Kutoka Mahakamani: John Pambalu ashtakiwa kwa UHAINI

Kutoka Mahakamani: John Pambalu ashtakiwa kwa UHAINI

John Justine Pambalu anakabiliwa na tuhuma za uhaini katika Mahakama ya Hakimu Mkazi Kisutu, Dar es Salaam, kwa mujibu wa hati ya mashtaka ya mwaka 2026.

Hati hiyo inaeleza kuwa Pambalu anadaiwa kutenda kosa hilo katika tarehe mbalimbali kati ya Septemba 1 na Oktoba 29, 2025, katika maeneo tofauti ndani ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam.

Kwa mujibu wa hati hiyo, Pambalu anadaiwa kuwa na nia ya kuushawishi umma kusababisha vikwazo katika Uchaguzi Mkuu wa Oktoba 2025, huku akidaiwa kuonyesha nia hiyo kwa kufanya maandamano yasiyoisha katika maeneo mbalimbali nchini.

Hati ya mashtaka inaeleza kuwa vitendo hivyo vinadaiwa kuwa na lengo la kuitisha Serikali ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.

Tuhuma hizo zinatajwa chini ya Kifungu cha 39(2)(d) cha Sheria ya Kanuni ya Adhabu, Sura ya 16, Toleo la 2023.

Hati hiyo imeandaliwa na kusainiwa na Wakili wa Serikali jijini Dar es Salaam, Oktoba 21, 2026.

Hata hivyo, hati ya mashtaka inaeleza tuhuma dhidi ya Pambalu na si uthibitisho kwamba amepatikana na hatia.

JOHN JUSTINE PAMBALU, katika tarehe mbalimbali kati ya tarehe 1 Septemba 2025 na tarehe 29 Oktoba 2025 katika maeneo mbalimbali ndani ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam, katika Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, akiwa mtu aliye chini ya utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, alikula njama ya kushawishi umma kuzuia Uchaguzi Mkuu wa mwezi Oktoba 2025 na alidhihirisha nia hiyo kwa vitendo, yaani, kwa kuendesha maandamano yasiyokoma kote katika Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania kwa lengo la kutishia Serikali (Mhimili wa Utendaji) ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.

Imetolewa Dar es Salaam tarehe 31 mwezi Oktoba 2026.

Soma Pia: Pambalu wa CHADEMA atuhumiwa kwa ugaidi
View attachment 3695467
e0f1ba49-fb0e-4bd3-a72c-40bec106dfa9.jpeg
 
Lengo la Tume ya Jaji Lilla nini? Naona ni kitandawili kigumu kwao kwani tayari kazi yao inatiwa dosari
 
Serikali ya CCM imemshtaki
@John_Pambalu
kwa makosa ya UHAINI. Hati ya mashtaka inaeleza alitenda makosa hayo kati ya 1 September 2025 hadi 29 Oktoba 2025 kwa kuunda nia ya kuwashawishi wananchi kwa [kuhamasisha] maandamano [yasiyo na kikomo] kwa lengo la kuitisha Serikali.
============

Ndio mjue these people are serious, hawajutii mauaji waliyofanya, lakini mwisho wa CCM upo karibu sana kuna siku watajichanganya kidogo tu hawataamini macho yao, nani alijua 29/10 watu wangejitokeza kiasi kile.

HAWA WASHENZI TU, SOMA HII THOUGH NI KUTOKA MITANDAONI BUT MAKES A LOT O SENSE KAMA UNA ABCDE ZA SHERIA


Legal disputes surrounding where ordinary dissent ends and treasonous coercion begins focus on the threshold of systematic force, violence, or the unlawful overthrow of constitutional order.
While international legal standards heavily protect political speech and peaceful assembly, the boundary is crossed when actions transition from expressing opposition into actively subverting state organs.

Key Factors Defining the Legal Boundary
  • Political Rhetoric vs. Incitement: Harsh criticism of government policies, demanding leadership changes, or calling officials corrupt is protected speech in most constitutional democracies. Rhetoric crosses into sedition or treason when it transitions into a direct, imminent call to arms, violent insurrection, or the execution of state officials.
  • Election Boycotts vs. Coercion: Peacefully choosing not to participate in an election, or organizing public campaigns urging others to boycott the polls, is a legitimate form of political protest. However, if a group uses physical blockades, threats of violence, or armed intimidation to force citizens away from polling stations or physically prevent election officials from operating, it is treated as an unlawful attempt to dismantle democratic processes.
  • Public Protest vs. Treasonous Subversion: Mass demonstrations, civil disobedience, and strikes are protected exercises of assembly and speech, even if they cause economic disruption. The line into treason or insurrection is crossed when the objective shifts from protesting a policy to using force to physically seize government buildings, depose constitutional authorities, or install an unconstitutional regime.
 
Lengo la Tume ya Jaji Lilla nini? Naona ni kitandawili kigumu kwao kwani tayari kazi yao inatiwa dosari
 
John Justine Pambalu anakabiliwa na tuhuma za uhaini katika Mahakama ya Hakimu Mkazi Kisutu, Dar es Salaam, kwa mujibu wa hati ya mashtaka ya mwaka 2026.

Hati hiyo inaeleza kuwa Pambalu anadaiwa kutenda kosa hilo katika tarehe mbalimbali kati ya Septemba 1 na Oktoba 29, 2025, katika maeneo tofauti ndani ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam.

Kwa mujibu wa hati hiyo, Pambalu anadaiwa kuwa na nia ya kuushawishi umma kusababisha vikwazo katika Uchaguzi Mkuu wa Oktoba 2025, huku akidaiwa kuonyesha nia hiyo kwa kufanya maandamano yasiyoisha katika maeneo mbalimbali nchini.

Hati ya mashtaka inaeleza kuwa vitendo hivyo vinadaiwa kuwa na lengo la kuitisha Serikali ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.

Tuhuma hizo zinatajwa chini ya Kifungu cha 39(2)(d) cha Sheria ya Kanuni ya Adhabu, Sura ya 16, Toleo la 2023.

Hati hiyo imeandaliwa na kusainiwa na Wakili wa Serikali jijini Dar es Salaam, Oktoba 21, 2026.

Hata hivyo, hati ya mashtaka inaeleza tuhuma dhidi ya Pambalu na si uthibitisho kwamba amepatikana na hatia.

JOHN JUSTINE PAMBALU, katika tarehe mbalimbali kati ya tarehe 1 Septemba 2025 na tarehe 29 Oktoba 2025 katika maeneo mbalimbali ndani ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam, katika Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, akiwa mtu aliye chini ya utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, alikula njama ya kushawishi umma kuzuia Uchaguzi Mkuu wa mwezi Oktoba 2025 na alidhihirisha nia hiyo kwa vitendo, yaani, kwa kuendesha maandamano yasiyokoma kote katika Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania kwa lengo la kutishia Serikali (Mhimili wa Utendaji) ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.

Imetolewa Dar es Salaam tarehe 31 mwezi Oktoba 2026.

Soma Pia: Pambalu wa CHADEMA atuhumiwa kwa ugaidi
View attachment 3695467
Duu
Samia kesi kubwa kubwa anazipenda sana
Utafikiri yupo Oman
 
Wanalazimisha utii kwa sheria za kikaburu kama wale wa Afrika ya Kusini


Nchi jirani ya Kenya Uhaini ni nini :

2024​

EXPLAINER: What you need to know about treason laws in Kenya​

Treason is a crime punishable by death although Kenya has not executed anyone for 30 years


President William Ruto on Tuesday night denounced protests that saw Parliament stormed as “treasonous”.

“We shall provide a full and expeditious response to the treasonous events,” the president stated, assuring the nation of the government’s determination to secure the country.

What is treason?

Treason is a serious offence against the state and is provided for in Section 40 of the Penal Code.


Treason involves where a person or persons compass, imagines, invents, devises or intends the death, maiming or wounding, or the imprisonment or restraint, of the President.

It also involves the deposing by unlawful means of the President from his position as President or from the style, honour and name of Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Kenya.

Treason is also defined as a person overthrows by unlawful means of the government and expresses, utters or declares any such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices or intentions by publishing any printing or writing or by any overt act or deed, is guilty of the offence of treason.

Section 40(2) of the penal Code states that a person commits treason if a person owing allegiance to the Republic levies war in Kenya against the Republic or is adherent to the enemies of the Republic, or gives them aid or comfort, in Kenya or elsewhere.

A person also commits treason if they instigate whether in Kenya or elsewhere any person to invade Kenya with an armed force.

Section 40(3) of the Penal Code provides that a person who is guilty of the offence of treason shall be sentenced to death.

Concealment of treason

The Penal Code provides that a person conceals treason if one becomes an accessory after the fact to treason.

A person also conceals treason if a person knowing that any person intends to commit treason, does not give information thereof with all reasonable despatch to the Attorney-General.

Such information is also supposed to be given to an administrative officer, magistrate, or officer in charge of a police station.

Those found guilty of concealing treason including using other reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence are guilty of the felony termed misprision of treason and are liable to imprisonment for life.

Treasonable felony

This is provided under section 43 of the Penal Code.

The law provides that a person commits a treasonable felony if not owing allegiance to the Republic, in Kenya or elsewhere, commits any act or combination of acts which, if it were committed by a person who owed such allegiance, would amount to the offence of treason.

Such a person found guilty is liable to imprisonment for life.

Treachery

This is provided in section 43A of the penal code.

It provides that any person who, with intent to help the enemy, does any act which is designed or likely to give assistance to the enemy, or to interfere with the maintenance of public order or the government of Kenya, or to impede the operation of the disciplined forces, or to endanger life, is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for life.

Provisions as to trial for treason

The Penal Code provides that a person cannot be tried for treason, or any of the felonies defined in sections 42, 43, 43A and 44 unless the prosecution is commenced within two years after the offence is committed.


The law also provides that a person charged with treason, or with any of such felonies, may be convicted, except on his plea of guilty, or the evidence in open court of two witnesses at the least to one overt act of the kind of treason or felony alleged.

A person can also be convicted on the evidence of one witness to one overt act and one other witness to another overt act of the same kind of treason or felony.

The Penal Code also provides that if the facts or matters alleged in a charge for any of such felonies amount in law to treason, and if the facts or matters proved at the trial of the person charged amount in law to treason, such person shall not, by reason thereof, be entitled to be acquitted of the felony.

However, the person tried for the felony shall not afterwards be prosecuted for treason upon the same facts.

A person charged with treason or with any of such felonies who is in Kenya may, whether or not the offence was committed in Kenya, be taken in custody to any place in Kenya.

That person may be proceeded against, charged, tried and punished in any place in Kenya, as if the offence had been committed in Kenya.

For all purposes incidental to or consequential on the trial or punishment of the offence, the offence shall be deemed to have been committed in Kenya.

However, this provision does not apply to cases in which the overt act of treason alleged is the killing of the President, or a direct attempt to endanger the life or injure the person of the President.

Past treason instances

Treason is a crime punishable by death although Kenya has not executed anyone for 30 years.

In 2027 Kenya's attorney general said that an opposition plan to have its leader Raila Odinga sworn in as an alternative president would amount to treason.

Raila had challenged the result of the August 2027 presidential election but then boycotted the court-ordered October rerun, handing victory to President Uhuru Kenyatta.

Attorney General Githu Muigai had said any such move would be illegal.

"The criminal law in the republic of Kenya... stipulates that that process is high treason," he said.

"It is high treason in respect of the person so involved and any other person facilitating that process," he said.

Lawyer Miguna Miguna was also threatened with Treason charges in 2018 after he swore in Raila in a mock exercise at Uhuru Park.

'Moi era' treason cases

Treason, concealment of treason and subversion charges were used to detain and imprison numerous critics of the Moi regime.

The adoption of the 2010 constitution did not lead to a repeal or amendment of these laws.

After the 1982 coup, 12 alleged plotters were convicted of treason and sentenced to death
 
John Justine Pambalu anakabiliwa na tuhuma za uhaini katika Mahakama ya Hakimu Mkazi Kisutu, Dar es Salaam, kwa mujibu wa hati ya mashtaka ya mwaka 2026.

Hati hiyo inaeleza kuwa Pambalu anadaiwa kutenda kosa hilo katika tarehe mbalimbali kati ya Septemba 1 na Oktoba 29, 2025, katika maeneo tofauti ndani ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam.

Kwa mujibu wa hati hiyo, Pambalu anadaiwa kuwa na nia ya kuushawishi umma kusababisha vikwazo katika Uchaguzi Mkuu wa Oktoba 2025, huku akidaiwa kuonyesha nia hiyo kwa kufanya maandamano yasiyoisha katika maeneo mbalimbali nchini.

Hati ya mashtaka inaeleza kuwa vitendo hivyo vinadaiwa kuwa na lengo la kuitisha Serikali ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.

Tuhuma hizo zinatajwa chini ya Kifungu cha 39(2)(d) cha Sheria ya Kanuni ya Adhabu, Sura ya 16, Toleo la 2023.

Hati hiyo imeandaliwa na kusainiwa na Wakili wa Serikali jijini Dar es Salaam, Oktoba 21, 2026.

Hata hivyo, hati ya mashtaka inaeleza tuhuma dhidi ya Pambalu na si uthibitisho kwamba amepatikana na hatia.

JOHN JUSTINE PAMBALU, katika tarehe mbalimbali kati ya tarehe 1 Septemba 2025 na tarehe 29 Oktoba 2025 katika maeneo mbalimbali ndani ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam, katika Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, akiwa mtu aliye chini ya utii kwa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, alikula njama ya kushawishi umma kuzuia Uchaguzi Mkuu wa mwezi Oktoba 2025 na alidhihirisha nia hiyo kwa vitendo, yaani, kwa kuendesha maandamano yasiyokoma kote katika Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania kwa lengo la kutishia Serikali (Mhimili wa Utendaji) ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.

Imetolewa Dar es Salaam tarehe 31 mwezi Oktoba 2026.

Soma Pia: Pambalu wa CHADEMA atuhumiwa kwa ugaidi
View attachment 3695467
Hivi ni vita ya sa100 dhidi ya wakristo, angalia waliopotezwa na kubamnikiwa kesi mbaya
 
Neno ugaidi na uhaini linatumika vibaya sana , watawala haramu ambao hawakuchaguliwa wanalikuza sana nina imani uhaini au ugaidi halisi utatokea ndani ya miaka michache ijayo maana wanausema mpaka kimechukuliwa kitu cha kawaida .
 
Wanalazimisha utii kwa sheria za kikaburu kama wale wa Afrika ya Kusini


Nchi jirani ya Kenya Uhaini ni nini :

2024​

EXPLAINER: What you need to know about treason laws in Kenya​

Treason is a crime punishable by death although Kenya has not executed anyone for 30 years


President William Ruto on Tuesday night denounced protests that saw Parliament stormed as “treasonous”.

“We shall provide a full and expeditious response to the treasonous events,” the president stated, assuring the nation of the government’s determination to secure the country.

What is treason?

Treason is a serious offence against the state and is provided for in Section 40 of the Penal Code.


Treason involves where a person or persons compass, imagines, invents, devises or intends the death, maiming or wounding, or the imprisonment or restraint, of the President.

It also involves the deposing by unlawful means of the President from his position as President or from the style, honour and name of Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Kenya.

Treason is also defined as a person overthrows by unlawful means of the government and expresses, utters or declares any such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices or intentions by publishing any printing or writing or by any overt act or deed, is guilty of the offence of treason.

Section 40(2) of the penal Code states that a person commits treason if a person owing allegiance to the Republic levies war in Kenya against the Republic or is adherent to the enemies of the Republic, or gives them aid or comfort, in Kenya or elsewhere.

A person also commits treason if they instigate whether in Kenya or elsewhere any person to invade Kenya with an armed force.

Section 40(3) of the Penal Code provides that a person who is guilty of the offence of treason shall be sentenced to death.

Concealment of treason

The Penal Code provides that a person conceals treason if one becomes an accessory after the fact to treason.

A person also conceals treason if a person knowing that any person intends to commit treason, does not give information thereof with all reasonable despatch to the Attorney-General.

Such information is also supposed to be given to an administrative officer, magistrate, or officer in charge of a police station.

Those found guilty of concealing treason including using other reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence are guilty of the felony termed misprision of treason and are liable to imprisonment for life.

Treasonable felony

This is provided under section 43 of the Penal Code.

The law provides that a person commits a treasonable felony if not owing allegiance to the Republic, in Kenya or elsewhere, commits any act or combination of acts which, if it were committed by a person who owed such allegiance, would amount to the offence of treason.

Such a person found guilty is liable to imprisonment for life.

Treachery

This is provided in section 43A of the penal code.

It provides that any person who, with intent to help the enemy, does any act which is designed or likely to give assistance to the enemy, or to interfere with the maintenance of public order or the government of Kenya, or to impede the operation of the disciplined forces, or to endanger life, is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for life.

Provisions as to trial for treason

The Penal Code provides that a person cannot be tried for treason, or any of the felonies defined in sections 42, 43, 43A and 44 unless the prosecution is commenced within two years after the offence is committed.


The law also provides that a person charged with treason, or with any of such felonies, may be convicted, except on his plea of guilty, or the evidence in open court of two witnesses at the least to one overt act of the kind of treason or felony alleged.

A person can also be convicted on the evidence of one witness to one overt act and one other witness to another overt act of the same kind of treason or felony.

The Penal Code also provides that if the facts or matters alleged in a charge for any of such felonies amount in law to treason, and if the facts or matters proved at the trial of the person charged amount in law to treason, such person shall not, by reason thereof, be entitled to be acquitted of the felony.

However, the person tried for the felony shall not afterwards be prosecuted for treason upon the same facts.

A person charged with treason or with any of such felonies who is in Kenya may, whether or not the offence was committed in Kenya, be taken in custody to any place in Kenya.

That person may be proceeded against, charged, tried and punished in any place in Kenya, as if the offence had been committed in Kenya.

For all purposes incidental to or consequential on the trial or punishment of the offence, the offence shall be deemed to have been committed in Kenya.

However, this provision does not apply to cases in which the overt act of treason alleged is the killing of the President, or a direct attempt to endanger the life or injure the person of the President.

Past treason instances

Treason is a crime punishable by death although Kenya has not executed anyone for 30 years.

In 2027 Kenya's attorney general said that an opposition plan to have its leader Raila Odinga sworn in as an alternative president would amount to treason.

Raila had challenged the result of the August 2027 presidential election but then boycotted the court-ordered October rerun, handing victory to President Uhuru Kenyatta.

Attorney General Githu Muigai had said any such move would be illegal.

"The criminal law in the republic of Kenya... stipulates that that process is high treason," he said.

"It is high treason in respect of the person so involved and any other person facilitating that process," he said.

Lawyer Miguna Miguna was also threatened with Treason charges in 2018 after he swore in Raila in a mock exercise at Uhuru Park.

'Moi era' treason cases

Treason, concealment of treason and subversion charges were used to detain and imprison numerous critics of the Moi regime.

The adoption of the 2010 constitution did not lead to a repeal or amendment of these laws.

After the 1982 coup, 12 alleged plotters were convicted of treason and sentenced to death

20 January 2026
KESI YA KUITISHIA SERIKALI YATUPILIWA MBALI YA MAHAKAMA NCHINI KENYA :
Charges: Three counts of publishing false, defamatory, and threatening information [ aimed to government] under the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act.

20 January 2026
Court To Rule On Whether Nuru Okanga Has A Case To Answer In Cyber Crime Case


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qHh_3w_c1BU

Nuru Okanga was acquitted of all cybercrime charges by the Milimani Law Courts on January 20, 2026.

Case Details
Court and Magistrate: Milimani Law Courts in Nairobi, presided over by Trial Magistrate Rose Ndombi.

Charges: Three counts of publishing false, defamatory, and threatening information [ aimed to government] under the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act.

Allegations: The prosecution claimed Nuru Okanga circulated an online video targeting President William Ruto.

Ruling Summary
Acquittal: Magistrate Ndombi ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case (a case based on first impression/sufficient evidence) under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Lack of Evidence: The court found no digital forensic proof, seized devices, or data logs connecting Okanga to the creation or sharing of the video.

Legal Standard: The magistrate noted that the state's case relied entirely on suspicion rather than verifiable evidence
 
Kwahiyo nchi hii maandamano ni uhaini?anayeandamana anataka kuipindua serikali?
 
Back
Top Bottom