LOL. hopefully they missed the Avian and Mammalian part.
I do acknowledge kwamba wengi hatujasoma vitu vingi. so tunaishia kurely on mtu ambaye ana imani sawa na yetu kusongesha debate.....nimeshagundua packs humu and their leaders.
and yes, some concepts people have never heard of but wouldnt think twice about dismissing them just because its against their faith.
people make premises about their already made conclusions. its difficult to move from there.
na wewe hukunijibu why are you so convinced that there is no creator!!!!
In the context of an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient and omni benevolent creator, mainly due to the inherent contradiction posed by the prospect of such a creator creating such a deficient world as this.
The argument that complexity must be created by intelligence only begs the question that that would need the creator to necessarily be created by an even higher intelligence, ad infinitum, ad absurdum.
I move from the less complex to the more complex.
I do not accept the existence of entities that cannot be proven.
I am ready to accept the existence of god should a convincing non contradictory and logical explanation be presented, followed by a conclusive proof.
For example, if one were to tell me that god exists, but he is a narcissist prick who made us just to watch us suffer in order to satisfy his sadistic needs, that explanation, although earthly, has no inherent contradiction when juxtaposed with the observable world, and can at least be entertained for further investigation. Eventually a stumbling block would still be a proof that such a being, far and above being logically conceivable, actually exists.
But this idea of an all loving, all powerful, all present god who creates a world with such evil as this is not only unfathomable, but also it insults the intelligence of any right thinking person.