Kiranga
Platinum Member
- Jan 29, 2009
- 78,790
- 128,275
- Thread starter
- #241
You are describing a totally different thing.May be I should use a simple linguistic analogy
Someone is online with profile that gives you and idea of him/her
It does not mean that this person exists or does not exists in a way that he has described himself online.But you,another person online at this time and place have access to this information only and it is your only way to understand this person who is virtual.So in making decision of whether this person exists as described you will not overlook the possibility that he does not exist as described.Therefore,whether he exists as described or not is an endless debate but the two way assertions may close the debate until at such time and place when you can confirm either without doubt.
I therefore think that I who believe that God exist am correct and you who believe that God does not exist are correct. It is therefore impossible for one argument to refute the other and itself remaining without the existence of the third person GOD to prove his own existence
It is better to therefore leave the burden of proof of his existence on Gods hand and use our feeble mind and ability to make this world a better place
Nobody disputes that the idea of God exists, which is what you are doing abracadabra about.
But that does not mean God exists.
Let's say, extending your analogy, there someone who has an online ID (some human person/s who wrote the Bible) and that someone is using an online ID of "Kiranga the Singularity", claiming that he is the shit,and his shit don't stink, in fact he shits diamonds cry Versace Eros, pee Aqua di Gio and spit jewels.
If someone, call him Skeptic says this Kiranga who shits Diamonds, cry Versace Eros and spit jewels does not exist, he is a myth, a fabrication of someone who has made up this whole story. The story is not logically consistent with observed reality.
Will Skeptic be wrong? Will it be true that this Kiranga exists and does not exist at the same time?
What kind of wishy-washy, fence sitting chameleon, flip-flopping liberal art free ranging avant--garde utopian laissez-faire school of thought is that?