Kadhia ya Law School "Wasomi Nguli" wasikilizwe

Kadhia ya Law School "Wasomi Nguli" wasikilizwe

9 October 2022
Wenzetu wako mbali sana kuhakikisha mambo yanakuwa ya viwango vinavyokybalika toka chini kabisa

National Rounds of the 2022 Schools Moot Court Competition Programme currently underway at the University of Pretoria




National Department of Basic EducationBasic Education Deputy Minister, Dr Reginah Mhaule, has officially opened the National Rounds of the 11th National Schools Moot Court Programme 2022, which commenced at the University of Pretoria on 6 October 2022. The Programme is a collaboration with the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, and the South African Human Rights Commission, and many other partners. The 2022 Problem Statement has been focused on Learner Pregnancy. During the Moot proceedings, more than 36 teams identified from across all nine provinces were taken through the preliminary round meant to identify the best two teams that will proceed to the finals, which will be held at the Constitutional Court in Johannesburg on 9 October 2022. The teams are expected to present oral arguments before the ConCourt Judges, who will announce the 2022 National Schools Moot Court champion.
The Programme was established in 2011 as a Human Rights Education Strategy of the DBE to educate learners about the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. It was also aimed at promoting constitutional values through research and oral arguments presented by learners at various levels of the competition. The finalists will automatically qualify to represent South Africa at the International Schools Moot Court Competition, hosted every two years.
Mrs Malebo Lefoka, Chief Education Specialist for Social Cohesion and Equity in Education, said that the DBE and the University of Pretoria, have succeeded in exposing young people to various aspects of legal practice through the Programme. “The Moot is divided into written and oral rounds. All secondary schools across South Africa have been invited to send teams of two Grade 10 or 11 learners to submit two short essays, each arguing the opposing views of the set fictional question. A panel of experts evaluate the submissions and select the four best submissions from each of South Africa’s nine provinces, which are then invited to the semi-final oral rounds held at the University of Pretoria, with the winners arguing in the final round at the Constitutional Court of South Africa, Johannesburg. Since its inception, the Moot problem statements have been part of the school curriculum to support the mass participation component of the Programme, reaching approximately 2 million learners,” explained Mrs Lefoka.
During her address, Deputy Minister Mhaule stated that the sector remains resolute and committed towards fostering human rights, values and strengthening democracy. “Our curriculum is embedded within the founding principles of human rights, and has the potential of imparting knowledge and advocating for unity, peace and nation building in the teaching and learning process. The 2022 Problem Statement on Learner Pregnancy highlights some of the human rights violations and challenges faced by our learners who find themselves in such situations. It also serves to raise awareness around the right to privacy and confidentiality, freedom of expression, access to education and many more sections of the Bill of Rights. Learner pregnancy is both a complex and complicated matter. In most instances, it reflects the situation of innocent girls who become subjected to sexual violence and the infringement of their rights. We chose this theme because of its universal nature as it affects children from all walks of life.”
The Deputy Minister further encouraged participants to be ambassadors of human rights in their respective communities. “I implore you to count yourselves as the heroes and heroines of today and the future. You have embarked on a journey that touches many lives and brings hope. I urge you to continue promoting peace, unity and nation building within our communities. Let us all treasure our democracy and unity and consciously choose not to participate in hateful comments, discriminatory and violent actions that sometimes disrupt and divide our family systems and communities. Dr Mhaule expressed her gratitude with a special mention of the National and Provincial Coordinators from the three institutions and organisers who gave so much of themselves to ensure the success of the event. Source: National Rounds of the 2022 Schools Moot Court Competition Programme currently underway at the University of Pretoria
Menu

Archived Documents » Archived Articles » National-Rounds-of-the-2022-Schools-Moot-Court-Competition-Programme-1022
Source : Department of Basic Education ZA
 
Kwa ujumla UDSM ni chuo cha kidikteta na udikteta huu unasababishwa na ukabila uliokithiri.

Kuna kabila hapo UDSM huwa hawafeli hata kama ni kialaza.

Kingine ngono. Kuna digrii nyingi za mabinti ni za ngono.

Unakuta binti anabakizwa kuwa tutorial asistant na GPA kubwa ila kichwani boga. Anabebwabebwa tu..

Hebu kila chuo kinachofundizha sheria kiwe na law school hapohapo chuoni.
kinaachoongelewa ni law school na siyo UDSM.
 
Kwa ujumla UDSM ni chuo cha kidikteta na udikteta huu unasababishwa na ukabila uliokithiri.

Kuna kabila hapo UDSM huwa hawafeli hata kama ni kialaza.

Kingine ngono. Kuna digrii nyingi za mabinti ni za ngono.

Unakuta binti anabakizwa kuwa tutorial asistant na GPA kubwa ila kichwani boga. Anabebwabebwa tu..

Hebu kila chuo kinachofundizha sheria kiwe na law school hapohapo chuoni.
Taja hilo kabila kiongozi,tupo jf hakuna anayekujua

Sent from my Infinix X690 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Hivi mtu kasoma hadi kapata degree ya chuo kikuu halafu ndio kaenda law school, aanze kudanga na kustarehe hapo ngwe ya mwisho kabisa ya elimu???!!!! Wanafunzi wa kudanga na starehe huwa hawafikii mbali na GPA zao huwa haziwaruhusu kukanyaga hiyo law school

Prof. Mahalu ameukata mzizi wa fitina. Mtu anafaulu vipi chini ya walimu hawa wenye:

(a) Matatizo ya uwezo,
(b) wanaopenda kuogopwa na wanafunzi,
(c) wale wasiotaka mafanikio ya wengine, ambalo ndiyo lililo hatari zaidi

Hapa ndipo shida ilipo.
 
FINAL ROUND
Ames Moot Court Competition 2019


Subtitles
Source : Harvard Law School

The case, United States Department of Interior v. Bryce Caldwell, was argued on Nov. 12, at the Ames Moot Court Competition. The presiding judges were Merrick Garland ’77, of the United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit; Michelle Friedland of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and Amul Thapar, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Patricia Roberts Harris Memorial Team (Respondents): Charlotte Butash Kelsey Fraser (oralist) Hilary Hurd Melanie Fontes (oralist) Kate Peiffer Alicia Alvero Koski Janet Wood Reno Memorial Team (Petitioners): Kevin Chen Mikaela Gilbert-Lurie (oralist) Caroline Li Al Kelly (oralist) KC Jaski Eliza Green The Ames Competition, held in the historic Ames Courtroom of Harvard Law School, is one of the most prestigious competitions for appellate brief writing and advocacy in the country. The students participating in the Final Round started the competition in fall of their 2L year. Two teams progressed to the Final Round through their strong research abilities and excellent written and oral advocacy.
 
Mawakili wa Upande wa utetezi waanza kumtetea mteja wao Félician Kabuga anayetuhumiwa kushiriki mauaji ya kimbari Rwanda, katika Mahakama Maalum ya IRMCT the Hague.

The HAGUE

30 September 2022
CASE : Prosecutor V. Félicien Kabuga (MICT-13-38),

Félicien Kabuga (MICT-13-38), Opening Statements, 30 September 2022



Source : IRMCT

Félicien Kabuga (MICT-13-38) - Resources​

kabuga.jpg

Félicien Kabuga was the President of the Comité provisoire of the Fonds de défense nationale (“National Defence Fund”)
source : Félicien Kabuga (MICT-13-38) - Resources | UNITED NATIONS | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals.
 
Wanafunzi someni acheni kuingiza siasa.Siasa ikiingizwa hapo matokeo yake tutapata wanasheria watakaokuja kupitisha mikataba ya kuumiza nchi kama ile ya gesi ya mtwara.walimu washikilie hapohapo hakuna cha tume uchwara wala nini.Tumeshuhudia mikataba mingi nchini hii imekuwa ya kipuuzi sana kumbe sababu ni uwezo mdogo wa wanaopata nafasi toka chuoni
 
Wanafunzi someni acheni kuingiza siasa.Siasa ikiingizwa hapo matokeo yake tutapata wanasheria watakaokuja kupitisha mikataba ya kuumiza nchi kama ile ya gesi ya mtwara.walimu washikilie hapohapo hakuna cha tume uchwara wala nini.Tumeshuhudia mikataba mingi nchini hii imekuwa ya kipuuzi sana kumbe sababu ni uwezo mdogo wa wanaopata nafasi toka chuoni
Nimepata wakati mgumu mnoo kukuelewa umesimamia hoja ipi, hasa kwa huo mfano wako ulioutia hapo juu.
 
Tatizo la Law School si dogo ambalo ati kila Tom, Dick au Harry anaweza kuwa na ufumbuzi au ushauri.

Kwa sampuli hii:

1. Profesa Cyriacus Binamungu (Mzumbe): anasema kuna shida kwa walimu katika taasisi hiyo (LST).

“Wanafunzi wanaandaliwa vizuri (vyuoni) isipokuwa kutakuwa na shida LST, walimu hawazingatii ufundishaji, wanafikiria mishahara, akipokea hajali mwanafunzi kaelewa au la.”

2. Profesa Costa Mahalu, (VC Saut): anasema ni aibu kwa taasisi hiyo kutokana na matokeo hayo, pia inapaswa ijitafakari.

“Haiwezekani wanaofeli mtihani wa uwakili pale LST hawana ujuzi na maarifa katika masomo yao kutoka vyuo walivyosoma. Hapana! Kuna tatizo na lazima utafutwe ufumbuzi,”

Profesa Mahalu anasema matokeo mabaya yanasababishwa na makundi matatu ya walimu wanaowafundisha wanafunzi hao wa uwakili.

(a) Matatizo ya uwezo,
(b) wanaopenda kuogopwa na wanafunzi,
(c) wale wasiotaka mafanikio ya wengine, ambalo ndiyo lililo hatari zaidi.

“Hata hapa Saut niliwakuta walimu wa aina hiyo. Tumefanya kazi kubwa kumaliza tatizo hilo,”

Profesa Mahalu anashauri kulindwa msingi wa kuanzishwa kwa LST ambao ni kutoa elimu kwa vitendo kutoka kwa majaji, mahakimu na mawakili wanaoshughulika na mashauri kila siku mahakamani.

“Maprofesa waliobobea katika nadharia wasipelekwe kuwafundisha wanafunzi pale LST kwa sababu kufanya hivyo ni kukiuka lengo la msingi la kuanzishwa kwa chuo hicho.”

Kabla ya taasisi hiyo, anasema Mahalu mawakili walipata maarifa kwa miezi tisa kutoka kwa mawakili na mahakimu waliopo kazini.

“Taifa lilipata wanasheria na mawakili nguli, nikiwemo mimi, Jaji mkuu mstaafu, Othman Chande na Waziri Mkuu mstaafu Mizengo Pinda mwaka 1974. Wahadhiri wa LST wajitafakari kwa matokeo haya.”
___________

Watu kama hawa walipaswa kuwamo kwenye tume ya Dr. Ndumbaro.

LST kuna matatizo na walimu yasiyokuwa ya kufumbiwa macho. Fika LST kuutambua ukwasi wa walimu hawa wenye kujiita 'fulani the don.'

Kwa hakika muda wa kuyatanzua makando kando yao ni sasa.

Wameyakoroga wenyewe, hawana budi kuyanywa.

Source:

Profesa Shivji asema tatizo ni mfumo ufaulu mtihani Uanasheria
-kwa taarifa yako ukisoma hiyo taarifa ya mwqnanchi utagundua kuwa, Prof shivji ameunga mkono hoja za LST,ambazo zilitolewa na Prof Lukumay, kwamba wanafunzi wa law school wana uwezo mdogo kutokana na wengi wao kuwa "half cooked" tokea kwenye degree ya kwanza
- Prof Mahalu, ulitarajia atakubali kwamba SAUT LL.B hawana uwezo?, halafu aliwahi kuwa mkuu wa chuo cha bagamoyo UoB ambacho kilifungiwa na TCU kwa matatizo ya ubora.
-Shivji amesema wanafunzi wana uwezo mdogo sana,
 
Kwa hiyo una shauri course zote wapitie law school kuliko na mitambo ya kutenganisha pumba na mchele mkuu?
-wewe nawe huelewei
-hajasema hivyo alichosema ni kwamba mbona wahasibu wanakaziwa kwenye ile mitihani ya nbaa ya kupata cpa, na hawalalamiki kama Lawyers ?
 
Kama utaupuuza ukweli kwamba wanafunzi ndiyo wenye shida basi mleta mada una wivu ama chuki binafsi na walimu wa shule ya sheria.

Wanafunzi wanachangia kufeli kwao kwa 75+%. Muda mwingi wanadanga, wanalewa, wanabet, wanawaza ukahaba, n.k.

Hawawezi kuandika sentensi nzuri za kiswahili na hata kiingereza. Unapata wapi ujasiri wa kuwalaumu walimu pekee?

Na wale walimu wanaodai K ndio wawapasishe wanafunzi wao? Hawa wapo wengi na sio LST peke yake lakini katika vyuo tele tanzania. Pia wapo ambao wanadai wazi wazi wanafunzi wawape hongo ili wakubali kuwa walimu wasimamizi wa project zao za mwisho vyuoni. Mfumo mzima wa walimu wa vyuo vikuu unatakiwa kuangaliwa to be honest!
 
9 October 2022
Wenzetu wako mbali sana kuhakikisha mambo yanakuwa ya viwango vinavyokybalika toka chini kabisa

National Rounds of the 2022 Schools Moot Court Competition Programme currently underway at the University of Pretoria





Source : Department of Basic Education ZA

nzuri hii, ila tatizo wengine wakifika university wanaenda kusoma human resource ,social work,nk nk
 
For how long has this problem persisted?
2. Only this year has such mass failure?
3. If #2 is yes, why?
4. Does LST recruited all new instructors this year? If the problem is all about instructors.

For how long has this problem persisted?

Answer: This is prevailing for a very long time.

Reference:

Dokezo - Tuhuma za Siasa chafu "Law School of Tanzania" wahusika wajitokeze kuzijibu

2. Only this year has such mass failure?

Answer: Find below statistics for the students who passed:

Cohort 28 pass 169 (less than 30%)
Cohort 29 pass 54 (less than 10%)
Cohort 30 pass 133 (less than 26%)
Cohort 31 pass 28 (less than 5%)

Note the current mass failure in subject is cohort 33.

Reference;

Tume ya Kuchunguza kadhia ya Law School inapaswa kuwa huru

3. If #2 is yes, why?

Answer #2 is "NO." In which case your subsequent question has no relevance.

4. Does LST recruited all new instructors this year? If the problem is all about instructors.

Answer: The given answers in #1, 2, and 3 render the entire of question #4 irrelevant.

I suggest you relax and go through the references. You will find what is being said for yourself if you wish.
 
For how long has this problem persisted?

Answer: This is prevailing for a very long time.

Reference:

Dokezo - Tuhuma za Siasa chafu "Law School of Tanzania" wahusika wajitokeze kuzijibu

2. Only this year has such mass failure?

Answer: Find below statistics for the students who passed:

Cohort 28 pass 169 (less than 30%)
Cohort 29 pass 54 (less than 10%)
Cohort 30 pass 133 (less than 26%)
Cohort 31 pass 28 (less than 5%)

Note the current mass failure in subject is cohort 33.

Reference;

Tume ya Kuchunguza kadhia ya Law School inapaswa kuwa huru

3. If #2 is yes, why?

Answer #2 is "NO." In which case your subsequent question has no relevance.

4. Does LST recruited all new instructors this year? If the problem is all about instructors.

Answer: The given answers in #1, 2, and 3 render the entire of question #4 irrelevant.

I suggest you relax and go through the references. You will find what is being said for yourself if you wish.
Mkuu, kama kumbukumbu zangu zitakuwa sama, huyo Mzee Mahalu aliwahi kufutiwa status yake ya Ubalozi kisha akafikishwa mahakamani kwa tuhuma za ufisadi katika Ubalozi wa Tanzania huko Italy katika utawala wa awamu ya nne.
 
-kwa taarifa yako ukisoma hiyo taarifa ya mwqnanchi utagundua kuwa, Prof shivji ameunga mkono hoja za LST,ambazo zilitolewa na Prof Lukumay, kwamba wanafunzi wa law school wana uwezo mdogo kutokana na wengi wao kuwa "half cooked" tokea kwenye degree ya kwanza
- Prof Mahalu, ulitarajia atakubali kwamba SAUT LL.B hawana uwezo?, halafu aliwahi kuwa mkuu wa chuo cha bagamoyo UoB ambacho kilifungiwa na TCU kwa matatizo ya ubora.
-Shivji amesema wanafunzi wana uwezo mdogo sana,

Kwamba Shivji kasema yake na Mahalu kasema yake. Bizimungu anasema yake, wanafunzi wanasema yao na walimu wansema yao.

Si ndipo inapotakiwa tume huru ambapo itaaminika kwa wadau wote?

Tume ya Kuchunguza kadhia ya Law School inapaswa kuwa huru

Nakuona una maumivu sana na maoni ya Prof. Mahalu.

Wewe ni wale was group (c) aka mkasirikao kwa mafanikio ya wengine?

NB: NIsiache kukufahamisha mlengo wa Prof Shivji kisiasa. Huyu anachoshangaa ni udhaifu wa wanafunzi wa law kushindwa kuwa chachu kwenye kudai haki.

Vipi katiba mpya, watu kukamatwa, watuhumiwa kuuwawa nk na jamii ya wanafunzi wakiwamo wa sheria kukaa kimya?

Vipi suala hili limefikia huku bila walimu wale kuingia kwenye maeneo ya shule?

Huyo ndiye Shivji kwa maana yake kamili siyo kwa finyu unayotaka kuidhania wewe.

Cc: Erythrocyte
 
Mkuu, kama kumbukumbu zangu zitakuwa sama, huyo Mzee Mahalu aliwahi kufutiwa status yake ya Ubalozi kisha akafikishwa mahakamani kwa tuhuma za ufisadi katika Ubalozi wa Tanzania huko Italy katika utawala wa awamu ya nne.
Kufutiwa status yake ya ubalozi, na kupelekwa mahakamani Italy, hakumzuii kutoa maoni yake, ni haki yake asikilizwe.
 
New Advocates in Town


On the 19th July 2019 , A disputation of Lawyers were admitted into the Tanganyika Bar Association in Tanzania to acquire right of Audience in High Court and Subordinate Court. LawXul Tz was there to get a glimpse of their experience.

Source : sheria "1o1"
 
Back
Top Bottom