DON'T DODGE MY QUESTIONS, I'm testing your theory sir:
Thank you for the compliments. However, it looks like this is your day job. Some of us have to do other things for a living. If an argument cannot be explained in a couple of paragraphs then we are wasting time. You will be shocked if I told you how much they pay me for an hour of my thinking.
At the moment I will indulge you. However, in the future, can we keep these interactions short?
You dont know my day job, I dont know yours
lets keep it that way, the same way I dont know your earnings and you dont know mine
.it has got nothing to do with this thread!!!
I keep interactions how I want them to be, short or long it is my choice, because your understanding is not what I thought it was, theyll be long enough to open your mind..
..
I don't know how civilization and ethics come into play here. We have all known of the divisions (makundi) within CCM. That is what you get when a party becomes too big to manage. That is why I wanted it scaled down. However, the divisions within CCM are known and are manageable. Such divisions also exist in CDM and other parties and Ican live with them. Divisions within UKAWA are not fully known and I can bet my bottom shilling that they cannot be managed in their current form.
JD man, I am getting tired of answering the same questions over and over again. Really, stop this. It is a form of intellectual abuse. In the past I already addressed these questions appearing in the last three paragraphs above. I am not trying to be rude (don't have a bone of rudeness in my body) but I will not dignify those questions with my answers.
You have a theory of viable opposition and Im testing your theory and I have to put the questions back again to you, kindly respond
..
According to your hypothesis of replacement with viable opposition, CCM should still continuously rule despite their failure to deliver on their preceding promises
??? YES or NO..If the answer is
YES,why do parties campaign?? If the answer is
NO,why shouldnt we punish under performance??
Between Group
(A) and (B) below,which one will bring development to the people
???A or B
Group A:Group of uncorrupt individuals in unison at this point and agreeing to disagree.
Group B:Group of corrupt persons working in tandem arrangement.
No one feeds me dogma. I wish you knew me in person. I am not trying to do anything toUKAWA here. You are the one who started this thread remember,way back when? Unlike you, I am not asking anyone to do what I will do. My decision matrix has been evolving throughout this period. It means that I think, evaluate, decide, change decisions as facts on the ground are revealed. You Sir, in contrast, have been stuck in the same gear all along. Your choice not mine.
Stop invoking what happened in other countries. They don't impress me. Let us deal with our own problems in our own backyard. What happened in other countries inform us not to repeat similar obvious mistakes but that is where they stop. I will reiterate my objection. Don'task me the questions I already addressed here in your thread in thepast. I am not a CCM apologist. CCM is not an angel. They have donemany bad things and that is why I wanted them out in the first place. But to replace CCM with the current UKAWA that will be our doom. Stop convincing me otherwise. We are now down to the wire and I am not changing my mind.
You are getting all goose bumps with CCM upsides you shouldnt avoid them on their downsides, remember you are supporting their candidate? Please deal with CCMs downsides as well
.
Other countries are important
because for example the candidate you are supporting is saying that with opposition in power we can have Tanzania evolving into some Tunisia, Egypt and Libyas scenarios
.and you have a similar theory that say UKAWA in office will create disaster for this country
.
Im testing your analysis again, and Im putting the question back to you and kindly answer
What do you have to say say about Escrow, Richmond, Meremeta, Mwananchi Gold, Import Commodity Support (CIS), EPA, ANBEN, Simba Trust,Kinanas Ivory business, Magufulis Fake ferry boat and Kebbys Hotel, Selling of government residential houses, Ridhiwanis illegal drug business etc.???Do you mean we shouldnt worry about these
???YES or NO.If the answer is
YES,how can the government expenditure help fulfil the promises in campaigns??,if the answer is
NO,why should we put back a corrupt system??
I told you no one is feeding me information. Ideas are mine and mine alone. So your reference to backroom boys was directed at me. BOY is an epithet if you are addressing a man. The colonialists used to call our fathers and grandfathersboys. Slave owners in the US called all their male slaves boys. When you hear an African American person calling you man, it is a sign of respect that was not accorded to them by the slave masters. So I take offense when someone calls me BOY.
You keep bringing these comparisons with what happened in Kenya. That is Kenya and this is Tanzania. If you wish to discuss Kenya politics, there is a whole arena in JF dedicated to them go there. Remember, that is where we first met? - Small world.
I am still testing your theory with practical examples
..you said UKAWA will create a disaster in this country when elected because it was formed hastily after constitutional debate
..Im bringing a Kenyan example so it can help us test your theory
.please answer
..
NARC was similarly formed with remarkable celerity in the aftermath of the Kenyan constitutional referendum, they ended up winning the election of 2002 and ousting and annihilating KANU and bringing progress not disasters to the Kenyan people. Does your theory of quickly formed unions creating disasters holds here
????YES or NO...
If YES,.how??..If NO,why??
You haven't told us how will power be shared between the parties after elections. You just told us 99%is done what is done? Short of detailed explanation this is just a blow of hot air. If other people are OK with not knowing the details fine, they can gamble with UKAWA. However, I know there are problems and you, not even the whole UKAWA squad, cannot sway me.
I am going to repeat what I said previously
We have a Nigeria and Kenyan example for analysis
.Im surprised you dont have any example to back up your theory
.please bring one in your next response
History tells us, that is has never been
..
APC(Nigeria) didnt disclose their power sharing structure any time before the election
.
NARC(Kenya) didnt do it
the point Im making is that, it neither cost an election victory nor create a disaster.
What is repugnant is to engage in a discourse with a political fundamentalist.You don't even listen to me. Anything I say flies right past you while you are thinking of a clever way to retort.
I think you are a lawyer probably just passed your bar exams. This is not a courtroom. Answer now, YES OR NO? Here we are engaged in a civil discourse and as for your last set of questions, I will not dignify them with answers. They are stupid questions. Which board passed you in your bar exams? Really, I would like to know.
Im testing your theory of internal problems creating disasters when opposition parties win elections
.Please answer those questions
.you cant just continue to dodge them
..
The following is a Nigerian case study
{The resolution to form APC (ruling party) in Nigeria was signed by Tom Ikimi, the who represented the ACN; Annie Okonkwo on behalf of the APGA; , Mallam Ibrahim Shekarau, the Chairman of ANPP's Merger Committee; and Garba Shehu, the Chairman of CPC's Merger Committee. Surprisingly, less than 2 years before the party's historic victory in the 2015 elections, TOP LEADERS Annie Okonkwo, Tom Ikimi and Ibrahim Shekarau resigned from the party and joined the PDP}
Does your theory of unviable opposition hold in this case
??YES or NO..if the answer is YES,tell me the disasters in Nigeria, if the answer is NO,your theory is unfounded
.
You are the one who said CCM was behind Slaa and Lipumba's departure. I think it was within my rights to ask you - what proof do you have, my learned brother?
I don't need to keep my fingers on any pulse. I have my own life, I just know that Tanzanians (that includes the majority of my family members) will fare worse if UKAWA,in its current version, takes over. I make my own decisions and I inform all my immediate and extended family members of the reasons for my decisions. They can do whatever they want
You need to make informed analysis
.that includes reading papers and getting updated with what is transpiring in this election, because if you dont, you become more vulnerable to dogmas and propagandas like in your situation now
..
The faring worse theory is what Im putting to test, and for that theory to hold up it has to hold true after scrutiny
..so please kindly answer my questions
.I will not give them up as long as you keeping repeating your fake theory
..
Now I know I am dealing with an imbecile. Did you really understand the essence of my response? Sometimes it makes me wonder why I even bother interacting with nitwits like you.
Insults and derogatory statements are not productiveand they only give a clear indication of weaknesses in the strength of yourarguments
..
Gees. You have no clue, do you? I just pointed out flaws that were made in your research and you don't even care? I just told you that I am an expert in GAME THEORY and you say that is irrelevant. I told you that they didn't anticipate CCM's response and you ask me - how can I tell? Are you a moron? An expert is giving you a professional evaluation and you dismiss him?
Again insults are weakening your own intelligence
..Anybody can say he/she is an expert in anything in this forum as long as they using unverified names and nobody can see their certificates or licenses of operation
.The point is there is a lot of research going on you can volunteer to give your advices
.
I told you that there were more than one organization given the task
and research companies have their own methodologies
.If you are intending to question the research work why dont you doubt the whole research rather than just part of it (data analysis)????
..Data analysis is not the only element in research that can render a study wrong....
