Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

Mombasa-to-Nairobi rail line set for commissioning
12th May 2017 BY: JOHN MUCHIRA
CREAMER MEDIA CORRESPONDENT
Kenya is gearing up for a new era in railway transport with the impending commissioning of a standard-gauge railway (SGR) line on June 1.

The East African nation has depended on a dilapidated 1-m-gauge railway system for more than a century, but that is about to change, following the completion of the $3.8-billion 472 km SGR line from the coastal city of Mombasa to Nairobi, the capital city.

ADVERTISEMENT
“The SGR line is the largest infrastructure project in post- independence Kenya. It’s commissioning will mean low freight transport costs, which is a good development for the economies of the region,” Kenya Railways MD Atanas Maina tells Engineering News.

The line, constructed by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), has the potential to reduce transport costs by as much as 35%. Australia-based construction company John Holland, a subsidiary of CCCC, has been contracted to operate the SGR line.

“The SGR line will assist in lowering the logistics costs associated with freight storage and delivery, which will lead to low freight transport costs for the business community,” says Maina.

The completion of the Mombasa–Nairobi line, which forms the first phase of a broader railway investment programme, is testament to Kenya’s determination to become East Africa’s transport hub.
Apart from the new line, Kenya intends to construct a 3 500 km SGR network under the Railways Master Plan that will connect the country to Uganda, South Sudan and Ethiopia.

Maina says the Mombasa–Nairobi line is critical for the development of Kenya because it will provide a more efficient mode of transport for freight in the northern corridor, the main transport route for cargo destined for not only Kenya but also Uganda, Rwanda and parts of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Trains will travel at 80 km/h, which will significantly reduce transit times for cargo. The line has a haulage capacity of up to 4 000 t a trip. Struggling

Currently, cargo transport along the northern corridor, which competes with Tanzania’s central corridor, is mainly by road, at 97%. Rift Valley Railways, the operator of the 1-m-gauge line between Kenya and Uganda, has been struggling to operate profitably.
“The SGR line will play a vital role in decongesting the Port of Mombasa, thus enable it to increase cargo throughput to the inland,” says Maina.

The commissioning of the line comes at a time when cargo traffic at the Mombasa port is increasing, having gone up by 2.4% from 26.7-million tons in 2015 to 27.3-million tons in 2016.

The SGR line is designed to carry 22-million tons of cargo a year, equivalent to 40% of the Mombasa port’s throughput.

In anticipation of increased container throughput at the port, the Kenya government is modernising and expanding the inland container depot (ICD), in Nairobi.

When completed, by August, the ICD will have five additional SGR lines serviced by six gantry cranes for offloading and loading containers, a staking yard for at least 5 000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) and a yearly throughput of 405 000 TEUs. Currently, the depot has a yearly throughput of 180 000 TEUs.

The second phase of the SGR project will see the line being extended from Nairobi to Naivasha, a distance of 120 km, at a cost of $1.5-billion, funded by a loan from the Chinese government.
Kenya has also signed construction agreements with CCCC covering Phase 2B, from Naivasha to Kisumu, and Phase 2C, from Kisumu to Malaba, on the Uganda border.

Engineering News - Mombasa-to-Nairobi rail line set for commissioning
 
SGR Kenya
C_sCrRMW0AAKAXb.jpg
C_sj8reXkAADHqn.jpg
 
Damn at 80km/h that will be the largest theft of the Century
 
Uhuru secures $3.59 billion more from China to extend SGR to Kisumu

Uhuru secures $3.59 billion more from China to extend SGR to Kisumu
May. 15, 2017, 3:00 pm
By PAUL ILADO IN BEIJING CHINA

President Uhuru Kenyatta has secured an additional $3.59 billion from China to extend SGR from Naivasha to Kisumu.

Uhuru secured the amount that will be available immediately at a meeting with Chinese President XI Jinping on Monday.

“The President wants the railway to reach Kisumu then Malaba especially because of the new port that is being built [there],” said State House Spokesman Manoa Esipisu.

Before flying to China, Uhuru had phone conversations with Uganda’s Yoweri Museveni and Rwanda’s Paul Kagame on the possibility of the two countries extending the railway all the way to Kigali.

As a result, the three countries will send a joint team to Beijing to bid for more funding for SGR to reach Malaba and go on to Kampala and then Kigali.
 
And those in Tanzania are 100 yrs old. Gosh i can't believe my eyez what Kenyan mafioso did to that country!
Dont worry about them, no one will call you to try them, ooh, we will use the 80Km/h to multiply our economy by 2, i think by four years you will be finishing your 160 Km/hr to Morogoro. It will be nice to see you use your 160Km/h with our economy twice yours
 
Dont worry about them, no one will call you to try them, ooh, we will use the 80Km/h to multiply our economy by 2, i think by four years you will be finishing your 160 Km/hr to Morogoro. It will be nice to see you use your 160Km/h with our economy twice yours
eti four years,hehehe this bongolalas haven't started theirs😀
 
Damn at 80km/h that will be the largest theft of the Century
At that 80km/hr carrying double the cargo(using double-stacked wagons) while yours at 120km/hr freight carrying half the cargo... at the end of a day ours would have moved more cargo than yours!
 
At that 80km/hr carrying double the cargo(using double-stacked wagons) while yours at a higher speed carrying half the cargo... at the end of a day ours would have moved more cargo than yours!
Here is a puzzle u don't know, double stacked wagons means more fuel consumption due to wind resistance n since the standards of ur track curvature is ratio of 1200/800 means sharp corners hence lower speed n those engines of urs can't shunt longer cargo wagons unlike the standards for our curvature which is simply a radius 1000m in Tanzania meaning bigger circumference less sharp corners n hence ability to attach n pull countless wagons in a very long train n at higher speed!

Sent from my SM-J320F using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Here is a puzzle u don't know, double stacked wagons means more fuel consumption due to wind resistance n since the standards of ur track curvature is ratio of 1200/800 means sharp corners hence lower speed n those engines of urs can't shunt longer cargo wagons unlike the standards for curvature simply a radius 1000m in Tanzania meaning bigger circumference less sharp corners n hence pulling very long wagons n at higher speed!

Sent from my SM-J320F using JamiiForums mobile app

wacha upuzi, the Kenyan SGR freign will move at avg 80km for freight train, even with all those factors accounted for, that is a done deal!!!! They already did their calculation and everything at design stage....Wind included..... They wagons can be as long as the tanzanian ones, at 80km/hr wind will not affect that much.. kwahivyo all that has already been taken care of
read this Cant (road/rail) - Wikipedia

On the other hand, if you do the math:
Lets assume both freight trains (Ke,Tz) will travel a similar distance of 400km in one day (24hrs) between point A and B, each movement from one point to the other counted as a 1 trip...

The Kenyan train carrying double the cargo of the tanzanian train... assume 100tons for kenya and 50tonnes for Tanzania..

Kenyan train moving at 80km/hr while Tanzanian freight moving at 120km/hr

using the formula Time taken = Distance/Speed
Tanzania time for a single trip = 400km/120kmhr == 3.3hrs
Kenya time for single trip =400/80kmhr == 5hrs

Now lets assume the two trains work continuously in 24hrs carrying cargo in each trip.........
For Tanzania where each trip is 3.3hrs, in 24hrs it would have done 24hr/3.3hr = 7.3trips
For Kenya where each trip takes 5hrs, in 24hrs it would have zigzagged 24hr/5 = 4.8trips


So in one busy day the Tanzanian freight train carrying single stacked containers with total 50 tones in each trip would have carried 50ton*7.3 = 365tons...
While the slower and heavier Kenyan freight train carrying double stacked containers totall 100tones in each trip would have carried 100ton*4.8 =480tons .....


Therefor the Kenyan cargo train would have carried 480 -365 = 115tonnes more than the Tanzanian one!!!!

this is just hypathetical, remember the Kenyans SGR has been designed to carry 22mln tonns a year while the Tanzaninn one is 17mln tonns a year meaning at a certain point the Tz rail wouldnt be able to compete even if they wanted to....



kila siku tunawaaambia, if you look at it in face value, it might look like Tanzanian or Ethiopia got a better deal but when you go to details, Kenyas SGR trumps all of them!!!!!
 
wacha upuzi, the Kenyan SGR freign will move at avg 80km for freight train, even with all those factors accounted for, that is a done deal!!!! They already did their calculation and everything at design stage....Wind included..... They wagons can be as long as the tanzanian ones, at 80km/hr wind will not affect that much.. kwahivyo all that has already been taken care of


On the other hand, if you do the math:
Lets assume both freight trains (Ke,Tz) will travel a similar distance of 400km in one day (24hrs) between point A and B, each movement from one point to the other counted as a 1 trip...

The Kenyan train carrying double the cargo of the tanzanian train... assume 100tons for kenya and 50tonnes for Tanzania..

Kenyan train moving at 80km/hr while Tanzanian freight moving at 120km/hr

using the formula Time taken = Distance/Speed
Tanzania time for a single trip = 400km/120kmhr == 3.3hrs
Kenya time for single trip =400/80kmhr == 5hrs

Now lets assume the two trains work continuously in 24hrs carrying cargo in each trip.........
For Tanzania where each trip is 3.3hrs, in 24hrs it would have done 24hr/3.3hr = 7.3trips
For Kenya where each trip takes 5hrs, in 24hrs it would have zigzagged 24hr/5 = 4.8trips


So in one busy day the Tanzanian freight train carrying single stacked containers with total 50 tones in each trip would have carried 50ton*7.3 = 365tons...
While the slower and heavier Kenyan freight train carrying double stacked containers totall 100tones in each trip would have carried 100ton*4.8 =480tons .....


Therefor the Kenyan cargo train would have carried 480 -365 = 115tonnes more than the Tanzanian one!!!!

this is just hypathetical, remember the Kenyans SGR has been designed to carry 22mln tonns a year while the Tanzaninn one is 17mln tonns a year meaning at a certain point the Tz rail wouldnt be able to compete even if they wanted to....



kila siku tunawaaambia, if you look at it in face value, it might look like Tanzanian or Ethiopia got a better deal but when you go to details, Kenyas SGR trumps all of them!!!!!

Well put, say no more
 
wacha upuzi, the Kenyan SGR freign will move at avg 80km for freight train, even with all those factors accounted for, that is a done deal!!!! They already did their calculation and everything at design stage....Wind included..... They wagons can be as long as the tanzanian ones, at 80km/hr wind will not affect that much.. kwahivyo all that has already been taken care of
read this Cant (road/rail) - Wikipedia

On the other hand, if you do the math:
Lets assume both freight trains (Ke,Tz) will travel a similar distance of 400km in one day (24hrs) between point A and B, each movement from one point to the other counted as a 1 trip...

The Kenyan train carrying double the cargo of the tanzanian train... assume 100tons for kenya and 50tonnes for Tanzania..

Kenyan train moving at 80km/hr while Tanzanian freight moving at 120km/hr

using the formula Time taken = Distance/Speed
Tanzania time for a single trip = 400km/120kmhr == 3.3hrs
Kenya time for single trip =400/80kmhr == 5hrs

Now lets assume the two trains work continuously in 24hrs carrying cargo in each trip.........
For Tanzania where each trip is 3.3hrs, in 24hrs it would have done 24hr/3.3hr = 7.3trips
For Kenya where each trip takes 5hrs, in 24hrs it would have zigzagged 24hr/5 = 4.8trips


So in one busy day the Tanzanian freight train carrying single stacked containers with total 50 tones in each trip would have carried 50ton*7.3 = 365tons...
While the slower and heavier Kenyan freight train carrying double stacked containers totall 100tones in each trip would have carried 100ton*4.8 =480tons .....


Therefor the Kenyan cargo train would have carried 480 -365 = 115tonnes more than the Tanzanian one!!!!

this is just hypathetical, remember the Kenyans SGR has been designed to carry 22mln tonns a year while the Tanzaninn one is 17mln tonns a year meaning at a certain point the Tz rail wouldnt be able to compete even if they wanted to....



kila siku tunawaaambia, if you look at it in face value, it might look like Tanzanian or Ethiopia got a better deal but when you go to details, Kenyas SGR trumps all of them!!!!!
The same way my argument says about ur curvatures design that can't take 5km train! That's Physics my friend u r illiterate of! Aside unknown cant measure of ur track to support that double stacked cargo while for us is known! Ours is way superior to urs..
 
The same way my argument says about ur curvatures design that can't take 5km train! That's Physics my friend u r illiterate of! Aside the cant measure of ur track to support that double stacked cargo that is not known while for us is known! Ours is way superior to urs..
You saw the curvature in your dreams or what? Have you even seen the designing of the SGR Kenya? You mean you know more physics than those guys who are building SGR Kenya? Then Build the one from Dar is Slum to Morogoro because it seems Bongolalas have their money and brains too!! No need of Merkez
 
You saw the curvature in your dreams or what? Have you even seen the designing of the SGR Kenya? You mean you know more physics than those guys who are building SGR Kenya? Then Build the one from Dar is Slum to Morogoro because it seems Bongolalas have their money and brains too!! No need of Merkez
There are specifications for each n every rail track design for Uganda, Kenya, Ethiopia n Tanzania that i posted before n according to Ugandan govt explanations.
 
Back
Top Bottom