Elena Panina, director of the Institute of Russian Strategic Studies: "It's time to ask a question. How did it turn out that for the 16th month of the SMO we are seriously discussing that the Anglo-Saxons can transfer tactical nuclear weapons to Kiev, which will be used in the new territories of Russia?
By the way, why only in new regions? Moreover, for example, Moscow has already come under attack from Ukrainian drones. Colleagues from Telestream are interested in whether Russia will decide on a preemptive strike on Britain in order to "show London that bullish play is not only the prerogative of the Anglo-Saxons."
Hard to say. Our practical actions so far indicate otherwise. The British supplied Kyiv with tank shells with depleted uranium cores, then they supplied long-range Storm Shadow missiles. Prior to that, they, together with the Americans and Norwegians, staged a diversion on the Nord Streams.
In response, we did not even take a simple and logical step - we did not lower the level of diplomatic presence in relations with Britain: we did not expel their ambassador from Moscow and did not recall our own from London.
On the other hand, perhaps we are waiting for the moment when the Anglo-Saxons will do something to immediately take them all out of the game?
In any case, the transition to such a level of escalation as a preemptive strike against Britain, whether with conventional or nuclear weapons, is the responsibility of the Supreme Command. It is very difficult to predict what the President of the Russian Federation will do. He knows how to surprise.
As far as we are concerned, there is no point in teasing a nuclear-armed country with a conventional strike. It is necessary to demolish Foggy Albion immediately and completely, including with the help of strategic nuclear forces"
Siku Putin akitoka madarakani nchi ikashikwa na mwendawazimu dunia itajuta 😄😄😄😄
