Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

[masoud mshahara]

After this scenario what happened to Paul then?

Paulo ndio nani kijana Tunajadili mambo ya maana hapa?

 

[2013]

Why Paul should not be trusted

Paul never met Jesus in his life.

This is one of the main reasons to not trust and believe in Paul.

Before his self-claimed apostleship, his name was Saul and he used to be a murderer of the true believers.

On the road to Damascus, while on assignment to harass the true believers, he claims to have seen a vision of Christ, after which, he claimed, that Jesus gave him the authority to teach in his name.

There are many problems here.

Since he never met Jesus, common sense says that he has nothing to do with the religion and when we read what he has to say, we find that he really has nothing to do with the true religion of Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him).

Lets take a look at Paul’s vision as he describes it to various different people of different races.

1. In ACTS 9:3, it is stated that only Paul fell to the ground on seeing the light. Verse 7 says that others with him stood speechless.

2. ACTS 26:14 says they ALL fell to the ground.

3. ACTS 9:7 states that the people who journeyed with Paul didn't see anyone but heard a voice.

4. ACTS 22:9 says that those who were with Paul saw the light but DID NOT hear the voice of the speaker.


The above are clear contradictions and any man would immediately reject Paul completely after reading these verses.

If these are just clear lies and Paul has forgotten where he said what, then it is nothing more than his stupidity but if he is deliberately using this technique to tell different stories to different people, then this technique is still yet present.

Such a technique has laid a very important base of the Church i.e. adopt an approach that suits the person.

Festivals like Christmas; Halloween etc have nothing to do with Christianity but the Church has introduced them into it following the footsteps of Paul.

"But be it so, I did not burden you nevertheless, being crafty, I CAUGHT YOU WITH GUILE."
(2 CORINTHIANS 12:16)

…and with it, he lies again,

1 Thess. 2:3
"For the appeal we make does not spring from error or impure motives, nor are we trying to trick you."

“I say the truth in Christ, I lie not"
(Rom. 9:1, 1 Tim. 2:7)

1. Although commonly assumed, it is not certain that Paul never saw Jesus during Jesus’ earthly ministry, because this is a conclusion mostly based on silence.

It is true that Paul does not often talk about the historical Jesus in the New Testament. But this does not mean he was unconcerned with the life of Jesus.

After seeing the risen Jesus, Paul went to visit Peter for fifteen days (Gal. 1:18). Paul learned about the historical Jesus while sitting under the authority of Peter.

In fact, the word Paul uses for his meeting with Peter is historeo, the very Greek word from which the English word history derives.
He was keenly interested in the historical Jesus.

Paul talking more about Jesus’ life in his letters. Most notably in the book of
1 Corinthians where he paraphrases Jesus’ words or discusses Jesus’ life a total of six times.

In addition, some of the accounts Paul relays about Jesus’ life indicate that he knew much more that he did not say in his letters, such as the words “on the night he was betrayed” (1 Cor. 11:23 NIV).
One could hardly imagine that Paul would say these words without knowing what actually did happen on the night Jesus was betrayed. Yet Paul never actually talks about the details in his letters.



2. According to grammar of the New Tastement and to make the long story short.;

In Act 9:7 Luke is narrating an event in Greek;

in Act 22:9 Paul is speaking to a crowd in Hebrew (or Aramaic).

There is solid base that, Paul meant was that THE MEN HEARD A SOUND BUT DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE VOICE WAS SAVING.

In Acts 9:7, “HEARING VOICE,” the noun “voice’ is in the partitive genitive case [i.e., hearing (something) of], whereas in Act 22:9, “THE HEARD NOT THE VOICE,” the construction is with the accusative. This removes the idea of any contradiction.

The former indicates a HEARING of the sound, the latter indicates the THE MEANING OR MASSAGE OF THE VOICE (this they did not hear).

“The former denotes the sensational perception, the latter (the accusative case) the thing perceived.” (Cremer).

Even In John 5:25, 28, the genitive case is used, indicating a “sensational perception” that the Lord’s voice is sounding; in 3:8, of hearing the wind, the accusative is used, stressing “the thing perceive

Case closed.

 

[masoud mshahara]

1. Although commonly assumed, it is not certain that Paul never saw Jesus during Jesus’ earthly ministry, because this is a conclusion mostly based on silence.

It is true that Paul does not often talk about the historical Jesus in the New Testament. But this does not mean he was unconcerned with the life of Jesus.

After seeing the risen Jesus, Paul went to visit Peter for fifteen days (Gal. 1:18). Paul learned about the historical Jesus while sitting under the authority of Peter.

In fact, the word Paul uses for his meeting with Peter is historeo, the very Greek word from which the English word history derives.
He was keenly interested in the historical Jesus.

Paul talking more about Jesus’ life in his letters. Most notably in the book of
1 Corinthians where he paraphrases Jesus’ words or discusses Jesus’ life a total of six times.

In addition, some of the accounts Paul relays about Jesus’ life indicate that he knew much more that he did not say in his letters, such as the words “on the night he was betrayed” (1 Cor. 11:23 NIV).
One could hardly imagine that Paul would say these words without knowing what actually did happen on the night Jesus was betrayed. Yet Paul never actually talks about the details in his letters.


2. According to grammar of the New Tastement, Is is simply to say;

In Act 9:7 Luke is narrating an event in Greek;

in Act 22:9 Paul is speaking to a crowd in Hebrew (or Aramaic).

There is solid base that, Paul meant was that THE MEN HEARD A SOUND BUT DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE VOICE WAS SAVING.

In Acts 9:7, “HEARING VOICE,” the noun “voice’ is in the partitive genitive case [i.e., hearing (something) of], whereas in Act 22:9, “THE HEARD NOT THE VOICE,” the construction is with the accusative. This removes the idea of any contradiction.

The former indicates a HEARING of the sound, the latter indicates the THE MEANING OR MASSAGE OF THE VOICE (this they did not hear).

“The former denotes the sensational perception, the latter (the accusative case) the thing perceived.” (Cremer).

Even In John 5:25, 28, the genitive case is used, indicating a “sensational perception” that the Lord’s voice is sounding; in 3:8, of hearing the wind, the accusative is used, stressing “the thing perceive

Case closed.

Ahahahahaahahaahaha mkuu uoni aibu kabisa kutetea uongo Ahahahahaaaahqa daah

 

[2013]

Ahahahahaahahaahaha mkuu uoni aibu kabisa kutetea uongo Ahahahahaaaahqa daah

PAUL, THE JEWISH LAW AND AUTHORITY OF THE DISCIPLES
.

It is true that Paul had an argument with Peter, as recorded in Galatians 2:11–14, but it is important to read the context. Paul informs us that shortly after his conversion, he went to Peter and stayed with him for fifteen days. After sitting under Peter and at times James the brother of Jesus, Paul went from city to city proclaiming the gospel for fourteen years. Then, to make sure he was still preaching according to the disciples’ teaching, he traveled back to Jerusalem and submitted his preaching to the disciples. After hearing him, Peter, James, and John gave him their approval and sent him on his way back to Antioch saying that he should preach to the Gentiles while they preached to the Jews in Jerusalem. All the while, Paul refers to the disciples as “pillars” of the church and those of “high esteem” (Gal. 2:6, 9 NIV). 


The argument only occurs when Peter was placed in a new situation and, so as not to offend some
people, he acted with double standards. Leaving Jerusalem, where he was a preacher to the Jews and the church was full of believers from Jewish backgrounds, Peter traveled to Antioch in Syria, “the headquarters of Gentile Christianity.”

Although the law of the Jews forbade them from eating with Gentiles, Peter was willing to eat with the Gentiles because he no longer considered the law binding (Gal. 2:12; cf. Acts 10; 15:10–11). But when believers from a Jewish background came to Antioch from Jerusalem,

Peter did not want to offend them, so he stopped eating with the Gentiles. This, understandably, caused problems in Antioch, and Paul corrected Peter for his double standard.

Virtually none of this account fits with the common Muslim characterization of Paul. It was Paul who first went to Peter and stayed with him and James. Later, Paul submitted what he was teaching to the disciples and continued preaching only when he received their approval. These are not the actions of someone who is trying to subvert the church, but rather those of a man who is submitting himself to the authority of the disciples.


When it comes to the Jewish law, IT WAS PETER WHO GAVE HIS APPROVAL FOR PAUL TO BE A MINISTER TO THE GENTILES, AND IT WAS PETER WHO DID NOT CONSIDER CHRISTIANS TO BE UNDER THE LAW, such that he ate with the Gentiles. The only measure that Paul used to argue with Peter was Peter himself: Peter had been willing to eat with the Gentiles at one time but refused to do so at another. Paul never attempted to invoke any authority over Peter but questioned Peter by his own standards: “If you, being a Jew, live like Gentiles and not like Jews, how can you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?” (Gal. 2:14).


According to the book of Acts, it was Peter himself who inaugurated the preaching of the gospel to the Gentiles. The tenth chapter of Acts shares the story of Peter’s receiving a vision to preach to the Gentiles and then being led by God to Caesarea to do exactly that. While preaching to Cornelius and those with him, Peter says, “YOU ARE WELL AWARE THAT IT IS AGAINST OUR LAW FOR A JEW TO ASSOCIATE WITH OR VISIT A GENTILE. BUT GOD HAS SHOWN ME THAT I SHOULD NOT CALL ANYONE IMPURE OR UNCLEAN.
” (Acts 10:28 NIV). It was this encounter that Peter invoked in Acts 15:7–11 when Peter himself suggested that Gentiles not be bound by the law.


So Paul does not rebel against Peter and James. Rather, he submits to their authority. When there is need to correct Peter, Paul does not dare invoke his own authority but reminds Peter of his own standards. Finally, Paul is not the one who absolves Gentiles of following the law; that is Peter, the very disciple who ushered in the era of evangelizing the Gentiles.


#Get the strap

 

[mgen]

Mtume alilingania watu miaka mingi hiyo aya ni kwa ajili ya makaidi , ila wewe mgeni bado ujawa mkaidi unaelewa kuwa Mungu kamtuma Yesu, hivyo Mungu ni boss na Yesu ni mtumwa tu ahahahahhqhhahah

Kumbe kuna aya zime-expire [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji106] Thanks masudi wa ukaye [emoji4]

 

[masoud mshahara]

Kumbe kuna aya zime-expire [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji106] Thanks masudi wa ukaye [emoji4]

Hiyo inafanya kazi kwa makaidi , wewe ujafika level hizo bado wakusoma kabisa wewe ndio maana unakubali Mungu ndio boss na Yesu ndio mtumwa ahahahhaahahajaajajjaa kwa hili bado tunaimani na wewe

 

[masoud mshahara]

PAUL, THE JEWISH LAW AND AUTHORITY OF THE DISCIPLES
.

It is true that Paul had an argument with Peter, as recorded in Galatians 2:11–14, but it is important to read the context. Paul informs us that shortly after his conversion, he went to Peter and stayed with him for fifteen days. After sitting under Peter and at times James the brother of Jesus, Paul went from city to city proclaiming the gospel for fourteen years. Then, to make sure he was still preaching according to the disciples’ teaching, he traveled back to Jerusalem and submitted his preaching to the disciples. After hearing him, Peter, James, and John gave him their approval and sent him on his way back to Antioch saying that he should preach to the Gentiles while they preached to the Jews in Jerusalem. All the while, Paul refers to the disciples as “pillars” of the church and those of “high esteem” (Gal. 2:6, 9 NIV). 


The argument only occurs when Peter was placed in a new situation and, so as not to offend some
people, he acted with double standards. Leaving Jerusalem, where he was a preacher to the Jews and the church was full of believers from Jewish backgrounds, Peter traveled to Antioch in Syria, “the headquarters of Gentile Christianity.”

Although the law of the Jews forbade them from eating with Gentiles, Peter was willing to eat with the Gentiles because he no longer considered the law binding (Gal. 2:12; cf. Acts 10; 15:10–11). But when believers from a Jewish background came to Antioch from Jerusalem,

Peter did not want to offend them, so he stopped eating with the Gentiles. This, understandably, caused problems in Antioch, and Paul corrected Peter for his double standard.

Virtually none of this account fits with the common Muslim characterization of Paul. It was Paul who first went to Peter and stayed with him and James. Later, Paul submitted what he was teaching to the disciples and continued preaching only when he received their approval. These are not the actions of someone who is trying to subvert the church, but rather those of a man who is submitting himself to the authority of the disciples.


When it comes to the Jewish law, IT WAS PETER WHO GAVE HIS APPROVAL FOR PAUL TO BE A MINISTER TO THE GENTILES, AND IT WAS PETER WHO DID NOT CONSIDER CHRISTIANS TO BE UNDER THE LAW, such that he ate with the Gentiles. The only measure that Paul used to argue with Peter was Peter himself: Peter had been willing to eat with the Gentiles at one time but refused to do so at another. Paul never attempted to invoke any authority over Peter but questioned Peter by his own standards: “If you, being a Jew, live like Gentiles and not like Jews, how can you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?” (Gal. 2:14).


According to the book of Acts, it was Peter himself who inaugurated the preaching of the gospel to the Gentiles. The tenth chapter of Acts shares the story of Peter’s receiving a vision to preach to the Gentiles and then being led by God to Caesarea to do exactly that. While preaching to Cornelius and those with him, Peter says, “YOU ARE WELL AWARE THAT IT IS AGAINST OUT LAW FOR A JEW TO ASSOCIATE WITH OR VISIT A GENTILE. BUT GOD HAS SHOWN ME THAT I SHOULD NOT CALL ANYONE IMPURE OR UNCLEAN.
” (Acts 10:28 NIV). It was this encounter that Peter invoked in Acts 15:7–11 when Peter himself suggested that Gentiles not be bound by the law.


So Paul does not rebel against Peter and James. Rather, he submits to their authority. When there is need to correct Peter, Paul does not dare invoke his own authority but reminds Peter of his own standards. Finally, Paul is not the one who absolves Gentiles of following the law; that is Peter, the very disciple who ushered in the era of evangelizing the Gentiles.


#Get the strap

Mbona unaleta jumla jumla maandiko, tunataka tuone andiko lipi unaandika, usitupe kazi mara mbili mkuu tuna mambo mengi , yaani namna Paulo anavyotangaza kutokewa na Yesu ni mazingaombwe tupu, hili linatosha wewe kujiuliza mara mbili mbili ahahhaahhaahahahah Ahahhahahaahaaahah

 

[Gavana]

1. Although commonly assumed, it is not certain that Paul never saw Jesus during Jesus’ earthly ministry, because this is a conclusion mostly based on silence.

It is true that Paul does not often talk about the historical Jesus in the New Testament. But this does not mean he was unconcerned with the life of Jesus.

After seeing the risen Jesus, Paul went to visit Peter for fifteen days (Gal. 1:18). Paul learned about the historical Jesus while sitting under the authority of Peter.

In fact, the word Paul uses for his meeting with Peter is historeo, the very Greek word from which the English word history derives.
He was keenly interested in the historical Jesus.

Paul talking more about Jesus’ life in his letters. Most notably in the book of
1 Corinthians where he paraphrases Jesus’ words or discusses Jesus’ life a total of six times.

In addition, some of the accounts Paul relays about Jesus’ life indicate that he knew much more that he did not say in his letters, such as the words “on the night he was betrayed” (1 Cor. 11:23 NIV).
One could hardly imagine that Paul would say these words without knowing what actually did happen on the night Jesus was betrayed. Yet Paul never actually talks about the details in his letters.



2. According to grammar of the New Tastement and to make the long story short.;

In Act 9:7 Luke is narrating an event in Greek;

in Act 22:9 Paul is speaking to a crowd in Hebrew (or Aramaic).

There is solid base that, Paul meant was that THE MEN HEARD A SOUND BUT DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE VOICE WAS SAVING.

In Acts 9:7, “HEARING VOICE,” the noun “voice’ is in the partitive genitive case [i.e., hearing (something) of], whereas in Act 22:9, “THE HEARD NOT THE VOICE,” the construction is with the accusative. This removes the idea of any contradiction.

The former indicates a HEARING of the sound, the latter indicates the THE MEANING OR MASSAGE OF THE VOICE (this they did not hear).

“The former denotes the sensational perception, the latter (the accusative case) the thing perceived.” (Cremer).

Even In John 5:25, 28, the genitive case is used, indicating a “sensational perception” that the Lord’s voice is sounding; in 3:8, of hearing the wind, the accusative is used, stressing “the thing perceive

Case closed.

😛😛😛😛

 

[2013]

SUMMARIZING PAUL


There is little reason to doubt Paul’s sincerity.

He received his teaching from Peter, and he submitted to Peter’s authority. He followed Peter in teaching that the Gentiles did not need to follow the law, a corollary of Jesus’ teaching implicit in Matthew 5:17.

Even though Paul did not know Jesus during Jesus’ ministry, we can be confident that Paul learned about the historical Jesus from Peter and knew much that he did not mention in his letters.

The common Muslim assertion that Paul hijacked Christianity, imposed his own teachings, and corrupted the true religion not only goes against the BIBLICAL RECORDS but also is unwarranted from a HISTORICAL POINT OF VIEW and enjoys very little scholarly support.

 

[mgen]

Ahahahahaahahaahaha sio iwe, ni habari ya mamlaka(UTAWALA) tu Mungu ana pua kama lako ahahahaahahhaa Ahahhahahaahaaahah

MUNGU anayo Mamlaka wee HUNA [emoji350] [emoji344] NDIO Mwanadamu ameumbwa kwa Mfano, Mfano, mfano tu wa MUNGU [emoji106] bado hujaelewa "MFANO" [emoji350] [emoji344]

 

[Gavana]

1. Although commonly assumed, it is not certain that Paul never saw Jesus during Jesus’ earthly ministry, because this is a conclusion mostly based on silence.

It is true that Paul does not often talk about the historical Jesus in the New Testament. But this does not mean he was unconcerned with the life of Jesus.

After seeing the risen Jesus, Paul went to visit Peter for fifteen days (Gal. 1:18). Paul learned about the historical Jesus while sitting under the authority of Peter.

In fact, the word Paul uses for his meeting with Peter is historeo, the very Greek word from which the English word history derives.
He was keenly interested in the historical Jesus.

Paul talking more about Jesus’ life in his letters. Most notably in the book of
1 Corinthians where he paraphrases Jesus’ words or discusses Jesus’ life a total of six times.

In addition, some of the accounts Paul relays about Jesus’ life indicate that he knew much more that he did not say in his letters, such as the words “on the night he was betrayed” (1 Cor. 11:23 NIV).
One could hardly imagine that Paul would say these words without knowing what actually did happen on the night Jesus was betrayed. Yet Paul never actually talks about the details in his letters.



2. According to grammar of the New Tastement and to make the long story short.;

In Act 9:7 Luke is narrating an event in Greek;

in Act 22:9 Paul is speaking to a crowd in Hebrew (or Aramaic).

There is solid base that, Paul meant was that THE MEN HEARD A SOUND BUT DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE VOICE WAS SAVING.

In Acts 9:7, “HEARING VOICE,” the noun “voice’ is in the partitive genitive case [i.e., hearing (something) of], whereas in Act 22:9, “THE HEARD NOT THE VOICE,” the construction is with the accusative. This removes the idea of any contradiction.

The former indicates a HEARING of the sound, the latter indicates the THE MEANING OR MASSAGE OF THE VOICE (this they did not hear).

“The former denotes the sensational perception, the latter (the accusative case) the thing perceived.” (Cremer).

Even In John 5:25, 28, the genitive case is used, indicating a “sensational perception” that the Lord’s voice is sounding; in 3:8, of hearing the wind, the accusative is used, stressing “the thing perceive

Case closed.

Umetoa kutoka injili gani mpya??

 

[masoud mshahara]

MUNGU anayo Mamlaka wee HUNA [emoji350] [emoji344] NDIO Mwanadamu ameumbwa kwa Mfano, Mfano, mfano tu wa MUNGU [emoji106] bado hujaelewa "MFANO" [emoji350] [emoji344]

Mungu ni Roho , kijana awezi kuwa na jipua kama lako uelewe nini kilaza wewe, Mungu ni mtawala , hivyo akamuumba mtu nae atawale na huu ndio mfanano Ahahaahahaaaaha

 

[mgen]

Yesu ajawai kuita watu WAKRISTO ahahhahajajjajjajaajajajja hawa wanafunzi wanamzidi mwalimu wao Ahahhahahaahaaahah

mshahara hajawahi kumuita mtu masudi [emoji38] [emoji38]

 

[masoud mshahara]

SUMMARIZING PAUL


There is little reason to doubt Paul’s sincerity.

He received his teaching from Peter, and he submitted to Peter’s authority. He followed Peter in teaching that the Gentiles did not need to follow the law, a corollary of Jesus’ teaching implicit in Matthew 5:17.

Even though Paul did not know Jesus during Jesus’ ministry, we can be confident that Paul learned about the historical Jesus from Peter and knew much that he did not mention in his letters.

The common Muslim assertion that Paul hijacked Christianity, imposed his own teachings, and corrupted the true religion not only goes against the BIBLICAL RECORDS but also is unwarranted from a HISTORICAL POINT OF VIEW and enjoys very little scholarly support.

Paulo amjui Yesu anapataje ujasiri wa kumhoji mtu aliemuona Yesu? au kwa Yale maigizo yake yaliyo jaa utata kuwa katokewa na Yesu ? ndugu hamka Paulo ndio tatizo kuu kwenye huo mnaoita ukristo kabla ya ukristo wenyewe Ahahahahaahahaahaha

 

[masoud mshahara]

mshahara hajawahi kumuita mtu masudi [emoji38] [emoji38]

Ahahahahaahahaahaha sio kuniita tu hata jina kanipa mshahara na cheti cha kuzaliwa kanifatilia mshahara. Mbona unarukaruka kaka nani alianza kumiita wewe na genge lako WAKRISTO?.Ahahahahaahahaahaha

 

[Kisoda2]

Paulo ndio nani kijana Tunajadili mambo ya maana hapa?

Mambo ya Maana kama haya siyo??

Sunan Ibn Majah » The Chapters on Marriage

It was narrated that 'Aishah said:
“The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed1, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.” 1: These verses were abrogated in recitation but not ruling. Other ahadith establish the number for fosterage to be 5.

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو سَلَمَةَ، يَحْيَى بْنُ خَلَفٍ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الأَعْلَى، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرٍ، عَنْ عَمْرَةَ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، ‏.‏ وَعَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْقَاسِمِ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ لَقَدْ نَزَلَتْ آيَةُ الرَّجْمِ وَرَضَاعَةُ الْكَبِيرِ عَشْرًا وَلَقَدْ كَانَ فِي صَحِيفَةٍ تَحْتَ سَرِيرِي فَلَمَّا مَاتَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ وَتَشَاغَلْنَا بِمَوْتِهِ دَخَلَ دَاجِنٌ فَأَكَلَهَا ‏.‏

Where can we find these two verses?
Mkeo aweza kunipa nyonyo yake ninyonye ili niwe mwanao???

​

 

[Gavana]

1. Although commonly assumed, it is not certain that Paul never saw Jesus during Jesus’ earthly ministry, because this is a conclusion mostly based on silence.

It is true that Paul does not often talk about the historical Jesus in the New Testament. But this does not mean he was unconcerned with the life of Jesus.

After seeing the risen Jesus, Paul went to visit Peter for fifteen days (Gal. 1:18). Paul learned about the historical Jesus while sitting under the authority of Peter.

In fact, the word Paul uses for his meeting with Peter is historeo, the very Greek word from which the English word history derives.
He was keenly interested in the historical Jesus.

Paul talking more about Jesus’ life in his letters. Most notably in the book of
1 Corinthians where he paraphrases Jesus’ words or discusses Jesus’ life a total of six times.

In addition, some of the accounts Paul relays about Jesus’ life indicate that he knew much more that he did not say in his letters, such as the words “on the night he was betrayed” (1 Cor. 11:23 NIV).
One could hardly imagine that Paul would say these words without knowing what actually did happen on the night Jesus was betrayed. Yet Paul never actually talks about the details in his letters.



2. According to grammar of the New Tastement and to make the long story short.;

In Act 9:7 Luke is narrating an event in Greek;

in Act 22:9 Paul is speaking to a crowd in Hebrew (or Aramaic).

There is solid base that, Paul meant was that THE MEN HEARD A SOUND BUT DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE VOICE WAS SAVING.

In Acts 9:7, “HEARING VOICE,” the noun “voice’ is in the partitive genitive case [i.e., hearing (something) of], whereas in Act 22:9, “THE HEARD NOT THE VOICE,” the construction is with the accusative. This removes the idea of any contradiction.

The former indicates a HEARING of the sound, the latter indicates the THE MEANING OR MASSAGE OF THE VOICE (this they did not hear).

“The former denotes the sensational perception, the latter (the accusative case) the thing perceived.” (Cremer).

Even In John 5:25, 28, the genitive case is used, indicating a “sensational perception” that the Lord’s voice is sounding; in 3:8, of hearing the wind, the accusative is used, stressing “the thing perceive

Case closed.

• Paul was never recognized as an apostle by the Disciples OR Jesus​
• Paul was never trained by the disciples, the men who walked, talked, and broke bread with our Jesus. He received his knowledge from "revelations."​
• Paul's account of his Damascus Road Experience changed every time he told it, thus the disciples knew he was lying.​
• Paul declared he was teaching another Gospel of which he himself was the Father​
• Paul declared he himself was the son of God​
• Paul issued his own commandments and laws for people to adhere to​
• Paul taught the exact Opposite of what Jesus and His real disciples did.​
• Paul worked to destroy and undo everything Jesus and His disciples did and were doing.​
• Paul was never repentant for being the greatest persecutor of Christians at that time! He boasted about it! Over and Over!​
• Paul said God's law was a Curse. Jesus said it was a blessing. Who's lying?​
• Paul condemned Jesus and His disciples for false teachings, he condemned Jesus Himself for having long hair in 1 Corinthians 11:14, something approved in Numbers 6:5and Judges 13:5.​
• Jesus Said: Keep the Sabbath (Mark 2:27), circumcise male children (Luke 2:21), Paul Said: Circumcision is not necessary (Romans 2:26) that is going against what the Christ said in Luke 2:21.​
• In 1 Corinthians 15:1 Paul says that he was not giving them anything but what “he preached.” He explained this even further in the second book (or letter) to the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 11:17). It reads - “That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting.” He's telling you plain and simple he was speaking of himself and not from or of the Lord!"​
• Paul cursed Jesus and His disciples​
• Paul claimed he himself was the son of God​
• Paul Supported and demanded Adherence to Iniquity (Discrimination), Jesus said to not let it be found among us! Who's lying?​

Jesus: When Yahshua confronts the Adversary, he defeats him by saying, "You shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of YHWH, and Him alone will you serve."
Paul: When Paul is mobbed by people who wish to stone him for preaching against the Law of YHWH, he relies on the worldly authorities as a Roman entitled to the protection of the government rulers who save him (Dt. 8:3, Mt.4:4, Acts 22:26, 23:27
​

 

[masoud mshahara]

Mambo ya Maana kama haya siyo??

Sunan Ibn Majah » The Chapters on Marriage

It was narrated that 'Aishah said:
“The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed1, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.” 1: These verses were abrogated in recitation but not ruling. Other ahadith establish the number for fosterage to be 5.

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو سَلَمَةَ، يَحْيَى بْنُ خَلَفٍ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الأَعْلَى، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرٍ، عَنْ عَمْرَةَ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، ‏.‏ وَعَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْقَاسِمِ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ لَقَدْ نَزَلَتْ آيَةُ الرَّجْمِ وَرَضَاعَةُ الْكَبِيرِ عَشْرًا وَلَقَدْ كَانَ فِي صَحِيفَةٍ تَحْتَ سَرِيرِي فَلَمَّا مَاتَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ وَتَشَاغَلْنَا بِمَوْتِهِ دَخَلَ دَاجِنٌ فَأَكَلَهَا ‏.‏

Where can we find these two verses?
Mkeo aweza kunipa nyonyo yake ninyonye ili niwe mwanao???

​

QURAN iko wazi mdogo wangu , imekamilika chochote ambacho hakipo katika QURAN hicho ni batili sawasawa, kuhusu kunyonya hiyo ni hekima kwa WATOTO ambao mama zao wametangulia mbele ya haki , au mama zao wanauhaba wa maziwa ,wewe unaleta mchezo ahahhaahhaahahahah

 

[Gavana]

Mambo ya Maana kama haya siyo??

Sunan Ibn Majah » The Chapters on Marriage

It was narrated that 'Aishah said:
“The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed1, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.” 1: These verses were abrogated in recitation but not ruling. Other ahadith establish the number for fosterage to be 5.

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو سَلَمَةَ، يَحْيَى بْنُ خَلَفٍ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الأَعْلَى، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرٍ، عَنْ عَمْرَةَ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، ‏.‏ وَعَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْقَاسِمِ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ لَقَدْ نَزَلَتْ آيَةُ الرَّجْمِ وَرَضَاعَةُ الْكَبِيرِ عَشْرًا وَلَقَدْ كَانَ فِي صَحِيفَةٍ تَحْتَ سَرِيرِي فَلَمَّا مَاتَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ وَتَشَاغَلْنَا بِمَوْتِهِ دَخَلَ دَاجِنٌ فَأَكَلَهَا ‏.‏

Where can we find these two verses?
Mkeo aweza kunipa nyonyo yake ninyonye ili niwe mwanao???

​

Wacha kujikimbiza kwenye I'd nyengine unaposhindwa hoja

 

[masoud mshahara]

• Paul was never recognized as an apostle by the Disciples OR Jesus​
• Paul was never trained by the disciples, the men who walked, talked, and broke bread with our Jesus. He received his knowledge from "revelations."​
• Paul's account of his Damascus Road Experience changed every time he told it, thus the disciples knew he was lying.​
• Paul declared he was teaching another Gospel of which he himself was the Father​
• Paul declared he himself was the son of God​
• Paul issued his own commandments and laws for people to adhere to​
• Paul taught the exact Opposite of what Jesus and His real disciples did.​
• Paul worked to destroy and undo everything Jesus and His disciples did and were doing.​
• Paul was never repentant for being the greatest persecutor of Christians at that time! He boasted about it! Over and Over!​
• Paul said God's law was a Curse. Jesus said it was a blessing. Who's lying?​
• Paul condemned Jesus and His disciples for false teachings, he condemned Jesus Himself for having long hair in 1 Corinthians 11:14, something approved in Numbers 6:5and Judges 13:5.​
• Jesus Said: Keep the Sabbath (Mark 2:27), circumcise male children (Luke 2:21), Paul Said: Circumcision is not necessary (Romans 2:26) that is going against what the Christ said in Luke 2:21.​
• In 1 Corinthians 15:1 Paul says that he was not giving them anything but what “he preached.” He explained this even further in the second book (or letter) to the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 11:17). It reads - “That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting.” He's telling you plain and simple he was speaking of himself and not from or of the Lord!"​
• Paul cursed Jesus and His disciples​
• Paul claimed he himself was the son of God​
• Paul Supported and demanded Adherence to Iniquity (Discrimination), Jesus said to not let it be found among us! Who's lying?​

Jesus: When Yahshua confronts the Adversary, he defeats him by saying, "You shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of YHWH, and Him alone will you serve."
Paul: When Paul is mobbed by people who wish to stone him for preaching against the Law of YHWH, he relies on the worldly authorities as a Roman entitled to the protection of the government rulers who save him (Dt. 8:3, Mt.4:4, Acts 22:26, 23:27
​

Ahahahahaahahaahaha ni ngumu kumtetea Paulo, kwasababu toka mwanzo limejaa kufuru ahahahahahahaja