua sehemu ndogo ya ushindi wa ukraine, lakini wanaacha sehemu kubwa ya mafanikio ya urusi.
Ilifika wakati rais alilia hadharani na kusema "hii inaweza kua mara yangu ya mwisho kuniona" ahsante kwa nato kwa kuingiza mercenaries na silaha nyingi.
Pia pongezi kwa mbinu za kivita za Ukraine kujichanganya na raia, ndio maana wakapiga marufuku raia wote kuondoka, pia waliwatumia kama 'human shield'. Embu fikiria raia wangeondoka na wao kubaki peke yao wapambane
Nna uhakika 100% vita itaisha kwa makubaliano ya pande mbili. Baada ya vita kuisha watatuambia ukweli wa hasara pale Ukraine, tutaonyeshwa picha kamili.
NB dharau zitapungua, kuheshimiana kutarudi
Pengine wanajipa moyo tuUkrainian Su-27 jet shot down today near the city of Kramatorsk
Habar mpya kabisa ya moto
Mm
Waambie mdau,russia haina tofauti na north korea ,ukiuliza wakimbizi wanaotoka Africa kwenda kutafuta life europe kati ya 10 ,8 wanaenda nchi za magharibi,kiukweli udikteta mmbaya sana haufai
Mpaka sasa ivi vita ikisimama basi kutakuwa na Ukraine ya Mashariki,na ukraine ya magharibi.alafu anakuja mtu anakwambia ukraine inashinda
Umeeleza vyema jomba, na me niongezee apo machache... Kuna tofauti kati ya Union Pay network na hii Swift.Huenda uelewa wetu ni mdogo sikatai, lakini ujuwe kuwa since 2014 Russia imekuwa blacklisted na system za SWIFT, walitakiwa kuondolewa kipindi hicho so walijua it'd happen.
Kama unafatilia, China na Russia walishatengeneza mifumo yao, Russia walishaanzisha National Payment Card Systems (NPCS) Mir, kwa ajili ya domestic payments (they knew haya yatatokea), leo hii Russians wanaweza kutumia UnionPay ya China(japo haijasambaa duniani kote) kufanya international transactions.
Kumbuka pia wanaweza kutumia nchi za jirani kufanya international transactions bila matatizo, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan lakini pia kuna system mpya ya Chinese Cross-border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) ambayo bank za Russia kwa sasa zinatumia.
Lastly, western countries watanunua mafuta na gas kwa ruble, hivyo kuipa nguvu currency yao. Sisemi vikwazo haviwapi shida, Ila hawalii ovyo kama ingekuwa sisi.
Maoni yangu ni kuwa Maslahi ya NATO ni kuidhoofisha Urusi. Ukraine anatumika tu na amejitahidi sana kuhold jambo ambalo NATO ni faida kwake.
Pia sikubaliani na Urusi kuivamia Ukraine kwa sababu ya NATO. Kwangu mm ilimpasa atumie diplomasia na ikishindikana atumie njia za kijasusi kubadili uongozi wa Ukraine.
Kumvamia Ukraine kunamfanya Puttin awe bully na apigane na vikwazo unnecessary. Pia ameweka Ulaya kwenye hatari ya Vita iwapo USA na NATO wataamua kuingilia anachofanya.
Huyo aliwazuia wananchi kutoroka kwenye huo mji kwa njia ya kuwarushia risasi wananchi, so alivyokamatwa wananchi kwa hasira wanataka kumnyoa roho yake hapoMbona wana muandama kafanyaje?
Russia is a 'military (Nuclear) Superpower'. Unamdhoofishaje kwa kuprolong vita vya ukraine!? Kinachofanya Russia ahofiwe zaidi ni 'Nuclear arsenal' Ashinde asishinde kwenye hii vita bado hofu ya nuclear deterrence kutoka kwake ipo pale pale. Lakini pia Endapo russia akiemerge mshindi (which is more likely to happen) atakuwa stronger zaidi. Naona Kama lengo ni kuidhoofisha Russia basi Nato kasukuma kete sio! Watakuwa wameipoteza UKR lakn hasimu wao atakuwa ameimarika zaidi!
On the other hand wanasema usimlaumu mtu kwa maamuzi aliyochukua bila kuzingatia kwanza 'options' alizokuwa nazo kabla. Pengine mamuzi hayo ndio bora zaidi kwenye options zote alizokiwa nazo. Putin alikuwa na options tunaweza kusema tatu. 1. Aachane na swala la UKr (awaache waukraine wafanye watakavyo) 2. Atumie dipolomasia 3. Military intervention/operation. Pia angeweza kutumia 4. Economic sanctions dhidi ya UKr kumfosi 'accomply'.
Kila option hapo ina faida na athari zake na kila moja ina ugumu wake lakini 'in the end' lazima Putin achague ile ambayo itakuwa na matokeo chanya (efficient). Nikuulize, Ikiwa sasa hivi tu vita vinaendelea watu wanakufa inchi inaharibiwa na bado maongezi 'diplomacy' yanayoendelea hayajazaa matunda unafkiri Putin angeamua kutumia diplomacy in the first place ingekuwa 'effective'?
Unamlaumu putin kuivamia UKr kijeshi (bullying) ambapo ameua na kufanya uharibifu ili tu atimize malengo yake ya kuineutralize UKR alafu hauwalaumu west (NATO) Kwa kutaka kuprolong vita ambayo inasababisha mauaji na uharibifu ili tu watimize malengo yao ya kuidhoofisha urusi. Huoni hapo kuna technical hypocrisy kwenye hizo lawama zako (biasness)!?.
Sent from my SM-A107F using JamiiForums mobile app
Pamoja na hayo kuna mengine pia yanajadiliwa mitandaoniMaoni yangu ni kuwa Maslahi ya NATO ni kuidhoofisha Urusi. Ukraine anatumika tu na amejitahidi sana kuhold jambo ambalo NATO ni faida kwake.
Pia sikubaliani na Urusi kuivamia Ukraine kwa sababu ya NATO. Kwangu mm ilimpasa atumie diplomasia na ikishindikana atumie njia za kijasusi kubadili uongozi wa Ukraine.
Kumvamia Ukraine kunamfanya Puttin awe bully na apigane na vikwazo unnecessary. Pia ameweka Ulaya kwenye hatari ya Vita iwapo USA na NATO wataamua kuingilia anachofanya.