Stiegler Dam, Taasisi za Kimataifa Vs. Magufuli

Stiegler Dam, Taasisi za Kimataifa Vs. Magufuli

Mwingereza

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Posts
1,115
Reaction score
2,771
JOHANNESBURG – The United Nations has called it one of Africa's biggest remaining wilderness areas. Now a dispute over a planned hydropower dam in Tanzania's Selous wildlife reserve pits the country's president against conservationists who say the project could cause irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage site.

On Tuesday, a few days after President John Magufuli said the Stiegler's Gorge dam will be built "come rain, come sun," the WWF conservation group said in a report that the project threatens an important wetland as well as the livelihoods of more than 200,000 people in impoverished areas, reliant on fishing, that would be downstream.

The Selous, which covers nearly 50,000 square kilometers (19,300 square miles), has been under pressure from poachers who have decimated its elephant population to supply the illegal ivory market. Mining concessions and other industrial projects are also a concern as the East African nation's campaign to boost its economy conflicts with international efforts to preserve habitats and their wildlife.

Speaking Saturday in Dar es Salaam, Magufuli said the dam and resulting reservoir will cover only about 3 percent of the Selous.

"We are not going to listen to people who speak about impacts on environment without facts on the ground," Magufuli said, according to Tanzania's Daily News newspaper.

However, conservationists say the project could have a negative impact on a much bigger area, for example by cutting off wildlife migration routes. The WWF has asked for an environmental assessment in line with Tanzanian law and wants the government to consider alternative ideas for generating power.

Tourism Minister Jumanne Maghembe told The Associated Press that Tanzania is a developing country and needs to use its natural resources to transform its economy.

He also said the government had long set aside 38 percent of the country's land for wildlife conservation. "It's too huge area, we need the project for our development," he said.

The plan at Stiegler's Gorge has been discussed for decades. Once completed, the project would increase Tanzania's power generation from 1,450 megawatts to at least 4,000 megawatts, according to the Daily News.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: MC7
"We are not going to listen to people who speak about impacts on environment without facts on the ground," Magufuli said, according to Tanzania's Daily News newspaper.
I hope an environmental impact assessment would be carried out before the project is implemented. It is important to figure out the unintended impacts so that mitigation strategies can be put in place. Ideally the results of the EIA should be taken into account in making the decision to go ahead. But if the decision to go ahead has been made then the EIA can shed light on what we should do to minimise the anticipated negative effects on the environment and the populace.
 
Tutaona !
Waende zao huko Wanataka waendelee kutuletea hiz IPTL za kulipa milion 400 kila sku iwe Mtambo umezalisha umeme au umezimwa sio...wamechelewa ndege imeshapaa watu wapo SITE.

Naiona Tanzania Mpya chini ya JPM ambayo wajukuu wetu na vitukuu Vyetu vitaifaidi. ..TRUMP mwenyewe aligundua NGO za kina AL GO znajfcha kwenye hii mikataba kwa aim ya kujipatia utajiri amejitoa kwenye mkataba mkubwa kabisa wa PARIS kwa Maslahi ya walipa kodi wa Marekani
 
Hata Trump amekataa kuwaamini wana mazingira kaamua makaa ya mawe lazima yachimbwe tu, kwanini Magufuli ashindwe? Acha tujenge bana ikileta athari haitatumika kwani sh. ngapi!!!!!!!!
 
I hope an environmental impact assessment would be carried out before the project is implemented. It is important to figure out the unintended impacts so that mitigation strategies can be put in place. Ideally the results of the EIA should be taken into account in making the decision to go ahead. But if the decision to go ahead has been made then the EIA can shed light on what we should do to minimise the anticipated negative effects on the environment and the populace.

It's good to keep hoping. But Mr. President has already vowed to ignore environmental concerns, making EIA a useless exercise. By the way, why do you believe in EIA? Judging from the way it works and considering the position already taken by Mr. President on the matter, it's now very easy to produce EIA report for the proposed hydro power dam saying there will be no negative environmental impacts. EIA is a political exercise of legitimating projects. I know nobody who takes EIA seriously except you.
 
Ee ee eeehh ee...
Mkuu hukututulipia ada...

Iweke kwa kiswAhili.
 
It's good to keep hoping. But Mr. President has already vowed to ignore environmental concerns, making EIA a useless exercise. By the way, why do you believe in EIA? Judging from the way it works and considering the position already taken by Mr. President on the matter, it's now very easy to produce EIA report for the proposed hydro power dam saying there will be no negative environmental impacts. EIA is a political exercise of legitimating projects. I know nobody who takes EIA seriously except you.
It is precisely for the position taken by the president that an EIA would assist the country. If there are going to be negative impacts on the environment (ecologically speaking) I believe it is important to identify them so that the most serious ones may be mitigated and impactees be prepared accordingly for the changes likely to affect their livelihoods.
Producing a report showing no negative EI by design is definitely unethical. I may be naive but what is the purpose of undertaking EIAs when you do not believe in them. To me an EIA is just one of the factors to be considered in decision making but an important one for that matter even if you discount the results.
 
JOHANNESBURG – The United Nations has called it one of Africa's biggest remaining wilderness areas. Now a dispute over a planned hydropower dam in Tanzania's Selous wildlife reserve pits the country's president against conservationists who say the project could cause irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage site.

On Tuesday, a few days after President John Magufuli said the Stiegler's Gorge dam will be built "come rain, come sun," the WWF conservation group said in a report that the project threatens an important wetland as well as the livelihoods of more than 200,000 people in impoverished areas, reliant on fishing, that would be downstream.

The Selous, which covers nearly 50,000 square kilometers (19,300 square miles), has been under pressure from poachers who have decimated its elephant population to supply the illegal ivory market. Mining concessions and other industrial projects are also a concern as the East African nation's campaign to boost its economy conflicts with international efforts to preserve habitats and their wildlife.

Speaking Saturday in Dar es Salaam, Magufuli said the dam and resulting reservoir will cover only about 3 percent of the Selous.

"We are not going to listen to people who speak about impacts on environment without facts on the ground," Magufuli said, according to Tanzania's Daily News newspaper.

However, conservationists say the project could have a negative impact on a much bigger area, for example by cutting off wildlife migration routes. The WWF has asked for an environmental assessment in line with Tanzanian law and wants the government to consider alternative ideas for generating power.

Tourism Minister Jumanne Maghembe told The Associated Press that Tanzania is a developing country and needs to use its natural resources to transform its economy.

He also said the government had long set aside 38 percent of the country's land for wildlife conservation. "It's too huge area, we need the project for our development," he said.

The plan at Stiegler's Gorge has been discussed for decades. Once completed, the project would increase Tanzania's power generation from 1,450 megawatts to at least 4,000 megawatts, according to the Daily News.

The problem, the west favour animals than black people. We also need better life and not to stay in the dark.
 
Hata Canada kuna mradi ulipita katikati ya misitu hao wanamazingira walipiga kelele lakini bomba likipitishwa
 
Hao wanaojiita wanamazingira waache kuingilia mambo ya nchi yetu, yaani sisi tuishi Giza na tukose uwekezaji mbalimbali kisa hakuna umeme wa uhakika wakati tuna vyanzo vya maji vya uhakika vya kuzalishia umeme wakati huo huo wanatucheka nyuma ya pazia kuwa hatujui kutumia rasilimali zetu.

Nadhan wangekuwa kweli ni wapigania mazingira wangeanza na mataifa yao yaliyoendelea ambayo yana tumia nuclear power kuzalisha umeme+kuwa na maviwanda yanayochafua anga na kusababisha mabadiliko ya tabia nchi duniani

Nuclear Power reactors unaweza kudhibiti zisichafue mazingira labda kutokea meltdown au leakages na hiyo ni mara chache sana. Tatizo ni pale wanapo tumia fuel ya mkaa wa mawe kuzalisha Umeme hapo ndipo balaa na kwa bahati mbaya Nchi nyingi za magharibi bado wanatumia mkaa wa mawe, wengine wanataka kuondoa vinu vya nuclear kwenye nchi zao badala yake watumie mkaa wa mawe,upepo na solar kuzalisha umeme.
 
It is precisely for the position taken by the president that an EIA would assist the country. If there are going to be negative impacts on the environment (ecologically speaking) I believe it is important to identify them so that the most serious ones may be mitigated and impactees be prepared accordingly for the changes likely to affect their livelihoods.
Producing a report showing no negative EI by design is definitely unethical. I may be naive but what is the purpose of undertaking EIAs when you do not believe in them. To me an EIA is just one of the factors to be considered in decision making but an important one for that matter even if you discount the results.

EIA is important. And you believe (like in Jesus Christ). But the President has spoken - he literally said 'f**k the environmental impacts', the project will go on irrespective of environmental impacts (actually, we are only talking about 3% of Selous Game Reserve. Tiny fraction of the 50,000 square kilometer reserve). Do you live in Tanzania? And if you insist on EIA, the President is going to write the report himself. And then we will see if EIA is as important as you believe. Are you following?
 
Waache kelele,tujenge bwawa la kufua umeme!
Hayo mengine ya mazingira tutatatua baadaye
 
Back
Top Bottom