Kwanini Nchi nyingi zenye asili ya Uislam zinakumbwa na Vita sana?

Kwanini Nchi nyingi zenye asili ya Uislam zinakumbwa na Vita sana?

Nchi nyingi zenye mlengo wa uislamu au majimbo mengi ya nchi yenye mlengo wa uislamu uwa ni kitovu cha ugaidi na maeneo hayo usifika kwa kuzalisha makundi mengi ya Kigaidi.

Sisemi tu kwa sababu nasema bali nasema kwa sababu zipo nadharia nyingi zinazoonesha kuwa ni kweli maeneo hayo ukumbwa na matukio ya kigaidi ama Vita.

Hata Tanzania miaka kadhaa ya nyuma kulikuwa na tetesi za matukio ya kigaidi maeneo ya Kibiti na jirani na maeneo hayo ambayo kwa wingi ukaliwa na watu wa Dini ya uislamu kitendo kilichopelekea Jeshi la Tanzania kuwekeza nguvu huko Kibiti na kutokomeza ugaidi huo ambao ulikuwa umeanza kumea katika maeneo hayo ya pwani ya Tanzania. Hata kijana mmoja wa kitanzania mwenye mlengo wa Dini ya kiislamu aliwahi kukamatwa Kenya akitumikia kikundi cha kigaidi cha Al-Shabab.

Ukiachilia mbali hayo, Duniani ukitamka neno ugaidi alafu ukasema tutajie dini yenye kuhusishwa na ugaidi moja kwa moja hata mtoto atakutajia Uislamu. Na hii ni kwa sababu Watu wote wanaokamatwa katika matukio hayo basi ujinasibu kama wanapigania Dini ama maslahi yao ya kidini. Ukiachilia mbali kupigania Dini au Maslahi ya Kidini. Nchi hizo hizo au maeneo hayo hayo yamekuwa yakikumbwa na Mapinduzi ya kijeshi na watu hao wakitaka kusimika dola la kiislamu.

Alikadharika maeneo hayo uwa yanakumbwa na vurugu za kivita za mara kwa mara.

Hapa Afrika ukitoa Congo DRC tu ambayo haina waislamu wengi, nchi nyingi zilizobaki zenye vita za mara kwa mara maeneo hayo yenye vita ukaliwa na waislamu kwa idadi kubwa.

Ukanda wote wa Sahel, yani kusini mwa mpaka wa jangwa la Sahara, nchi kama Sudan, Niger, Mali, Burkinafaso, Chad na nyinginezo na nchi zinazokumbwa na vikundi vya kigaidi mara kwa mara. Na ni nchi zenye uislamu mwingi na kama unavyoona zinapakana na nchi za waarabu wa kiafrika ambazo kwa asilimia 90 raia wa nchi hizo ni waislamu.
View attachment 2943395
Nigeria pia ni miongoni mwa nchi inayokumbwa na matukio ya kigaidi sana hususani Maeneo ya kaskazini ya nchi hiyo ambayo ukaliwa na waislamu wengi. Nchini Nigeria wakristo wengi wanapatikana Kusini katika majiji kama Lagos, na Abuja, na waislamu wengi upatikana maeneo ya Kaskazini mwa nchi ambayo mara nyingi majimbo ya Maeneo hayo uongozwa kwa Sheria za kiislamu, pia nadhani juzi kati katika mfungo wa ramadhani watu wa maeneo hayo walikamatwa kwa kutokufunga Mfungo wa Ramadhani na waliadhibiwa. Maeneo hayo hayo ndio kituo cha Kundi la Boko Haram na vikundi vingine vya namna hiyo.

Tukiama barani Afrika tukaamia bara la Asia ukanda ya Middle East (Mashariki ya Kati) ambapo ndiko uislamu umeanzia huko ndiko kuna vikundi vingi vya kigaidi, na karibia kila nchi ina vikundi vyake. Nadhani wengi mnavifahamu vikundi kama Hamas kilichoishambulia Israel na kuteka na kuua watu katika tamasha la mziki, na kupeleka vita ambayo imeigharimu ardhi ya Palestina ukanda wa Gaza. Vilevile haikupita miezi mingi kuna kikundi kutoka Yemen nacho kinaitwa Hauthi kikaanza kulipa mashambulizi kwa kupiga meli zinazopita ukanda wa bahari ya sham bila kujali kuwa anaepigwa ni raia wa nchi gani.

Ukiachilia mzozo huo wa Israel na maadui zake, hakuna asiyejua kundi la kigaidi lenye mlengo wa kiislamu lililotikisa Dunia kwa matukio ya kutisha kwa kuchinja, kupiga risasi au kujitoa Mhanga. Hii ya kujitoa mhanga ikapelekea Waislamu hasa waliojifunika mwili mzima kuogopwa sana kuhisi labda wamebeba mabomu ya kujitoa mhanga. Chini ya Osama Bin Laden, kundi hili liliisumbua Dunia hasa Marekani kwa kuipa Jeraha lisilosahaulika la Septemba 11.

Kwa kifupi huko Middle East (Mashariki ya Kati) kuna vikundi vingi sana vya kigaidi, vingine vinakuwaga vimelala tu, vinakuwa (Inactive) lakini viko tayari kwa mashambulizi. Na vikundi hivi ndivyo vinafanya Dola za kiislamu zinaendelea kusimama na sheria kali za kiislamu zifatwe, mfano moja wapo ni Kundi la Taliban kutokea pale Afghanistan ambalo baada ya kushika dola tu likaweka sheria kali za kiislamu ikiwemo wanafunzi kusoma madarasa kwa kuzingatia jinsia mpaka chuo kikuu yani mtoto wa kike na wakiume kila mtu darasa lake.

Kundi jingine la Kigaidi ni kundi la ISIS yani Islamic State. Kundi hili juzi kati limekiri kupiga Tukio pale Russia kwa kumimina Risasi katika Mall moja pale Moscow kwenye tamasha la mziki na kuua watu zaidi ya 150 na kuchoma jengo kwa vilipuzi. Lakini Rais wa Russia Vladimir Putin hajawaacha salama, kawadaka watu kadhaa ambao wanahusika na tukio hilo ambao wengi wao wanasema wamekodiwa kutokea nchi ya Uturuki ambayo ni yenye mlengo wa kiislamu.

Kwa ufupi makundi haya ni mengi sana na yana uhusiano wa moja kwa moja, kwa sababu mengi yanakuwa na link au uhusiano.

Kwani ndugu zetu waislamu mnapokuwa mnafundishwa Dini uwa mnapewa maelezo gani yanayowatia baadhi yenu mioyo ya kikatili, kutaka kumwaga Damu?
waislamu ndio wanaoonewa sana
 
Mzee wa vibonzo ,ukweli ndio huo dini inayotambua mashoga haswa viongozi wake ,papa ndio kaanzisha dini hiyo🤣🤣
4011164bf1a42c85c53e57ed883d76ac.jpg

Mud aliliwa mpaka na mbwa
 
Actually, even though Muhammad claimed homosexuality was wrong, he himself was involved in homosexual behavior.

Sunan Abi Dawud 52
Narrated Usayd ibn Huday
Abdur Rahman ibn AbuLayla, quoting Usayd ibn Hudayr, a man of the Ansar, said that while he was given to jesting and was talking to the people and making them laugh, the Prophet poked him under the ribs with a stick. He said: Let me take retaliation. He said: Take retaliation. He said: You are wearing a shirt but I am not. The Prophet then raised his shirt and the man embraced him and began to kiss his side. Then he said: This is what I wanted, Messenger of Alla

A man kissing Muhammad's bare ches
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 27
Narrated 'Aisha

"Zaid bin Harithah arrived in Al-Madinah while the Messenger of Allah was in his house. So he went and knocked at the door, so the Messenger of Allah stood naked, dragging his garment - and by Allah! I did not see him naked before nor afterwards - and he hugged him and kissed him

Naked Muhammad kissing another man

Muhammad was a pedophile and a homosexual.
 
Actually, even though Muhammad claimed homosexuality was wrong, he himself was involved in homosexual behavior.

Sunan Abi Dawud 52
Narrated Usayd ibn Huday
Abdur Rahman ibn AbuLayla, quoting Usayd ibn Hudayr, a man of the Ansar, said that while he was given to jesting and was talking to the people and making them laugh, the Prophet poked him under the ribs with a stick. He said: Let me take retaliation. He said: Take retaliation. He said: You are wearing a shirt but I am not. The Prophet then raised his shirt and the man embraced him and began to kiss his side. Then he said: This is what I wanted, Messenger of Alla

A man kissing Muhammad's bare ches
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 27
Narrated 'Aisha

"Zaid bin Harithah arrived in Al-Madinah while the Messenger of Allah was in his house. So he went and knocked at the door, so the Messenger of Allah stood naked, dragging his garment - and by Allah! I did not see him naked before nor afterwards - and he hugged him and kissed him

Naked Muhammad kissing another man

Muhammad was a pedophile and a homosexual.
Waanzilishi wa ukristo pale vatican wote mashoga🤣🤣
 
Waanzilishi wa ukristo pale vatican wote mashoga🤣🤣
Hizo ngonjera tu. We kafiri
Lete maamndiko kwenye bible kama ninavyoleta kwenye qurani

Muhammad had proposed that his adopted-son Zayd marry Zaynab (Quran 33:36).

Muhammad sees Zaynab naked and becomes attracted to Zayna

Muhammad causes the divorce of Zayd and Zaynab due to Muhammad lusting after Zayna


Quran 33:37
Muhammad marries Zayna

It wasn’t even an appropriate marriage to the Arabs in the 7th Century who had complained about it which resulted in Muhammad abolishing adoption in Isla

That meant that Muhammad could then keep Zaynab as a Wife & that Zayd would no longer be regarded as the adopted-son of Muhamma

Muhammad then sent Zayd on a suicide mission to lead a Muslim Army to fight the Roman Byzantines in Jordan where Zayd would be killed in Battle.d.m.b.b.b.



Defend with verses from bible. Your prophet was a satyriasis.
 
Actually,

A Lying Prophet


'And Elisha said unto him, Go, say unto him, "Thou mayest certainly recover": howbeit the LORD hath shewed me that he shall surely die.'


– 2 Kings 8.10.
 




Father of Lies?


"All scripture is given by inspiration of God"

– 2 Timothy 3.16.


"And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie."
– 2 Thessalonians 2.11
 


Deception


Thus by small steps a complex weave of fantasy is woven. As indeed the Church Fathers cheerfully admit:


"I will only mention the Apostle Paul. ... He, then, if anyone, ought to be calumniated; we should speak thus to him: ‘The proofs which you have used against the Jews and against other heretics bear a different meaning in their own contexts to that which they bear in your Epistles.

We see passages taken captive by your pen and pressed into service to win you a victory, which in volumes from which they are taken have no controversial bearing at all ... the line so often adopted by strong men in controversy – of justifying the means by the result."

– St. Jerome, Epistle to Pammachus (xlviii, 13; N&PNF. vi, 72-73)


Was Saint Paul an unabashed liar? From this verse in Romans it would appear so:


"For if the truth of God hath more abounded by my lie unto his glory, why yet am I also adjudged a sinner?" – St. Paul, Romans 3.7.


However in context Paul is actually censuring other Christians who say "Let us do evil, that good may come" (that is, from God's judgement). But like Paul we can "take the passage captive" to make a point.
 
Wanavihere mswedeee na hawashauriki, wanalipiza jema kwa baya wanavinyongo ,utu zerooo,
 


Luminaries of Deception



Jerome is not alone in his candour. Bishop Eusebius, the official propagandist for Constantine, entitles the 32nd Chapter of his 12th Book of Evangelical Preparation:


"How it may be Lawful and Fitting to use Falsehood as a Medicine, and for the Benefit of those who Want to be Deceived."


Eusebius
is notoriously the author of a great many falsehoods – but then he does warn us in his infamous history:


"We shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity."

– Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 8, chapter 2.


Clement of Alexandria
was one of the earliest of the Church Fathers to draw a distinction between "mere human truth" and the higher truth of faith:


"Not all true things are the truth, nor should that truth which merely seems true according to human opinions be preferred to the true truth, that according to the faith."

– Clement (quoted by M. Smith, Clement of Alexandria, p446)


John Chrysostom, 5th century theologian and erstwhile bishop of Constantinople, is another:


"Do you see the advantage of deceit? ...

For great is the value of deceit, provided it be not introduced with a mischievous intention. In fact action of this kind ought not to be called deceit, but rather a kind of good management, cleverness and skill, capable of finding out ways where resources fail, and making up for the defects of the mind ...

And often it is necessary to deceive, and to do the greatest benefits by means of this device, whereas he who has gone by a straight course has done great mischief to the person whom he has not deceived."


– Chrysostom, Treatise On The Priesthood, Book 1.
 



'Golden Mouth' John is notable for his extensive commentaries on the Bible which emphasized a literal understanding of the stories; the style popular at Alexandria until then was to acknowledge an allegorical meaning of the text.


Thus eminent ‘believers’ added falsehood to the beliefs of later generations. ‘For the best of reasons’ they ‘clarified’ obscure points, conjured up characters to speak dialogue that could have been said, invented scenarios that could have happened, borrowed extensively from a wider culture. And this all before they became the custodians of power and had real reasons for lies, inventions and counterfeits. As we shall see, god’s immutable laws became as flexible as putty.


The 5th and 6th centuries was the 'golden age' of Christian forgery. In a moment of shocking candour, the Manichean bishop (and opponent of Augustine) Faustus said:


"Many things have been inserted by our ancestors in the speeches of our Lord which, though put forth under his name, agree not with his faith; especially since – as already it has been often proved – these things were written not by Christ, nor [by] his apostles, but a long while after their assumption, by I know not what sort of half Jews, not even agreeing with themselves, who made up their tale out of reports and opinions merely, and yet, fathering the whole upon the names of the apostles of the Lord or on those who were supposed to follow the apostles, they maliciously pretended that they had written their lies and conceits according to them."


In the ferocious battle for adherents, the propagandists sought to outdo each other at every turn. One example: by the 5th century, four very different endings existed to Mark's gospel. Codex Bobiensis ends Mark at verse 16:8, without any post-crucifixion appearances; it lacks both the 'short conclusion' (of Jesus sending followers to 'east and west') or the 'long conclusion' – the fabulous post-death apparitions, where Jesus promises his disciples that they will be immune to snake bites and poison.


Once the Church had grabbed mastery of much of Europe and the middle-east, its forgery engine went into overdrive.


'The Church forgery mill did not limit itself to mere writings but for centuries cranked out thousands of phony "relics" of its "Lord," "Apostles" and "Saints" … There were at least 26 'authentic' burial shrouds scattered throughout the abbeys of Europe, of which the Shroud of Turin is just one … At one point, a number of churches claimed the one foreskin of Jesus, and there were enough splinters of the "True Cross" that Calvin said the amount of wood would make "a full load for a good ship." '

– Acharya S, The Christ Conspiracy.
 


Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556), the tireless zealot for papal authority – he was the founder of the Society of Jesus (the Jesuits) – even wrote:


"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."


The Reformation may have swept away some abuses perpetrated by the priesthood but lying was not one of them. Martin Luther, in private correspondence, argued:


"What harm would it do, if a man told a good strong lie for the sake of the good and for the Christian church ... a lie out of necessity, a useful lie, a helpful lie, such lies would not be against God, he would accept them."

– Martin Luther (Cited by his secretary, in a letter in Max Lenz, ed., Briefwechsel Landgraf Phillips des Grossmüthigen von Hessen mit Bucer, vol. I.)
 
Yesu: aliyeniona Mimi, amemwona Mungu. (Yohana 14:5-9).
Maneno haya aliyotamka Yesu, hakuna mwanadamu yeyote wala malaika wala kerubi wala serafi awezaye kujitamkia, isipokuwa Mungu tu.

Kimsingi Yesu alikuwa akisema: unavyoniona Mimi hapa, ndiye Mungu hasa niliye katika sura na umbile la kibinadamu.

Kabla ya maneno haya kutamkwa, Tomaso alikuwa amemuuliza Yesu swali: ^Bwana, sisi hatujui uendako; nasi twaijuaje njia?^ (aya ya 5).

Jibu la Yesu linaonesha uhusiano Wake na Baba ukoje: Mimi ndiye njia, kweli na uzima; mtu haji kwa Baba, ila kwa njia ya Mimi.

Siyo tu kwamba Yesu ni njia na kweli ya kutufikisha kwa Baba, bali hapa anatamka kwamba Yeye ndiye uzima kwa vile ndiye Muumbaji! (Mwanzo 2:7).

Isingeleta mantiki yoyote hata kidogo kudai hivyo kwamba Yeye ni njia, kweli na uzima iwapo angekuwa Mtume tu wa Mungu!

Akaongeza: ^Kama mngalinijua Mimi, mngalimjua na Baba; tangu sasa mnamjua, tena mmemwona.^
“Filipo akamwambia, Bwana, tuonyeshe Baba, nasi yatutosha. Baba; nawe wasemaje basi, Utuonyeshe Baba?

Yohana 14:8-9
Pamoja na maneno hayo ya Kristu, yasiyokuwa na chembe ya mashaka yoyote kwamba Yeye ni nani, bado Filipo akarudia swali la msisitizo:

^Bwana, utuoneshe Baba, yatutosha!^

Ni kama vile alikuwa akimwambia Yesu:

^Bwana, iwapo unazungumzia kumjua au kumwona Mungu kupitia matendo Yako, hilo mbona tunalifahamu vizuri sana. Tunachotaka sisi ni kumwona Mungu kabisa jinsi alivyo, yukoje, Yeye ni nani!^

Hii ni kweli, hasa ikizingatiwa kwamba wanafunzi hao walikuwa pamoja na Kristu muda wote, walijua historia Yake na kwamba watu wengine wote walimtambua kama nabii wa Mungu.

Maswali ya Tomaso na Filipo yasingeleta maana yoyote iwapo walikuwa tu wakiuliza kuhusu utendaji wa Mungu.

Kwamba walitaka kuoneshwa matendo ya Mungu kupitia Yesu, wakati walikuwa wameshuhudia muda wote huduma Zake mbalimbali za huruma na upendo pamoja na miujiza Yake?

Ukweli ni kwamba maswali haya ya Tomaso na Filipo ni sawa na lile la Musa alipomwomba Mungu akisema, ^Nakusihi unioneshe utukufu Wako^ (Kutoka 33:18), ambapo akajibiwa, ^Huwezi kuniona uso Wangu, maana mwanadamu hataniona akaishi.^

Ni wazi kwamba Musa alitaka kumwona Mungu katika uhalisia Wake, vivyo hivyo na Tomaso na Filipo. Musa alioneshwa wema wa Mungu, huku wale wanafunzi wakioneshwa Kristo Mwenyewe!

^Filipo akamwambia, Bwana, utuoneshe Baba, yatutosha. Yesu akamwambia, Mimi nimekuwapo pamoja nanyi siku hizi zote, wewe usinijue, Filipo? Aliyeniona Mimi amemwona Baba; basi wewe wasemaje, Utuoneshe Baba? Husadiki kwamba Mimi ni ndani ya Baba, na Baba yu ndani Yangu?^ (Yohana 14:8-10a).

Yesu alikuwa anatuambia tu kwamba matendo yake mwenyewe na miujiza inapaswa kuwa uthibitisho wa kutosha wa kuwepo kwa Mungu bila Mungu kushuka kimwili na kujiruhusu kuonekana kila wakati mtu ana shaka.
Majibu yaleyale ambayo Yesu aliwaambia wanafunzi katika Yohana 14, ndiyo aliwaambia Wayahudi waliotaka kujua Yeye ni nani hasa (Yohana 10:24-38):

^Hata lini utatuhangaisha nafsi zetu? Kama Wewe ndiye Kristo, utuambie waziwazi.^

Wayahudi walikuwa wakifahamu vyema unabii waliosoma katika Agano la Kale kumhusu Kristu. Mathalani:

Isaya 9:6 ^Maana kwa ajili yetu Mtoto amezaliwa, Tumepewa Mtoto mwanamume; Na uweza wa kifalme utakuwa begani Mwake; Naye ataitwa jina Lake Mshauri wa ajabu, Mungu mwenye nguvu, Baba wa milele, Mfalme wa amani.^

Isaya 7:14 ^Kwa hiyo Bwana Mwenyewe atawapa ishara. Tazama, bikira atachukua mimba, atazaa Mtoto mwanamume, Naye atamwita jina Lake Imanueli.^

Si ajabu Yesu alipowaambia Yeye ndiye alitabiriwa katika unabii kabla hajafanyika mwanadamu, wakaokota mawe ili kumpiga (kwa sababu Wayahudi wengi hawakuamini kwamba Yeye ndiye alikuwa Masihi!)

Zingatia baadhi ya maneno aliyotamka Kristu hapa, yanayoonesha Yeye ni zaidi ya mwanadamu na malaika:

^Nami nawapa uzima wa milele^ (aya ya 28). Ni Mungu pekee ndiye awezaye kutupatia uhai au kuuondoa.

^Mimi na Baba tu umoja^ (aya ya 30). Ndiyo maana Yesu anaitwa Mwana pekee (the only begotten Son). Maneno ya Kiyunani ni monogenes, yenye maana ya mwenye asili ileile sawa Naye!

Kama unadhani Wayahudi hawakuelewa kile ambacho Yesu Kristu alikuwa akiwaambia juu ya uhusiano Wake na Baba, hebu zingatia maneno yao:

^Kwa ajili ya kazi njema hatukupigi kwa mawe; bali kwa kukufuru, na kwa sababu Wewe uliye mwanadamu wajifanya Mwenyewe u Mungu.^ (aya ya 33).

Ni wazi hapa Yesu alikuwa akiwaambia kwamba Yeye ndiye Mungu hasa! Na wala siyo kwamba matendo Yake tu ndiyo yalikuwa sawa na yale ya Mungu!

Ikiwa tunataka kusisitiza kwamba wakati Filipo alipomwona Yesu (AS), alikuwa amemwona Mungu "Baba" kimwili kwa sababu Yesu "ndiye" Baba na wote wawili ni "Utatu," na Yesu ni "mwili" wa Mungu, basi. hii itatulazimisha kuhitimisha kuwa Yohana 1:18, 1 Yoh 4:12, Yoh 5:37..nk. yote ni uongo.
Ujio wa Yesu duniani katika sura na umbile la mwanadamu ni sawa kabisa na vile ambavyo Mungu aliwatokea manabii, mitume na watu Wake zamani katika maumbile mbalimbali kama vile malaika, nk. (Waamuzi 13:20-22; 6:11-23).

Mungu anaweza kujivika sura ya nafsi yoyote au kitu chochote. Kule jangwani, Mungu alimtokea Musa katika kichaka kilichokuwa kinawaka moto bila kuteketea (Kutoka 3:1-6).

Yesu ni Mungu katika umbile la kibinadamu. Asili Yake ya uungu ilisitirika katika ubinadamu. Katika umbile hili ndipo wanafunzi Wake waliweza kumwona Mungu.

Hawakuishia kuona matendo tu ya Mungu, bali walimwona Mungu Mwenyewe hasa!

^Hapo mwanzo alikuwepo Neno, Naye Neno alikuwa kwa Mungu, Naye Neno alikuwa Mungu.

Huyo mwanzo alikuwepo kwa Mungu. Vyote vilifanyika kupitia Huyo; wala pasipo Yeye hakikufanyika chochote kilichofanyika.

Ndani Yake ndimo ulimokuwa uzima, nao ule uzima ulikuwa nuru ya watu.

Naye Neno akafanyika mwili, akakaa kwetu; nasi tukauona utukufu Wake, utukufu kama wa Mwana pekee atokaye kwa Baba; amejaa neema na kweli.^ (Yohana 1:1-4, 14).
 
Back
Top Bottom